SOS e Clarion Of Dalit

October 1, 2017

Collegium or MAFIA

Filed under: dalit human rights — Nagaraja M R @ 8:39 am

Dalit’s  Diary  –   e  News   Weekly  

Working  For  The  Rights  &  Survival  Of  The Oppressed

Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R… VOL.11 issue.38… . 04  / 10 / 2017

 

 

Editorial  :   Judge’s  MAFIA  – Accountability  of  Judges

Now in  India ,  along with criminalization of politics , police and executive  criminalization of Judiciary is also evident.  However  Judges  who take lakhs of rupees salary & perks  from  public exchequer  are not  accountable to public. Judges don’t respond to RTI queries  nor  reply  to legal  notices  nor  the decisions of  transfer of judges , elevation or non elevation of judges  are made public. If a judge  has adverse  observations  from Intelligence Bureau or any other statutory body  which makes him unfit for elevation in such a circumstance  that judge is even unfit  to continue in his existing post.

The collegiums of Judges  is behaving like a MAFIA  in league with powers that be.  The honest judges who don’t favor mafia  face dismissal  , arrest , non elevation , transfer , etc.  Judge’s  MAFIA   has time & again  sent  such  subtle message to honest  judges.  Judges  who  have committed crimes but  has the blessings of MAFIA get promotions , favorable postings , enquiries  against them will be manipulated  to save them.

Few judges  although have committed crimes  are technically staying as INNOCENTS by manipulating  fair investigation , prosecution  against  them.  This is an appeal  to  HONEST few in judiciary to  demand  accountability of their corrupt  colleagues.

Judges , Police – Learn Honesty

Life of illegally terminated judge  Mr.Gwal  is a lesson of honesty for all judges & police. Inspite of being  HONEST  in his duties , Mr.Gwal  is suffering at the hands of powers that be & judicial mafia. Mr.Gwal could have choosen the easy , luxurious path of  favoring powers and could have enjoyed luxurious life with his family. He  rightly chose the path to uphold constitution ended  up even without money to pay his children’s school fees. Even  apex  court didn’t come to his rescue. SHAME  SHAME .  Except  for few  honest judges & police , many of them are leading lifestyles beyond the sources  of their legal income.  Few of  them  are successful in  manipulating legal process to continue in service , get promotions despite  grave criminal allegations against them. Some  judges  have  even entered supreme court , what a shame ? They  must learn righteousness  honesty  from  Mr.Gwal.

There are fake lawyers ,  advocates  with uncle judge connections  who are  leading  life styles   beyond the legal sources of their income.  These advocates  are cheating the public & court  as well making contempt of them. Why not criminal prosecutions against those guilty  lawyers , advocates ?

Above all these type of  corrupt  people in gowns of judges , advocates &  corrupt  police preach others  about honesty , integrity and prosecute  other criminals  while they themselves are criminals. It is like a PROSTITUTE  preaching about virginity , chastity to a young girl.

Our whole hearted respects to  few honest judges , police & advocates  in public service. It is an appeal to them to prosecute their corrupt colleagues.  We once again offer our conditional services to SCI  , to apprehend legally  prosecutes criminal judges , criminal police & criminals in public service.  Is CJI  ready ?

Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

 

Your’s ,

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi

 

PIL –   JAIL  Dipak Mishra Unfit Judge & Others

An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India  &  H.E. Honourable President  of India

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor   , Indian’s  Diary  &  Dalit’s  Diary ,

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State

….Petitioner

 

Versus

 

Honourable  Chief   Justice  of  India   &  Others

….Respondents

 

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

 

To ,

Hon’ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship’s Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the

Petitioner above named.

 

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

 

  1. Facts of the case:

 

“Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed.” Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.

In his death  note  Former Arunachal Pradesh  Chief Minister Mr.Kalikho  Pul  has clearly  alleged involvement of CJI Khehar , Dipak Mishra , President Mukherjee & others in the crime.

Justice  Dipak  Mishra  has a criminal past of fraud ,  cheating the authorities   to get land allotment. . He is unfit even to be a munsiff judge let alone CJI. He has managed the crime cover up well.

