<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>e - Clarion Of Dalit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="e - Clarion Of Dalit" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>SHAME  to  Chief  Justice  of India</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/shame-to-chief-justice-of-india-2/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/shame-to-chief-justice-of-india-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dalit human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S.O.S - e - Clarion  Of  Dalit  -  Weekly Newspaper On Web Working  For  The  Rights  &#38;  Survival  Of  The  Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R… VOL.05 issue. 46 …………16/11/2011 &#160;   “There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ” - Mahatma Gandhi &#160; Hunger Deaths Malnutrition Deaths Poverty  Earning  Less than Rupees 32 per day             Honest  Hard Working Child Laborers [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=137&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>S</strong><strong>.</strong><strong>O</strong><strong>.</strong><strong>S</strong><strong> </strong><strong>-</strong><strong> </strong><strong>e -</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Clarion</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>Of </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Dalit </strong><strong> </strong><strong>-</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Weekly</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Newspaper</strong><strong> </strong><strong>On</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Web</strong></p>
<p><strong>Working</strong><strong> </strong><strong> For</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>The</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Rights</strong><strong> </strong><strong> &amp;</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>Survival</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>The</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Oppressed</strong><br />
<strong><em>Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R</em></strong><strong><em>…</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>VOL.05 issue. 46 </em></strong><strong><em>…</em></strong><strong><em>…</em></strong><strong><em>……</em></strong><strong><em>16/11/2011</em></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><em>“</em><em>There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. </em><em>”</em><em><br />
- Mahatma Gandhi</em></p>
<p align="left">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img src="http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/_/rsrc/1320136662913/shame-to-you---chief-justice-of-india-prime-minister-of-india-president-of-india" alt="" /></p>
<p><img src="http://eclarionofdalit.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/shame-on-you.jpg?w=300" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Hunger Deaths Malnutrition Deaths Poverty  Earning  Less than Rupees 32 per day</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/307885_10150444892443185_513253184_10143062_239668265_n.jpg" alt="" />         <strong><img src="http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/307885_10150444892438185_513253184_10143061_1367777029_n.jpg" alt="" /></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Honest  Hard Working Child Laborers Earning Less Than Rupees 32 per day</strong></p>
<p><strong><img src="http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/307885_10150444892448185_513253184_10143063_1638189650_n.jpg" alt="" /></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Corrupt Dishonest Criminal Public Servants Earning More than Rupees 5000 per day  </strong><strong>Murderers</strong><strong> of </strong><strong>Justice</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><img src="https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-6eHqUnXRJxE/TqGFxJd6i-I/AAAAAAAAADg/Y_eeW6KTknQ/Justice%252520Hanged.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="223" /></p>
<p><strong> Ill-gotten Wealth of  Corrupt Public Servants</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong><img src="http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/307885_10150444892453185_513253184_10143064_1028021131_n.jpg" alt="" />   <img src="http://photos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/307885_10150444892458185_513253184_10143065_1774911212_a.jpg" alt="" />   <img src="http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/302507_10150444895033185_513253184_10143068_302152660_n.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong>Murderers of Justice Shame to You</strong></p>
<p><strong><img src="http://api.ning.com/files/mN-5mQKNkfqe7TDK9asUxuPoy23idjfYWSURXuMhGimBFDFzQYJDzCBm-py3Nw5rLVbS1cRCLL3ALJNYeMjJ6ranbIhDKxyj/cartoon.jpg" alt="" /></strong></p>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><em>Follow me at</em></strong><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Nagaraj-Mysore-Raghupathi/513253184" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/people/Nagaraj-Mysore-Raghupathi/513253184</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw" rel="nofollow">http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><br />
<strong><em><a href="http://twitter.com/#%21/naghrw" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/naghrw</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>SHAME</strong><strong>   </strong><strong>to Chief Justice of India</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>,</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>Prime Minister of India</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>&amp; President</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>of</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>India</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">In India  half the population is living  in poverty , barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day .  It is hard for them  to earn even Rupees 32 a day  , even children  of those poor families are working  very hard  to  fill their stomach. Whereas , the  public servants  who legally earn  thousands of rupees a day , get 5-star pay , perks , bungalows , cars , etc  at tax payer’s expense. They are cheating the public  , not properly doing their  official duties .  They must learn  hard work , work ethics from these child laborers.  Public servants   neglect  their  official duties , do they neglect  drawing their  monthly salary ? do they  come out of their 5-star quarters ? Public servants neglect their official duties  but not their 5-star pay &amp; perks. SHAME TO THEM.</p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">When specific &amp; general cases  of crimes are brought to the  notice  0f CJI , PM , GOI &amp; President of India repeatedly ,  appropriate action is not at all taken , in turn aiding the criminals in manipulating the evidences &amp; continuing with their illegalities.  Even  our  conditional offer of services  to the government ,  to legally apprehend criminals  is  not honored.  Thereby ,  Chief Justice of India , Prime Minister of India &amp; President of India  they themselves are CRIMINALS.  Do these people know the value  of our hard won independence  ?  Do these people know the sacrifices made by our freedom fighters  ?  The present day  public servants  are  shamelessly misusing their official powers  , squandering  our independence.  SHAME  SHAME  TO   SHAMELESS  PUBLIC  SERVANTS.</p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>A  person committing a criminal offense is a CRIMINAL. The Person who aids a criminal in his criminal act , in hiding the criminal act , in destroying the evidences  of criminal act  is also  a CRIMINAL. The person whose duty is to prevent criminal acts from  happening , who intentionally fails in his preventive duties  and  thereby  facilitating the criminal in committing crime is also a CRIMINAL.</strong></p>
<p><strong>In this way many of our public servants including judges &amp; police themselves are criminals , but are not prosecuted by the authorities , why ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>At the outset , we express  our whole hearted respects to the honest few  public servants in public service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service don’t deserve  respect as individuals – as they are  parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.</strong></p>
<p><strong>All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term</strong><strong>“JUDGE”</strong><strong> mentioned throught includes all public servants  discharging  judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice of India.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages &amp; is for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise  their voice seeking justice  are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . </strong><strong>If anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be responsible  for it.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court of India &amp; other government authorities, in apprehending criminals including corrupt judges &amp; police. Herewith  , we once  again  appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The public servants &amp; the government must be role models in law  abiding acts , for others to emulate &amp; follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable &amp; can be corrected by the </strong><strong>teacher</strong><strong>. </strong><strong>if</strong><strong> the  teacher himself makes a mistake , all  his students will do the same mistake. </strong><strong>if</strong><strong> a thief steals , he can be caught  , legally punished &amp; reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his patronage.  even </strong><strong>if</strong><strong> a police , public  servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted &amp; justice can be sought by the  aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime &#8211; violations of RTI Act , constitutional  rights &amp; human rights of public  and obstructs the public from  performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it  gives a booster dose to the rich &amp; mighty , those in power , criminals  in public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is  happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the occassion &amp;  peacefully , democratically  must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF  MAHATMA GANDHI&#8217;S DREAM.</strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Kindly go through the following articles &amp; provide justice by giving complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the following questionnaire in an unambiguous  manner.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect &amp; uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to<br />
protect our national integrity , to respect &amp; protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has  the right to obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal  privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the  FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN&#8217;S OF INDIA. </em></strong><br />
<strong><em>We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India &amp; by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed  back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether  we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information . so ,<br />
basically Right To Information  is an inalienable part of our  fundamental rights &amp; human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time  limit , responsibilities of public servants up to  certain extent. However the citizen&#8217;s fundamental right &amp; human right to seek  information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act. </em></strong><br />
<strong><em>Hereby , we seek complete  truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to my RTI application appeal no :  APPEAL NO. 300/2010 .. HEREBY , WE ARE  ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS  IN PUBLIC INTEREST &amp;  JUSTICE. Hereby ,  we request you to register this appeal as a PIL  petition &amp; to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters  raised in my RTI Application , in public interest &amp; equitable justice. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM. </em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Nagaraj.M.R. </em></strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p><strong>……………………</strong><strong>..</strong><strong>DECLARATION</strong><strong>………………………</strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong><br />
N</strong><strong>ame</strong><strong> </strong><strong>: &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;NAGARAJA.M.R.</p>
<p></strong><br />
<strong>A</strong><strong>ddress</strong><strong> </strong><strong>: &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP<br />
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE &#8211; 570017 INDIA</p>
<p>P</strong><strong>rofessional / Trade Title</strong><strong> </strong><strong>:</strong><strong> </strong><strong>S</strong><strong>.</strong><strong>O</strong><strong>.</strong><strong>S</strong><strong> </strong><strong>-</strong><strong> </strong><strong>e</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>Clarion</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Dalit</strong><strong></p>
<p>P</strong><strong>eriodicity</strong><strong> </strong><strong>: WEEKLY</p>
<p>C</strong><strong>irculation</strong><strong> </strong><strong>: FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB</p>
<p>D</strong><strong>onations</strong><strong> </strong><strong>: NOT ACCEPTED.</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .</p>
<p>M</strong><strong>onetary gains</strong><strong> </strong><strong>: nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.</p>
<p>O</strong><strong>wner/editor/printer/publisher</strong><strong> </strong><strong>: NAGARAJA.M.R.</p>
<p>N</strong><strong>ationality</strong><strong> </strong><strong>: INDIAN</strong><br />
<strong><br />
</strong><strong>B</strong><strong>ody Donation</strong><strong> </strong><strong>:</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>clarion of Dalit &amp;</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>to JSS Medical College , Mysore ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>medical students.</strong><strong></p>
<p></strong><br />
<strong>E</strong><strong>ye</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Donation</strong><strong> </strong><strong>:</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Both EYES</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>clarion of Dalit &amp;</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>to</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>eyes</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>must be</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>handed over to</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>Mysore Eye Bank</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>, Mysore</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>WITHIN 6 Hours</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.</strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong></p>
<p>H</strong><strong>ome page :</strong><strong>  </strong><br />
<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home</a> ,<br />
<a href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit" target="_blank">http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit</a>  ,<br />
<a href="http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/</a> ,<br />
<a href="http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/</a></p>
<p><strong><br />
C</strong><strong>ontact</strong><strong> </strong><strong>:</strong><strong> </strong><strong><a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/post?postID=189wnR5c0QwNR06w510E7XClbtSEtWJoSH2gZVez_U_eDd4On4hmHy-uLHlLKg" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">naghrw@</a><a href="http://yahoo.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">yahoo.com</a></strong><strong> </strong><strong>,</strong><strong> </strong><strong>naga&#8230;@hotmail.com</strong><strong> </strong><strong>  </strong><strong>,</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>UID</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Aadhaar</strong><strong> </strong><strong> No</strong><strong> </strong><strong> :</strong><strong> </strong><strong> 5703</strong><strong> </strong><strong> 5339</strong><strong> </strong><strong> 3479</strong><strong> </strong><strong></p>
<p>C</strong><strong>ell</strong><strong> </strong><strong>: 0 9341820313</p>
<p></strong><br />
<strong>I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge &amp; belief.</strong><strong> </strong><strong>If i am</strong><strong> </strong><strong>repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>police file fake cases against me or my dependents</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.</strong><strong></p>
<p></strong><strong>If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents</strong><strong>   </strong><strong>or to my family members</strong><strong>    </strong><strong>- In such case Chief Justice of</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>India together with the jurisdictional</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>revenue &amp; police officials will be responsible for it ,</strong><strong> </strong><strong>in such case the government of india</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries.</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong></p>
<p></strong><strong></p>
<p>date :</strong><strong>   07.11.</strong><strong>2011</strong><strong>…………………………</strong><strong>..your&#8217;s sincerely,</p>
<p>place :</strong><strong> </strong><strong>India</strong><strong>………………………………… </strong><strong>Nagaraja.M.R.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><a name="TOC-Minister-s-DQ-proves-judges-are-mor"></a><strong>Minister’s DQ proves judges are more corrupt than civil  servant</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>NEW DELHI/BHUBANESWAR</strong>:<strong> An investigation by Cobra post and IBN Network has revealed how former and sitting judges of Orissa, police officers and bureaucrats have received flats from the DiscretionaryQuota (DQ) of ministers. As a matter of fact, successive Urban Development Ministers in the Naveen Patnaik government have misused the discretionary housing quota.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>According to the revelation, the judges have got the ‘minister quota’ flats out of turn and at cheaper rates.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>The IBN Network accessed letters of judges written to the government asking for prime property in Cuttack and Bhubaneswar.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Prime properties were acquired in Cuttack at concession rates, bypassing the Cuttack Development Authority. In fact, Sectors 10, 11 and 13 of Cuttack’s Abhinav Bidanasi project has practically become a judges’ residential colony.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Former Chief Justice G B. Patnaik is a resident of flat 1B/22 in Sector 11 while former Orissa High CourtJudge Radhakrishna Patra has flat 1B/23 in the same sector, given out on lease.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Supreme Court judge Deba Priya Mohapatra, Orissa High Court judges Sanju Panda, Madan Mohan Das, Nityanand Prastuti also own flats in Sector 10 and 11.Papers for the flats were prepared quickly and some judges even got preferred plots.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Most of the allotments took place between 2000 and 2007, under the BJP  cadre Urban and Housing Development Minister  Sameer De who was State Development Minister from 2000-2004 and then Kanak Vardhan Singh Deo who called the shots from 2004 to 2007.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>All that the judges had to do was written to the Minister. The CNN-IBN has a letter written by Justice Madan Mohan Das to the CDA Chairman and to Minister Kanak Vardhan Singhdeo, asking for a B-Category Flat in Sector 10, saying he would ensure a third party transfer of a C-Category Flat already owned by his wife.Justice Das was allotted the flat in just six days.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>When asked why the discretionary quota was used to make the allotments, Sameer Dey, former Orissa urban development minister, said, “The Orissa act does not have any such rule. There is 5 per cent and 10 per cent allocation in discretionary quota. Apart from that we don’t have any rule.”</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Kanak Vardhan Singh Deo, former Orissa urban development minister, said, “The rule is that only those who apply for the project can be allotted land via Discretionary Quota. So if any such person does not apply what can we do?”</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>CNN-IBN has also found that many of the judges who were allotted land through the discretionary quota already own ancestral property in Cuttack. Yet the ministers were allotted the land they asked for.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Judicial Layout Site Allotment </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> BRIBE TO JUDGES ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20110919aB001101004&amp;ileft=177&amp;itop=1252&amp;zoomRatio=134&amp;AN=20110919aB001101004" rel="nofollow">http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20110919aB001101004&amp;ileft=177&amp;itop=1252&amp;zoomRatio=134&amp;AN=20110919aB001101004</a>  ,</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20110919a_004101002&amp;ileft=233&amp;itop=92&amp;zoomRatio=130&amp;AN=20110919a_004101002" rel="nofollow">http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20110919a_004101002&amp;ileft=233&amp;itop=92&amp;zoomRatio=130&amp;AN=20110919a_004101002</a>  ,</p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20110919a_004101003&amp;ileft=780&amp;itop=92&amp;zoomRatio=157&amp;AN=20110919a_004101003" rel="nofollow">http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20110919a_004101003&amp;ileft=780&amp;itop=92&amp;zoomRatio=157&amp;AN=20110919a_004101003</a></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>CROSS-EXAMINATION</strong><strong>  </strong><strong> of</strong><strong>  </strong><strong> Chief Justice of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> India</strong><strong> </strong><strong> -</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Half of Former Chief Justices of India</strong><strong> </strong><strong> are Corrupt</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong><strong>Visit :</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/answer-my-lord">http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/answer-my-lord</a></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Is the</strong><strong> </strong><strong> allotment of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> residential plots to Judges @ yelahanka Judicial Layout , a mode of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> paying bribe to judges by the biggest litigant government itself &amp; the</strong><strong> </strong><strong> corrupt public servants in the government. So that the government can pass illegal laws like </strong><strong>“</strong><strong>Regularization of Illegal Buildings</strong><strong>”</strong><strong> , </strong><strong>“</strong><strong> Illegal Appointments to Medical colleges in Hassan , Mysore</strong><strong>”</strong><strong> ,etc &amp;</strong><strong> </strong><strong> ministers , IAS officers</strong><strong> </strong><strong> can indulge in illegal unconstitutional acts , but the courts will not</strong><strong> </strong><strong> take any</strong><strong> </strong><strong> appropriate action suo motto or based on any petition. IT IS</strong><strong> </strong><strong> MUTUAL HELP , NEXUS OF TWO CRIMINALS </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> JUDICIARY &amp; GOVERNMENT. Ofcourse , there are honest few exceptions in judiciary &amp; government. We Respect those honest few.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Information input</strong><strong> </strong><strong> forms part of process of one</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>s expression. One</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>s expression in any forms </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information &amp; Expression are inseparable parts &amp; form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>s</strong><strong> </strong><strong> right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also</strong><strong> </strong><strong> are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>In a democracy , people have a right to know</strong><strong> </strong><strong> how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding</strong><strong> </strong><strong> behind the veil of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created</strong><strong> </strong><strong> by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption</strong><strong> </strong><strong> , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview &amp; bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India</strong><strong> </strong><strong> , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to</strong><strong> </strong><strong> millions</strong><strong> </strong><strong> of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Indian judges , police &amp; public servants</strong><strong> </strong><strong> .</strong><strong>  </strong><strong> The</strong><strong> </strong><strong> information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals</strong><strong> </strong><strong> in public service.</strong><strong> </strong><strong> The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : </strong><strong>“</strong><strong>writ of Mandamus</strong><strong>”</strong><strong> and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the</strong><strong> </strong><strong> questions.</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>KIADB de-notification scandal , BMIC – NICE SCANDAL  , Illegal Judicial Lay-out , MINING SCANDALS and Threats to RTI Applicant</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>-  PIL Appeal To Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of Mandamus</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"> <strong>Just months back , we have witnessed the collapse of a multi storied building in bellary ,Karnataka &amp; we have witnessed  a fire tragedy in a  multi-storey building in Bangalore,  months ago there was collapse of a huge building under construction in Bangalore , all resulting in loss of human lives. Recently we have seen de-notification scam involving VVIPs . All these are the result of violations of Urban Town Planning Laws , Building bye-laws which  are observed more in breach by the criminals &amp; conniving public servants .  The authorities are behaving like real estate agents of criminals , by-passing norms , framing laws to the tune of criminals . Authorities are not honoring RTI requests &amp; even high ranking IAS officer  repeatedly threatens a commoner  seeking information under RTI ACT .</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Before embarking on land acquisition for any projects government authorities must plan &amp; assess what are the actual requirement of land for that particular project. After finding out the actual requirement of land , they must  assess the loss of forest area , cost of compensation pay-out , cost of rehabilitation of people , environmental damages &amp; resultant health damages to people in surrounding areas ,it’s resultant losses when the project gets running , if at all the benefits , profits from that project far outweighs the losses ,then only project should be put before the public for their consent. Ministers &amp; IAS officers must not take these decisions all by themselves in a hush – hush manner.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Even when a project is downsized , from the previously approved size , the land left over , surplus land must be given back to the original owner on first priority . The project managers must not sell those surplus lands to third parties for a premium .</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Even when KIADB ,BDA ,MUDA &amp; other authorities acquire lands from farmers ,for constructing industrial  parks or residential layouts , etc , has framed comprehensive development plans (CDP) for their respective cities , clearly demarcating land usage pattern . However after acquisition of land , the KIADB , BDA , MUDA , etc are selling those very lands to private third parties for different land usage purposes ,completely violating CDP. Are these KIADB , BDA , BBMP , MUDA ,MCC real estate agents of Rich people ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Now , consider NICE – BMIC SCANDAL or MINING Scandals , public servants in responsible positions are accusing each other , there by proving that almost all of them are criminals. In democracy , ministers &amp; IAS officers are public servants , MLAs , MPs are not leaders just public servants  &#8211; representative of people. They must represent people’s wishes &amp; must order the IAS &amp; other officers to fulfil the wishes of people as per legal provisions.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Information input  forms part of process of one&#8217;s expression. One&#8217;s expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information &amp; Expression are inseparable parts &amp; form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person&#8217;s  right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also  are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>In a democracy , people have a right to know  how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding  behind the veil of  Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created  by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption  , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent</strong><strong> delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview &amp; bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of</strong><strong> India  , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to  millions  of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of  Indian judges , police &amp; public servants  .   The  information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals  in public service.  The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : &#8220;writ of Mandamus&#8221; and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the  questions.  </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Hereby , e-voice urges the  concerned authorities  , to answer the following questionnaire about BMIC project by NICE</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><a href="http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20100214a_009101001&amp;ileft=50&amp;itop=56&amp;zoomRatio=130&amp;AN=20100214a_009101001" rel="nofollow">http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20100214a_009101001&amp;ileft=50&amp;itop=56&amp;zoomRatio=130&amp;AN=20100214a_009101001</a> </strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>NICE Corridor Questions to  Former CHIEF MINISTER .Mr.Yediyurappa</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Read full questionnaire </strong><br />
<strong><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/nice-corridor-questions-to-chief-minister" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/nice-corridor-questions-to-chie\<br />
f-minister</a></strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Editorial :</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Threats to</strong><strong>  Human Rights Activist / RTI Applicant</strong><strong> -</strong><strong> </strong><strong> An Appeal to CIC , KIC &amp; </strong><strong> Chief  Justice  of India</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p><strong>shame shame to VVIPs , Public servants</strong><strong> </strong><strong> who are</strong><strong> </strong><strong> hiding truths , who are covering up crimes , by denying RTI REQUESTS </strong><strong> </strong><strong>to us.</strong></p>
<p><strong>In </strong><strong>India , many Corrupt public servants</strong><strong> </strong><strong> don</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>t</strong><strong> </strong><strong> honour</strong><strong> </strong><strong> RTI</strong><strong> </strong><strong> requests with one pretext or the other. They are aware that the information if given will become evidences</strong><strong> </strong><strong> of their criminals acts. They go to any length to hide truth , to hide information. They murder RTI Applicants , fix them in cases , etc. Nowadays</strong><strong> </strong><strong> murders of RTI Applicants , Human Rights Activists are frequent.</strong><br />
<strong>I have myself suffered threats , attempts to murder me , closure of my news paper , loss of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> job , etc at the hands of criminal nexus. Example : I have requested Mysore district , district magistrate for information under RTI regarding illegalities worth crores of rupees , instead of taking action against the culprits , Preventing further irregularities , illegalities , criminals he repeatedly abused me &amp; threatened me. The illegalities continued , a lake was partially closed illegally allotted to an industrialist alleged to be very close to the state Industries minister. In the same way I have been threatened by police often , I have even received threatening phone calls from a person claiming himself to be a UP High Court Judge.</strong><br />
<strong>To my previous</strong><strong> </strong><strong> appeals to CIC &amp; KIC , they were mum , as it concerns a Commoner </strong><strong> </strong><strong>it won</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>t give them any image build up , publicity or TRP ratings instead</strong><strong> </strong><strong> it will raise the heckles of powers that be marring the future prospects , lucrative postings , etc </strong><strong>  </strong><strong>of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> CIC</strong><strong> </strong><strong> &amp; KIC members .</strong><br />
<strong>Bureaucrats are of secretive nature , a career bureaucrat if appointed to information commission , he works against the principle of Transparency &amp; RTI . If further the career bureaucrat happens to be utterly corrupt</strong><strong> </strong><strong> &amp; given posting in Information commission as a favor by his corrupt colleagues in the government , RTI &amp; RTI Applicant will suffer , die. Example : Karnataka state information commissioner Mr. H.N Krishna.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Ofcourse , there are few honest people in public service including in information commissions . We respect those honest few</strong><strong> </strong><strong> &amp; request </strong><strong> </strong><strong>their </strong><strong> </strong><strong>support </strong><strong> </strong><strong>in apprehending their corrupt colleagues . If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents , together with the criminals all the members of CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION &amp; KARNATAKA STATEINFORMATION COMMISSION</strong><strong> </strong><strong> will be responsible for it. Subject to conditions , hereby I do offer my services to CIC , KIC &amp; GOI in apprehending </strong><strong> </strong><strong>, legally prosecuting</strong><strong> </strong><strong> criminals , corrupt public servants , etc.</strong><br />
<strong>Hereby , I do request the CIC &amp; KIC to order the concerned officials to give information in following cases &amp; RTI Requests mentioned below.</strong><br />
<strong>RTI Request made to Dy Chairman , Rajyasabha , New Delhi</strong><br />
<strong>SA/UG/11/14290f12f</strong></p>
<p><strong>RTI Request made to Union Home Minister , GOI , New Delhi</strong><br />
<strong>SA/UG/11/14291iwho</strong></p>
<p><strong>RTI </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Request </strong><strong> </strong><strong>made to Chief Justice of India , New Delhi</strong><br />
<strong>SA/UG/11/14287gink</strong></p>
<p><strong>RTI Request made to President of India , New Delhi</strong><br />
<strong>SA/UG/11/14288iv66</strong></p>
<p><strong>RTI Request made to Loksabha Speaker , New Delhi</strong><br />
<strong>SA/UG/11/142892yj9</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of</strong><strong> India</strong><strong>  , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to  millions  of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of  Indian judges , police &amp; public servants  .   The  information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals  in public service.  The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : &#8220;writ of Mandamus&#8221; and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the  questions.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Jai</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Hind. Vande Mataram.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Your</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>s sincerely ,</strong><br />
<strong>Nagaraja M R .</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><em>POLICE </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>NOT </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>REGISTERING </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>COMPLAINT </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> AGAINST </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>CHIEF </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>JUSTICE OF</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
INDIA </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>&amp; </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>OTHERS</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
<em>From,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><em><br />
NAGARAJ.M.R.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
LIG-2 / 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
LAXMIKANTANGAR, HEBBAL,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
MYSORE - 570017.</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
<em>Through,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><em><br />
Honourable DG &amp; IG of Police ,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
State Police H.Q ,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
Bangalore.</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
<em>To,</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
<em>Honourable Circle Inspector of Police,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
Vijayanagar Police Station,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
Mysore.</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
<em>Honourable Sir,</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
</strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>Subject : Violation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; HUMAN RIGHTS by Honourable Chief Jusice of India &amp; </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>H.E.Honourable President of India &amp; other public servants</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><em><br />
</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>Karnataka Police are NOT registering &amp; acting on my </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>complaint </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>to them dated </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>04.07.2009</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
<em>A </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>person committing a criminal offense is a CRIMINAL. The Person </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>who aids a criminal in his criminal act , in hiding the criminal act , in destroying the evidences </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>of criminal act </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>is also </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>a CRIMINAL. The</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
person whose duty is to prevent criminal acts from </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>happening , who intentionally fails in his preventive duties </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>and </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>thereby facilitating </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>the criminal in committing crime is also a CRIMINAL.</em></strong><strong><br />
<em><br />
Information </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>given by government </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>authorities are EVIDENCES , denial of information </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>amounts to hiding </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>of evidence , </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>improper , half truth information given </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>amounts to MANIPULATION &amp; DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCES. In this way many of our public servants including judges &amp; police themselves are criminals , but are not prosecuted by the authorities , why ?</em></strong><strong><br />
<em><br />
Due to delay in giving appropriate </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>information , many crimes have</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> taken place which could have been prevented. As the delay in taking action , giving information / evidence is on the part of government</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
authorities , the issue of TIME BARRED FOR ADMISSABILITY doesn</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>t arise. At the outset , we express </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>our whole hearted respects to the honest few </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>public servants in public service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service don</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>t deserve </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>respect as individuals </em></strong><strong><em>–</em></strong><strong><em> as they are </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.</em></strong><strong><br />
<em>All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term </em></strong><strong><em>“</em></strong><strong><em>JUDGE</em></strong><strong><em>”</em></strong><strong><em> mentioned throught includes all public servants </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>discharging</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>judicial</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice of India.</em></strong><strong><br />
<em>Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages &amp; is for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>their voice seeking justice </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
responsible </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>for it.</em></strong><strong><br />
<em>The Vijayanagar police in mysore stated that </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>they don</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>t have legal jurisdiction to book the criminals I have mentioned in the complaint &amp; by taking a statement from me to that effect </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>closed the case</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
temporarily on </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>11.09.2010 </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>after sitting over the complaint </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>for years together. Is it not the </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>duty of </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>DG&amp;IGP to seek the permission from home ministry to legally prosecute the alleged criminal VVIPs ?</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