 He and present CJI Khehar have helped the union government   in their  unjust  illegal  actions like  unjust  imposition of president  rule and change of chief miniser   in few states,  cover up of Corporate scams like  Birla – Sahara ,  lake , forest , revenue land encroachments by  powerful ,  etc. In turn  as a payout  Union government has made them Chief Justice of India and  helped  the judges in cover up of their own crimes. Quid Pro Quo.

  CJI Khehar & Dipak Mishra have  effectively stalled proper investigations  into crimes committed by them. They have even stalled the legal prosecution. All through Union Government and respective state governments have helped them inspite of clinching evidences  against two  judges.

  Nowadays   judges  who don’t  dance to the  tune of corrupt  higher judges , corrupt ministers  , don’t get promotions. Even may  loose their jobs  or land up  in jail for upholding justice.

  If  Dipak Mishra  is made CJI , it  will be  roaring business for corrupt mafia. Innocents , commoners will be sent  to jail , may even be hanged while the rich criminals roams free.

    Since 20 years  we are appealing  to Chief Justice of India   concerning public issues  , seeking justice from him. Till date  no action instead more injustices meted out  to silence me after appealing to supreme court and authorities. This  itself proves the criminal nexus of judges , police and public sevants.

Police show full bravery , courage , use  full might of law while acting against innocents , commoners. Even  takes suo motto action. Frequently crosses legal limits  while acting against commoners like 3rd degree torture , arrest / search  , seizure without warrant , arrest in mid night , etc . While they are supposed to take action against rich crooks , their own corrupt colleagues  no suo motto action , delayed action inspite of complaint  allowing time for rich crook to get anticipatory bail , no 3rd degree torture on him , no arrest , search , seizure without warrant. Where is the bravery , courage of police ?

Judges show their full wisdom , apply rigid law book while  judging cases of commoners , take suo motto action  where as  cases involving rich crooks comes before them inspite of repeated PILs they don’t consider it , let alone take suo motto action. Judges make far fetched interpretations of law , ultimately benefitting the rich crook. Where is the wisdom of Judges ?

 

 

  1. Question(s) of Law:

As per constitution of India , are not all citizens of india equal before  law ?  Why no action against JS Khehar , Dipak Mishra & Pranab Mukherjee ? Are they special ? WHERE IS THE BRAVERY , COURAGE OF POLICE ? Before  big crooks CBI , Police are zeroes.

 

  1. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice. Prosecution of  corrupt  Judges , CJI  J S Khehar ,  Supreme Court Judge Dipak Mishra , Former President  Mukherjee    &  Corrupt  Public  Servants.

 

  1. Averment:

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the  cases to perform their duties.

 

 

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants , in the case to perform their duties.

  1. To register FIR  against Chief Justice of India JS Khehar, Supreme Court Judge Dipak Mishra , Former President of India Mukherjee & others and arrest them for legal prosecution with respect to Orissa Land allotment scam , Arunachal Pradesh Chief minister change over , death of CM Kalikho Pul, Cover up of  Birla Sahara Scam ,  Reliance Oil Basin Scam , Lake & Land Encroachments in bangalore , Karnataka., etc.
  2. To constitute an impartial  investigation team to investigate the crimes. The team must be accountable to the public.
  3. Till investigation is over , hold the promotion of Dipak Mishra  to the post of Chief Justice of India.

e . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

 

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

 

Dated 12th    August  2017 …………………. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

 

Place : Mysuru , India…………………….      PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

 

PIL –   Collegium  or  Judge’s  Mafia ?

An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India  &  H.E. Honourable President  of India

 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2017

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF

 

NAGARAJA . M.R

editor   , Indian’s  Diary  &  Dalit’s  Diary ,

# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,

Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State

….Petitioner

 

Versus

 

Honourable  Chief   Justice  of  India   &  Others

….Respondents

 

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

 

To ,

Hon’ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship’s Companion

Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the

Petitioner above named.