Why he was silent ? Ofcourse the lower rung police officers practically don</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>t have power to prosecute high &amp; mighty ?</em></strong><strong><br />
<em>Hereby , I do request the </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>DG &amp; IG OF Police , Government of Karnataka to seek the legal sanction from union home ministry &amp; Karnataka state home ministry , for the prosecution of </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>below mentioned criminal VVIPs &amp; to reopen my complaint here with.</em></strong><strong><br />
<em>In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are equal , have right to equal oppurtunity &amp; equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the constitution has guaranteed these to every</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
Indian citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of his / her birth. However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLIC SERVANTS have forgotten this &amp; are acting as lords , autocrats &#8211; unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
appointed to serve the public, public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &amp; paymasters of this very same public servants. In India , corruption has spread it</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>s tentacles far &amp; wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there corruption has spread .In present day India , if one is rich , he can committ any type of crime &amp; get away clean from courts of law. there are corrupt police officials who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up different line of investigation , </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>fix innocents , coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3<sup>rd</sup></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>degree torture , file B report closing the case , decides not to appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the list of millionnaire police officials who are caught by karnataka lokayukta.</em></strong><strong><br />
<em><br />
Next step , the prosecutor &amp; defense advocate strikes a deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way of presentation of case &amp; way of argument favouring the rich crooks for a price , as observed in high profile BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN &amp; defense counsel RK ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police &amp; advocates , together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is left high &amp; dry even though the judge is honest, he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is corrupt , people</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>s last hope , democracy is dead. Nowadays we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.</em></strong><strong><br />
<em><br />
our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION before hon</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>ble supreme court of India but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ? ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS.<br />
The issues raised by us for sample :</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
1. sale of fake medicines &amp; adulterated food products , beverages , colas affecting the health of millions of Indians &amp; public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous products from india .</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits , tribals , backward castes by government authorities whereas regularising </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings by high &amp; mighty people in total disregard to law. in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying court orders &amp; enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws , pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants leaking india</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>s defense secrets to foreign countries &amp; some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM &amp; underworld dons in gulf countries &amp; elsewhere. these type of appeals are for public good , national security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of india is not considering our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good , inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints. over &amp; above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was very low &amp; i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me. Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>the Honourable chief justice of India &amp; H.E.Honourable President of India are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &amp; PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high &amp; mighty criminals , anti nationals , amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a cognizable offence.</em></strong><strong><br />
<em><br />
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html" target="_blank">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-&#8230;</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
DEALS IN COURTS </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>&amp; </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>POLICE </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>STATIONS </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> READ :</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html" target="_blank">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><br />
<em>ACCUSED Chief Justice of India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of-india" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of-india.html" target="_blank">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</a></em></strong><strong><br />
<em>CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
INDIA -</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI </em></strong><strong><em>– </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF DG&amp;IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE </em></strong><strong><em>– </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE </em></strong><strong><em>– </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE </em></strong><strong><em>– </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
reliance industry where is accountability ?</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
crimes at infosys campus</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
crimes of land mafia in India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://landscam.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://landscam.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em> ,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
currency thefts in RBI Press</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
killer colas &amp; killer medicines of India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://deathcola.blogpot.com/" target="_blank">http://deathcola.blogpot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://deathcola.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://deathcola.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201</a></em></strong><strong><br />
<em>We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies , public servants , but it is an appeal to the honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt colleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of India &amp; H.E.Honourable President of India have violated their oaths of office , failed in their constitutional duties , suppressed material truths / informations &amp; thereby repeatedly violated my Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS &amp; Obstructing me from performing constitutionally prescribed FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA.</em><br />
<em><br />
Hereby , i do request you to legally prosecute the below mentioned public servants </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>ACCUSED CRIMINALS </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>viz</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><em>1.</em></strong><strong><em>     </em></strong><strong><em> H.E.Honourable President of India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
2. Honourable Chief Justice Of India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
3. Union Home Secretary , GOI</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
4. Governor , Reserve Bank Of India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
5. Director-General &amp; Inspector General Of Police , government of karnataka</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
6. Commissioner , Bangalore Development Authority</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
7. Commissioner , Mysore Urban Development Authority</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
8. Commissioner , Mysore City Corporation</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
9. Labour Commissioner , government of karnataka and</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
10. all public servants belonging to tax dept , pollution control board , etc mentioned in the above cases with web links, on the above mentioned charges.</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>the whole issue of this news paper &amp; the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of this</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
complaint. If i am </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
criminal nexus levels fake charges , </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>police file fake cases against me or my dependents </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><em>if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , public servants &amp; Constitutional functionaries. Thanking you.</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.</em></strong><strong></p>
<p><em>Date : 19.03.2011</em></strong><strong><em>…………………………</em></strong><strong><em>Your</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>s sincerely,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
Place : Mysore</em></strong><strong><em>……………………………</em></strong><strong><em>Nagaraj.M.R.</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><em> </em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
</strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong> </strong><strong>FINAL SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO </strong><strong> </strong><strong>HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF</strong><strong> </strong><strong>INDIA</strong><strong> </strong><strong>,</strong><strong> </strong><strong> SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>&amp; OTHERS</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong></p>
<p>In</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india</strong><strong> </strong><strong>democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic</strong><strong> </strong><strong>freedom RIGHT TO INFORMATION &amp; EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the</strong><strong> </strong><strong>government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps &amp; leads</strong><strong> </strong><strong>to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least bothered</strong><strong> </strong><strong>about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats ,</strong><strong> </strong><strong>parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these people</strong><strong> </strong><strong>want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so</strong><strong> </strong><strong>that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes of</strong><strong> </strong><strong>V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.<br />
To my numerous appeals , HRW&#8217;s appeals to you ,you have not yet</strong><strong> </strong><strong>replied. It clearly shows that you are least bothered about the lives</strong><strong> </strong><strong>of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to</strong><strong> </strong><strong>protect the criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the</strong><strong> </strong><strong>police to enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to</strong><strong> </strong><strong>police station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy &#8220;legal</strong><strong> </strong><strong>immunity privileges&#8221; ,why don&#8217;t you have given powers to the police /</strong><strong> </strong><strong>investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why</strong><strong> </strong><strong>don&#8217;t all of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily for</strong><strong> </strong><strong>enquiry ?at the least why don&#8217;t all of you are not sending your</strong><strong> </strong><strong>statement about the case to the police either through legal counsel or</strong><strong> </strong><strong> through post? you are aiding criminals ,by denying me job</strong><strong> </strong><strong>oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city civil</strong><strong> </strong><strong>court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc &amp; by illegally closing</strong><strong> </strong><strong>my newspaper.<br />
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> office. this amounts to public cheating &amp; moral turpitude on your</strong><strong> </strong><strong> part.<br />
1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.<br />
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india.<br />
3.you are making contempt of citizens of</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india.<br />
4.you are sponsoring &amp; aiding terorrism &amp; organized crime.<br />
5.you are violating the fundamental &amp; human rights of the citizens of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> india</strong><strong> </strong><strong>and of neighbouring countries.<br />
6.you are violating &amp; making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER</strong><strong> </strong><strong> to which</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india</strong><strong> </strong><strong>is a signatory.<br />
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a</strong><strong> </strong><strong> citizen of</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india.<br />
you are hereby called upon to SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you</strong><strong> </strong><strong> cann&#8217;t be legally prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes .</p>
<p>If i am</strong><strong> </strong><strong> repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,</strong><strong> </strong><strong> police file fake cases against me or my dependents</strong><strong> </strong><strong> to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.<br />
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india</strong><strong> </strong><strong>is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking you.<br />
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.</p>
<p>Date : </strong><strong> </strong><strong>19.03.2011</strong><strong>……………………………………………</strong><strong>..your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Place :</strong><strong> </strong><strong>Mysore</strong><strong> </strong><strong>, India</strong><strong>………………………</strong><strong>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Nagaraj M R</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><em>An</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Appeal to</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Honourable United Nations Human Rights High Commissioner </em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>&amp;</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>Honourable International Court of Justice</em></strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p><strong><em>Dear Madam / Sir ,</em></strong></p>
<p align="left">
<strong><em>SUBJECT :</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>BY</em></strong><strong><em>   </em></strong><strong><em>GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>&amp; SUPREME COURT OF</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>INDIA</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>I have individually suffered numerous human rights violations , injustices</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>by</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>public servants working for government of India</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>when I raised my voice seeking justice for my fellow countrymen . for the society. These public servants are involved in crimes like aiding &amp; abetting terrorism , underworld , manslaughter , etc.</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>when I appealed to the supreme court of</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>seeking justice , they</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>have turned their blind eye. As a result more injustices are being committed till date. Even the police are not registering the complaint</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>against these guilty public servants.</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Police &amp; Supreme Court Judges in league with CRIMINALS , ANTI NATIONALS , TERORRISTS ?</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>In</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>, some Parliamentarians take money for even</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>raising Questions in parliament , favorable laws / government rules are</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>enacted</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>to favor</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>rich criminals (refer 2G &amp; Nira Radia scam). Police for a price manipulate evidence ,</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>prematurely close case , fix innocent</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>&amp; mete out 3<sup>rd</sup></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>degree torture , murder in the name of encounter . Public prosecutor can change the way of argument , etc for a price. Even judges in</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>give favorable judicial orders for money , SEX , post retirement benefits , etc. please refer details at following web pages :</em></strong><br />
<strong><em><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-fixed">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-fixed</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><br />
<strong><em><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/3rd-degree-torture-by-indian-police">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/3rd-degree-torture-by-indian-police</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><br />
<strong><em><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-for-a-price">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-for-a-price</a></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>I have not got justice till date , instead I have suffered physical assaults , murder attempts on me , my newspaper was illegally clamped down , my job opportunities</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>were illegally snatched away (cutting off the source of livelihood). I</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>have been threatened by police that I &amp; my family members will be fixed up in criminal cases (false implication) &amp; will be behind the bars for rest of our life.</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>I have been refused</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>proper medical care in government hospitals , so that</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>I will die sooner . All these</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Injustices</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>are meted out at the hands of criminal nexus of CRIMINAL </em></strong><strong><em>–</em></strong><strong><em> POLICE</em></strong><strong><em>–</em></strong><strong><em> JUDGE -</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>BUREAUCRAT </em></strong><strong><em>–</em></strong><strong><em> MP / MLA .</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Democracy is the best form of governance. My motherland</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>is one of the greatest country.</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>However</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Criminals</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>have entered into</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>halls of parliament , criminals have become judges , criminals have become police ,</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>almost total criminalization of public service has taken place. These criminals are framing laws for the masses much against the democratic aspirations of the masses. Criminal judges are relying on these laws made by criminals &amp; sending innocents to gallows .</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Criminal Police</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>are making deals with criminals &amp;</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>arresting , torturing innocents.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Still very few</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>HONEST</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>people are left in public service</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>- Parliament , Judiciary &amp; Police , However they are keeping mum. My</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>struggle is not against the government of</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>or it</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>s constitutional bodies rather it is against the corrupt people who are</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>in those bodies . I do have whole hearted respects for the government of</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>&amp; it</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>s constitutional bodies , But I despise the corrupt people over there in those institutions. Our system is good , many of the people working there are not good. It is struggle against those corrupt people , to save our democracy , to save our freedom.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Hereby , I do request your honourableselves</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Honourable United Nations Human Rights High Commissioner</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>and</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Honourable International Court</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Of</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Justice</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>, to</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>order</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>the Honourable Supreme Court of India , Government of India to do it</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>s</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>constitutional duties</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>properly</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>, to safeguard</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>the human rights of</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>all and</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>to</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>provide justice in the matter.</em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>Thanking You.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>Date :</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>15<sup>th</sup></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>July 2011</em></strong><strong><em> ……………………………</em></strong><strong><em>..Your</em></strong><strong><em>’</em></strong><strong><em>s Sincerely ,</em></strong><br />
<strong><em>Place :</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>Mysore</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>India</em></strong><strong><em>………………………………</em></strong><strong><em>Nagaraj . M . R .</em></strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Tax </strong><strong> Thieves  Corporate  Terrorists  of  India</strong></p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/10/tax-thieves-corporate-terrorists-of.html">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/10/tax-thieves-corporate-terrorists-of.html</a></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><em>Judgement  Fixing in Indian  Courts of Law / Justice</em></strong></p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-09-20T06%3A30%3A00-07%3A00&amp;max-results=1" target="_blank">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-09-20T06%3A30%3A00-07%3A00&amp;max-results=1</a></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Murderers of Justice</strong></p>
<p align="left"><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/murderers-of-justice">https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/murderers-of-justice</a></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>BOFORS , QUATROCHI  &amp;  RAJIV ASSASINATION </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/bofors-quattrochi-rajiv-assasination">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/bofors-quattrochi-rajiv-assasination</a>  </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Threats  to  RTI  / Human  Rights  Activist</strong></p>
<p align="left"><a href="https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-judgement-fixing" target="_blank">https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-judgement-fixing</a></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Mechanics of Corruption in Indian Judiciary</strong></p>
<p align="left"><a href="http://www.livemint.com/2007/05/02160432/8F771B83-547A-4758-BA01-0C2C57B70065ArtVPF.pdf" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>http://www.livemint.com/2007/05/02160432/8F771B83-547A-4758-BA01-0C2C57B70065ArtVPF.pdf</strong></a></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"> <strong>RTI QUESTIONS HONOURABLE GOVERNOR OF RESEVE BANK OF INDIA IS </strong><strong> </strong><strong>EVADING </strong><strong> </strong><strong>TO ANSWER</strong></p>
<p><strong>SOILED NOTE FRAUD CASE @ RBI BANGALORE</strong><br />
<strong>-</strong><strong>      </strong><strong> Trauma of an old man</strong></p>
<p><strong>Complete case details also available at</strong><strong> </strong><strong><a href="http://members.lycos.co.uk/ganapathihariram/" rel="nofollow">http://members.lycos.co.uk/ganapathihariram/</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>As per allegations of RBI management Bangalore in 1977-79 , criminal</strong><br />
<strong>nexus of RBI employees stole Rs. 220000 from RBI Bangalore. All the</strong><br />
<strong>banks , government treasuries in Karnataka , submit defaced / soiled</strong><br />
<strong>currency notes to RBI Bangalore in exchange for good notes. RBI after</strong><br />
<strong>collecting such defaced currency notes , sorts out fairly good notes</strong><br />
<strong>which can be reissued &amp; burns off the remaining totally defaced</strong><br />
<strong>currency notes. All these process is done in a systematic manner.</strong></p>
<p><strong>As per allegations of the management , the crime took place in the</strong><br />
<strong>period of 1977-79 at RBI Bangalore. A nexus of employees, took away</strong><br />
<strong>the currency bundles meant for destruction &amp; substituted it in the</strong><br />
<strong>place of bundles of reissuables.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Charge sheet issued by RBI Bangalore office to mr.G.Hariram</strong><br />
<strong>Staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 1 april 1985</strong><br />
<strong>Amended charge sheet staff no 3798/156-84/85 dt 8 april 1985</strong></p>
<p><strong>CBI has charge sheeted 17 employees in connection with this case ,</strong><br />
<strong>case olde no. cc34/1989</strong><strong>      </strong><strong> new no.</strong><strong> </strong><strong> sc 436/1991</strong><strong>           </strong><strong> . the honourable 21 city additional city civil &amp; sessions court Bangalore in it&#8217;s order dated 24.01.1992</strong><br />
<strong>  </strong><strong> discharged</strong><strong>       </strong><strong> 03</strong><strong> </strong><strong> charge sheeted employees , as the prosecution</strong><br />
<strong>failed to prove the charges against them. They came out clean , as</strong><br />
<strong>they were innocents saddled with the crime done by others. One of the</strong><br />
<strong>charge sheeted employee who turned approver for the prosecution, has</strong><br />
<strong>given detailed account of the crime. Nowhere he has mentioned the</strong><br />
<strong>involvement of accussed no.15 mr.G.Hariram in the crime.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Even after coming out clean, mr.G.Hariram was not reinstated into</strong><br />
<strong>service by RBI. They gave the ruse of domestic enquiry &amp; showed</strong><br />
<strong>contempt to the court order. On appeal, the honourable high court of</strong><br />
<strong>Karnataka ordered RBI to review it&#8217;s order with respect to</strong><br />
<strong>mr.G.Hariram , still RBI failed to reinstate mr.G.Hariram into service</strong><br />
<strong>, once gain showing contempt to the court of law.</strong></p>
<p><strong>In India as per law , the decisions of court of law are binding on all</strong><br />
<strong>, orders of court over rides the organisation&#8217;s internal rules ,</strong><br />
<strong>service rules , etc. inspite of lack of evidences, in a whimsical</strong><br />
<strong>manner the higher authorities of RBI , fixed some innocents as the</strong><br />
<strong>scape goats heaped all charges against them ( against whom they had</strong><br />
<strong>personal grudge , dislikes ). RBI</strong><strong> </strong><strong> repeatedly showed contempt to the</strong><br />
<strong>court orders , dismissed the scape goat &#8211; ailing old man mr.G.Hariram</strong><br />
<strong>from service. RBI snatched away his PF money towards the alleged loss</strong><br />
<strong>to the bank , didn&#8217;t pay his gratuity amount , salary arrears and</strong><br />
<strong>finally he was even deprived of the pension. As a result , the old man</strong><br />
<strong>has even lost his social prestige, dignity , his family suffered a lot</strong><br />
<strong>&amp; he is a mental wreck today.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Why RBI authoroties are hell bent upon to send away the innocents /</strong><br />
<strong>scape goats away from service ? why CBI didn&#8217;t conduct polygraph tests</strong><br />
<strong>of all the accussed , specifically higher officers of RBI , managers</strong><br />
<strong>of RBI office Bangalore ? probably the scape goats were aware of the</strong><br />
<strong>crimes master minded by higher ups &amp; didn&#8217;t co-operate with the higher</strong><br />
<strong>ups in their crimes. So, the criminals were afraid that the scape</strong><br />
<strong>goats will blurt out truth to the world , fixed non co-operating</strong><br />
<strong>innocents themselves as criminals.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Who will give justice to innocents like old man mr.G.Hariram &amp; who</strong><br />
<strong>will bell the corrupt , criminals , fat cats of RBI ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &amp; GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><br />
APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005</strong><br />
<strong><br />
( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><br />
FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><br />
ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.,</strong><br />
<strong><br />
EDITOR , E-VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH,</strong><br />
<strong><br />
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,</strong><br />
<strong><br />
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,</strong><br />
<strong><br />
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA</strong><br />
<strong><br />
PIN </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> 570017.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><br />
DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION REQUIRED :</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong><br />
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS &#8211; WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.</strong><br />
<strong>WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO</strong><strong> </strong><strong> old CC34 / 1989 &amp; NEW NO SC436/1991</strong><strong>  </strong><strong> AT 21 ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL &amp; SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE</strong></p>
<p><strong>CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE</strong></p>
<p><strong>CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985</strong></p>
<p><strong>Amended charge sheet</strong><strong> </strong><strong> staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985</strong></p>
<p><strong>1. Why didn&#8217;t you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 &amp; 79 till the</strong><br />
<strong>mid of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> 1979 ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good</strong><br />
<strong>Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your</strong><br />
<strong>inspection division working properly ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry &amp; exit</strong><br />
<strong>out of premises ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of</strong><br />
<strong>value of bags of reissuable notes &amp; bags of note meant for destruction</strong><br />
<strong>, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,</strong><br />
<strong>value of notes issued for sorting ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all</strong><br />
<strong>the employees of those sections ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 &amp; protect respective</strong><br />
<strong>documents relating to such high profile crime ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>7. why didn&#8217;t you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &amp;</strong><br />
<strong>waited till 1983 ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same</strong><br />
<strong>sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic enquiry ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before</strong><br />
<strong>the court ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested interests ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while</strong><br />
<strong>preparing charge sheet &amp; during investigation , instead</strong><strong> </strong><strong> of</strong><br />
<strong>independent investigation ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused</strong><br />
<strong>the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic</strong><br />
<strong>enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records</strong><br />
<strong>have been destroyed. Are not CBI &amp; RBI responsible for destruction of</strong><br />
<strong>evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations</strong><br />
<strong>for preserving old documents / records ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken</strong><br />
<strong>utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for</strong><br />
<strong>producing before courts of law as &amp; when demanded. But it</strong><strong> </strong><strong> didn&#8217;t , why ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,</strong><br />
<strong>with the criminals ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead</strong><br />
<strong>of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of defense ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>17. RBI authorities have stated</strong><strong> </strong><strong> that court proceedings &amp; domestic</strong><br />
<strong>enquiry are independent of each other &amp; are not binding on one</strong><br />
<strong>another. However</strong><strong> </strong><strong> RBI authorities straight away took on record of</strong><br />
<strong>domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn&#8217;t honour</strong><br />
<strong>the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>18. The alleged crime</strong><strong> </strong><strong> was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was</strong><br />
<strong>framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>19. didn&#8217;t this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,</strong><br />
<strong>manipulate evidences ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note</strong><br />
<strong>packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher</strong><br />
<strong>officers &#8211; S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA &amp; others ,</strong><br />
<strong>if not why ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high</strong><br />
<strong>ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,</strong><br />
<strong>negligent higher officials ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the</strong><br />
<strong>line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative</strong><br />
<strong>of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become</strong><br />
<strong>illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct</strong><br />
<strong>any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the</strong><br />
<strong>misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though</strong><br />
<strong>mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why</strong><strong> </strong><strong> RBI has denied his</strong><br />
<strong>pension ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over &amp; above ,</strong><br />
<strong>domestic enquiry committees &amp; judicial orders supersedes the domestic</strong><br />
<strong>enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court &amp; didn&#8217;t</strong><br />
<strong>reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>27. even if an employee&#8217;s misconduct causing loss to the bank is</strong><br />
<strong>proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the</strong><br />
<strong>bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.</strong><br />
<strong>But in mr.G.Hariram&#8217;s case , pension was denied in full without taking</strong><br />
<strong>previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000</strong><br />
<strong>to the bank &amp; recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was</strong><br />
<strong>nothing left over to recover , still RBI</strong><strong> </strong><strong> completely denied pension to</strong><br />
<strong>mr.G.Hariram , why ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should</strong><br />
<strong>be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court</strong><br />
<strong>of law. In mr.G.Hariram&#8217;s case , CBI &amp; RBI failed to prove the charges</strong><br />
<strong>in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.</strong><br />
<strong>To cover-up it&#8217;s failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much</strong><br />
<strong>beyond court orders date &amp; gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does</strong><br />
<strong>the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over &amp; above</strong><br />
<strong>the court of law ? is it not illegal &amp; contempt of court ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court</strong><br />
<strong>against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But</strong><br />
<strong>it was not done , why ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension</strong><br />
<strong>period ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of</strong><br />
<strong>key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in</strong><br />
<strong>giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central</strong><br />
<strong>board&#8217;s sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher</strong><br />
<strong>management. What disciplinary action has been taken against</strong><br />
<strong>J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF &amp; others ? if not why ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate</strong><br />
<strong>mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge sheet ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual</strong><br />
<strong>happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation</strong><br />
<strong>towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of bundled verified defective note packets ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted officers illegal ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>38. how come such an important evidence 22<sup>nd</sup></strong><strong> </strong><strong>note packet went missing ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head / expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed from packets made into new bundles , right ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst treasurers are there , who didn&#8217;t work at all on that day is not it ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals , putting some innocents seals over the notes ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification section ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &amp; 1979 ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry &amp; court proceedings ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so &amp; so. He has clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he himself is not 100% sure ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this , on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn&#8217;t it ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn&#8217;t notice3 any fraud. However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no action has been taken ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>51. why you didn&#8217;t produce all records of all persons , who have specifically worked in alleged sections , the registers of those departments with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet nos , bag nos , etc ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not there to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn&#8217;t it ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up officers they dislike &amp; falsely implicating them ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from original criminals ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79 mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not withheld ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for picking up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal prosecution and leaving the majority of probables ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why you didn&#8217;t even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone legal prosecution ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>59. Is it RBI&#8217;s &amp; CBI&#8217;s way of fair play &amp; justice ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed 95% lot , isn&#8217;t it ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections, some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play &amp; legal ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted , dismissed &amp; their pension , gratuity withheld ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>64. you don&#8217;t have any internal statuotary records to prove that mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer&#8217;s office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted just to fix mr.G.Hariram ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out of 40 officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of 1095 working days , he has worked for only 223 days in those sections , still those officers who worked for more days in those sections are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI higher authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired &amp; let off why ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>68.</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>      </strong><strong>the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say substitution of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between loss of one number of note &amp; 100 number of notes ?</strong></p>