 

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

 

  1. Facts of the case:

Now in  India ,  along with criminalization of politics , police and executive  criminalization of Judiciary is also evident.  However  Judges  who take lakhs of rupees salary & perks  from  public exchequer  are not  accountable to public. Judges don’t respond to RTI queries  nor  reply  to legal  notices  nor  the decisions of  transfer of judges , elevation or non elevation of judges  are made public. If a judge  has adverse  observations  from Intelligence Bureau or any other statutory body  which makes him unfit for elevation in such a circumstance  that judge is even unfit  to continue in his existing post.

The collegiums of Judges  is behaving like a MAFIA  in league with powers that be.  The honest judges who don’t favor mafia  face dismissal  , arrest , non elevation , transfer , etc.  Judge’s  MAFIA   has time & again  sent  such  subtle message to honest  judges.  Judges  who  have committed crimes but  has the blessings of MAFIA get promotions , favorable postings , enquiries  against them will be manipulated  to save them.

Few judges  although have committed crimes  are technically staying as INNOCENTS by manipulating  fair investigation , prosecution  against  them.  This is an appeal  to  HONEST few in judiciary to  demand  accountability of their corrupt  colleagues.

 

  1. Question(s) of Law:

As per constitution of India , are not all citizens of india equal before  law ?  Why  no action against Judge’s MAFIA ? Are they special ? WHERE IS THE BRAVERY , COURAGE OF POLICE ? Before  big crooks CBI , Police are zeroes.

 

  1. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice. Prosecution of  corrupt  Judges  &  Corrupt  Public  Servants.

 

  1. Averment:

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the  cases to perform their duties.

 

 

PRAYER:

In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants , in the case to perform their duties.

  1. to make public the Judge’s collegium decision first to transfer  Justice Jayant Patel from Gujarath High Court to Karnataka High Court and  afterwards from  Karnataka High Court to  Allahabad High Court.
  2. to make public the Judge’s collegium decision  NOT  to  elevate Uttarakhand chief  Justice K M Joseph , Orissa High Court Judge  B P Das , Karnataka High Court Judge Jayant Patel.
  3. to make public collegium’s decision against Justice Karnan & Sukma Judge Prabhakar Gwal.
  4. certain judges although facing grave criminal charges , allegations but in favorable terms with ruling establishment are elevated example Justice  Dinakaran , Justice Dipak Mishra , Mysore Roost Resort  SEX  scandal fame  Judges , etc. What  is  so special about those judges  which deserves promotion. Also  fair investigation , enquiry , prosecution  against such special judges are stalled , buried  by higher judges , ruling government , why ? make the reasons for stalling investigations , prosecution public .  what is   so SPECIAL ?  Make that special collegium’s decision public.
  5. Is It not shameful to collegium judges that they are public servants , taking huge salaries , perks from public exchequer  but unaccountable to public. To make  it mandatory accountability of judges to public , accountability of Judge’s collegium to public..
  6. to make public the list of judges since independence till date  who faced   allegations , actions  taken or not taken against them with reasons thereof.
  7. To build safeguarding mechanism which  reassures  HONEST  JUDGEs that they will not be victimized , persecuted by higher judges , judge’s collegium or ruling government.
  8. In many instances relatives of  judges  are being  appointed as judges  from bar. To make public the selection criteria for appointment of judges  from bar.
  9. In many instances the senior advocates get a patient hearing in courts while  fair hearing is no given to  junior lawyers. Sometimes although junior lawters are making logical argument  presiding judge makes harsh comment  as though  judge himself is more brilliant , wise in the universe.  It is unjust & against law. To make public criteria adopted for designating  lawyers  as seniors &  allocating time for  senior lawyers / junior lawyers.

 

  1. to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

 

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

 

Dated  30th September 2017 …………………. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

 

Place : Mysuru , India…………………….      PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

 

 

 

Gujarath  High Court Advocate Letter

https://barandbench.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/GHCAA-Letter-watermark.pdf

Justice Jayant Patel resignation: K’taka law minister reacts, lawyers to suspend work

 

Many have suggested that Justice Patel is paying the price of his ruling in the Ishrat Jahan case in Gujarat, back in 2011

 

The sudden resignation of Justice Jayant Patel has triggered strong reactions from state Law Minister TB Jayachandra and also from the state’s lawyers.