<p><strong>69. as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of bundles only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the failure of statuotary system of work practices ?</strong><br />
<strong>70. does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI &amp; CBI were hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram &amp; to shield the original criminals ?</strong><br />
<strong>Questions with respect to other cases :</strong><br />
<strong>71. how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?</strong><br />
<strong>72. how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks have invested ?</strong><br />
<strong>73. how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank officials , who work in shares investment / equity funds section , etc ?</strong><br />
<strong>74. inspite of project reports by bank officials , over assessment of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank officials , the loans become NPAs &amp; full value cann&#8217;t be realized in the market by selling off the assets of debtor companies also. In such cases , what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude with criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than permissible ?</strong><br />
<strong>75. give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.</strong><br />
<strong>76. give names of industrial groups / promoters whose companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them , before investing in new companies promoted by them.</strong><br />
<strong>77. is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?</strong><br />
<strong>78. why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?</strong><br />
<strong>79. if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ? but debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?</strong><br />
<strong>80. what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?</strong><br />
<strong>81. what action has been taken against those involved ?</strong><br />
<strong>82. have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are powerful &amp; bigwigs ?</strong><br />
<strong>83. how you are controlling the illegal finance activities , money lending by individuals , pawn brokers &amp; chit fund companies ?</strong><br />
<strong>84. how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations , foreign donations by many NGOs ?</strong><br />
<strong>85. how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?</strong><br />
<strong>Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE</strong><br />
<strong>86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for what criminal roles ?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
89. who is responsible for installing, operating &amp; supervising the security set-up in R.B.I ?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are accounted for in inward stores &amp; while issuing for printing ?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process are accounted for?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
93. Who keeps physical figures &amp; possession of goods, inventory of all the above?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?</strong><br />
<strong>96. Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?</strong><br />
<strong>97. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?</strong><br />
<strong>98. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistants &amp; maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the year 1996-1998 ?</strong><br />
<strong>99. is not RBI &amp; BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?</strong><br />
<strong>100. still why BRBNMPL &amp; RBI refused to answer my previous information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons will come out of cubboard ?</strong><br />
<strong>101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore &amp; SBI Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of rupees ? if not why ?</strong><br />
<strong>102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?</strong><br />
<strong>103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing huge losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1988 onwards . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.</strong><strong> </strong><strong></p>
<p>FEES PAID : IPO NO 63E 318935 FOR RUPEES TEN ONLY Favouring CPIO RBI HQ MUMBAI</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
V.S.DAS , CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER , O/O HONOURABLE GOVERNOR, RBI HQ , CENTRAL OFFICE , AMAR BUILDING , P.M.MARG ,MUMBAI-400001.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Date : 01.11.2008</strong><strong>……………………</strong><strong>. Your</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>s sincerely,</strong><br />
<strong>Place : Mysore</strong><strong>……………………………</strong><strong>.. Nagaraj.M.R.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>FINANCE SCAMS IN INDIA &amp; 5-STAR LEADERS WITH BEGGING BOWL</strong><br />
<strong></p>
<p>In &#8221; mysooru mithra&#8221; a kannada daily dated 15/06/2005, the editor has written about a copy of the complaint made by Transparency International India-Bangalore to central vigilance commission of india.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
In indian banks , there is a strange practice that whenever a cheque is put before the clearing house by a bank, the clearing house sends that cheque to the service branch of bank paying. The service branch then sends that cheque to the appropriate bank branch</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
for deduction of cash from the cheque account. In this travel , if the cheque is lost or misplaced midway, the service branch pays out of it&#8217;s suspense account to the cash collecting bank. Logically, afterwards the service branch must initiate a thorough inquiry, get authentication from both persons one who gave cheque &amp; other who collected cheque. Finally, the money must be transferred from the account of cheque giver to the suspense account.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
However , upto 1997 two branches of state bank of india in bangalore &amp; overseas branch sufferred from frequent loss of cheques totally amounting to RUPEES THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED CRORE. In all cases of cheque loss the bank has paid out of suspense account, totally amounting to Rs.3200 crore. However the bank has not</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
initiated any enquiry to recover that amount from the cheque givers.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
In the 1997 internal audit report of the bank itself , this has been clearly pointed out. Till date, even the central vigilance commission has not initiated any action about it. A member of central vigilance commission happens to be ex-chairman of state bank of india.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
It is just an instance of two branches of SBI, what about hundreds of branches of SBI, what about thousands of branches of other public sector,private sector &amp; co-operative banks. It is fraud,fraud,fraud all the way. Few months back to cover-up the crimes</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
of global trust bank ( GTB) , it was taken over by oriental bank of commerce ( OBC).</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
While sanctioning a loan of just Rs.10000 to a common man , he has to comply with lengthy legalities. If he defaults, bankers breath down his neck, bankers send rowdies in the form of recovery agents to humiliate the common man &amp; his properties are</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
auctioned-off, finally all dues to the last penny are recovered. In most of the cases bankers even force the defaulters to commit suicide. However influential persons easily gets loans amounting to hundreds of crores of rupees, coolly defaults, siphons-off the funds &amp; shuts his shop. No recovery at all , just it becomes a non- performing asset (NPA) in the bank ledger. The total NPAs of all public sector banks is more than Rs.80000 crore. This burden is spead over the crores of hapless indians.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
The government takes pride in murdering forest brigand veerappan. The ill-gotten wealth of veerappan is not even pea nuts before this huge amount. Remember past finance scams </strong><strong>–</strong><strong>MS SHOES, HAWALA, HARSHAD MEHTA SHARE SCAM, KETAN PAREKH SHARE SCAM, UTI, etc. totally in all these scams billions of dollars of public money have gone to the coffers of criminals. These scamsters put veerappan to shame in their turnover. However the government is not even exhibiting a fraction of it&#8217;s ELIMINATE VEERAPPAN DRIVE against these scamsters, why?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
In india, both central &amp; state government tax/ revenue officials are neck deep in corruption. By, taking bribe they make lower assessment of income, gains, etc &amp; spare businessmen from the tax payment. The government in return for favours received from</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
lobbies, gives tax exemptions to them at it&#8217;s sweet will. All these scams &amp; it&#8217;s cover-ups are insider jobs. The government is not interested to collect, recover it&#8217;s own monies</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
amounting to billions of billions of dollars every year. However our 5-star leaders living at the expense of tax-payers, go-on foreign jaunts with a begging bowl for a few lakhs of dollars. What a shame?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
More than 50 billion indians are barely surviving on a single meal per day &amp; hundreds are dying due to starvation, billions don&#8217;t even have basic necessities of life. If the government even just collects a fraction of it&#8217;s dues from scamsters, defaulting industrialists </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> people won&#8217;t die of hunger in india. Has this enlightened our thick skinned netas ?</strong><br />
<strong>AN APPEAL TO Mr.P.CHIDAMBARAM UNION FINANCE MINISTER GOVERNMENT OF</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
INDIA</strong><strong> </strong><strong></p>
<p>An age old saying </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> AS THE KING SO DOES THE SUBJECTS. In india various financial scams, crimes &amp; it&#8217;s cover-ups have taken place amounting to billions of billions of dollars have taken place, made possible , just due to the involvement of the king </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> the netas &amp; government officials themselves in the shameful act </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> the crime.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
The tax officials are utterly corrupt, the wards of these officials spend double their pappa&#8217;s salary just during</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
weekends. Now, realise their financial might. These ill-gotten wealth is destabilising our economy &amp; might have even found it&#8217;s way into the hands of underworld, terorrists. INDIA WILL BE DEFEATED FROM</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
CRIMINAL FORCES WITHIN LIKE THIS NOT FROM THE EXTERNAL FORCES.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Hereby, the HRW urges you to make public:</strong><br />
<strong><br />
1. the financial worth of finance minister to tax official at circle level, on annual basis including his spouse&#8217;s worth &amp; property details.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
2. to make public the NPAs, losses &amp; monies under litigation by both private &amp; public sector banks annually.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
3. to make public measures taken to recover these monies.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
4. to publish annual accounts with complete details of discretionary funds allotted to the defence ministry, president, prime minister, chief ministers , governors &amp; intelligence agencies.</strong><br />
<strong><br />
Public want to know whether proper discretion is being applied while spending.</strong></p>
<p><strong>RTI QUESTIONS</strong><strong> </strong><strong> COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) &amp; COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE</strong><strong> </strong><strong> CITY CORPORATION ) ARE EVADING </strong><strong> </strong><strong>TO ANSWER</strong></p>
<p><strong>APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &amp; GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>NAGARAJ.M.R.,</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>EDITOR , E-VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH,</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong># LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA , PIN </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> 570017.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION REQUIRED :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS &#8211; WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the mysore city&#8217;s comprehensive city development plan ?</p>
<p>2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?</p>
<p>4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?</p>
<p>6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &amp; commercial site ? if not why ?</p>
<p>7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>9. how much of MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s / GOVERNMENT&#8217;s lands , sites , buildings &amp; houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?</p>
<p>10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s resolution instead of of reallotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?</p>
<p>12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?</p>
<p>13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies &amp; real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT &amp; how many not ? since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies &amp; illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?</p>
<p>15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &amp; housing societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?</p>
<p>16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &amp; legalizing those<br />
violations. Safety of public &amp; amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn&#8217;t have a parking space of it&#8217;s own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries &amp; deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries &amp; deaths ?</p>
<p>17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?</p>
<p>18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?</p>
<p>20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts &amp; evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees &amp; build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?</p>
<p>22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?</p>
<p>24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> tresspassers ? if not why ?</p>
<p>25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &amp; sufficient time to bidders about it&#8217;s auction schedules ?</p>
<p>26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?</p>
<p>27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?</p>
<p>28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &amp; selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?</p>
<p>29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /<br />
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?</p>
<p>30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other land developers ?</p>
<p>31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?</p>
<p>32. in &amp; around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out<br />
advertisement spaces &amp; built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer&#8217;s money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under<br />
&amp; surrounding HT lines legal ?</p>
<p>33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired &amp; sold as sites by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?</p>
<p>34. in &amp; around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA &amp; private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?</p>
<p>35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC &amp; other developers , housing societies ?</p>
<p>36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment &amp; creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in &amp; around mysore city ? what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /<br />
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB&#8217;s<br />
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?</p>
<p>40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?</p>
<p>41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s CDP &amp; KIADB&#8217;s industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?</p>
<p>42. is the MUDA &amp; KIADB revising / modifying CDP &amp; INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &amp; Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?</p>
<p>43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar&#8217;s report on land grabbings in mysore ?</p>
<p>44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal &amp; in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s CDP ? if not why ? what action ?</p>
<p>45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?</p>
<p>46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?</p>
<p>47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it&#8217;s objections , in it&#8217;s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues &amp; the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &amp; alienation legal ?</p>
<p>48.numerous NGO&#8217;s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?</p>
<p>49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC &amp; government action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections &amp; given media publicity ? if not why ?</p>
<p>52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE officials &amp; their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?</p>
<p>53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?</p>
<p>54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?</p>
<p>55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 2006 &amp; 2007 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>REMARKS :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>PIO of O/O commissioner , Mysore urban development authority , Mysore failed to provide full information to us. Vide lettes ,</strong><br />
<strong>No: PRO/519/2007-08 dt 28/08/07 &amp; no:BDA/CP/705/07-08 dt 23.10.07</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER , O/O COMMISSIONER , MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , MYSORE .</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">DATE : 21.04.08…………………… YOUR’S SINCERELY,<br />
PLACE : MYSORE………………….. NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p><strong>RTI </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY</strong><strong> </strong><strong> ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE ( BBMP ) &amp; CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ( KIADB ) </strong><strong> </strong><strong>ARE</strong><strong> </strong><strong> EVADING TO ANSWER</strong></p>
<p><strong>APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &amp; GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>NAGARAJ.M.R.,</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>EDITOR , E-VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH,</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong># LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA , PIN </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> 570017.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION REQUIRED :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS &#8211; WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<strong>1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the Bangalore city&#8217;s comprehensive city development plan ?</p>
<p>2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?</p>
<p>4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?</p>
<p>6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &amp; commercial site ? if not why ?</p>
<p>7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings &amp; houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?</p>
<p>10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?</p>
<p>12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?</p>
<p>13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies &amp; real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; how many not ? since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies &amp; illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?</p>
<p>15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &amp; housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?</p>
<p>16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &amp; legalizing those violations. Safety of public &amp; amenities of public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn&#8217;t have a parking space of it&#8217;s own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries &amp; deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries &amp; deaths ?</p>
<p>17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?</p>
<p>18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?</p>
<p>20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts &amp; evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees &amp; build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?</p>
<p>22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?</p>
<p>24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> tresspassers ? if not why ?</p>
<p>25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &amp; sufficient time to bidders about it&#8217;s auction schedules ?</p>
<p>26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?</p>
<p>27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?</p>
<p>28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &amp; selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?</p>
<p>29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?</p>
<p>30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?</p>
<p>31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?</p>
<p>32. in &amp; around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces &amp; built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer&#8217;s money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under &amp; surrounding HT lines legal ?</p>
<p>33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired &amp; sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?</p>
<p>34. in &amp; around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?</p>
<p>35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; other developers , housing societies ?</p>
<p>36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment &amp; creating public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in &amp; around bangalore city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB&#8217;s comprehensive industrial area development plan ?</p>
<p>40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?</p>
<p>41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT&#8217;s industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?</p>
<p>42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP &amp; INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &amp; Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?</p>
<p>43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar&#8217;s report on land grabbings in mysore ?</p>
<p>44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal &amp; in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s CDP ? if not why ? what action ?</p>
<p>45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?</p>
<p>46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?</p>
<p>47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it&#8217;s objections , in it&#8217;s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues &amp; the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &amp; alienation legal ?</p>
<p>48.numerous NGO&#8217;s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?</p>
<p>49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections &amp; given media publicity ? if not why ?</p>
<p>52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT officials &amp; their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?</p>
<p>53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?</p>
<p>54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?</p>
<p>55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter no:</strong><strong> </strong><strong>310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>57. why BDA didn&#8217;t file police complaint to evict encroachers?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>58. why BDA didn&#8217;t inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their allotment ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of BDA committee legal ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufficient time to reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request &amp; stated that the said file concerning this issue cann&#8217;t be found ie lost . is it legal ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><a name="TOC-CRIMES-BY-BANGALORE-DEVELOPMENT-AUT"></a><strong>CRIMES BY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( B.D.A) AGAINST A POOR WOWAN</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>The B.D.A flouts it&#8217;s own rules &amp; spreads red carpet for big land developers &amp; land grabbers. B.D.A posting is a huge money spinner for corrupt officials. The corrupt B.D.A officials work hand in glove with criminal elements &amp; rowdies. They illegally evict genuine allottees who are poor &amp; without any connections from allotted prime lands &amp; sell-off those prime land to the highest bidder of bribe. The poor fellow is re-alloted lands in backward areas &amp; in some cases left in the lurch.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Now , take the following case. Mr. S.D. chandrashekaraiah a poor old man aged around 80 years was allotted with house no.185, kumaraswamy lay-out, first block, bangalore in 1978 vide letter no.310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>The chairman of B.D.A has allotted the built house on lease cum sale basis. The poor old man mr. S.D.chandrashekaraiah complied with all the rules &amp; in accordance with it even deposited 25% of the house cost in B.D.A&#8217;S account. However when he went over to his allotted house for residing in it, he found out some rowdy elements were already residing there. He complained about this matter to the legal owner of the house ie B.D.A . the B.D.A officials didn&#8217;t take steps to evict the illegal encroachers nor did they make any complaint to the police. His appeals to B.D.A, chief minister of karnataka , etc fell on deaf ears. Hurt by this gross injustice &amp; mounting financial burdens the poor old man died.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Subsequently, the poor man&#8217;s daughter smt. Nagalakshmi who was also very poor , appealed to the B.D.A authorities once again , to evict illegal encroachers from her father&#8217;s allotted house. This time the corrupt B.D.A officials played a different game. They showed her a vacant house, gave her oral instructions to live in that vacant house &amp; told her that they will regularise it in due course. The hapless poor woman took huge loans &amp; repaired the house fit for occupation. Just before she was to occupy that house , corrupt B.D.A officials once again planted rowdy elements in that house. Once again the poor woman was cheated. She lost her house, on top of it her loan burden mounted.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Till date, that poor woman is suffering from these gross injustices of B.D.A . SHAMELESS B.D.A OFFICIALS who take thousands of rupees salary &amp; perks every month, all at the expense of tax-payer has not even cared to rectify the injustice. Thereby, they are violating the poor woman&#8217;s fundamental &amp; human rights.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>Hereby, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH urges the honourable chief minister of karnataka, honourable lokayuktha for karnataka , honourable chairman national human rights commission , honourable chairman national commission for women &amp; honourable chairman state commission for women karnataka, to take the appropriate action &amp; to speedily provide justice to this poor woman.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 2006 &amp; 2007 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left"><strong>REMARKS :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>PIO of O/O commissioner , Bangalore development authority , Bangalore failed to provide full information to us. Vide lettes ,</strong><br />
<strong>No: BDA/DySEC-2/ADMN/KMS-1/185/2007-08 dt 23.08.07 &amp;</strong><br />
<strong>NO:BDA/CPM/RIA/296/2277/07-08 dt 27.09.07</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER , O/O COMMISSIONER , BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , BANGALORE .</strong></p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">DATE : 21.04.08……………………………. YOUR’S SINCERELY,<br />
PLACE : MYSORE…………………………. NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p align="left">
<p><strong>RTI</strong><strong> </strong><strong> QUESTIONS </strong><strong>  </strong><strong>CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , UNION HOME MINISTER ,</strong><strong> </strong><strong> LOKSABHA SPEAKER , Dy Chairman of rajyasabha , PRESIDENT OF INDIA</strong><strong> </strong><strong> , GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA , CHIEF MINISTER OF KARNATAKA</strong><strong> </strong><strong> &amp;</strong><strong> </strong><strong> DIRECTOR GENERAL OF KARNATAKA POLICE</strong><strong> </strong><strong> ARE</strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>EVADING</strong><strong> </strong><strong> TO ANSWER</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong></p>
<p>APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005</strong><strong>   </strong><strong>              </strong><strong> </strong><strong>                    </strong><strong>( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 ) OF GOI</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong></p>
<p>FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.,<br />
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE </strong><strong> </strong><strong>&amp; SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,<br />
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,<br />
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,<br />
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA </strong><strong> </strong><strong>PIN </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> 570017.</p>
<p>DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION REQUIRED :<br />
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS &#8211; WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE&#8217;S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY &amp; ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING &amp; ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &amp; CRIMINALS</p>
<p>Hereby ,</strong><strong> </strong><strong> we </strong><strong> </strong><strong>do request</strong><strong> </strong><strong> PIO O/O </strong><strong> </strong><strong>Honourable Chief Justice of India </strong><strong> </strong><strong>, PIO , O/O H.E.Honorable President of India , PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha , PIOs of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka CMO , Union Home Ministry GOI</strong><strong> </strong><strong> and</strong><strong> </strong><strong> DG &amp; IG of Police of Government of Karnataka to answer the following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national security , </strong><strong> </strong><strong>National unity &amp; integrity &amp; to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary &amp; police.</p>
<p>Main A :<br />
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional institutions &amp;</strong><strong> </strong><strong> to the honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This is an appeal to the honest few in public service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>1.                 </strong><strong> does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain from voting</strong><strong> </strong><strong>legal ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>2.           </strong><strong> why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>3.           </strong><strong> just remember , the</strong><strong> </strong><strong> vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature &amp; how some</strong><strong> </strong><strong> MLAs</strong><strong>  </strong><strong> vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita</strong><strong> </strong><strong> in state legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by MPs &amp; MLAs</strong><strong> </strong><strong> legal ? does not these constitute contempt of the house by MPs &amp; MLAs themselves ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>4.           </strong><strong> all the people</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>s representatives from panchayath member to president of India must read ABCD</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Of Democracy</strong><strong> </strong><strong> provide along with.since independence of India till date , MPs &amp; MLAs are forcing projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating policies against the wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies &amp; Laws , undemocratic &amp; illegal ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>5.           </strong><strong> is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>6.           </strong><strong> how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>7.           </strong><strong> are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>8.           </strong><strong> what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false affidavits ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>9.           </strong><strong> who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>10.         </strong><strong> the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih &amp; kin raises even during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural products , their companies register increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
Main B :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>1.                 </strong><strong> we do once again offer</strong><strong> </strong><strong> our conditional services to the government of india , all state governments &amp; supreme court of india , in apprehending</strong><strong> </strong><strong> tax evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt</strong><strong> </strong><strong> public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the the government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of India , are not ready</strong><strong> </strong><strong> to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>2.           </strong><strong> the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information / records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>3.           </strong><strong> why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police complaints made by us ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>4.           </strong><strong> why DG &amp; IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) , from union &amp; state home ministries ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>5.           </strong><strong> the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the supreme court of India &amp; national human rights</strong><strong> </strong><strong> commission</strong><strong> </strong><strong> has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high profile case</strong><strong> </strong><strong> ? is it because it</strong><strong> </strong><strong> is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings , TRPs ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>6.           </strong><strong> the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites &amp; terrorists , by their delaying tactics &amp; denial of information , records. What action has been taken against such anti-national elements in public service ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>7.           </strong><strong> how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist , Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit &amp; SOS e-voice for justice) to Karnataka police , to national human rights commission</strong><strong> </strong><strong> to supreme court of India till date ? what action taken with respect to each complaint ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>8.           </strong><strong> the delay in taking action by public servants</strong><strong> </strong><strong> with respect to following cases has resulted in</strong><strong> </strong><strong> more crimes , destruction / manipulation of evidences , records</strong><strong> </strong><strong> and more injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in following cases ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
<em>SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html" target="_blank">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-&#8230;</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
DEALS IN COURTS </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>&amp; </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>POLICE </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em>STATIONS </em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em> READ :</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html" target="_blank">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><br />
<em>ACCUSED Chief Justice of India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of-india" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of-india.html" target="_blank">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</a></em></strong><strong><br />
<em>CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
INDIA -</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI </em></strong><strong><em>– </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF DG&amp;IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE </em></strong><strong><em>– </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crosscji.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crosscji.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE </em></strong><strong><em>– </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE </em></strong><strong><em>– </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
reliance industry where is accountability ?</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
crimes at infosys campus</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/" target="_blank">http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
crimes of land mafia in India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://landscam.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://landscam.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em> ,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
currency thefts in RBI Press</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80</a></em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
killer colas &amp; killer medicines of India</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://deathcola.blogpot.com/" target="_blank">http://deathcola.blogpot.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://deathcola.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">http://deathcola.wordpress.com/</a></em></strong><strong><em>  </em></strong><strong><em>,</em></strong><strong><em> </em></strong><strong><em><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&amp;q=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201" target="_blank">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201</a></em></strong><strong><br />
<em>HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE</em><br />
<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale</a></strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> pushpa kolasani</strong><strong> </strong><strong> on hunger strike in anantapur</strong><strong> </strong><strong> district jail Andhra Pradesh<br />
<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap</a></strong><strong> </strong><strong></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>9.                 </strong><strong> how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral &amp; illegal acts , since independence till date ? what action taken in each case ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>10.         </strong><strong> what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in public examination in Andhra Pradesh ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>11.         </strong><strong> have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions</strong><strong> </strong><strong> taken by such judges of doubtful integrity &amp; honesty ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>12.         </strong><strong> is it not the duty of government &amp; supreme court of India , to protect</strong><strong> </strong><strong> the fundamental rights &amp; human rights of all Indian citizens ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>13.         </strong><strong> why the government &amp; supreme court of India has failed to protect the fundamental rights &amp; human rights of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> me</strong><strong> </strong><strong> &amp; those mentioned in my complaint ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>14.         </strong><strong> how many former CJIs</strong><strong> </strong><strong> ,</strong><strong> </strong><strong> supreme court &amp; high court judges have disproportionate wealth ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>15.         </strong><strong> Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests</strong><strong> </strong><strong> amounts to suppression of evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring public servants ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>16.         </strong><strong> why my previous RTI requests or part</strong><strong> </strong><strong> there of was not transferred to appropriate authorities and information given to me in a consolidated form ?</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong></p>
<p>Main </strong><strong> </strong><strong>C </strong><strong> </strong><strong>:Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?</p>
<p>Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3<sup>rd</sup></strong><strong> </strong><strong>degree torture on prisoners ?</p>
<p>Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals &amp; backstabs our motherland , it&#8217;s national security ?</p>
<p>Q4. Don&#8217;t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law &amp; order ?</p>
<p>Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?</p>
<p>Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth &amp; provide timely justice ?<br />
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich &amp; mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?<br />