The minister said, “Justice Patel was one of the most honest and best judges I have seen,” calling the development as unfortunate.

Lawyers in Karnataka are also set to boycott work for one day, Advocate-general Madhusudan R Naik told The New Indian Express. An emergency meeting is likely to be held by the state Bar Council.

Justice Patel, who is the senior-most puisne judge had tendered his resignation after he was transferred to Allahabad High Court.

He was eligible to be the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court as Chief Justice SK Mukherjee is set to retire on October 9. But the judge refused to speak on his non-elevation citing “institutional discipline”.

If he had accepted the transfer, Justice Patel would have retired being the third senior judge in Allahabad HC.

Speaking to reporters on Tuesday, he cited that he did not want to move to a new place for just 10 months.

“I did not want to move to a new place for a period of 10 months. This is the reason I resigned. I have put in 16 years in service,” he said.

This is not the first time that Justice Patel has been passed up for a promotion. The senior judge was the Acting Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court, prior to his transfer to Karnataka.

Many have suggested that Justice Patel is paying the price of  his ruling in the Ishrat Jahan case in Gujarat, back in 2011. Justice Patel was part of the division bench that handed over the investigation into the 2004 killings of Ishrat Jahan, Javed Sheikh and two others, to a Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT).

 

LAWYERS’ COMMUNITY BANGALORE, KARNATAKA

 

 

To,                                                                                   

The Hon’ble Chief Justice Of India

Supreme Court of India,

Open Letter to the Supreme Court Collegium regarding the transfer and supersession of the seniority of Justice Jayant Patel

The decision of the Collegium transferring Justice Jayant Patel to the Allahabad High Court resulting in his supersession to the post of the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court has shocked the advocates not only in Karnataka, but across the country. Justice Jayant Patel is known as a fair, impartial and independent judge. The decision of the collegium to transfer him has once again brought to the forefront the issues relating to the absolute lack of transparency and accountability in the functioning of the collegium system.

Several attending circumstances raise further doubts as to the propriety of the decision of the collegium. Considering the impeccable record and clinical efficiency of Justice Jayant Patel, becoming the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court was a natural progression in his tenure, which he has now been deprived of. The timing of the transfer clearly shows that it was intended to ensure that Justice Jayant Patel would not be made Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court. Further, the transfer being evidently unwarranted at this juncture, having regard to the serious shortage of Judges in the Karnataka High Court, due to more than 50% of the posts of judges being vacant, also, call for disclosure of reasons behind his transfer.

This is not the first time that Justice Jayant Patel has been superseded. Previously, in 2015, when he was the acting Chief Justice of the Gujarat High Court, he was transferred to the Karnataka High Court. We must remember that the last famous supersession happened during the emergency, when Justice H.R. Khanna was superseded for his dissenting opinion in the Habeas Corpus case. The lack of transparency and accountability at that juncture had allowed for such grave injustice. It is indeed ironic that after Justice Khanna was vindicated on 24.08.2017 by the Supreme Court in the judgment of the Right to Privacy Case, that the Collegium has taken this decision. The independence of the judiciary is an essential attribute of Rule of law, and the actions taken against Justice Jayant Patel raises serious questions regarding the independence of the judiciary and hence the rule of law itself.

We, the members of the Bangalore Bar are of the opinion that this action against Justice Jayant Patel is symptomatic of the lack of accountability and transparency in the judicial system. This affects the independence of the judiciary and erodes the fundamental values of our Constitution.

Thus, we believe, that in the light of the facts and circumstances narrated above, the independence of the judiciary is at stake. Hence, we demand that the Apex Court Collegium make public the reasons for the transfer of Justice Jayant Patel, the agenda for the meeting in which the decision was taken and the minutes of the meeting of the Collegium. We also seek that the order of transfer issued to him be immediately revoked and his resignation not be accepted.