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don&#8217;t give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts don&#8217;t take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?<br />
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?<br />
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases &amp; by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?<br />
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police &amp; intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?<br />
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?<br />
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses &amp; all parties involved , both during case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q14. How do you monitor &amp; check corrupt police personnel &amp; increase in their family&#8217;s wealth year after year ?<br />
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidate&#8217;s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?<br />
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?<br />
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?<br />
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just &amp; legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?<br />
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded &amp; aided couter terrorist groups , is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained &amp; funded &#8220;salwa judum&#8221; to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements &amp; attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?<br />
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld &amp; fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms &amp; ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty &amp; rich ?<br />
Q23. Law is one &amp; same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich &amp; poor ? why this differentiation ?<br />
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it&#8217;s products come with IMEI number only &amp; stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their&#8217;s as it doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they don&#8217;t have any business relationship with either tata indicom or it&#8217;s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets &amp; cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing<br />
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file &#8220;B&#8221; report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?<br />
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with &#8220;B&#8221; report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?<br />
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?<br />
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?<br />
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ?<br />
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG &amp; IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police &amp; intelligence personnel ?<br />
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?<br />
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases &amp; can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn&#8217;t cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission &amp; home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?<br />
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?<br />
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people&#8217;s representatives are facing criminal charges ?<br />
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?<br />
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?<br />
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people&#8217;s representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?<br />
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?<br />
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?<br />
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?<br />
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?<br />
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin &amp; while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?<br />
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?<br />
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi&#8217;s family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it&#8217;s partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it&#8217;s case &amp; prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks &amp; others , when shiv sena</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it&#8217;s partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q48.what damages has been done to india&#8217;s national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?<br />
Q49. What action by the government ?<br />
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?<br />
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?<br />
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?<br />
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years &amp; acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?<br />
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters &amp; 3<sup>rd</sup></strong><strong> </strong><strong>degree torture ?<br />
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?<br />
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3<sup>rd</sup>degree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan&#8217;s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?<br />
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my &#8220;fundamental duty&#8221; hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI &amp; GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?<br />
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more &amp; even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police &amp; their family members on the lines of defense forces ?<br />
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable &amp; his family ?<br />
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?<br />
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?<br />
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?<br />
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?<br />
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?<br />
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?<br />
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?<br />
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?<br />
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings &amp; subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right &amp; legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.<br />
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?<br />
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?<br />
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date<br />
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?<br />
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?<br />
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?<br />
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?<br />
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?<br />
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?<br />
Q78. how ? if not why ?<br />
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judge&#8217;s family members ?<br />
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?<br />
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?<br />
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?<br />
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement &amp; meating out injustice ?<br />
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>judges are not subjected to tests like &#8220;poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc&#8221; , in the interest of justice &amp; truth ?<br />
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of &#8220;Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society&#8221;. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society &amp; allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said society&#8217;s</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ?<br />
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?<br />
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3<sup>rd</sup></strong><strong> </strong><strong>degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured person&#8217;s case responsible for it ?<br />
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges &amp; the police officers for committing 3<sup>rd</sup></strong><strong> </strong><strong>degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder &amp; murder ? if not why ?<br />
Q89. registrar , Mysore district &amp; sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.<br />
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.<br />
Q91. when a person doesn&#8217;t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that person&#8217;s case responsible for it ? what action ?<br />
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food &amp; medical care to prisoners ?<br />
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence &amp; gives him 3 months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?<br />
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years &amp; finally the judge finds them as innocents &amp; acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?<br />
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions &amp; the actions arising out of misuse of office ?<br />
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges &amp; their personal actions as individuals ?<br />
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?<br />
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?<br />
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?<br />
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?<br />
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities &amp; women are their in supreme court , state high courts &amp; subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .<br />
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges &amp; to check corruption in judiciary ?<br />
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?<br />
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill &amp; claimed traveling allowance ?<br />
Q106. what action has been taken against</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>selectors ie Karnataka high court judges &amp; newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?<br />
Q107. when common people / tax payers &amp; even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right &amp; just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in</strong><strong> India , abroad , all at tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties &amp; mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?<br />
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?<br />
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?<br />
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in a case ?<br />
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi&#8217;s assassination case , was not considered by the court ?<br />
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?<br />
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?<br />
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy person&#8217;s rights violation ?<br />
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q117. is the use of 3<sup>rd</sup></strong><strong> </strong><strong>degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?<br />
Q118. when the corrupt police officer &amp; government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>to cover-up rich crooks , high &amp; mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?<br />
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper &amp; fair prosecution of cases against rich &amp; mighty ?<br />
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?<br />
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?<br />
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>the honourable court ready to utilize it ?<br />
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of india&#8217;s on-line grievance system ( DPG &amp; DARPG ) :<br />
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618<br />
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pages<br />
<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/message/182" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182</a></strong><strong> </strong><strong>,<br />
<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/message/206" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206</a></strong><strong> </strong><strong>,<br />
<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/message/208" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208</a></strong><strong> </strong><strong>,<br />
<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/message/212" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</a></strong><strong> </strong><strong>,<br />
<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/message/209" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209</a></strong><strong> </strong><strong>,<br />
<a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw</a><br />
what are the status of those appeals ?<br />
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes</strong><strong> – </strong><strong>rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India &amp; citizens ofIndia ? please answer.<br />
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemen&#8217;s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen &amp; their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?<br />
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.<br />
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?<br />
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?<br />
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel &amp; pay it as compensation to victims of police failures &amp; atrocities ?<br />
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?<br />
Q133. during british rule in india &amp; various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &amp; other british colonies. After india&#8217;s independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ?<br />
Q134. in how many cases GOI &amp; other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?<br />
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?<br />
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it&#8217;s colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?<br />
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?<br />
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?<br />
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND &amp; prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &amp; prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ?<br />
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?<br />
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?<br />
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?</p>
<p>Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators &amp; parliamentarians by the constitution of India?</p>
<p>a) Inside the House b) Outside the House</p>
<p>Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like</p>
<p>a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India</p>
<p>c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC</p>
<p>e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.</p>
<p>Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.</p>
<p>b) Cover both their official &amp; personal actions.</p>
<p>Q146. Are the privileges defined &amp; codified ?</p>
<p>Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?</p>
<p>Q148. Are the liberty &amp; fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?</p>
<p>Q149. Can the Indian legislatures &amp; parliament be equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?</p>
<p>Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?</p>
<p>Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives &amp; executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers &amp; contempt of the court by the House.</p>
<p>Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?</p>
<p>Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of official&#8217;s secret act &amp; go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges</p>
<p>Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court &amp; Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?</p>
<p>Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer&#8217;s money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q157. Judges &amp; Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more<br />
valid) in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?</p>
<p>Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?</p>
<p>Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?</p>
<p>Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?</p>
<p>Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation&#8221; ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.</p>
<p>Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. &amp; giving free legal aid ?</p>
<p>Q164. Communication &#8211; free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?<br />
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just &amp; legal ? give me the names of accused judges &amp; description of charges against them ?<br />
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?<br />
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?<br />
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.<br />
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?<br />
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?<br />
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses &amp; brain. That is why the acts &amp; sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects &amp; produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police &amp; judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them &amp; to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police &amp; judges in drunken state legal ?</p>
<p>Q 172 . What action</strong><strong> </strong><strong> has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?</p>
<p>Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state ministers &amp; central ministers who fully aided the criminals </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> Union Carbide official</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail</strong><strong> </strong><strong> &amp; flee the country without court</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>s permission ?</p>
<p>Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of court </strong><strong> </strong><strong>&amp; for aiding a criminal to escape ?</p>
<p>Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?</strong><strong> </strong><strong> what action has been taken against the CJI who</strong><strong> </strong><strong> became an official of the</strong><strong> </strong><strong> trust belonging to the criminal ?</p>
<p>Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?</p>
<p>Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department &amp; pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?</p>
<p>Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal although they don</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>t have right to do so ?</p>
<p>Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors &amp; Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didn</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>t</strong><strong> </strong><strong> press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for</strong><strong> </strong><strong> producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?</p>
<p>Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials &amp; people</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>s representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up &amp; aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of</strong><strong> </strong><strong>thousands &amp; maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?</p>
<p>Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt</strong><strong> </strong><strong> labour / pollution control board officials</strong><strong> </strong><strong> HUMAN BEINGS ?<br />
Q</strong><strong> </strong><strong> 182</strong><strong>   </strong><strong> Why</strong><strong> </strong><strong> police are</strong><strong> </strong><strong> not registering my complaint</strong><strong>  </strong><strong> against</strong><strong> </strong><strong> CJI &amp; other VVIPS ,Even after years ?<br />
Q </strong><strong>  </strong><strong>183</strong><strong>  </strong><strong> don</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>t the</strong><strong> </strong><strong> police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal</strong><strong> </strong><strong> jurisdiction</strong><strong> </strong><strong> to register</strong><strong> </strong><strong> the case</strong><strong> </strong><strong> against these VVIPs ? or</strong><strong> </strong><strong> just</strong><strong> </strong><strong> because the criminals happens to be VVIPs</strong><strong> </strong><strong> ,they</strong><strong> </strong><strong>are </strong><strong> </strong><strong>not booked </strong><strong> </strong><strong>by police? If the </strong><strong> </strong><strong>said</strong><strong> </strong><strong> police don</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>t have</strong><strong> </strong><strong> legal jurisdiction to book</strong><strong> </strong><strong> these VVIPs , they should have</strong><strong> </strong><strong> transferred the complaint</strong><strong> </strong><strong> to</strong><strong> </strong><strong> those authorities who have jurisdiction &amp;</strong><strong>  </strong><strong>authority to book</strong><strong> </strong><strong> &amp; prosecute</strong><strong>  </strong><strong> these</strong><strong> </strong><strong> VVIPs , but not done</strong><strong> </strong><strong> so , why ?<br />
Q </strong><strong> </strong><strong>184</strong><strong> </strong><strong> are not all these actions , of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> VVIPs &amp; police amounting to</strong><strong> </strong><strong> cover up of crimes &amp; criminals ? are</strong><strong> </strong><strong> not</strong><strong> </strong><strong> these cover ups itself is a crime ?<br />
Q </strong><strong> </strong><strong>185.</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals</strong><strong> </strong><strong> for justice</strong><strong> </strong><strong> concerning public welfare , national security</strong><strong> </strong><strong> sent</strong><strong> </strong><strong> through</strong><strong> </strong><strong> post , e-mail </strong><strong> </strong><strong>to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ?</strong><strong> </strong><strong> does</strong><strong> </strong><strong> not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals? </strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
Q 186 </strong><strong>  </strong><strong>Are not</strong><strong> </strong><strong> the honourable chief justice of india</strong><strong> </strong><strong> together</strong><strong> </strong><strong> with the jurisdictional police &amp; Revenue district magistrate</strong><strong> </strong><strong> responsible</strong><strong> </strong><strong> to protect</strong><strong> </strong><strong> the</strong><strong> </strong><strong> fundamental &amp; human rights</strong><strong> </strong><strong> of people ?</strong><strong> </strong><strong>why the CJI , Mysore DC</strong><strong> &amp; Jurisdictional Police</strong><strong> </strong><strong> have failed to protect the fundamental &amp; human rights of</strong><strong> </strong><strong> people</strong><strong> </strong><strong> including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate &amp; jurisdictional police </strong><strong> </strong><strong>are</strong><strong> </strong><strong> together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the quartet </strong><strong> –</strong><strong> Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city &amp; Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station</strong><strong> </strong><strong> , mysore</strong><strong> </strong><strong> will be responsible .</strong><strong> </strong><strong><br />
</strong><strong> </strong><strong>These corrupt</strong><strong> </strong><strong> parasites will feel </strong><strong> </strong><strong>, understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> In</strong><strong> </strong><strong> whose</strong><strong> </strong><strong> Court of justice</strong><strong> </strong><strong> MATCH FIXING is not there &amp; every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.</p>
<p>YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1991-2011 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.<br />
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :<br />
1. PIO , O/O Honorable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.<br />
2. PIO , O/O</strong><strong> </strong><strong> H.E.Honorable President of India , Rashtrapathi Bhawan , New Delhi.<br />
3. PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , GOI , New Delhi.<br />
4. PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha , GOI , New Delhi.<br />
5. PIO , O/O Union Home Minister ,GOI</strong><strong> </strong><strong>, New Delhi.<br />
6. PIO , O/O H.E.Honorable Governor of Karnataka , Raj Bhawan , Bangalore.<br />
7. PIO , O/O Honorable Chief Minister of Karnataka , CMO , Bangalore.<br />
8. PIO , O/O DG &amp; IG of Police , Government of Karnataka ,Police HQ , Bangalore.</p>
<p>Fees Paid :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>1.                 </strong><strong> IPO 90E 787047 for rupees ten only.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>2.           </strong><strong> IPO 90E 787048 for rupees ten only.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>3.           </strong><strong> IPO 90E 787049 for rupees ten only.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>4.           </strong><strong> IPO 90E 787050 for rupees ten only.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>5.           </strong><strong> IPO 90E 787051 for rupees ten only.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>6.           </strong><strong> IPO 56C 376730</strong><strong> </strong><strong> for rupees 5 only + IPO 56C 376731 for rupees 5 only.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>7.           </strong><strong> IPO 56C 376732 for rupees 5 only + IPO 56C 376733 for rupees 5 only.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>8.           </strong><strong> IPO 56C 376734 for rupees 5 only + IPOIPO 56C 376735 for rupees 5 only.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
Enclosed :</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>1.                 </strong><strong> Police Complaint dated 19.03.2011</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>2.           </strong><strong> Show Cause Notice Dated 19.03.2011</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>3.           </strong><strong> ABCD Lesson of Democracy.</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong><br />
DATE : 19.03.2011 </strong><strong>……………</strong><strong>..</strong><strong>………………………</strong><strong>NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA</strong><strong>…</strong><strong>.. </strong><strong>………………………</strong><strong>.( APPLICANT)</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>A B C D of Democracy </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> A Lesson for all people</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>s representatives</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>HOW MPs ,MLAs</strong><strong> </strong><strong> , Ministers &#8211; PEOPLE</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>S REPRESENTATIVES MUST FUNCTION</strong><strong> </strong><br />
<strong>People are the kings , self rulers in a democracy . Peoples representatives must just represent the wishes ,</strong><strong> </strong><strong> aspirations of people. When</strong><strong> </strong><strong> people in Jaitapur , Maharashtra state ofIndia</strong><strong> </strong><strong> are totally against a nuke plant in their area</strong><strong> </strong><strong> and they don</strong><strong>’</strong><strong>t want it , still the authorities are forcing this project over their head.</strong><br />
<strong>Since 63 years of independence , In India the learned IAS babus &amp; Netas are forcing their agendas , SEZs , Projects over the people for their own selfish gains , against the wishes of people. This is not DEMOCRACY.</strong></p>
<p><strong>In</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india, indirect democracy is the form of governance. In this form, people&#8217;s representatives are bound to raise the questions , issues concerning their constituents on their behalf , on the floor of the house. However the sad part in</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india</strong><strong> </strong><strong>even after </strong><strong> </strong><strong>63 </strong><strong> </strong><strong>years of democracy , is the lobbying is at it&#8217;s peak. The lobbying is a gentleman&#8217;s white collared crook&#8217;s way of forming favour seeker&#8217;s group , creating a corpus to pay lumpsum bribe &amp; influencing decision making.</strong></p>
<p><strong><br />
The people&#8217;s representatives are bound to represent their people first , then their party &amp; party think tanks.</strong><strong> </strong><strong>India</strong><strong> </strong><strong>has come to this sorry state of affairs , widespread corruption , huge black economy &amp; rampant poverty, all due to inefficient legislations &amp; enforcements.<br />
These think tanks &amp; IAS lobby, consider themselves as most super brains on earth &amp; gives out suggestions . the present state of affairs is a barometer of their brilliance. These think tanks &amp; IAS lobby are the hand maidens of lobbyists / bribers.</p>
<p>Now consider the following example :<br />
Mr.raj gandhi is a member of parliament from mandya constituency in karnataka state. He is a MBA graduate &amp; member of ruling Indian progressive party. The multinational giant M/S GREY HOUND CORPORATION wants to enter into paper manufacturing business in</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india. It&#8217;s sight falls on the public sector paper giant mandya national paper mills (MNPM) in mandya district of karnataka. The MNC effectively lobbies with the government. The ruling party think tank &amp; the cabinet advisory group recommends to the government to make strategic<br />
disinvestment in the PSU M/S MNPM. They bring out graph with full power point presentation stating that it is good for the company as well as the government. The lobbyists follows it up with media reports on the positive aspect of strategic disinvestment. A favourable impression is created in the minds of literate public. The cabinet<br />
committee okays it.</p>
<p>The &#8221; strategic dis investment issue &#8221; comes before the parliament for legislation / approval. The ruling party issues a party whip to it&#8217;s members to vote in favour of dis investment. However M.P mr.raj gandhi who is an MBA in his own wisdom also favours the dis investment. However ,most importantly the constituents </strong><strong>–</strong><strong> people in mandya parliamentary constituency through protest marches , mass post card campaigns lakhs in numbers expresses their disagreement with the dis investment &amp; urges their MP mr.gandhi to vote against the disinvestment legislation.</p>
<p>On the D-day in parliament , mr. Raj gandhi as per his party whip &amp; his own wisdom votes in favour of strategic disinvestment legislation, much against the wishes of his people , constituents &amp; mis represents them in parliament. the democracy has failed here. in This way democracy is being derailed since 62 years in</strong><strong> </strong><strong>india.</p>
<p>In democracy, party whip , MP or MLA&#8217;s own wisdom / brilliance, think tank &amp; IAS lobby recommendations are all secondary , the constituent&#8217;s of his constituency , people&#8217;s wishes aspirations are of primary importance &amp; supreme. What people need is a honest<br />
representative, who simply delivers the people&#8217;s aspirations on the floor of the house back &amp; forth , without superimposing it with his own ideas &amp; party ideas. For true democracy , the people&#8217;s representatives must be true postmans.</p>
<p>Towards this end , the people must be educated about their democratic rights &amp; responsibilities. This is an appeal to the honest few in the parliament &amp; state legislatures to weed out their corrupt colleagues , lobbyists, to uphold the dignity of the house &amp; to install democracy in it&#8217;s true form.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p align="left">
<p><strong>edited , printed , published &amp; owned by</strong><strong> </strong><strong>NAGARAJA.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE</strong><strong> </strong><strong>-570017</strong><strong> </strong><strong>INDIA</strong><strong>                       </strong><strong>cell : 91 9341820313 </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong> </strong><strong>  </strong></p>
<p><strong>home page:</strong><strong>    </strong><br />
<a href="https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home</a> ,<br />
<a href="http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit" target="_blank">http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit</a>  ,<br />
<a href="http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/</a> ,<br />
<a href="http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/</a>                                                                                                                                                                            e-mail : <span style="text-decoration:underline;"><a href="mailto:nagarajhrw@hotmail.com">nagarajhrw@hotmail.com</a> </span><span style="text-decoration:underline;">   </span>     ,  <span style="text-decoration:underline;"><a href="mailto:naghrw@yahoo.com">naghrw@yahoo.com</a> </span><span style="text-decoration:underline;">   </span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/137/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=137&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/shame-to-chief-justice-of-india-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/_/rsrc/1320136662913/shame-to-you---chief-justice-of-india-prime-minister-of-india-president-of-india" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://eclarionofdalit.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/shame-on-you.jpg?w=300" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/307885_10150444892443185_513253184_10143062_239668265_n.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/307885_10150444892438185_513253184_10143061_1367777029_n.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/307885_10150444892448185_513253184_10143063_1638189650_n.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-6eHqUnXRJxE/TqGFxJd6i-I/AAAAAAAAADg/Y_eeW6KTknQ/Justice%252520Hanged.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/307885_10150444892453185_513253184_10143064_1028021131_n.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://photos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/307885_10150444892458185_513253184_10143065_1774911212_a.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/302507_10150444895033185_513253184_10143068_302152660_n.jpg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://api.ning.com/files/mN-5mQKNkfqe7TDK9asUxuPoy23idjfYWSURXuMhGimBFDFzQYJDzCBm-py3Nw5rLVbS1cRCLL3ALJNYeMjJ6ranbIhDKxyj/cartoon.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SHAME  to  Chief  Justice  of India</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/shame-to-chief-justice-of-india/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/shame-to-chief-justice-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web Working For The Rights &#38; Survival Of The Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R… VOL.05 issue. 46 …………16/11/2011 “There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ” - Mahatma Gandhi Hunger Deaths [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=133&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion  Of  Dalit  &#8211;  Weekly Newspaper On Web</p>
<p>Working  For  The  Rights  &amp;  Survival  Of  The  Oppressed</p>
<p>Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R… VOL.05 issue. 46 …………16/11/2011</p>
<p>“There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ”<br />
- Mahatma Gandhi</p>
<p>Hunger Deaths Malnutrition Deaths Poverty  Earning  Less than Rupees 32 per day</p>
<p>Honest  Hard Working Child Laborers Earning Less Than Rupees 32 per day</p>
<p>Corrupt Dishonest Criminal Public Servants Earning More than Rupees 5000 per day  Murderers of Justice</p>
<p> Ill-gotten Wealth of  Corrupt Public Servants</p>
<p>Murderers of Justice Shame to You</p>
<p>Follow me at<br />
http://www.facebook.com/people/Nagaraj-Mysore-Raghupathi/513253184 ,<br />
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw ,<br />
http://twitter.com/naghrw  ,</p>
<p>SHAME   to Chief Justice of India  ,  Prime Minister of India  &amp; President  of  India</p>
<p>In India  half the population is living  in poverty , barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day .  It is hard for them  to earn even Rupees 32 a day  , even children  of those poor families are working  very hard  to  fill their stomach. Whereas , the  public servants  who legally earn  thousands of rupees a day , get 5-star pay , perks , bungalows , cars , etc  at tax payer’s expense. They are cheating the public  , not properly doing their  official duties .  They must learn  hard work , work ethics from these child laborers.  Public servants   neglect  their  official duties , do they neglect  drawing their  monthly salary ? do they  come out of their 5-star quarters ? Public servants neglect their official duties  but not their 5-star pay &amp; perks. SHAME TO THEM.</p>
<p>When specific &amp; general cases  of crimes are brought to the  notice  0f CJI , PM , GOI &amp; President of India repeatedly ,  appropriate action is not at all taken , in turn aiding the criminals in manipulating the evidences &amp; continuing with their illegalities.  Even  our  conditional offer of services  to the government ,  to legally apprehend criminals  is  not honored.  Thereby ,  Chief Justice of India , Prime Minister of India &amp; President of India  they themselves are CRIMINALS.  Do these people know the value  of our hard won independence  ?  Do these people know the sacrifices made by our freedom fighters  ?  The present day  public servants  are  shamelessly misusing their official powers  , squandering  our independence.  SHAME  SHAME  TO   SHAMELESS  PUBLIC  SERVANTS.</p>
<p>A  person committing a criminal offense is a CRIMINAL. The Person who aids a criminal in his criminal act , in hiding the criminal act , in destroying the evidences  of criminal act  is also  a CRIMINAL. The person whose duty is to prevent criminal acts from  happening , who intentionally fails in his preventive duties  and  thereby  facilitating the criminal in committing crime is also a CRIMINAL.</p>
<p>In this way many of our public servants including judges &amp; police themselves are criminals , but are not prosecuted by the authorities , why ?</p>
<p>At the outset , we express  our whole hearted respects to the honest few  public servants in public service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service don’t deserve  respect as individuals – as they are  parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.</p>
<p>All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term“JUDGE” mentioned throught includes all public servants  discharging  judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice of India.</p>
<p>Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages &amp; is for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise  their voice seeking justice  are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be responsible  for it.</p>
<p>Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court of India &amp; other government authorities, in apprehending criminals including corrupt judges &amp; police. Herewith  , we once  again  appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.</p>
<p>The public servants &amp; the government must be role models in law  abiding acts , for others to emulate &amp; follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable &amp; can be corrected by the teacher. if the  teacher himself makes a mistake , all  his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught  , legally punished &amp; reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his patronage.  even if a police , public  servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted &amp; justice can be sought by the  aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime &#8211; violations of RTI Act , constitutional  rights &amp; human rights of public  and obstructs the public from  performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it  gives a booster dose to the rich &amp; mighty , those in power , criminals  in public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is  happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the occassion &amp;  peacefully , democratically  must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF  MAHATMA GANDHI&#8217;S DREAM.</p>
<p>Kindly go through the following articles &amp; provide justice by giving complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the following questionnaire in an unambiguous  manner.</p>
<p>The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect &amp; uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to<br />
protect our national integrity , to respect &amp; protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has  the right to obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal  privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the  FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN&#8217;S OF INDIA.<br />
We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India &amp; by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed  back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether  we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information . so ,<br />
basically Right To Information  is an inalienable part of our  fundamental rights &amp; human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time  limit , responsibilities of public servants up to  certain extent. However the citizen&#8217;s fundamental right &amp; human right to seek  information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.<br />
Hereby , we seek complete  truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to my RTI application appeal no :  APPEAL NO. 300/2010 .. HEREBY , WE ARE  ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS  IN PUBLIC INTEREST &amp;  JUSTICE. Hereby ,  we request you to register this appeal as a PIL  petition &amp; to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters  raised in my RTI Application , in public interest &amp; equitable justice. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM. </p>
<p>Your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Nagaraj.M.R. </p>
<p>……………………..DECLARATION………………………</p>
<p>Name : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;NAGARAJA.M.R.</p>
<p>Address : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP<br />
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE &#8211; 570017 INDIA</p>
<p>Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S &#8211; e – Clarion Of  Dalit</p>
<p>Periodicity : WEEKLY</p>
<p>Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB</p>
<p>Donations : NOT ACCEPTED.  Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .</p>
<p>Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.</p>
<p>Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.</p>
<p>Nationality : INDIAN</p>
<p>Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated  to JSS Medical College , Mysore ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be  handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of  medical students.</p>
<p>Eye Donation : Both EYES  of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated  to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my  eyes  must be  handed over to  Mysore Eye Bank  , Mysore  WITHIN 6 Hours  for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.</p>
<p>Home page :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,<br />
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,       </p>
<p>http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/</p>
<p>Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , naga&#8230;@hotmail.com   ,</p>
<p>UID  Aadhaar  No  :  5703  5339  3479 </p>
<p>Cell : 0 9341820313</p>
<p>I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge &amp; belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.</p>
<p>If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents   or to my family members    &#8211; In such case Chief Justice of  India together with the jurisdictional  revenue &amp; police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india  is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries.  </p>
<p>date :   07.11.2011…………………………..your&#8217;s sincerely,</p>
<p>place : India………………………………… Nagaraja.M.R.</p>
<p>Minister’s DQ proves judges are more corrupt than civil  servant</p>
<p>NEW DELHI/BHUBANESWAR: An investigation by Cobra post and IBN Network has revealed how former and sitting judges of Orissa, police officers and bureaucrats have received flats from the DiscretionaryQuota (DQ) of ministers. As a matter of fact, successive Urban Development Ministers in the Naveen Patnaik government have misused the discretionary housing quota.</p>
<p>According to the revelation, the judges have got the ‘minister quota’ flats out of turn and at cheaper rates.</p>
<p>The IBN Network accessed letters of judges written to the government asking for prime property in Cuttack and Bhubaneswar.</p>
<p>Prime properties were acquired in Cuttack at concession rates, bypassing the Cuttack Development Authority. In fact, Sectors 10, 11 and 13 of Cuttack’s Abhinav Bidanasi project has practically become a judges’ residential colony.</p>
<p>Former Chief Justice G B. Patnaik is a resident of flat 1B/22 in Sector 11 while former Orissa High CourtJudge Radhakrishna Patra has flat 1B/23 in the same sector, given out on lease.</p>
<p>Supreme Court judge Deba Priya Mohapatra, Orissa High Court judges Sanju Panda, Madan Mohan Das, Nityanand Prastuti also own flats in Sector 10 and 11.Papers for the flats were prepared quickly and some judges even got preferred plots.</p>
<p>Most of the allotments took place between 2000 and 2007, under the BJP  cadre Urban and Housing Development Minister  Sameer De who was State Development Minister from 2000-2004 and then Kanak Vardhan Singh Deo who called the shots from 2004 to 2007.</p>
<p>All that the judges had to do was written to the Minister. The CNN-IBN has a letter written by Justice Madan Mohan Das to the CDA Chairman and to Minister Kanak Vardhan Singhdeo, asking for a B-Category Flat in Sector 10, saying he would ensure a third party transfer of a C-Category Flat already owned by his wife.Justice Das was allotted the flat in just six days.</p>
<p>When asked why the discretionary quota was used to make the allotments, Sameer Dey, former Orissa urban development minister, said, “The Orissa act does not have any such rule. There is 5 per cent and 10 per cent allocation in discretionary quota. Apart from that we don’t have any rule.”</p>
<p>Kanak Vardhan Singh Deo, former Orissa urban development minister, said, “The rule is that only those who apply for the project can be allotted land via Discretionary Quota. So if any such person does not apply what can we do?”</p>
<p>CNN-IBN has also found that many of the judges who were allotted land through the discretionary quota already own ancestral property in Cuttack. Yet the ministers were allotted the land they asked for.</p>
<p>Judicial Layout Site Allotment – BRIBE TO JUDGES ?</p>
<p>http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20110919aB001101004&amp;ileft=177&amp;itop=1252&amp;zoomRatio=134&amp;AN=20110919aB001101004  ,</p>
<p>http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20110919a_004101002&amp;ileft=233&amp;itop=92&amp;zoomRatio=130&amp;AN=20110919a_004101002  ,</p>
<p>http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20110919a_004101003&#038;ileft=780&#038;itop=92&#038;zoomRatio=157&#038;AN=20110919a_004101003</p>
<p>CROSS-EXAMINATION   of   Chief Justice of  India  &#8211;  Half of Former Chief Justices of India  are Corrupt</p>
<p> Visit :  http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/answer-my-lord</p>
<p>Is the  allotment of  residential plots to Judges @ yelahanka Judicial Layout , a mode of  paying bribe to judges by the biggest litigant government itself &amp; the  corrupt public servants in the government. So that the government can pass illegal laws like “Regularization of Illegal Buildings” , “ Illegal Appointments to Medical colleges in Hassan , Mysore” ,etc &amp;  ministers , IAS officers  can indulge in illegal unconstitutional acts , but the courts will not  take any  appropriate action suo motto or based on any petition. IT IS  MUTUAL HELP , NEXUS OF TWO CRIMINALS – JUDICIARY &amp; GOVERNMENT. Ofcourse , there are honest few exceptions in judiciary &amp; government. We Respect those honest few.</p>
<p>Information input  forms part of process of one’s expression. One’s expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information &amp; Expression are inseparable parts &amp; form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person’s  right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also  are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.</p>
<p>In a democracy , people have a right to know  how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding  behind the veil of  Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created  by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption  , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview &amp; bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.</p>
<p>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India  , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to  millions  of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of  Indian judges , police &amp; public servants  .   The  information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals  in public service.  The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the  questions. </p>
<p>KIADB de-notification scandal , BMIC – NICE SCANDAL  , Illegal Judicial Lay-out , MINING SCANDALS and Threats to RTI Applicant</p>
<p>-  PIL Appeal To Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of Mandamus</p>
<p> Just months back , we have witnessed the collapse of a multi storied building in bellary ,Karnataka &amp; we have witnessed  a fire tragedy in a  multi-storey building in Bangalore,  months ago there was collapse of a huge building under construction in Bangalore , all resulting in loss of human lives. Recently we have seen de-notification scam involving VVIPs . All these are the result of violations of Urban Town Planning Laws , Building bye-laws which  are observed more in breach by the criminals &amp; conniving public servants .  The authorities are behaving like real estate agents of criminals , by-passing norms , framing laws to the tune of criminals . Authorities are not honoring RTI requests &amp; even high ranking IAS officer  repeatedly threatens a commoner  seeking information under RTI ACT .</p>
<p>Before embarking on land acquisition for any projects government authorities must plan &amp; assess what are the actual requirement of land for that particular project. After finding out the actual requirement of land , they must  assess the loss of forest area , cost of compensation pay-out , cost of rehabilitation of people , environmental damages &amp; resultant health damages to people in surrounding areas ,it’s resultant losses when the project gets running , if at all the benefits , profits from that project far outweighs the losses ,then only project should be put before the public for their consent. Ministers &amp; IAS officers must not take these decisions all by themselves in a hush – hush manner.</p>
<p>Even when a project is downsized , from the previously approved size , the land left over , surplus land must be given back to the original owner on first priority . The project managers must not sell those surplus lands to third parties for a premium .</p>
<p>Even when KIADB ,BDA ,MUDA &amp; other authorities acquire lands from farmers ,for constructing industrial  parks or residential layouts , etc , has framed comprehensive development plans (CDP) for their respective cities , clearly demarcating land usage pattern . However after acquisition of land , the KIADB , BDA , MUDA , etc are selling those very lands to private third parties for different land usage purposes ,completely violating CDP. Are these KIADB , BDA , BBMP , MUDA ,MCC real estate agents of Rich people ?</p>
<p>Now , consider NICE – BMIC SCANDAL or MINING Scandals , public servants in responsible positions are accusing each other , there by proving that almost all of them are criminals. In democracy , ministers &amp; IAS officers are public servants , MLAs , MPs are not leaders just public servants  &#8211; representative of people. They must represent people’s wishes &amp; must order the IAS &amp; other officers to fulfil the wishes of people as per legal provisions.</p>
<p>Information input  forms part of process of one&#8217;s expression. One&#8217;s expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information &amp; Expression are inseparable parts &amp; form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person&#8217;s  right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also  are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.</p>
<p>In a democracy , people have a right to know  how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding  behind the veil of  Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created  by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption  , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview &amp; bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.</p>
<p>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India  , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to  millions  of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of  Indian judges , police &amp; public servants  .   The  information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals  in public service.  The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : &#8220;writ of Mandamus&#8221; and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the  questions. </p>
<p>Hereby , e-voice urges the  concerned authorities  , to answer the following questionnaire about BMIC project by NICE</p>
<p>http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20100214a_009101001&#038;ileft=50&#038;itop=56&#038;zoomRatio=130&#038;AN=20100214a_009101001</p>
<p>NICE Corridor Questions to  Former CHIEF MINISTER .Mr.Yediyurappa</p>
<p>Read full questionnaire </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/nice-corridor-questions-to-chie\</p>
<p>f-minister</p>
<p>Editorial : Threats to  Human Rights Activist / RTI Applicant &#8211;  An Appeal to CIC , KIC &amp;  Chief  Justice  of India</p>
<p>shame shame to VVIPs , Public servants  who are  hiding truths , who are covering up crimes , by denying RTI REQUESTS  to us.</p>
<p>In India , many Corrupt public servants  don’t  honour  RTI  requests with one pretext or the other. They are aware that the information if given will become evidences  of their criminals acts. They go to any length to hide truth , to hide information. They murder RTI Applicants , fix them in cases , etc. Nowadays  murders of RTI Applicants , Human Rights Activists are frequent.<br />
I have myself suffered threats , attempts to murder me , closure of my news paper , loss of  job , etc at the hands of criminal nexus. Example : I have requested Mysore district , district magistrate for information under RTI regarding illegalities worth crores of rupees , instead of taking action against the culprits , Preventing further irregularities , illegalities , criminals he repeatedly abused me &amp; threatened me. The illegalities continued , a lake was partially closed illegally allotted to an industrialist alleged to be very close to the state Industries minister. In the same way I have been threatened by police often , I have even received threatening phone calls from a person claiming himself to be a UP High Court Judge.<br />
To my previous  appeals to CIC &amp; KIC , they were mum , as it concerns a Commoner  it won’t give them any image build up , publicity or TRP ratings instead  it will raise the heckles of powers that be marring the future prospects , lucrative postings , etc   of  CIC  &amp; KIC members .<br />
Bureaucrats are of secretive nature , a career bureaucrat if appointed to information commission , he works against the principle of Transparency &amp; RTI . If further the career bureaucrat happens to be utterly corrupt  &amp; given posting in Information commission as a favor by his corrupt colleagues in the government , RTI &amp; RTI Applicant will suffer , die. Example : Karnataka state information commissioner Mr. H.N Krishna.</p>
<p>Ofcourse , there are few honest people in public service including in information commissions . We respect those honest few  &amp; request  their  support  in apprehending their corrupt colleagues . If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents , together with the criminals all the members of CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION &amp; KARNATAKA STATEINFORMATION COMMISSION  will be responsible for it. Subject to conditions , hereby I do offer my services to CIC , KIC &amp; GOI in apprehending  , legally prosecuting  criminals , corrupt public servants , etc.<br />
Hereby , I do request the CIC &amp; KIC to order the concerned officials to give information in following cases &amp; RTI Requests mentioned below.<br />
RTI Request made to Dy Chairman , Rajyasabha , New Delhi<br />
SA/UG/11/14290f12f</p>
<p>RTI Request made to Union Home Minister , GOI , New Delhi<br />
SA/UG/11/14291iwho</p>
<p>RTI  Request  made to Chief Justice of India , New Delhi<br />
SA/UG/11/14287gink</p>
<p>RTI Request made to President of India , New Delhi<br />
SA/UG/11/14288iv66</p>
<p>RTI Request made to Loksabha Speaker , New Delhi<br />
SA/UG/11/142892yj9</p>
<p>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India  , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to  millions  of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of  Indian judges , police &amp; public servants  .   The  information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals  in public service.  The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : &#8220;writ of Mandamus&#8221; and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the  questions.</p>
<p>Jai  Hind. Vande Mataram.</p>
<p>Your’s sincerely ,<br />
Nagaraja M R .</p>
<p>POLICE  NOT  REGISTERING  COMPLAINT   AGAINST  CHIEF  JUSTICE OF<br />
INDIA  &amp;  OTHERS</p>
<p>From, </p>
<p>NAGARAJ.M.R.<br />
LIG-2 / 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE,<br />
LAXMIKANTANGAR, HEBBAL,<br />
MYSORE &#8211; 570017.</p>
<p>Through, </p>
<p>Honourable DG &amp; IG of Police ,<br />
State Police H.Q ,<br />
Bangalore.</p>
<p>To,</p>
<p>Honourable Circle Inspector of Police,<br />
Vijayanagar Police Station,<br />
Mysore.</p>
<p>Honourable Sir,</p>
<p>   Subject : Violation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; HUMAN RIGHTS by Honourable Chief Jusice of India &amp;  H.E.Honourable President of India &amp; other public servants </p>
<p>                   Karnataka Police are NOT registering &amp; acting on my  complaint  to them dated  04.07.2009</p>
<p>A  person committing a criminal offense is a CRIMINAL. The Person  who aids a criminal in his criminal act , in hiding the criminal act , in destroying the evidences  of criminal act  is also  a CRIMINAL. The<br />
person whose duty is to prevent criminal acts from  happening , who intentionally fails in his preventive duties  and  thereby facilitating  the criminal in committing crime is also a CRIMINAL.</p>
<p>Information  given by government  authorities are EVIDENCES , denial of information  amounts to hiding  of evidence ,  improper , half truth information given  amounts to MANIPULATION &amp; DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCES. In this way many of our public servants including judges &amp; police themselves are criminals , but are not prosecuted by the authorities , why ?</p>
<p>Due to delay in giving appropriate  information , many crimes have  taken place which could have been prevented. As the delay in taking action , giving information / evidence is on the part of government<br />
authorities , the issue of TIME BARRED FOR ADMISSABILITY doesn’t arise. At the outset , we express  our whole hearted respects to the honest few  public servants in public service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service don’t deserve  respect as individuals – as they are  parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.<br />
All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term “JUDGE” mentioned throught includes all public servants  discharging judicial<br />
functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice of India.<br />
Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages &amp; is for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise  their voice seeking justice  are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already<br />
attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be<br />
responsible  for it.<br />
The Vijayanagar police in mysore stated that  they don’t have legal jurisdiction to book the criminals I have mentioned in the complaint &amp; by taking a statement from me to that effect  closed the case<br />
temporarily on  11.09.2010  after sitting over the complaint  for years together. Is it not the  duty of  DG&amp;IGP to seek the permission from home ministry to legally prosecute the alleged criminal VVIPs ?<br />
Why he was silent ? Ofcourse the lower rung police officers practically don’t have power to prosecute high &amp; mighty ?<br />
Hereby , I do request the  DG &amp; IG OF Police , Government of Karnataka to seek the legal sanction from union home ministry &amp; Karnataka state home ministry , for the prosecution of  below mentioned criminal VVIPs &amp; to reopen my complaint here with.<br />
In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are equal , have right to equal oppurtunity &amp; equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the constitution has guaranteed these to every<br />
Indian citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of his / her birth. However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLIC SERVANTS have forgotten this &amp; are acting as lords , autocrats &#8211; unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS<br />
appointed to serve the public, public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &amp; paymasters of this very same public servants. In India , corruption has spread it’s tentacles far &amp; wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there corruption has spread .In present day India , if one is rich , he can committ any type of crime &amp; get away clean from courts of law. there are corrupt police officials who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up different line of investigation ,  fix innocents , coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture , file B report closing the case , decides not to appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the list of millionnaire police officials who are caught by karnataka lokayukta.</p>
<p>Next step , the prosecutor &amp; defense advocate strikes a deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way of presentation of case &amp; way of argument favouring the rich crooks for a price , as observed in high profile BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN &amp; defense counsel RK ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police &amp; advocates , together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is left high &amp; dry even though the judge is honest, he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is corrupt , people’s last hope , democracy is dead. Nowadays we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.</p>
<p>our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION before hon’ble supreme court of India but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ? ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS.<br />
The issues raised by us for sample :<br />
1. sale of fake medicines &amp; adulterated food products , beverages , colas affecting the health of millions of Indians &amp; public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous products from india .<br />
2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits , tribals , backward castes by government authorities whereas regularising  illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings by high &amp; mighty people in total disregard to law. in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying court orders &amp; enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.<br />
3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws , pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.<br />
4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants leaking india’s defense secrets to foreign countries &amp; some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM &amp; underworld dons in gulf countries &amp; elsewhere. these type of appeals are for public good , national security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of india is not considering our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good , inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints. over &amp; above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was very low &amp; i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me. Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals  the Honourable chief justice of India &amp; H.E.Honourable President of India are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &amp; PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high &amp; mighty criminals , anti nationals , amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a cognizable offence.</p>
<p>SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA </p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-&#8230;</p>
<p>DEALS IN COURTS  &amp;  POLICE  STATIONS   READ :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html  ,<br />
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</p>
<p>, </p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</p>
<p>CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF<br />
INDIA -<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF DG&amp;IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/<br />
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/<br />
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –<br />
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/  , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/<br />
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/  , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED<br />
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218</p>
<p>MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>are you ready to catch tax thieves ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>reliance industry where is accountability ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>crimes at infosys campus<br />
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214</p>
<p>crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>crimes of land mafia in India<br />
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://landscam.wordpress.com/   , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>currency thefts in RBI Press<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80</p>
<p>killer colas &amp; killer medicines of India<br />
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201</p>
<p>We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies , public servants , but it is an appeal to the honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt colleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of India &amp; H.E.Honourable President of India have violated their oaths of office , failed in their constitutional duties , suppressed material truths / informations &amp; thereby repeatedly violated my Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS &amp; Obstructing me from performing constitutionally prescribed FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA.</p>
<p>Hereby , i do request you to legally prosecute the below mentioned public servants  ACCUSED CRIMINALS  viz</p>
<p>1.      H.E.Honourable President of India<br />
2. Honourable Chief Justice Of India<br />
3. Union Home Secretary , GOI<br />
4. Governor , Reserve Bank Of India<br />
5. Director-General &amp; Inspector General Of Police , government of karnataka<br />
6. Commissioner , Bangalore Development Authority<br />
7. Commissioner , Mysore Urban Development Authority<br />
8. Commissioner , Mysore City Corporation<br />
9. Labour Commissioner , government of karnataka and<br />
10. all public servants belonging to tax dept , pollution control board , etc mentioned in the above cases with web links, on the above mentioned charges.</p>
<p> the whole issue of this news paper &amp; the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of this<br />
complaint. If i am  repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the<br />
government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police<br />
station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my<br />
family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if<br />
criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.</p>
<p>if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , public servants &amp; Constitutional functionaries. Thanking you.<br />
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.</p>
<p>Date : 19.03.2011…………………………Your’s sincerely,<br />
Place : Mysore……………………………Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p> FINAL SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO  HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA ,  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  &amp; OTHERS</p>
<p>In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT TO INFORMATION &amp; EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps &amp; leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least bothered about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats , parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these people want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.<br />
To my numerous appeals , HRW&#8217;s appeals to you ,you have not yet replied. It clearly shows that you are least bothered about the lives of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to protect the criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the police to enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to police station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy &#8220;legal immunity privileges&#8221; ,why don&#8217;t you have given powers to the police / investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why don&#8217;t all of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily for enquiry ?at the least why don&#8217;t all of you are not sending your statement about the case to the police either through legal counsel or  through post? you are aiding criminals ,by denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city civil court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc &amp; by illegally closing my newspaper.<br />
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of  office. this amounts to public cheating &amp; moral turpitude on your  part.<br />
1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.<br />
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.<br />
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.<br />
4.you are sponsoring &amp; aiding terorrism &amp; organized crime.<br />
5.you are violating the fundamental &amp; human rights of the citizens of  india and of neighbouring countries.<br />
6.you are violating &amp; making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER  to which india is a signatory.<br />
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a  citizen of india.<br />
you are hereby called upon to SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you  cann&#8217;t be legally prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes .</p>
<p>If i am  repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.<br />
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking you.<br />
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.</p>
<p>Date :  19.03.2011……………………………………………..your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Place : Mysore , India………………………&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..Nagaraj M R</p>
<p>An  Appeal to  Honourable United Nations Human Rights High Commissioner   &amp;   Honourable International Court of Justice</p>
<p>Dear Madam / Sir ,</p>
<p>SUBJECT :  HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS  BY   GOVERNMENT OF INDIA  &amp; SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</p>
<p>I have individually suffered numerous human rights violations , injustices  by  public servants working for government of India  when I raised my voice seeking justice for my fellow countrymen . for the society. These public servants are involved in crimes like aiding &amp; abetting terrorism , underworld , manslaughter , etc.  when I appealed to the supreme court of India seeking justice , they  have turned their blind eye. As a result more injustices are being committed till date. Even the police are not registering the complaint  against these guilty public servants.  Police &amp; Supreme Court Judges in league with CRIMINALS , ANTI NATIONALS , TERORRISTS ?</p>
<p>In India , some Parliamentarians take money for even  raising Questions in parliament , favorable laws / government rules are  enacted  to favor  rich criminals (refer 2G &amp; Nira Radia scam). Police for a price manipulate evidence ,  prematurely close case , fix innocent  &amp; mete out 3rd degree torture , murder in the name of encounter . Public prosecutor can change the way of argument , etc for a price. Even judges in India give favorable judicial orders for money , SEX , post retirement benefits , etc. please refer details at following web pages :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-fixed ,<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/3rd-degree-torture-by-indian-police  ,</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-for-a-price</p>
<p>I have not got justice till date , instead I have suffered physical assaults , murder attempts on me , my newspaper was illegally clamped down , my job opportunities  were illegally snatched away (cutting off the source of livelihood). I  have been threatened by police that I &amp; my family members will be fixed up in criminal cases (false implication) &amp; will be behind the bars for rest of our life.  I have been refused  proper medical care in government hospitals , so that  I will die sooner . All these  Injustices  are meted out at the hands of criminal nexus of CRIMINAL – POLICE– JUDGE &#8211;  BUREAUCRAT – MP / MLA .</p>
<p>Democracy is the best form of governance. My motherland India is one of the greatest country.  However  Criminals  have entered into  halls of parliament , criminals have become judges , criminals have become police ,  almost total criminalization of public service has taken place. These criminals are framing laws for the masses much against the democratic aspirations of the masses. Criminal judges are relying on these laws made by criminals &amp; sending innocents to gallows .  Criminal Police  are making deals with criminals &amp;  arresting , torturing innocents.</p>
<p>Still very few HONEST people are left in public service  &#8211; Parliament , Judiciary &amp; Police , However they are keeping mum. My  struggle is not against the government of India or it’s constitutional bodies rather it is against the corrupt people who are  in those bodies . I do have whole hearted respects for the government of India &amp; it’s constitutional bodies , But I despise the corrupt people over there in those institutions. Our system is good , many of the people working there are not good. It is struggle against those corrupt people , to save our democracy , to save our freedom.</p>
<p>Hereby , I do request your honourableselves  Honourable United Nations Human Rights High Commissioner  and  Honourable International Court  Of  Justice  , to  order  the Honourable Supreme Court of India , Government of India to do it’s  constitutional duties  properly  , to safeguard  the human rights of  all and  to  provide justice in the matter.  Thanking You.</p>
<p>Date : 15th July 2011 ……………………………..Your’s Sincerely ,<br />
Place : Mysore , India………………………………Nagaraj . M . R .</p>
<p>Tax  Thieves  Corporate  Terrorists  of  India</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/10/tax-thieves-corporate-terrorists-of.html</p>
<p>Judgement  Fixing in Indian  Courts of Law / Justice</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-09-20T06%3A30%3A00-07%3A00&#038;max-results=1</p>
<p>Murderers of Justice</p>
<p>https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/murderers-of-justice</p>
<p>BOFORS , QUATROCHI  &amp;  RAJIV ASSASINATION</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/bofors-quattrochi-rajiv-assasination</p>
<p>Threats  to  RTI  / Human  Rights  Activist</p>
<p>https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-judgement-fixing</p>
<p>Mechanics of Corruption in Indian Judiciary</p>
<p>http://www.livemint.com/2007/05/02160432/8F771B83-547A-4758-BA01-0C2C57B70065ArtVPF.pdf</p>
<p> RTI QUESTIONS HONOURABLE GOVERNOR OF RESEVE BANK OF INDIA IS  EVADING  TO ANSWER</p>
<p>SOILED NOTE FRAUD CASE @ RBI BANGALORE<br />
-       Trauma of an old man</p>
<p>Complete case details also available at http://members.lycos.co.uk/ganapathihariram/</p>
<p>As per allegations of RBI management Bangalore in 1977-79 , criminal<br />
nexus of RBI employees stole Rs. 220000 from RBI Bangalore. All the<br />
banks , government treasuries in Karnataka , submit defaced / soiled<br />
currency notes to RBI Bangalore in exchange for good notes. RBI after<br />
collecting such defaced currency notes , sorts out fairly good notes<br />
which can be reissued &amp; burns off the remaining totally defaced<br />
currency notes. All these process is done in a systematic manner.</p>
<p>As per allegations of the management , the crime took place in the<br />
period of 1977-79 at RBI Bangalore. A nexus of employees, took away<br />
the currency bundles meant for destruction &amp; substituted it in the<br />
place of bundles of reissuables.</p>
<p>Charge sheet issued by RBI Bangalore office to mr.G.Hariram<br />
Staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 1 april 1985<br />
Amended charge sheet staff no 3798/156-84/85 dt 8 april 1985</p>
<p>CBI has charge sheeted 17 employees in connection with this case ,<br />
case olde no. cc34/1989       new no.  sc 436/1991            . the honourable 21 city additional city civil &amp; sessions court Bangalore in it&#8217;s order dated 24.01.1992<br />
   discharged        03  charge sheeted employees , as the prosecution<br />
failed to prove the charges against them. They came out clean , as<br />
they were innocents saddled with the crime done by others. One of the<br />
charge sheeted employee who turned approver for the prosecution, has<br />
given detailed account of the crime. Nowhere he has mentioned the<br />
involvement of accussed no.15 mr.G.Hariram in the crime.</p>
<p>Even after coming out clean, mr.G.Hariram was not reinstated into<br />
service by RBI. They gave the ruse of domestic enquiry &amp; showed<br />
contempt to the court order. On appeal, the honourable high court of<br />
Karnataka ordered RBI to review it&#8217;s order with respect to<br />
mr.G.Hariram , still RBI failed to reinstate mr.G.Hariram into service<br />
, once gain showing contempt to the court of law.</p>
<p>In India as per law , the decisions of court of law are binding on all<br />
, orders of court over rides the organisation&#8217;s internal rules ,<br />
service rules , etc. inspite of lack of evidences, in a whimsical<br />
manner the higher authorities of RBI , fixed some innocents as the<br />
scape goats heaped all charges against them ( against whom they had<br />
personal grudge , dislikes ). RBI  repeatedly showed contempt to the<br />
court orders , dismissed the scape goat &#8211; ailing old man mr.G.Hariram<br />
from service. RBI snatched away his PF money towards the alleged loss<br />
to the bank , didn&#8217;t pay his gratuity amount , salary arrears and<br />
finally he was even deprived of the pension. As a result , the old man<br />
has even lost his social prestige, dignity , his family suffered a lot<br />
&amp; he is a mental wreck today.</p>
<p>Why RBI authoroties are hell bent upon to send away the innocents /<br />
scape goats away from service ? why CBI didn&#8217;t conduct polygraph tests<br />
of all the accussed , specifically higher officers of RBI , managers<br />
of RBI office Bangalore ? probably the scape goats were aware of the<br />
crimes master minded by higher ups &amp; didn&#8217;t co-operate with the higher<br />
ups in their crimes. So, the criminals were afraid that the scape<br />
goats will blurt out truth to the world , fixed non co-operating<br />
innocents themselves as criminals.</p>
<p>Who will give justice to innocents like old man mr.G.Hariram &amp; who<br />
will bell the corrupt , criminals , fat cats of RBI ?</p>
<p>APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &amp; GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA</p>
<p>APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005</p>
<p>( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )</p>
<p>FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.,</p>
<p>EDITOR , E-VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH,</p>
<p># LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,</p>
<p>HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,</p>
<p>HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA</p>
<p>PIN – 570017.</p>
<p>DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION REQUIRED :</p>
<p>HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS &#8211; WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.<br />
WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO  old CC34 / 1989 &amp; NEW NO SC436/1991   AT 21 ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL &amp; SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE</p>
<p>CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE</p>
<p>CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985</p>
<p>Amended charge sheet  staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985</p>
<p>1. Why didn&#8217;t you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 &amp; 79 till the<br />
mid of  1979 ?</p>
<p>2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good<br />
Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your<br />
inspection division working properly ?</p>
<p>3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry &amp; exit<br />
out of premises ?</p>
<p>4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of<br />
value of bags of reissuable notes &amp; bags of note meant for destruction<br />
, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,<br />
value of notes issued for sorting ?</p>
<p>5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all<br />
the employees of those sections ?</p>
<p>6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 &amp; protect respective<br />
documents relating to such high profile crime ?</p>
<p>7. why didn&#8217;t you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &amp;<br />
waited till 1983 ?</p>
<p>8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same<br />
sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic enquiry ?</p>
<p>9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before<br />
the court ?</p>
<p>10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested interests ?</p>
<p>11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while<br />
preparing charge sheet &amp; during investigation , instead  of<br />
independent investigation ?</p>
<p>12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused<br />
the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic<br />
enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records<br />
have been destroyed. Are not CBI &amp; RBI responsible for destruction of<br />
evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?</p>
<p>13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations<br />
for preserving old documents / records ?</p>
<p>14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken<br />
utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for<br />
producing before courts of law as &amp; when demanded. But it  didn&#8217;t , why ?</p>
<p>15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,<br />
with the criminals ?</p>
<p>16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead<br />
of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of defense ?</p>
<p>17. RBI authorities have stated  that court proceedings &amp; domestic<br />
enquiry are independent of each other &amp; are not binding on one<br />
another. However  RBI authorities straight away took on record of<br />
domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn&#8217;t honour<br />
the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?</p>
<p>18. The alleged crime  was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was<br />
framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?</p>
<p>19. didn&#8217;t this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,<br />
manipulate evidences ?</p>
<p>20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note<br />
packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?</p>
<p>21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher<br />
officers &#8211; S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA &amp; others ,<br />
if not why ?</p>
<p>22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high<br />
ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?</p>
<p>23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,<br />
negligent higher officials ?</p>
<p>24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the<br />
line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative<br />
of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become<br />
illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?</p>
<p>25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct<br />
any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the<br />
misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though<br />
mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why  RBI has denied his<br />
pension ?</p>
<p>26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over &amp; above ,<br />
domestic enquiry committees &amp; judicial orders supersedes the domestic<br />
enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court &amp; didn&#8217;t<br />
reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?</p>
<p>27. even if an employee&#8217;s misconduct causing loss to the bank is<br />
proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the<br />
bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.<br />
But in mr.G.Hariram&#8217;s case , pension was denied in full without taking<br />
previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?</p>
<p>28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000<br />
to the bank &amp; recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was<br />
nothing left over to recover , still RBI  completely denied pension to<br />