 

Supreme Court collegium should explain why Justice Jayant Patel’s transfer was in public interest

The manner in which the transfer was effected has raised questions about transparency in judicial appointments.

 

Justice Jayant Patel of the Karnataka High Court resigned on September 25, after he was transferred to the Allahabad High Court.

The transfer meant Patel lost the opportunity to become chief justice of the Karnataka High Court, where he was the second-most senior judge. In the Allahabad High Court, he would have been relegated to the position of the third-most senior judge. When appointing chief justices, the Supreme Court collegium usually (but not exclusively), considers a candidate’s seniority.

The resignation of Patel, who originally belonged to the Gujarat High Court, has caused a stir in the judiciary. The Karnataka State Bar Association has asked lawyers to abstain from work on October 4 to protest the transfer. In Gujarat, lawyers stopped work on Wednesday.

This was Patel’s second transfer. In 2016, he was moved from Gujarat to Karnataka, where he has since served as a puisne judge.

The manner in which the transfer was effected has raised serious questions about transparency in judicial appointments. Appearing in a debate on NDTV Wednesday evening, senior advocate Dushyant Dave alleged political interference in the decision. He noted that as acting chief justice of the Gujarat High Court, Patel had ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation to inquire into the murder of Mumbai teenager Ishrat Jahan by Gujarat police officers in 2004. They claimed that Jahan and her three companions were conspiring to kill Narendra Modi, who was then Gujarat’s chief minister. The investigation ordered by Patel led to charges being filed against several senior police officers and embarrassed the state government led by Modi.

These allegations aside, Patel’s transfer begs an important question: Did the Supreme Court follow its own observations on transferring judges?

Judicial transfers

Judges are appointed by a a five-member collegium, consisting of the Chief Justice of India and the four most senior judges of the Supreme Court. The collegium system of judges appointing their fellow judges developed over time through judgements of the Supreme Court. The most important of them was the Supreme Court Advocates On Record Association vs Union of India, 1993. The Constitution created a system in which the President would appoint judges after consulting with the Chief Justice of India. But the 1993 verdict effectively gave all powers to appoint judges to the judiciary.

It also dealt with their transfers and laid down guidelines on how the process should be handled. Referring to Article 222(1) of the Constitution, which gives the President the power to transfer judges, the judgement stated:

“There is nothing in the language of Article 222(1) to rule out a second transfer of a once transferred judge without his consent but ordinarily the same must be avoided unless there exist pressing circumstances making it unavoidable. Ordinarily a transfer effected in public interest may not be punitive but all the same the Chief Justice of India must take great care to ensure that in the guise of public interest the judge is not being penalised.”

Two things stand out in this observation when applied to Patel’s case. One, he was being transferred for a second time. Two, it is clear from Patel’s resignation that the decision did not have his consent.

Although the consent of the judge being transferred is not strictly necessary, the 1993 judgment makes it clear that consent should be taken “unless there exist pressing circumstances making it unavoidable”. In addition, the circumstances must be in “public interest”.

Here lies the problem. The collegium’s decisions are not made public, which means there is no public scrutiny of the circumstances leading to a decision. Also, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the collegium need not justify its decisions. This is why allegations such as Dave’s are impossible to verify.

Further, transfers are not justiciable, which means that a judge who is transferred cannot challenge the order in the Supreme Court except if the transfer was made without the collegium’s approval – an impossible prospect as the President, following the 1993 order, does not have the power to appoint or transfer judges without the concurrence of the Chief Justice of India. The transfer has to be initiated by the collegium.

This touches upon the most crucial aspect of Patel’s transfer: what were the “pressing circumstances” and “public interest” that necessitated his move to the Allahabad High Court? The answer to this question may never be known given the opacity of the collegium.

One thing, though, is clear from reactions to Patel’s transfer by lawyers in Gujarat and Karnataka: he has a reputation of being an upright and efficient judge. Unlike, say, former Karnataka High Court judge PD Dinakaran, who was moved out to Sikkim in 2010 following corruption allegations, Patel apparently had no serious complaints against him.