mr.G.Hariram , why ?</p>
<p>29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should<br />
be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court<br />
of law. In mr.G.Hariram&#8217;s case , CBI &amp; RBI failed to prove the charges<br />
in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.<br />
To cover-up it&#8217;s failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much<br />
beyond court orders date &amp; gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does<br />
the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over &amp; above<br />
the court of law ? is it not illegal &amp; contempt of court ?</p>
<p>30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court<br />
against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But<br />
it was not done , why ?</p>
<p>31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension<br />
period ?</p>
<p>32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of<br />
key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in<br />
giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central<br />
board&#8217;s sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher<br />
management. What disciplinary action has been taken against<br />
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF &amp; others ? if not why ?</p>
<p>33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?</p>
<p>34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate<br />
mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge sheet ?</p>
<p>35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual<br />
happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation<br />
towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?</p>
<p>36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of bundled verified defective note packets ?</p>
<p>37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted officers illegal ?</p>
<p>38. how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went missing ?</p>
<p>39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?</p>
<p>40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head / expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed from packets made into new bundles , right ?</p>
<p>41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst treasurers are there , who didn&#8217;t work at all on that day is not it ?</p>
<p>42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals , putting some innocents seals over the notes ?</p>
<p>43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification section ?</p>
<p>44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?</p>
<p>45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?</p>
<p>46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &amp; 1979 ?</p>
<p>47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry &amp; court proceedings ?</p>
<p>48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so &amp; so. He has clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he himself is not 100% sure ?</p>
<p>49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this , on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn&#8217;t it ?</p>
<p>50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn&#8217;t notice3 any fraud. However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no action has been taken ?</p>
<p>51. why you didn&#8217;t produce all records of all persons , who have specifically worked in alleged sections , the registers of those departments with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet nos , bag nos , etc ?</p>
<p>52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?</p>
<p>53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not there to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn&#8217;t it ?</p>
<p>54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up officers they dislike &amp; falsely implicating them ?</p>
<p>55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from original criminals ?</p>
<p>56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79 mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not withheld ?</p>
<p>57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for picking up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal prosecution and leaving the majority of probables ?</p>
<p>58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why you didn&#8217;t even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone legal prosecution ?</p>
<p>59. Is it RBI&#8217;s &amp; CBI&#8217;s way of fair play &amp; justice ?</p>
<p>60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed 95% lot , isn&#8217;t it ?</p>
<p>61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections, some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play &amp; legal ?</p>
<p>62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?</p>
<p>63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted , dismissed &amp; their pension , gratuity withheld ?</p>
<p>64. you don&#8217;t have any internal statuotary records to prove that mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer&#8217;s office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted just to fix mr.G.Hariram ?</p>
<p>65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?</p>
<p>66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out of 40 officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of 1095 working days , he has worked for only 223 days in those sections , still those officers who worked for more days in those sections are not charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able to say on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI higher authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?</p>
<p>67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired &amp; let off why ?</p>
<p>68.        the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say substitution of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between loss of one number of note &amp; 100 number of notes ?</p>
<p>69. as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of bundles only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the failure of statuotary system of work practices ?<br />
70. does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI &amp; CBI were hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram &amp; to shield the original criminals ?<br />
Questions with respect to other cases :<br />
71. how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?<br />
72. how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks have invested ?<br />
73. how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank officials , who work in shares investment / equity funds section , etc ?<br />
74. inspite of project reports by bank officials , over assessment of collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank officials , the loans become NPAs &amp; full value cann&#8217;t be realized in the market by selling off the assets of debtor companies also. In such cases , what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude with criminal industrialists for availing higher amount of loan than permissible ?<br />
75. give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.<br />
76. give names of industrial groups / promoters whose companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them , before investing in new companies promoted by them.<br />
77. is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?<br />
78. why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?<br />
79. if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ? but debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?<br />
80. what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?<br />
81. what action has been taken against those involved ?<br />
82. have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are powerful &amp; bigwigs ?<br />
83. how you are controlling the illegal finance activities , money lending by individuals , pawn brokers &amp; chit fund companies ?<br />
84. how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations , foreign donations by many NGOs ?<br />
85. how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?<br />
Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE<br />
86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?</p>
<p>87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for what criminal roles ?</p>
<p>88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?</p>
<p>89. who is responsible for installing, operating &amp; supervising the security set-up in R.B.I ?</p>
<p>90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are accounted for in inward stores &amp; while issuing for printing ?</p>
<p>91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process are accounted for?</p>
<p>92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?</p>
<p>93. Who keeps physical figures &amp; possession of goods, inventory of all the above?</p>
<p>94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?</p>
<p>95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?<br />
96. Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?<br />
97. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?<br />
98. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistants &amp; maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the year 1996-1998 ?<br />
99. is not RBI &amp; BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?<br />
100. still why BRBNMPL &amp; RBI refused to answer my previous information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons will come out of cubboard ?<br />
101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore &amp; SBI Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of rupees ? if not why ?<br />
102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?<br />
103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing huge losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?</p>
<p>YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1988 onwards . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947. </p>
<p>FEES PAID : IPO NO 63E 318935 FOR RUPEES TEN ONLY Favouring CPIO RBI HQ MUMBAI</p>
<p>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :<br />
V.S.DAS , CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER , O/O HONOURABLE GOVERNOR, RBI HQ , CENTRAL OFFICE , AMAR BUILDING , P.M.MARG ,MUMBAI-400001.</p>
<p>Date : 01.11.2008……………………. Your’s sincerely,<br />
Place : Mysore…………………………….. Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>FINANCE SCAMS IN INDIA &amp; 5-STAR LEADERS WITH BEGGING BOWL</p>
<p>In &#8221; mysooru mithra&#8221; a kannada daily dated 15/06/2005, the editor has written about a copy of the complaint made by Transparency International India-Bangalore to central vigilance commission of india.</p>
<p>In indian banks , there is a strange practice that whenever a cheque is put before the clearing house by a bank, the clearing house sends that cheque to the service branch of bank paying. The service branch then sends that cheque to the appropriate bank branch<br />
for deduction of cash from the cheque account. In this travel , if the cheque is lost or misplaced midway, the service branch pays out of it&#8217;s suspense account to the cash collecting bank. Logically, afterwards the service branch must initiate a thorough inquiry, get authentication from both persons one who gave cheque &amp; other who collected cheque. Finally, the money must be transferred from the account of cheque giver to the suspense account.</p>
<p>However , upto 1997 two branches of state bank of india in bangalore &amp; overseas branch sufferred from frequent loss of cheques totally amounting to RUPEES THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED CRORE. In all cases of cheque loss the bank has paid out of suspense account, totally amounting to Rs.3200 crore. However the bank has not<br />
initiated any enquiry to recover that amount from the cheque givers.</p>
<p>In the 1997 internal audit report of the bank itself , this has been clearly pointed out. Till date, even the central vigilance commission has not initiated any action about it. A member of central vigilance commission happens to be ex-chairman of state bank of india.</p>
<p>It is just an instance of two branches of SBI, what about hundreds of branches of SBI, what about thousands of branches of other public sector,private sector &amp; co-operative banks. It is fraud,fraud,fraud all the way. Few months back to cover-up the crimes<br />
of global trust bank ( GTB) , it was taken over by oriental bank of commerce ( OBC).<br />
While sanctioning a loan of just Rs.10000 to a common man , he has to comply with lengthy legalities. If he defaults, bankers breath down his neck, bankers send rowdies in the form of recovery agents to humiliate the common man &amp; his properties are<br />
auctioned-off, finally all dues to the last penny are recovered. In most of the cases bankers even force the defaulters to commit suicide. However influential persons easily gets loans amounting to hundreds of crores of rupees, coolly defaults, siphons-off the funds &amp; shuts his shop. No recovery at all , just it becomes a non- performing asset (NPA) in the bank ledger. The total NPAs of all public sector banks is more than Rs.80000 crore. This burden is spead over the crores of hapless indians.</p>
<p>The government takes pride in murdering forest brigand veerappan. The ill-gotten wealth of veerappan is not even pea nuts before this huge amount. Remember past finance scams –MS SHOES, HAWALA, HARSHAD MEHTA SHARE SCAM, KETAN PAREKH SHARE SCAM, UTI, etc. totally in all these scams billions of dollars of public money have gone to the coffers of criminals. These scamsters put veerappan to shame in their turnover. However the government is not even exhibiting a fraction of it&#8217;s ELIMINATE VEERAPPAN DRIVE against these scamsters, why?</p>
<p>In india, both central &amp; state government tax/ revenue officials are neck deep in corruption. By, taking bribe they make lower assessment of income, gains, etc &amp; spare businessmen from the tax payment. The government in return for favours received from<br />
lobbies, gives tax exemptions to them at it&#8217;s sweet will. All these scams &amp; it&#8217;s cover-ups are insider jobs. The government is not interested to collect, recover it&#8217;s own monies<br />
amounting to billions of billions of dollars every year. However our 5-star leaders living at the expense of tax-payers, go-on foreign jaunts with a begging bowl for a few lakhs of dollars. What a shame?</p>
<p>More than 50 billion indians are barely surviving on a single meal per day &amp; hundreds are dying due to starvation, billions don&#8217;t even have basic necessities of life. If the government even just collects a fraction of it&#8217;s dues from scamsters, defaulting industrialists – people won&#8217;t die of hunger in india. Has this enlightened our thick skinned netas ?<br />
AN APPEAL TO Mr.P.CHIDAMBARAM UNION FINANCE MINISTER GOVERNMENT OF<br />
INDIA </p>
<p>An age old saying – AS THE KING SO DOES THE SUBJECTS. In india various financial scams, crimes &amp; it&#8217;s cover-ups have taken place amounting to billions of billions of dollars have taken place, made possible , just due to the involvement of the king – the netas &amp; government officials themselves in the shameful act – the crime.</p>
<p>The tax officials are utterly corrupt, the wards of these officials spend double their pappa&#8217;s salary just during<br />
weekends. Now, realise their financial might. These ill-gotten wealth is destabilising our economy &amp; might have even found it&#8217;s way into the hands of underworld, terorrists. INDIA WILL BE DEFEATED FROM<br />
CRIMINAL FORCES WITHIN LIKE THIS NOT FROM THE EXTERNAL FORCES.</p>
<p>Hereby, the HRW urges you to make public:</p>
<p>1. the financial worth of finance minister to tax official at circle level, on annual basis including his spouse&#8217;s worth &amp; property details.</p>
<p>2. to make public the NPAs, losses &amp; monies under litigation by both private &amp; public sector banks annually.</p>
<p>3. to make public measures taken to recover these monies.</p>
<p>4. to publish annual accounts with complete details of discretionary funds allotted to the defence ministry, president, prime minister, chief ministers , governors &amp; intelligence agencies.</p>
<p>Public want to know whether proper discretion is being applied while spending.</p>
<p>RTI QUESTIONS  COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) &amp; COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE  CITY CORPORATION ) ARE EVADING  TO ANSWER</p>
<p>APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &amp; GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA</p>
<p>APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005</p>
<p>( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )</p>
<p>FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT :</p>
<p>NAGARAJ.M.R.,</p>
<p>EDITOR , E-VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH,</p>
<p># LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,</p>
<p>HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,</p>
<p>HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA , PIN – 570017.</p>
<p>DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION REQUIRED :</p>
<p>HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS &#8211; WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.</p>
<p>1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the mysore city&#8217;s comprehensive city development plan ?</p>
<p>2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?</p>
<p>4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?</p>
<p>6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &amp; commercial site ? if not why ?</p>
<p>7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>9. how much of MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s / GOVERNMENT&#8217;s lands , sites , buildings &amp; houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?</p>
<p>10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s resolution instead of of reallotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?</p>
<p>12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?</p>
<p>13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies &amp; real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT &amp; how many not ? since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies &amp; illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?</p>
<p>15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &amp; housing societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?</p>
<p>16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &amp; legalizing those<br />
violations. Safety of public &amp; amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn&#8217;t have a parking space of it&#8217;s own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries &amp; deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries &amp; deaths ?</p>
<p>17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?</p>
<p>18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?</p>
<p>20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts &amp; evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees &amp; build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?</p>
<p>22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?</p>
<p>24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals – tresspassers ? if not why ?</p>
<p>25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &amp; sufficient time to bidders about it&#8217;s auction schedules ?</p>
<p>26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?</p>
<p>27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?</p>
<p>28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &amp; selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?</p>
<p>29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /<br />
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?</p>
<p>30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other land developers ?</p>
<p>31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?</p>
<p>32. in &amp; around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out<br />
advertisement spaces &amp; built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer&#8217;s money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under<br />
&amp; surrounding HT lines legal ?</p>
<p>33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired &amp; sold as sites by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?</p>
<p>34. in &amp; around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA &amp; private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?</p>
<p>35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC &amp; other developers , housing societies ?</p>
<p>36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment &amp; creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in &amp; around mysore city ? what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /<br />
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?</p>
<p>39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB&#8217;s<br />
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?</p>
<p>40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?</p>
<p>41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s CDP &amp; KIADB&#8217;s industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?</p>
<p>42. is the MUDA &amp; KIADB revising / modifying CDP &amp; INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &amp; Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?</p>
<p>43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar&#8217;s report on land grabbings in mysore ?</p>
<p>44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal &amp; in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s CDP ? if not why ? what action ?</p>
<p>45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?</p>
<p>46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?</p>
<p>47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it&#8217;s objections , in it&#8217;s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues &amp; the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &amp; alienation legal ?</p>
<p>48.numerous NGO&#8217;s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?</p>
<p>49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC &amp; government action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections &amp; given media publicity ? if not why ?</p>
<p>52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE officials &amp; their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?</p>
<p>53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?</p>
<p>54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?</p>
<p>55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?</p>
<p>YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 2006 &amp; 2007 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.</p>
<p>REMARKS :</p>
<p>PIO of O/O commissioner , Mysore urban development authority , Mysore failed to provide full information to us. Vide lettes ,<br />
No: PRO/519/2007-08 dt 28/08/07 &amp; no:BDA/CP/705/07-08 dt 23.10.07</p>
<p>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :</p>
<p>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER , O/O COMMISSIONER , MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , MYSORE .</p>
<p>DATE : 21.04.08…………………… YOUR’S SINCERELY,<br />
PLACE : MYSORE………………….. NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>RTI – QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY  ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE ( BBMP ) &amp; CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ( KIADB )  ARE  EVADING TO ANSWER</p>
<p>APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &amp; GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA</p>
<p>APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005</p>
<p>( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )</p>
<p>FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT :</p>
<p>NAGARAJ.M.R.,</p>
<p>EDITOR , E-VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH,</p>
<p># LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,</p>
<p>HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,</p>
<p>HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA , PIN – 570017.</p>
<p>DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION REQUIRED :</p>
<p>HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS &#8211; WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.</p>
<p>1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the Bangalore city&#8217;s comprehensive city development plan ?</p>
<p>2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?</p>
<p>4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?</p>
<p>6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &amp; commercial site ? if not why ?</p>
<p>7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings &amp; houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?</p>
<p>10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?</p>
<p>12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?</p>
<p>13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies &amp; real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; how many not ? since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies &amp; illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?</p>
<p>15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &amp; housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?</p>
<p>16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &amp; legalizing those violations. Safety of public &amp; amenities of public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn&#8217;t have a parking space of it&#8217;s own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries &amp; deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries &amp; deaths ?</p>
<p>17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?</p>
<p>18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?</p>
<p>20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts &amp; evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees &amp; build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?</p>
<p>22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?</p>
<p>24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals – tresspassers ? if not why ?</p>
<p>25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &amp; sufficient time to bidders about it&#8217;s auction schedules ?</p>
<p>26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?</p>
<p>27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?</p>
<p>28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &amp; selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?</p>
<p>29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?</p>
<p>30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?</p>
<p>31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?</p>
<p>32. in &amp; around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces &amp; built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer&#8217;s money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under &amp; surrounding HT lines legal ?</p>
<p>33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired &amp; sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?</p>
<p>34. in &amp; around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?</p>
<p>35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; other developers , housing societies ?</p>
<p>36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment &amp; creating public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in &amp; around bangalore city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?</p>
<p>39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB&#8217;s comprehensive industrial area development plan ?</p>
<p>40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?</p>
<p>41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT&#8217;s industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?</p>
<p>42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP &amp; INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &amp; Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?</p>
<p>43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar&#8217;s report on land grabbings in mysore ?</p>
<p>44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal &amp; in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s CDP ? if not why ? what action ?</p>
<p>45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?</p>
<p>46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?</p>
<p>47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it&#8217;s objections , in it&#8217;s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues &amp; the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &amp; alienation legal ?</p>
<p>48.numerous NGO&#8217;s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?</p>
<p>49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections &amp; given media publicity ? if not why ?</p>
<p>52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT officials &amp; their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?</p>
<p>53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?</p>
<p>54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?</p>
<p>55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?</p>
<p>56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.</p>
<p>57. why BDA didn&#8217;t file police complaint to evict encroachers?</p>
<p>58. why BDA didn&#8217;t inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their allotment ?</p>
<p>59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?</p>
<p>60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of BDA committee legal ?</p>
<p>61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufficient time to reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?</p>
<p>62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request &amp; stated that the said file concerning this issue cann&#8217;t be found ie lost . is it legal ?</p>
<p>63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.</p>
<p>CRIMES BY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( B.D.A) AGAINST A POOR WOWAN</p>
<p>The B.D.A flouts it&#8217;s own rules &amp; spreads red carpet for big land developers &amp; land grabbers. B.D.A posting is a huge money spinner for corrupt officials. The corrupt B.D.A officials work hand in glove with criminal elements &amp; rowdies. They illegally evict genuine allottees who are poor &amp; without any connections from allotted prime lands &amp; sell-off those prime land to the highest bidder of bribe. The poor fellow is re-alloted lands in backward areas &amp; in some cases left in the lurch.</p>
<p>Now , take the following case. Mr. S.D. chandrashekaraiah a poor old man aged around 80 years was allotted with house no.185, kumaraswamy lay-out, first block, bangalore in 1978 vide letter no.310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.</p>
<p>The chairman of B.D.A has allotted the built house on lease cum sale basis. The poor old man mr. S.D.chandrashekaraiah complied with all the rules &amp; in accordance with it even deposited 25% of the house cost in B.D.A&#8217;S account. However when he went over to his allotted house for residing in it, he found out some rowdy elements were already residing there. He complained about this matter to the legal owner of the house ie B.D.A . the B.D.A officials didn&#8217;t take steps to evict the illegal encroachers nor did they make any complaint to the police. His appeals to B.D.A, chief minister of karnataka , etc fell on deaf ears. Hurt by this gross injustice &amp; mounting financial burdens the poor old man died.</p>
<p>Subsequently, the poor man&#8217;s daughter smt. Nagalakshmi who was also very poor , appealed to the B.D.A authorities once again , to evict illegal encroachers from her father&#8217;s allotted house. This time the corrupt B.D.A officials played a different game. They showed her a vacant house, gave her oral instructions to live in that vacant house &amp; told her that they will regularise it in due course. The hapless poor woman took huge loans &amp; repaired the house fit for occupation. Just before she was to occupy that house , corrupt B.D.A officials once again planted rowdy elements in that house. Once again the poor woman was cheated. She lost her house, on top of it her loan burden mounted.</p>
<p>Till date, that poor woman is suffering from these gross injustices of B.D.A . SHAMELESS B.D.A OFFICIALS who take thousands of rupees salary &amp; perks every month, all at the expense of tax-payer has not even cared to rectify the injustice. Thereby, they are violating the poor woman&#8217;s fundamental &amp; human rights.</p>
<p>Hereby, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH urges the honourable chief minister of karnataka, honourable lokayuktha for karnataka , honourable chairman national human rights commission , honourable chairman national commission for women &amp; honourable chairman state commission for women karnataka, to take the appropriate action &amp; to speedily provide justice to this poor woman.</p>
<p>YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 2006 &amp; 2007 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.</p>
<p>REMARKS :</p>
<p>PIO of O/O commissioner , Bangalore development authority , Bangalore failed to provide full information to us. Vide lettes ,<br />
No: BDA/DySEC-2/ADMN/KMS-1/185/2007-08 dt 23.08.07 &amp;<br />
NO:BDA/CPM/RIA/296/2277/07-08 dt 27.09.07</p>
<p>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :</p>
<p>PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER , O/O COMMISSIONER , BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY , BANGALORE .</p>
<p>DATE : 21.04.08……………………………. YOUR’S SINCERELY,<br />
PLACE : MYSORE…………………………. NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>RTI  QUESTIONS   CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , UNION HOME MINISTER ,  LOKSABHA SPEAKER , Dy Chairman of rajyasabha , PRESIDENT OF INDIA  , GOVERNOR OF KARNATAKA , CHIEF MINISTER OF KARNATAKA  &amp;  DIRECTOR GENERAL OF KARNATAKA POLICE  ARE   EVADING  TO ANSWER</p>
<p>APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005                                      ( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 ) OF GOI</p>
<p>FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.,<br />
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE  &amp; SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,<br />
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,<br />
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,<br />
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA  PIN – 570017.</p>
<p>DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION REQUIRED :<br />
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS &#8211; WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE&#8217;S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY &amp; ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING &amp; ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD &amp; CRIMINALS</p>
<p>Hereby ,  we  do request  PIO O/O  Honourable Chief Justice of India  , PIO , O/O H.E.Honorable President of India , PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha , PIOs of  Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka CMO , Union Home Ministry GOI  and  DG &amp; IG of Police of Government of Karnataka to answer the following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national security ,  National unity &amp; integrity &amp; to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary &amp; police.</p>
<p>Main A :<br />
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional institutions &amp;  to the honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This is an appeal to the honest few in public service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.</p>
<p>1.                  does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain from voting legal ?</p>
<p>2.            why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?</p>
<p>3.            just remember , the  vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature &amp; how some  MLAs   vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita  in state legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by MPs &amp; MLAs  legal ? does not these constitute contempt of the house by MPs &amp; MLAs themselves ?</p>
<p>4.            all the people’s representatives from panchayath member to president of India must read ABCD  Of Democracy  provide along with.since independence of India till date , MPs &amp; MLAs are forcing projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating policies against the wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies &amp; Laws , undemocratic &amp; illegal ?</p>
<p>5.            is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ?</p>
<p>6.            how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted?</p>
<p>7.            are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?</p>
<p>8.            what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false affidavits ?</p>
<p>9.            who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ?</p>
<p>10.          the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih &amp; kin raises even during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural products , their companies register increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ?</p>
<p>Main B :</p>
<p>1.                  we do once again offer  our conditional services to the government of india , all state governments &amp; supreme court of india , in apprehending  tax evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt  public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the the government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of India , are not ready  to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?</p>
<p>2.            the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information / records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?</p>
<p>3.            why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police complaints made by us ?</p>
<p>4.            why DG &amp; IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) , from union &amp; state home ministries ?</p>
<p>5.            the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the supreme court of India &amp; national human rights  commission  has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high profile case  ? is it because it  is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings , TRPs ?</p>
<p>6.            the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites &amp; terrorists , by their delaying tactics &amp; denial of information , records. What action has been taken against such anti-national elements in public service ?</p>
<p>7.            how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist , Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit &amp; SOS e-voice for justice) to Karnataka police , to national human rights commission  to supreme court of India till date ? what action taken with respect to each complaint ?</p>
<p>8.            the delay in taking action by public servants  with respect to following cases has resulted in  more crimes , destruction / manipulation of evidences , records  and more injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in following cases ?</p>
<p>SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA </p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-&#8230;</p>
<p>DEALS IN COURTS  &amp;  POLICE  STATIONS   READ :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html  ,<br />
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</p>
<p>, </p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</p>
<p>CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF<br />
INDIA -<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF DG&amp;IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/<br />
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/<br />
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –<br />
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/  , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/<br />
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/  , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED<br />
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218</p>
<p>MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>are you ready to catch tax thieves ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>reliance industry where is accountability ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>crimes at infosys campus<br />
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214</p>
<p>crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>crimes of land mafia in India<br />
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://landscam.wordpress.com/   , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>currency thefts in RBI Press<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80</p>
<p>killer colas &amp; killer medicines of India<br />
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/  , </p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201</p>
<p>HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale</p>
<p>Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP – pushpa kolasani  on hunger strike in anantapur  district jail Andhra Pradesh</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap</p>
<p>9.                  how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral &amp; illegal acts , since independence till date ? what action taken in each case ?</p>
<p>10.          what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in public examination in Andhra Pradesh ?</p>
<p>11.          have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions  taken by such judges of doubtful integrity &amp; honesty ?</p>
<p>12.          is it not the duty of government &amp; supreme court of India , to protect  the fundamental rights &amp; human rights of all Indian citizens ?</p>
<p>13.          why the government &amp; supreme court of India has failed to protect the fundamental rights &amp; human rights of  me  &amp; those mentioned in my complaint ?</p>
<p>14.          how many former CJIs  ,  supreme court &amp; high court judges have disproportionate wealth ?</p>
<p>15.          Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests  amounts to suppression of evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring public servants ?</p>
<p>16.          why my previous RTI requests or part  there of was not transferred to appropriate authorities and information given to me in a consolidated form ?</p>
<p>Main  C  :Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?</p>
<p>Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ?</p>
<p>Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals &amp; backstabs our motherland , it&#8217;s national security ?</p>
<p>Q4. Don&#8217;t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law &amp; order ?</p>
<p>Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?</p>
<p>Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth &amp; provide timely justice ?<br />
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich &amp; mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?<br />
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don&#8217;t give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts don&#8217;t take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?<br />
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?<br />
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases &amp; by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?<br />
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police &amp; intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?<br />
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?<br />
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses &amp; all parties involved , both during case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q14. How do you monitor &amp; check corrupt police personnel &amp; increase in their family&#8217;s wealth year after year ?<br />
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidate&#8217;s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?<br />
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?<br />
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?<br />
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just &amp; legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?<br />
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded &amp; aided couter terrorist groups , is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained &amp; funded &#8220;salwa judum&#8221; to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements &amp; attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?<br />
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld &amp; fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms &amp; ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty &amp; rich ?<br />
Q23. Law is one &amp; same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich &amp; poor ? why this differentiation ?<br />
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it&#8217;s products come with IMEI number only &amp; stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their&#8217;s as it doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they don&#8217;t have any business relationship with either tata indicom or it&#8217;s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets &amp; cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing<br />
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file &#8220;B&#8221; report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?<br />
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with &#8220;B&#8221; report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?<br />
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?<br />
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?<br />
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ?<br />
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG &amp; IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police &amp; intelligence personnel ?<br />
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?<br />
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases &amp; can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn&#8217;t cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission &amp; home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?<br />
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?<br />
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people&#8217;s representatives are facing criminal charges ?<br />
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?<br />
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?<br />
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people&#8217;s representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?<br />
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?<br />
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?<br />
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?<br />
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?<br />
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin &amp; while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?<br />
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?<br />
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi&#8217;s family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it&#8217;s partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it&#8217;s case &amp; prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks &amp; others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it&#8217;s partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q48.what damages has been done to india&#8217;s national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?<br />
Q49. What action by the government ?<br />
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?<br />
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?<br />
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?<br />
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years &amp; acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?<br />
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters &amp; 3rd degree torture ?<br />
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?<br />
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan&#8217;s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?<br />
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my &#8220;fundamental duty&#8221; hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI &amp; GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?<br />
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more &amp; even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police &amp; their family members on the lines of defense forces ?<br />
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable &amp; his family ?<br />
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?<br />
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?<br />
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?<br />
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?<br />
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?<br />
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?<br />
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?<br />
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?<br />
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings &amp; subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right &amp; legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.<br />
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?<br />
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?<br />
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date<br />
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?<br />
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?<br />
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?<br />
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?<br />
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?<br />
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?<br />
Q78. how ? if not why ?<br />
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judge&#8217;s family members ?<br />
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?<br />
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?<br />
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?<br />
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement &amp; meating out injustice ?<br />
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests like &#8220;poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc&#8221; , in the interest of justice &amp; truth ?<br />
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of &#8220;Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society&#8221;. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society &amp; allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said society&#8217;s – judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ?<br />
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?<br />
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured person&#8217;s case responsible for it ?<br />
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges &amp; the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder &amp; murder ? if not why ?<br />
Q89. registrar , Mysore district &amp; sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.<br />
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.<br />
Q91. when a person doesn&#8217;t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that person&#8217;s case responsible for it ? what action ?<br />
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food &amp; medical care to prisoners ?<br />
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence &amp; gives him 3 months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?<br />
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years &amp; finally the judge finds them as innocents &amp; acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?<br />
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions &amp; the actions arising out of misuse of office ?<br />
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges &amp; their personal actions as individuals ?<br />
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?<br />
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?<br />
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?<br />
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?<br />
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities &amp; women are their in supreme court , state high courts &amp; subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .<br />
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges &amp; to check corruption in judiciary ?<br />
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?<br />
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill &amp; claimed traveling allowance ?<br />
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high court judges &amp; newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?<br />
Q107. when common people / tax payers &amp; even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right &amp; just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties &amp; mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?<br />
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?<br />
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?<br />
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in a case ?<br />
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi&#8217;s assassination case , was not considered by the court ?<br />
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?<br />
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?<br />
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy person&#8217;s rights violation ?<br />
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?<br />
Q118. when the corrupt police officer &amp; government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high &amp; mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?<br />
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper &amp; fair prosecution of cases against rich &amp; mighty ?<br />
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?<br />
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?<br />
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court ready to utilize it ?<br />
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of india&#8217;s on-line grievance system ( DPG &amp; DARPG ) :<br />
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618<br />
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pages<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw</p>
<p>what are the status of those appeals ?<br />
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India &amp; citizens ofIndia ? please answer.<br />
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemen&#8217;s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen &amp; their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?<br />
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.<br />
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?<br />
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?<br />
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel &amp; pay it as compensation to victims of police failures &amp; atrocities ?<br />
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?<br />
Q133. during british rule in india &amp; various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &amp; other british colonies. After india&#8217;s independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ?<br />
Q134. in how many cases GOI &amp; other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?<br />
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?<br />
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it&#8217;s colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?<br />
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?<br />
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?<br />
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND &amp; prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &amp; prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ?<br />
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?<br />
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?<br />
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?</p>
<p>Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators &amp; parliamentarians by the constitution of India?</p>
<p>a) Inside the House b) Outside the House</p>
<p>Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like</p>
<p>a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India</p>
<p>c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC</p>
<p>e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.</p>
<p>Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.</p>
<p>b) Cover both their official &amp; personal actions.</p>
<p>Q146. Are the privileges defined &amp; codified ?</p>
<p>Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?</p>
<p>Q148. Are the liberty &amp; fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?</p>
<p>Q149. Can the Indian legislatures &amp; parliament be equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?</p>
<p>Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?</p>
<p>Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives &amp; executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers &amp; contempt of the court by the House.</p>
<p>Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?</p>
<p>Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of official&#8217;s secret act &amp; go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges</p>
<p>Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court &amp; Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?</p>
<p>Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer&#8217;s money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q157. Judges &amp; Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more<br />
valid) in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?</p>
<p>Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?</p>
<p>Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?</p>
<p>Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?</p>
<p>Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation&#8221; ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.</p>
<p>Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. &amp; giving free legal aid ?</p>
<p>Q164. Communication &#8211; free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?<br />
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just &amp; legal ? give me the names of accused judges &amp; description of charges against them ?<br />
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?<br />
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?<br />
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.<br />
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?<br />
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?<br />
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses &amp; brain. That is why the acts &amp; sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects &amp; produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police &amp; judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them &amp; to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police &amp; judges in drunken state legal ?</p>
<p>Q 172 . What action  has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?</p>
<p>Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state ministers &amp; central ministers who fully aided the criminals – Union Carbide official  Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail  &amp; flee the country without court’s permission ?</p>
<p>Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of court  &amp; for aiding a criminal to escape ?</p>
<p>Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?  what action has been taken against the CJI who  became an official of the  trust belonging to the criminal ?</p>
<p>Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?</p>
<p>Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department &amp; pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?</p>
<p>Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal although they don’t have right to do so ?</p>
<p>Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors &amp; Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didn’t  press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for  producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?</p>
<p>Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials &amp; people’s representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up &amp; aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of thousands &amp; maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?</p>
<p>Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt  labour / pollution control board officials  HUMAN BEINGS ?<br />
Q  182    Why  police are  not registering my complaint   against  CJI &amp; other VVIPS ,Even after years ?<br />
Q   183   don’t the  police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal  jurisdiction  to register  the case  against these VVIPs ? or  just  because the criminals happens to be VVIPs  ,they are  not booked  by police? If the  said  police don’t have  legal jurisdiction to book  these VVIPs , they should have  transferred the complaint  to  those authorities who have jurisdiction &amp;  authority to book  &amp; prosecute   these  VVIPs , but not done  so , why ?<br />
Q  184  are not all these actions , of  VVIPs &amp; police amounting to  cover up of crimes &amp; criminals ? are  not  these cover ups itself is a crime ?<br />
Q  185.  Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals  for justice  concerning public welfare , national security  sent  through  post , e-mail  to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ?  does  not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?<br />
Q 186   Are not  the honourable chief justice of india  together  with the jurisdictional police &amp; Revenue district magistrate  responsible  to protect  the  fundamental &amp; human rights  of people ? why the CJI , Mysore DC &amp; Jurisdictional Police  have failed to protect the fundamental &amp; human rights of  people  including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus  Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate &amp; jurisdictional police  are  together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the quartet  – Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city &amp; Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station  , mysore  will be responsible .<br />
 These corrupt  parasites will feel  , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In  whose  Court of justice  MATCH FIXING is not there &amp; every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.</p>
<p>YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1991-2011 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.<br />
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :<br />
1. PIO , O/O Honorable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.<br />
2. PIO , O/O  H.E.Honorable President of India , Rashtrapathi Bhawan , New Delhi.<br />
3. PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , GOI , New Delhi.<br />
4. PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha , GOI , New Delhi.<br />
5. PIO , O/O Union Home Minister ,GOI , New Delhi.<br />
6. PIO , O/O H.E.Honorable Governor of Karnataka , Raj Bhawan , Bangalore.<br />
7. PIO , O/O Honorable Chief Minister of Karnataka , CMO , Bangalore.<br />
8. PIO , O/O DG &amp; IG of Police , Government of Karnataka ,Police HQ , Bangalore.</p>
<p>Fees Paid :</p>
<p>1.                  IPO 90E 787047 for rupees ten only.</p>
<p>2.            IPO 90E 787048 for rupees ten only.</p>
<p>3.            IPO 90E 787049 for rupees ten only.</p>
<p>4.            IPO 90E 787050 for rupees ten only.</p>
<p>5.            IPO 90E 787051 for rupees ten only.</p>
<p>6.            IPO 56C 376730  for rupees 5 only + IPO 56C 376731 for rupees 5 only.</p>
<p>7.            IPO 56C 376732 for rupees 5 only + IPO 56C 376733 for rupees 5 only.</p>
<p>8.            IPO 56C 376734 for rupees 5 only + IPOIPO 56C 376735 for rupees 5 only.</p>
<p>Enclosed :</p>
<p>1.                  Police Complaint dated 19.03.2011</p>
<p>2.            Show Cause Notice Dated 19.03.2011</p>
<p>3.            ABCD Lesson of Democracy.</p>
<p>DATE : 19.03.2011 ……………..………………………NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)</p>
<p>A B C D of Democracy – A Lesson for all people’s representatives</p>
<p>HOW MPs ,MLAs  , Ministers &#8211; PEOPLE’S REPRESENTATIVES MUST FUNCTION<br />
People are the kings , self rulers in a democracy . Peoples representatives must just represent the wishes ,  aspirations of people. When  people in Jaitapur , Maharashtra state ofIndia  are totally against a nuke plant in their area  and they don’t want it , still the authorities are forcing this project over their head.<br />
Since 63 years of independence , In India the learned IAS babus &amp; Netas are forcing their agendas , SEZs , Projects over the people for their own selfish gains , against the wishes of people. This is not DEMOCRACY.</p>
<p>In india, indirect democracy is the form of governance. In this form, people&#8217;s representatives are bound to raise the questions , issues concerning their constituents on their behalf , on the floor of the house. However the sad part in india even after  63  years of democracy , is the lobbying is at it&#8217;s peak. The lobbying is a gentleman&#8217;s white collared crook&#8217;s way of forming favour seeker&#8217;s group , creating a corpus to pay lumpsum bribe &amp; influencing decision making.</p>
<p>The people&#8217;s representatives are bound to represent their people first , then their party &amp; party think tanks. India has come to this sorry state of affairs , widespread corruption , huge black economy &amp; rampant poverty, all due to inefficient legislations &amp; enforcements.<br />
These think tanks &amp; IAS lobby, consider themselves as most super brains on earth &amp; gives out suggestions . the present state of affairs is a barometer of their brilliance. These think tanks &amp; IAS lobby are the hand maidens of lobbyists / bribers.</p>
<p>Now consider the following example :<br />
Mr.raj gandhi is a member of parliament from mandya constituency in karnataka state. He is a MBA graduate &amp; member of ruling Indian progressive party. The multinational giant M/S GREY HOUND CORPORATION wants to enter into paper manufacturing business in india. It&#8217;s sight falls on the public sector paper giant mandya national paper mills (MNPM) in mandya district of karnataka. The MNC effectively lobbies with the government. The ruling party think tank &amp; the cabinet advisory group recommends to the government to make strategic<br />
disinvestment in the PSU M/S MNPM. They bring out graph with full power point presentation stating that it is good for the company as well as the government. The lobbyists follows it up with media reports on the positive aspect of strategic disinvestment. A favourable impression is created in the minds of literate public. The cabinet<br />
committee okays it.</p>
<p>The &#8221; strategic dis investment issue &#8221; comes before the parliament for legislation / approval. The ruling party issues a party whip to it&#8217;s members to vote in favour of dis investment. However M.P mr.raj gandhi who is an MBA in his own wisdom also favours the dis investment. However ,most importantly the constituents – people in mandya parliamentary constituency through protest marches , mass post card campaigns lakhs in numbers expresses their disagreement with the dis investment &amp; urges their MP mr.gandhi to vote against the disinvestment legislation.</p>
<p>On the D-day in parliament , mr. Raj gandhi as per his party whip &amp; his own wisdom votes in favour of strategic disinvestment legislation, much against the wishes of his people , constituents &amp; mis represents them in parliament. the democracy has failed here. in This way democracy is being derailed since 62 years in india.</p>
<p>In democracy, party whip , MP or MLA&#8217;s own wisdom / brilliance, think tank &amp; IAS lobby recommendations are all secondary , the constituent&#8217;s of his constituency , people&#8217;s wishes aspirations are of primary importance &amp; supreme. What people need is a honest<br />
representative, who simply delivers the people&#8217;s aspirations on the floor of the house back &amp; forth , without superimposing it with his own ideas &amp; party ideas. For true democracy , the people&#8217;s representatives must be true postmans.</p>
<p>Towards this end , the people must be educated about their democratic rights &amp; responsibilities. This is an appeal to the honest few in the parliament &amp; state legislatures to weed out their corrupt colleagues , lobbyists, to uphold the dignity of the house &amp; to install democracy in it&#8217;s true form.</p>
<p>edited , printed , published &amp; owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA                       cell : 91 9341820313       </p>
<p>home page:<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,<br />
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,<br />
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/                                                                                                                                                                            e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com         ,  naghrw@yahoo.com       </p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/133/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=133&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/shame-to-chief-justice-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crimes by ELECTION  COMMISSION OF INDIA</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/crimes-by-election-commission-of-india/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/crimes-by-election-commission-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRIME]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web Working For The Rights &#38; Survival Of The Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.05 issue. 23………..08/06/2011 Crimes By Election Commission of India &#8211; An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India From, Nagaraj M R , Editor , SOS e – Voice For Justice &#38; [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=131&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion  Of  Dalit  &#8211;  Weekly Newspaper On Web<br />
Working  For  The  Rights  &amp;  Survival  Of  The  Oppressed</p>
<p>Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.05 issue. 23………..08/06/2011</p>
<p>Crimes By Election Commission of India                                                               &#8211; An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India</p>
<p>From,<br />
   Nagaraj M R ,<br />
  Editor , SOS e – Voice For Justice  &amp; SOS e – Clarion Of Dalit ,<br />
  # LIG – 2 / 761 , HUDCO  First  Stage ,<br />
Laxmikantanagar ,  Hebbal ,<br />
Mysore – 570017  ,  INDIA .</p>
<p>To ,<br />
     The Honourable Supreme Court Of India ,<br />
     New Delhi.</p>
<p>Honourable Sir /  Madam  ,<br />
     Subject : Violation of people’s democratic rights by Election Commission Of India<br />
In India ,  on election days it is quite common to see voters arguing with polling staff after finding their names missing from electoral list. It has happened to many prominent personalities , fate of common voters is far worse. On a whole sale scale some times names of residents of a particular by-lane or cross goes missing. Is this due to the negligence of city corporation staff / Election Commission or is it due to the connivance of local ruling politician with corporation staff who thinks that  particular residents of a house or by-lane are against  him and will vote to his  opponent if kept in voters list ?</p>
<p>As per Law , Preventing a person from voting ( Ex ; Armed goons preventing Voters ) is a criminal offence . Some of these politicians &amp; officials are so brilliant that they don’t use  goons nor arms , but make the names of eligible voters to disappear from voters list . Are not officials of Election Commission of India Punishable for this criminal offense , for preventing eligible voters from casting their ballots.</p>
<p>See the paradox , eligible voters born &amp; brought up in India don’t get voter’s ID Card , PDS Ration  Card  and  must face hurdles to get a Driving License , where as Pakistani Intruders , Terrorists  who have sneaked into india  get Voter’s ID , PDS Ration Card , DL , etc. Shame  to concerned public servants.</p>
<p>Take for instance my case , I have voted for first time in 1995 general election  &amp; voted in subsequent  election. I  have got Voter’s ID on 23.09.2002  by  ECI , No. GGB 3633096 &amp; voted in subsequent election. Afterwards my name went missing from voter’s list. Till date since 5 – 6 years I am prevented from voting in various elections for corporation , assembly , etc. I don’t even have a PDS Ration Card inspite of numerous applications. Numerous times I have submitted the details in prescribed format to the officials who came to our house &amp; have personally handed over forms to corporation officials at the designated office. Till date I have not received Election ID Card nor PDS Ration Card.  It is the birth right , natural democratic right of every Indian citizen to vote , to cast ballot in elections. Even the Apex court of the land does not have the authority to snatch this right from a citizen , how come ECI / Corporation officials can snatch my democratic right ? Are not ECI / Corporation officials guilty of criminal offense ?  Hereby , I do request the Honourable  Supreme Court Of India to Order ECI to include my name in the Electoral list of our constituency &amp; to  legally prosecute ECI officials for their failures.</p>
<p>My Details ,<br />
Name ; NAGARAJ M R<br />
Date of Birth : 22 / 07 / 1971<br />
Present  Residential Address :<br />
Nagaraj M R ,<br />
  Editor , SOS e – Voice For Justice  &amp; SOS e – Clarion Of Dalit ,<br />
  # LIG – 2 / 761 , HUDCO  First  Stage ,<br />
Laxmikantanagar ,  Hebbal ,<br />
Mysore – 570017  ,  INDIA .</p>
<p>Southern Graduate Constituency Voter list details :<br />
Registered in 2010 &amp; Voted in 2010 Graduate constituency election  , Part No . 43   Sl No. 1525 ( Not received any ID Card )</p>
<p>Old Voter’s ID issued on 23.09.2002  by  ECI , No. GGB 3633096</p>
<p>My UID Aadhaar No :  5703 5339  3479</p>
<p>Thanking  You.</p>
<p>Date : 29.05.2011…………………………………………….Your’s sincerely,<br />
Place : Mysore…………………………………………………Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>Visit : Criminal Judges Police &amp; RTI<br />
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com/2011/04/criminal-judges-police-in-india.html  ,</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/04/criminal-judges-police-rti.html</p>
<p>Follow me at<br />
http://www.facebook.com/people/Nagaraj-Mysore-Raghupathi/513253184 ,<br />
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw ,<br />
http://twitter.com/naghrw  ,</p>
<p>“There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of conscience It supercedes all other courts. ”<br />
- Mahatma Gandhi</p>
<p>ANSWER YOUR HONOUR<br />
-         Questions SUPREME COURT  OF INDIA  JUDGES  are NOT Answering</p>
<p>Main A :<br />
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional institutions &amp;  to the honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This is an appeal to the honest few in public service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.<br />
does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain from voting  legal ?<br />
why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?<br />
just remember , the  vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature &amp; how some  MLAs   vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita  in state legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by MPs &amp; MLAs  legal ? does not these constitute contempt of the house by MPs &amp; MLAs themselves ?<br />
all the people’s representatives from panchayath member to president of India must read ABCD  Of Democracy  provide along with.since independence of India till date , MPs &amp; MLAs are forcing projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating policies against the wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies &amp; Laws , undemocratic &amp; illegal ?<br />
is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ?<br />
how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted?<br />
are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?<br />
what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false affidavits ?<br />
who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ?<br />
the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih &amp; kin raises even during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural products , their companies register increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ?</p>
<p>Main B :<br />
we do once again offer  our conditional services to the government of india , all state governments &amp; supreme court of india , in apprehending  tax evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt  public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the the government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of India , are not ready  to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?<br />
the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information / records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?<br />
why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police complaints made by us ?<br />
why DG &amp; IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) , from union &amp; state home ministries ?<br />
the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the supreme court of India &amp; national human rights  commission  has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high profile case  ? is it because it  is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings , TRPs ?<br />
the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites &amp; terrorists , by their delaying tactics &amp; denial of information , records. What action has been taken against such anti-national elements in public service ?<br />
how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist , Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit &amp; SOS e-voice for justice) to Karnataka police , to national human rights commission  to supreme court of India till date ? what action taken with respect to each complaint ?<br />
the delay in taking action by public servants  with respect to following cases has resulted in  more crimes , destruction / manipulation of evidences , records  and more injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in following cases ?</p>
<p>SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-&#8230;</p>
<p>DEALS IN COURTS  &amp;  POLICE  STATIONS   READ :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html  ,<br />
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</p>
<p>,</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of&#8230;</p>
<p>CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF<br />
INDIA -<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF DG&amp;IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/<br />
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/<br />
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –<br />
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/  , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/<br />
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/  , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED<br />
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218</p>
<p>MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>are you ready to catch tax thieves ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>reliance industry where is accountability ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>crimes at infosys campus<br />
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214</p>
<p>crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>crimes of land mafia in India<br />
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://landscam.wordpress.com/   ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>currency thefts in RBI Press<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80</p>
<p>killer colas &amp; killer medicines of India<br />
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201</p>
<p>HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale</p>
<p>Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP – pushpa kolasani  on hunger strike in anantapur  district jail Andhra Pradesh </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap</p>
<p>how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral &amp; illegal acts , since independence till date ? what action taken in each case ?<br />
what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in public examination in Andhra Pradesh ?<br />
have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions  taken by such judges of doubtful integrity &amp; honesty ?<br />
is it not the duty of government &amp; supreme court of India , to protect  the fundamental rights &amp; human rights of all Indian citizens ?<br />
why the government &amp; supreme court of India has failed to protect the fundamental rights &amp; human rights of  me  &amp; those mentioned in my complaint ?<br />
how many former CJIs  ,  supreme court &amp; high court judges have disproportionate wealth ?<br />
Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests  amounts to suppression of evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring public servants ?<br />
why my previous RTI requests or part  there of was not transferred to appropriate authorities and information given to me in a consolidated form ?</p>
<p>Main  C  :Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?</p>
<p>Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ?</p>
<p>Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals &amp; backstabs our motherland , it&#8217;s national security ?</p>
<p>Q4. Don&#8217;t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law &amp; order ?</p>
<p>Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?</p>
<p>Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth &amp; provide timely justice ?<br />
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich &amp; mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?<br />
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don&#8217;t give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts don&#8217;t take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?<br />
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?<br />
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases &amp; by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?<br />
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police &amp; intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?<br />
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?<br />
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses &amp; all parties involved , both during case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q14. How do you monitor &amp; check corrupt police personnel &amp; increase in their family&#8217;s wealth year after year ?<br />
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidate&#8217;s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?<br />
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?<br />
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?<br />
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just &amp; legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?<br />
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded &amp; aided couter terrorist groups , is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained &amp; funded &#8220;salwa judum&#8221; to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements &amp; attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?<br />
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld &amp; fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms &amp; ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty &amp; rich ?<br />
Q23. Law is one &amp; same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich &amp; poor ? why this differentiation ?<br />
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it&#8217;s products come with IMEI number only &amp; stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their&#8217;s as it doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they don&#8217;t have any business relationship with either tata indicom or it&#8217;s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets &amp; cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing<br />
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file &#8220;B&#8221; report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?<br />
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with &#8220;B&#8221; report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?<br />
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?<br />
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?<br />
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ?<br />
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG &amp; IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police &amp; intelligence personnel ?<br />
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?<br />
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases &amp; can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn&#8217;t cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission &amp; home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?<br />
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?<br />
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people&#8217;s representatives are facing criminal charges ?<br />
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?<br />
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?<br />
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people&#8217;s representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?<br />
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?<br />
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?<br />
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?<br />
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?<br />
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin &amp; while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?<br />
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?<br />
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi&#8217;s family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it&#8217;s partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it&#8217;s case &amp; prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks &amp; others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it&#8217;s partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q48.what damages has been done to india&#8217;s national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?<br />
Q49. What action by the government ?<br />
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?<br />
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?<br />
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?<br />
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years &amp; acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?<br />
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters &amp; 3rd degree torture ?<br />
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?<br />
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan&#8217;s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?<br />
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my &#8220;fundamental duty&#8221; hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI &amp; GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?<br />