Lawyers protest

This is the context in which lawyers’ groups are vociferously protesting Patel’s transfer. A resolution passed by the Karnataka State Bar Council on Tuesday stated:

“That the entire legal fraternity is anguished and is greatly disturbed by the shaking of faith/confidence in the collegium system; which has meted out such treatment to the Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jayant Patel, who apparently, has satisfactorily discharged his duties and functions as a Judge.

Members of the Bar perceive that, apparently decision makers in judiciary and executive have overlooked the aspirations and spirit of the National Judicial Appointments Commission verdict in achieving transparency by the actions reflected in recent events, like proposed transfer of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Jayant Patel on the eve of incumbent Chief Justice of Karnataka retiring and need to appoint another in the vacancy accruing.”

In a 2015 judgement rejecting the proposed National Judicial Appointments Commission, the Supreme Court recommended improving the transparency of the collegium system. But not much has happened on that front. The Centre and the Supreme Court are locked in a battle over the formulation of a new memorandum of procedure for judicial appointments, with the court objecting to certain clauses in the draft that give the Centre a greater say in the process.

Meanwhile, the Bar Council of India has issued a show cause notice to Dave for his allegations against Chief Justice of India Deepak Misra and the collegium. The Supreme Court Bar Association has expressed concern over the manner of Patel’s transfer, saying its executive committee will meet on October 3 to discuss the matter.

 

What I said on NDTV is the truth, Dushyant Dave responds

 

Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave has given an initial response to the news about Bar Council of India (BCI) issuing a show cause notice against him for his remarks against CJI Dipak Misra.

Speaking to Bar & Bench, Dave stood by his remarks on air stating that what he said on NDTV is the truth.

“I haven’t still got the notice and not read it . But what I said on NDTV last night is the truth.”

He further said that it is a matter of grave concern that the conduct of judges go unchecked and allegations against CJI Misra were very serious.

“It is a matter of concern for all in legal system and nation that such conduct of Judges go unchecked. In fact BCI should have opposed Justice Dipak Misra’s appointment to the highest judicial office to which only the best and non-controversial person can be appointed. The allegations against him were serious and those holding Constitutional offices should have been conscious and not appointed him.”

Dave said that he has nothing personal against CJI Dipak Misra but the allegations against him should be investigated.

“These allegations are not even being investigated but are suppressed from the Nation. I have nothing personal against him but it worries me as a citizen and a lawyer that with such background, the Executive is bound to exploit the situation especially when the SC today has to deal with highly political matters of far reaching consequence.”

Dave also condemned the Bar Council of India calling it a body which has not held elections for years under “some pretext”.

“BCI, by doing this gives an opportunity to bring on fore what should have been debated by Nation earlier. Advocates Act gives no such power to BCI, a body which has not held elections for years under some pretext and Mr. Mishra continues to occupy the position as Chairman unduly. I will happily contest this notice to prove that I was right and BCI is wrong.”

Public Prosecutor   Appointment Scam

http://starofmysore.com/assistant-public-prosecutors-appointment-scam-unearthed/ ,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAEBJsp_Zsg ,

 

Four Arrested in  Delhi Police Recruitment Scam

http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/four-arrested-in-delhi-police-recruitment-scam-2998152/  ,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vyapam_scam ,

 

KPSC  , Scam

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-2362317/CID-probe-exposes-jobs-marriage-scam-KPSC.html  ,

http://bangalore.citizenmatters.in/articles/kpsc-recruitment-scam-cid-report-confirms-malpractice ,

 

Judge   Selection   Illegal

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/indiahome/indianews/article-3300929/Did-judges-children-special-treatment-Supreme-Court-examine-answer-sheets-Delhi-judicial-exam-2014-favouritism-complaints.html  ,

http://www.timesnow.tv/india/video/sc-judge-rips-into-cji-headed-collegium-shuns-selection-meetings/48804  ,