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more &amp; even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police &amp; their family members on the lines of defense forces ?<br />
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable &amp; his family ?<br />
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?<br />
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?<br />
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?<br />
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?<br />
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?<br />
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?<br />
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?<br />
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?<br />
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings &amp; subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right &amp; legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.<br />
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?<br />
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?<br />
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date<br />
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?<br />
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?<br />
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?<br />
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?<br />
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?<br />
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?<br />
Q78. how ? if not why ?<br />
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judge&#8217;s family members ?<br />
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?<br />
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?<br />
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?<br />
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement &amp; meating out injustice ?<br />
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests like &#8220;poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc&#8221; , in the interest of justice &amp; truth ?<br />
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of &#8220;Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society&#8221;. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society &amp; allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said society&#8217;s – judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ?<br />
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?<br />
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured person&#8217;s case responsible for it ?<br />
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges &amp; the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder &amp; murder ? if not why ?<br />
Q89. registrar , Mysore district &amp; sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.<br />
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.<br />
Q91. when a person doesn&#8217;t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that person&#8217;s case responsible for it ? what action ?<br />
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food &amp; medical care to prisoners ?<br />
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence &amp; gives him 3 months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?<br />
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years &amp; finally the judge finds them as innocents &amp; acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?<br />
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions &amp; the actions arising out of misuse of office ?<br />
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges &amp; their personal actions as individuals ?<br />
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?<br />
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?<br />
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?<br />
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?<br />
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities &amp; women are their in supreme court , state high courts &amp; subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .<br />
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges &amp; to check corruption in judiciary ?<br />
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?<br />
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill &amp; claimed traveling allowance ?<br />
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high court judges &amp; newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?<br />
Q107. when common people / tax payers &amp; even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right &amp; just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties &amp; mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?<br />
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?<br />
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?<br />
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in a case ?<br />
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi&#8217;s assassination case , was not considered by the court ?<br />
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?<br />
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?<br />
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy person&#8217;s rights violation ?<br />
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?<br />
Q118. when the corrupt police officer &amp; government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high &amp; mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?<br />
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper &amp; fair prosecution of cases against rich &amp; mighty ?<br />
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?<br />
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?<br />
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court ready to utilize it ?<br />
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of india&#8217;s on-line grievance system ( DPG &amp; DARPG ) :<br />
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618<br />
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pages<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw</p>
<p>what are the status of those appeals ?<br />
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India ? please answer.<br />
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemen&#8217;s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen &amp; their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?<br />
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.<br />
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?<br />
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?<br />
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel &amp; pay it as compensation to victims of police failures &amp; atrocities ?<br />
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?<br />
Q133. during british rule in india &amp; various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &amp; other british colonies. After india&#8217;s independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ?<br />
Q134. in how many cases GOI &amp; other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?<br />
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?<br />
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it&#8217;s colonies , to face prosecution afterIndia gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?<br />
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?<br />
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?<br />
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND &amp; prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &amp; prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ?<br />
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?<br />
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?<br />
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?</p>
<p>Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators &amp; parliamentarians by the constitution ofIndia?</p>
<p>a) Inside the House b) Outside the House</p>
<p>Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like</p>
<p>a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India</p>
<p>c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC</p>
<p>e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.</p>
<p>Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.</p>
<p>b) Cover both their official &amp; personal actions.</p>
<p>Q146. Are the privileges defined &amp; codified ?</p>
<p>Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?</p>
<p>Q148. Are the liberty &amp; fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?</p>
<p>Q149. Can the Indian legislatures &amp; parliament be equated to the House of commons in Englandwhich is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?</p>
<p>Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?</p>
<p>Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives &amp; executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers &amp; contempt of the court by the House.</p>
<p>Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?</p>
<p>Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of official&#8217;s secret act &amp; go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges</p>
<p>Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court &amp; Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?</p>
<p>Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer&#8217;s money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q157. Judges &amp; Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more<br />
valid) in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?</p>
<p>Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?</p>
<p>Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?</p>
<p>Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?</p>
<p>Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation&#8221; ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.</p>
<p>Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. &amp; giving free legal aid ?</p>
<p>Q164. Communication &#8211; free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?<br />
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just &amp; legal ? give me the names of accused judges &amp; description of charges against them ?<br />
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?<br />
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?<br />
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.<br />
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?<br />
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?<br />
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses &amp; brain. That is why the acts &amp; sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects &amp; produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police &amp; judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them &amp; to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police &amp; judges in drunken state legal ?</p>
<p>Q 172 . What action  has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?</p>
<p>Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state ministers &amp; central ministers who fully aided the criminals – Union Carbide official  Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail  &amp; flee the country without court’s permission ?</p>
<p>Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of court  &amp; for aiding a criminal to escape ?</p>
<p>Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?  what action has been taken against the CJI who  became an official of the  trust belonging to the criminal ?</p>
<p>Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?</p>
<p>Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department &amp; pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?</p>
<p>Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal although they don’t have right to do so ?</p>
<p>Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors &amp; Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didn’t  press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for  producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?</p>
<p>Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials &amp; people’s representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up &amp; aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of  thousands &amp; maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?</p>
<p>Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt  labour / pollution control board officials  HUMAN BEINGS ?<br />
Q  182    Why  police are  not registering my complaint   against  CJI &amp; other VVIPS ,Even after years ?<br />
Q   183   don’t the  police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal  jurisdiction  to register  the case  against these VVIPs ? or  just  because the criminals happens to be VVIPs  ,they  are  not booked  by police? If the  said  police don’t have  legal jurisdiction to book  these VVIPs , they should have  transferred the complaint  to  those authorities who have jurisdiction &amp;   authority to book  &amp; prosecute   these  VVIPs , but not done  so , why ?<br />
Q  184  are not all these actions , of  VVIPs &amp; police amounting to  cover up of crimes &amp; criminals ? are  not  these cover ups itself is a crime ?<br />
Q  185.  Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals  for justice  concerning public welfare , national security  sent  through  post , e-mail  to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ?  does  not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?<br />
Q 186   Are not  the honourable chief justice of india  together  with the jurisdictional police &amp; Revenue district magistrate  responsible  to protect  the  fundamental &amp; human rights  of people ?  why the CJI , Mysore DC &amp; Jurisdictional Police  have failed to protect the fundamental &amp; human rights of  people  including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus  Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate &amp; jurisdictional police  are  together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the quartet  – Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city &amp; Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station  , mysore  will be responsible .</p>
<p> These corrupt  parasites will feel  , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In  whose  Court of justice  MATCH FIXING is not there &amp; every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.</p>
<p>EDITORIAL : COURT JUDGEMENTS  FOR  SALE  &#8211;   JUDGEMENTS  FIXING  MATCH FIXING  IN  INDIAN  LEGAL  SYSTEM</p>
<p>PIL Appeal To Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of Mandamus</p>
<p>RTI  First Appeal An Appeal to Shri.Sunil Thomas , Honourable Registrar (Admn) &amp; RTI Appellate Authority , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi</p>
<p>From,<br />
Nagaraj .M. R.<br />
Editor , S.O.S e-Clarion of Dalit &amp; S.O.S  e-Voice for Justice,<br />
# LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO First Stage, Laxmikantanagar,<br />
Hebbal  ,  Mysore . PIN-570017   Cell – 09341820313</p>
<p>To ,<br />
Shri. Sunil Thomas ,<br />
Honourable Registrar (Administration) / RTI Appellate Authority ,<br />
Supreme Court of India,<br />
New Delhi.</p>
<p>Honourable Sir / Madam ,<br />
Subject : RTI  FIRST APPEAL<br />
Reference : Your Letter No. Dy.No.28 /  RTI  / 11-12 / SCI  dated  05.05.2011</p>
<p>Greetings to all my fellow Indian citizens. We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel &amp; martyrs for all the sacrifices made by them. Let us build a strong , Secular , Democratic India by getting rid off few corrupt  elements , anti nationals , traitors  among public servants.</p>
<p>Information input  forms part of process of one’s expression. One’s expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information &amp; Expression are inseparable parts &amp; form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person’s  right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also  are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.</p>
<p>In a democracy , people have a right to know  how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding  behind the veil of  Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created  by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption  , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview &amp; bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.</p>
<p>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India  , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to  millions  of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of  Indian judges , police &amp; public servants  .   The  information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals  in public service.  The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the  questions.</p>
<p>At the outset , we express  our whole hearted respects to the honest few  public servants in public service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service don’t deserve  respect as individuals – as they are  parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.</p>
<p>All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term“JUDGE” mentioned throught includes all public servants  discharging  judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice of India.</p>
<p>Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages &amp; is for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise  their voice seeking justice  are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be responsible  for it.</p>
<p>Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court of India &amp; other government authorities, in apprehending criminals including corrupt judges &amp; police. Herewith  , we once  again  appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.</p>
<p>The public servants &amp; the government must be role models in law  abiding acts , for others to emulate &amp; follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable &amp; can be corrected by the teacher. if the  teacher himself makes a mistake , all  his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught  , legally punished &amp; reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his patronage.  even if a police , public  servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted &amp; justice can be sought by the  aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime &#8211; violations of RTI Act , constitutional  rights &amp; human rights of public  and obstructs the public from  performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it  gives a booster dose to the rich &amp; mighty , those in power , criminals  in public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is  happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the occassion &amp;  peacefully , democratically  must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF  MAHATMA GANDHI&#8217;S DREAM.</p>
<p>Kindly go through the following articles &amp; provide justice by giving complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the following questionnaire in an unambiguous  manner.</p>
<p>please refer details at following web pages :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judgements-for-sale ,<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-fixed ,<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/3rd-degree-torture-by-indian-police  ,</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-for-a-price</p>
<p>The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect &amp; uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to protect our national integrity , to respect &amp; protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has  the right to obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal  privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the  FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN&#8217;S OF INDIA.<br />
We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India &amp; by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed  back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether  we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information . so , basically Right To Information  is an inalienable part of our  fundamental rights &amp; human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time  limit , responsibilities of public servants up to  certain extent. However the citizen&#8217;s fundamental right &amp; human right to seek  information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.<br />
Hereby , we seek complete  truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to my RTI application . HEREBY , WE ARE  ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS  IN PUBLIC INTEREST &amp;  JUSTICE. Hereby ,  we request you to register this appeal as a PIL  petition &amp; to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters  raised in my RTI Application , in public interest &amp; equitable justice. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.</p>
<p>Your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>An  Appeal to  Honourable United Nations Human Rights HighCommissioner  ,  Honourable International Court of Justice , CIC &amp; KIC</p>
<p>Dear Madam / Sir ,</p>
<p>SUBJECT :  HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS  BY   GOVERNMENT OF INDIA  &amp; SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</p>
<p>I have individually suffered numerous human rights violations , injustices  by  public servants working for government of India  when I raised my voice seeking justice for my fellow countrymen . for the society. These public servants are involved in crimes like aiding &amp; abetting terrorism , underworld , manslaughter , etc.  when I appealed to the supreme court of India seeking justice , they  have turned their blind eye. As a result more injustices are being committed till date. Even the police are not registering the complaint  against these guilty public servants.  Police &amp; Supreme Court Judges in league with CRIMINALS , ANTI NATIONALS , TERORRISTS ?</p>
<p>In India , some Parliamentarians take money for even  raising Questions in parliament , favorable laws / government rules are  enacted  to favor  rich criminals (refer 2G &amp; Nira Radia scam). Police for a price manipulate evidence ,  prematurely close case , fix innocent  &amp; mete out 3rd degree torture , murder in the name of encounter . Public prosecutor can change the way of argument , etc for a price. Even judges in India give favorable judicial orders for money , SEX , post retirement benefits , etc. please refer details at following web pages :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judgements-for-sale ,<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-fixed ,<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/3rd-degree-torture-by-indian-police  ,</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/court-judgements-for-a-price</p>
<p>I have not got justice till date , instead I have suffered physical assaults , murder attempts on me , my newspaper was illegally clamped down , my job opportunities  were illegally snatched away (cutting off the source of livelihood). I  have been threatened by police that I &amp; my family members will be fixed up in criminal cases (false implication) &amp; will be behind the bars for rest of our life.  I have been refused  proper medical care in government hospitals , so that  I will die sooner . All these  Injustices are meted out at the hands of criminal nexus of CRIMINAL – POLICE – JUDGE &#8211;  BUREAUCRAT – MP / MLA .</p>
<p>Democracy is the best form of governance. My motherland India is one of the greatest country. However  Criminals  have entered into  halls of parliament , criminals have become judges , criminals have become police ,  almost total criminalization of public service has taken place. These criminals are framing laws for the masses much against the democratic aspirations of the masses. Criminal judges are relying on these laws made by criminals &amp; sending innocents to gallows .  Criminal Police are making deals with criminals &amp;  arresting , torturing innocents.</p>
<p>Still very few HONEST people are left in public service  &#8211; Parliament , Judiciary &amp; Police , However they are keeping mum. My  struggle is not against the government of India or it’s constitutional bodies rather it is against the corrupt people who are  in those bodies . I do have whole hearted respects for the government of India &amp; it’s constitutional bodies , But I despise the corrupt people over there in those institutions. Our system is good , many of the people working there are not good. It is struggle against those corrupt people , to save our democracy , to save our freedom.</p>
<p>Hereby , I do request your honourableselves  Honourable United Nations Human Rights High Commissioner  and  Honourable International Court  Of  Justice  , to  order  the Honourable Supreme Court of India , Government of India to do it’s  constitutional duties  properly  , to safeguard  the human rights of  all and  to  provide justice in the matter.  Thanking You.</p>
<p>Date : 01st May  2011 ……………………………..Your’s Sincerely ,<br />
Place : Mysore , India………………………………Nagaraj . M . R .</p>
<p>……………………..DECLARATION………………………</p>
<p>Name : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>Address : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP<br />
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE &#8211; 570017 INDIA</p>
<p>Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S &#8211; e – Clarion Of  Dalit</p>
<p>Periodicity : WEEKLY</p>
<p>Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB</p>
<p>Donations : NOT ACCEPTED.  Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .</p>
<p>Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.</p>
<p>Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>Nationality : INDIAN</p>
<p>Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated  to JSS Medical College , Mysore ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be  handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of  medical students.</p>
<p>Eye Donation : Both EYES  of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated  to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my  eyes  must be  handed over to  Mysore Eye Bank  , Mysore  WITHIN 6 Hours  for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.</p>
<p>Home page :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,<br />
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,           </p>
<p>http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/</p>
<p>Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com  ,</p>
<p>UID  Aadhaar  No  :  5703  5339  3479 </p>
<p>Cell : 0 9341820313</p>
<p>I ,NAGARAJ.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge &amp; belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.</p>
<p>If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents   or to my family members    &#8211; In such case Chief Justice of  India together with the jurisdictional  revenue &amp; police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india  is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries.  </p>
<p>date :  29/05/2011…………………………..your&#8217;s sincerely,</p>
<p>place : India…………………………………Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>edited , printed , published &amp; owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA                                                       cell : 91 9341820313<br />
home page:<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,<br />
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,         </p>
<p>http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/</p>
<p> e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com     ,  naghrw@yahoo.com    </p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/131/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=131&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/crimes-by-election-commission-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rajiv Gandhi Assasination Cover Up</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/12/26/rajiv-gandhi-assasination-cover-up/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/12/26/rajiv-gandhi-assasination-cover-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 13:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rajiv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web Working For The Rights &#38; Survival Of The Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.05 issue. 01…… 05/01/2011 home page: http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home , http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit , http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ WIKILEAKS – Uncensored TRUTH http://213.251.145.96/ , Editorial : Covering up Late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination conspiracy - An Appeal [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=129&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web<br />
Working For The Rights &amp; Survival Of The Oppressed</p>
<p>Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.05 issue. 01…… 05/01/2011</p>
<p>home page:<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,<br />
 http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit   ,<br />
 http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,        </p>
<p>http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/</p>
<p>WIKILEAKS – Uncensored TRUTH<br />
http://213.251.145.96/  ,</p>
<p>Editorial : Covering up Late  PM Rajiv  Gandhi Assassination conspiracy<br />
-	An Appeal to the Honourable Supreme Court of India</p>
<p>The GOI  &amp; investigating authorities have failed to punish the real master minds behind the Late Prime minister Shri . Rajiv Gandhi assassination case .<br />
When  a responsible Indian citizen volunteered to appear before the supreme court of india as an amicus curie , to give certain information before the court relating to this assassination , he was not at all permitted. Instead he was threatened , attempts made to murder him , his news paper was closed , his jobs were illegally snatched away , police &amp; investigating agencies repeatedly grilled him ,  THE PURPOSE IS TO SILENCE THAT PERSON . The Police failed to act upon his complaints. The Supreme Court of India Failed to admit his PIL Petitions. ALL TO COVER UP THE POWERS THAT BE .</p>
<p>who are covering-up late p.m. rajiv gandhi assassination case? who are those conspirators? who are trying to silence me? </p>
<p>My sufferings began hand in hand with my crusade. I have raised various issues of social concern from time to time at the appropriate levels, one of those is LATE P.M. RAJIV GANDHI ASASSINATION CASE. where-in only the tools of the conspirator&#8217;s were punished where as the conspirators are roaming free. i have raised this topic of inequity , travesty of justice and sought a fair, proper enquiry&amp; trial , at various forums. but to no avail.<br />
the conspirators were disturbed by this and tried to silence me by threatening me, physically assaulting me and even made attempts to murder me. they prevented me from appearing before the JAIN COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY. they even manipulated the recruitment systems to deny me the appointments in R.B.I.CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE, P.E.S. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING MANDYA, N.I.E MYSORE , District Court Mysore &amp; Illegally snatched away my job in RPG Cables  Ltd , Mysore . they even tried to silence me by forcibly closing down my newspaper publications THE TESTUDO &amp; VOICE OF CRUSADER.<br />
my appeals for justice resulted only in police enquiries. the central intelligence bureau(I.B.) state intelligence &amp; state police personnel enquired me exhaustively number of times, but they never did enquire the powers that be. any way these people don&#8217;t have practical powers to enquire such people. the highest constitutional functionaries who can order a proper enquiry, trial are keeping mum inspite of repeated appeals. probably they are acting under the directions of conspirators. thereby they are not only covering up the crime, they are actively sponsoring terrorism , but are also violating my fundamental/human rights &amp; obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.</p>
<p>Numerous times , I have offered my conditional services to the honourable supreme court of India , Government of India &amp; Government of Karnataka , to apprehend criminals. The government authorities which are responsible for these duties have failed to perform. Hereby , I do once again offer my services (subject to conditions) to the honourable supreme court of India , Government of India &amp; Governemnt of Karnataka , to legally book the criminals the corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt public servants  &amp;  tax evading , criminal entrepreneurs with respect to wide ranging cases. Thereby , I want to help the government authorities in bringing culprits to the book &amp; in recovering revenue loss to the exchequer. Are you ready to utilize my service ?</p>
<p>hereby , i do request you to protect my fundamental &amp; human rights and to facilitate me to perform my FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES as a citizen of india.also, i do request you to give me information about following cases ,it&#8217;s final reports&amp; it&#8217;s action taken report.</p>
<p>1.the roost resort scandal involving karnataka high court judges.<br />
2.the scam of gem cutting &amp; polishing units in mysore set-up under VISHWA self-employment scheme.<br />
3.the murder of under-trial,TADA detenue mr.arjunan(forest brigand veerappan&#8217;s brother).<br />
4.the murder of journalist mr.satyanarayan near mysore.<br />
5.the murder of ex-minister mr.nagappa near mysore.<br />
6.the amount of ransom paid by state governments of karnataka,tamilnadu &amp; the union govrnment and the general public to forest brigand veerappan during all kidnap episodes (including movie star rajkumar&#8217;s).the role played by facilitators.the contents of all cassettes sent by veerappan to governments &amp; vice versa.<br />
7.the final report of justice a.j. sadashivas&#8217;s committee which enquired into atrocities &amp; human rights violations committed by police,special task force(S.T.F.) on the innocent tribal people of M.M.HILLS.<br />
8.the report of past district magistrate of mysore mr.T.M.vijayabhaskar about the land scam in &amp; around mysore.<br />
9.even in developed countrise like U.S.A. &amp; U.K. mal-handling of radio-active materials takes place now &amp; then, which in itself constitute nuclear disasters on small scale.refer the DECCAN HERALD (12/10/03 to18/10/03).in india how many cases of mal-handling of radio-active materials have taken place? no public knowledge.in the back drop of corrupt,negligent,hush-hush,buck passing work culture in most of the government service in india, i do want to know how safe are we the mysoreans from the processing &amp; storage of radio-active materials at M/S RARE EARTH MATERIALS PLANT,yelwal,mysore? in the past there were media reports about damages caused to the human beings ,the environment by the same organisation M/S R.E.M.P. &amp; it&#8217;s sister concern M/S URANIUM CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED(U.C.I.L.) at kerala state &amp; at jadaguda ,orissa state respectively.even some of the insurance companies like M/S.metlife india insurance co.,don&#8217;t cover the risk of health damages ,death due to nuclear hazards.in such an event who will bear the cost of compensation?how the quantum of compensation is calculated?give me information about the safety measures taken by M/S. R,E,M.P.mysore &amp; the compensation pay sructure and the safety measures being followed by all agencies dealing with radio-active materials.<br />
I do hope for justice , from the apex court of India. Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.</p>
<p>Your’s sincerely,<br />
Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p> ** LTTE-Sonia link ?<br />
http://indiaview.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/ltte-sonia-link/  ,<br />
http://www.scribd.com/doc/18053175/Sonias-Ottavio-Quattrochchi-Paid-for-Rajiv-Gandhi ,<br />
http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/watch?v=g4uinmueUqg ,<br />
http://www.legalsutra.org/1466/criminal-conspiracy/ ,<br />
http://www.spur.asn.au/extra/rajiv.htm ,</p>
<p>An LTTE-Sonia family link?<br />
S. Gurumurthy,Newindpress<br />
April 29 2008 </p>
<p>The LTTE suicide squad did plan and eliminate Rajiv Gandhi. But, why did the LTTE do it? Was there a larger conspiracy that extended beyond the LTTE as the strike force?<br />
Was the LTTE the author of the crime or the mercenary for some one else or for some purpose that yielded some benefit to it? These questions persisted even after the actual assassins were brought to book.<br />
The Narasimha Rao government appointed the Jain Commission to go into the conspiracy angle to the murder.In its interim report the commission did exceedingly good work to bring on record evidence about the political forces involved in promoting the LTTE in Tamil Nadu that made the crime possible.<br />
Yet it made a mockery of its main work, the conspiracy angle. It floated dubious and wild theories, involving Mossad! CIA! Besides adding confusion, it ended up trivialising a very serious exercise. This also robbed the commission of its credibility.<br />
As the commission’s final report proved a flop, the Vajpayee government appointed a Multi- Disciplinary Monitoring Agency (MDMA) in 1998 to unearth the conspiracy angle.<br />
But the person who first demanded, but, ultimately made, investigation into the conspiracy to murder Rajiv Gandhi irrelevant was none other than his widow Sonia Gandhi.<br />
Her attitude to the investigation and suspected actors in the murder dramatically changed. Her conduct in 1997 when she was working to enter active politics was a stark contrast to her attitude after taking over the congress leadership on the Jain Commission issue.<br />
In 1997, she demanded that the DMK which, the Jain commission had said, was part of the conspiracy, be sacked as a partner of the UF alliance and pulled down the government when the demand was not met. Her party insisted the entire facts about the conspiracy be investigated and revealed.<br />
Addressing a meeting at Amethi, Sonia hinted that the DMK was a fan of the LTTE and charged that those who doubted the Jain commission report were diverting the attention from the investigation into the conspiracy to murder Rajiv and demanded that the probe be completed expeditiously (Indian Express 2.2.1998).</p>
<p>But, once she took over the party leadership, she not only ceased to evince any interest in pursuing the Rajiv Gandhi murder conspiracy, but also began allying with the alleged conspirators themselves.<br />
The developments, put together, reveal a shocking picture.The year after taking over the Congress, Sonia Gandhi makes a secret move.<br />
In the year 1999, she told then President Dr K R Narayanan privately that ‘neither she nor her son and daughter wanted any of the four convicts’ sentenced to death for Rajiv’s assassination ‘to be hanged’, and pleaded that no child should be orphaned by an act of the State.<br />
Noted the Indian Express (Nov 20, 1999) that before her plea for mercy to the Rajiv killers the Congress party was the leading opponent of mercy to them. This silenced the party once and for all.<br />
What transpired at her private meeting with the President was revealed not by Sonia, but by Mohini Giri (the former chairperson of the National Women’s Commission) and on that basis Nalini’s death sentence was commuted to life. (Frontline Nov 5-18, 2005).<br />
Then, in February 2004, there were reports, editorially commented by the Island newspaper in Colombo on Feb 20, 2004, that Eduardo Faleiro, her emissary, had a secret meeting with the LTTE chief Prabhakaran at Killinochi. Island had also referred to reports that Sonia’s mother Ms Paula Maino had met Anton Balasingham, LTTE’s point man in London, in connection with the electoral alliance between the DMK and the Congress. While Eduardo Faleiro at least made a feeble attempt to deny the meeting, Paulo Maino would not even deny that.Third, the Paulo Maino meeting preceded, and the Faleiro meeting succeeded, the unbelievable U-turn of Sonia Gandhi to forge alliance with the DMK which was accused by her own party in 1997 of being part of the conspiracy to murder her husband. The DMK-Congress alliance seems to have been agreed upon sometime in December 2003. In January 2004, Sonia met the DMK chief and concretised the alliance.<br />
The coming together of one of the alleged conspirators and the victim of the conspiracy made a mockery of any further investigation into Rajiv Gandhi murder.<br />
For the last four years there is not a single word spoken by Sonia on pursuing the Rajiv Gandhi murderers and on unearthing the conspiracy or for the extradition of Prabhakaran or Pottu Amman.<br />
This is despite the fact that, when, on April 10, 2002, Prabhakaran met the press at Killinochi, he did not even deny that LTTE was involved in Rajiv assassination.<br />
Fourth, the LTTE too responded favourably to signals from Sonia that she was not against LTTE.<br />
On January 27, 2006, Anton Balasingham, told an Indian TV news channel that the Rajiv killing was ‘monumental tragedy’ and asked the people of India to be ‘magnanimous to put the past behind’ and deal with the LTTE.<br />
Fifth, Sonia did not object to the inclusion of the DMK woman MP in whose house Sivarasan the main killer of Rajiv Gandhi had stayed for which she was detained under the TADA, as a minister in the UPA government.<br />
Sixth, the MDMA which was appointed by the NDA government after Sonia rejected the Action Taken Report on the Jain Commission, has virtually become defunct under the UPA regime.<br />
Since 2004, she has not uttered a single word asking what the MDMA is doing.<br />
And finally now in March 2008, Priyanka Vadra, Sonia’s daughter makes a secret visit to Vellore jail and meets the first accused in the murder of Rajiv, for over an hour.<br />
Media reports say that they sat by each other’s side, cried and professed goodwill towards each other! No one knows what transpired between them. The meeting clearly illegal, looks almost a conspiracy, would have remained a secret had the media not exposed it.<br />
Priyanka said that neither Sonia nor Rahul or Priyanka believe in hate or anger, and that the visit was her way of coming to terms with the Rajiv Gandhi murder.<br />
Moral high ground seems to be a cover for undisclosed political strategies. But where was this high moral ground when Sonia angrily pulled down the UF government on the ground that DMK, a suspected co-conspirator with LTTE, was part of the alliance?<br />
Is Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination a personal affair between the Sonia Gandhi family and the LTTE for the former to punish or pardon the latter?<br />
LTTE has neither confessed nor regretted its action for the Gandhis to pardon. The LTTE is even today unrepenting.<br />
The prosecution case is that the LTTE supremo decided to avenge Rajiv Gandhi for sending IPKF to Sri Lanka and betraying the LTTE. But that was no personal decision of Rajiv Gandhi. The assassination was an act against the state of India.<br />
This is how it should be seen and pursued. Neither Sonia nor Priyanka nor the Congress has the right to pardon the criminals who have challenged the sovereignty of India.<br />
QED: Sonia Gandhi family and the LTTE connection is mysterious. Is the maverick Dr Subramanian Swamy right after all in his theory that LTTE and the Maino family have had links before?  http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IEM20080428231348&amp;Title=Main+Article&amp;rLink=0<br />
RELATED STORIES:   </p>
<p>Do you know Sonia : Subramanian Swamy @ http://www.saveindi aforum.com/ dynamic/<br />
Sonia Cong’s blitzkrieg evangelisation thru RBI: V. Sundaram @ http://www.newstodaynet.com/2007sud/may07/230507.htm<br />
She became loyal bit late: by Gurumurthy@ http://indiaview.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/she-became-loyal-to-india-a-trifle-late/<br />
Demo-narchy of India @ http://indiaview.wordpress.com/2007/08/01/de%e2%80%99