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/Discrepancies-in-magistrate-test-evaluation-HC-asks-for-registrys-views/articleshow/46470410.cms  ,

 

Top police official in Kerala allegedly caught red-handed while copying in LL.M. exam

http://www.livelaw.in/top-police-official-in-kerala-allegedly-caught-red-handed-while-copying-in-ll-m-exam/  ,

 

Judges Suspended For Mass Copying

http://news.fullhyderabad.com/hyderabad-news/five-judges-suspended-for-mass-copying-1434.html   ,

 

JAIL   Chief  Justice  Dipak Mishra

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/dipak-mishra-unfit-judge  

 

Mishra Threatens Complainant

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/mishra-threatens-petitioner  

 

Notice  To  Chief  Justice  of  India

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/notice-to-chief-justice ,

 

Judicial  Tyranny

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/judicial-tyranny ,

 

Judges  SEX  crimes

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-sex-crimes

 

A – Z   of   Manipulation  of  Indian  Legal  System

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System   ,

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal   ,

 

 

50% of higher judiciary corrupt, says ex-SC judge Markandey Katju

http://www.hindustantimes.com/punjab/50-of-higher-judiciary-corrupt-says-ex-sc-judge-markandey-katju/story-Hfu8Ru8o9YfoGOjloboytN.html

 

Eight chief justices were corrupt: Ex-law minister

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Eight-chief-justices-were-corrupt-Ex-law-minister/articleshow/6568723.cms

 

In suicide note, Arunachal CM Kalikho Pul alleges graft by SC judges, Congress

http://www.sify.com/news/in-suicide-note-arunachal-cm-kalikho-pul-alleges-graft-by-sc-judges-congress-news-national-rcruamjjfdhhc.html ,

 

Calcutta HC Justice Karnan calls judiciary corrupt, brings up old allegations against HC judges

 

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/calcutta-hc-justice-karnan-calls-judiciary-corrupt-brings-up-old-allegations-against-hc-judges/story-k0WRYaBWRPYaUI6HgzPDHP.html

 

Traitors  in  Judiciary &  Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/329980170/Traitors-in-Judiciary-Police  ,

 

Crimes  by  Khaki

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/crimes-by-khaki 

 

FIRST  Answer  Judges  Police

https://www.scribd.com/document/336585411/FIRST-Answer-Judges-Police 

 

Cropping Up Of SC Judge’s Name During Inquiry Is No Reason To Stall Probe Against Orissa HC Judge, CJAR Writes To In-House Committee Chairman

Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/cropping-sc-judges-name-inquiry-no-reason-stall-probe-orissa-hc-judge-cjar-writes-house-committee-chairman/

 

Intellectual Dishonesty Is The Biggest Challenge To The Independence Of Judiciary: Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave
Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/intellectual-dishonesty-biggest-challenge-independence-judiciary-senior-advocate-dushyant-dave-video / ,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiqRt9YsYhQ&t=825s ,

 

Why The kith And Kin Of Judges Being Mostly Considered For Appointments? Asks SCBA President

http://www.livelaw.in/kith-kin-judges-mostly-considered-appointments-asks-scba-president-judges-child-calibre-heshe-can-become-judge-cji/ ,

 

 

 

 

Edited, printed , published  owned  by  NAGARAJA.M.R. @  # LIG-2   No  761, HUDCO  FIRST  STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSURU – 570017  KARNATAKA  INDIA

 

Cell : 91 8970318202

 

Home page :  

http://eclarionofdalit.dalitonline.in/

 

https://sites.google.com/site/dalitsdiary/

 

https://in.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dalitsdiary/info

 

https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21forum/dalits–diary

 

https://dalitsdiary.blogspot.in/

 

https://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/

 

http://naghrw.tripod.com/dalitsdiary/

 

http://thecitizens.torpress2sarn7xw.onion/

 

 

 

Contact  :   Naag@protonmail.com ,  Naag@dalitonline.in  , 

Secure  Mail :  Naag@torbox3uiot6wchz.onion ,

 

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: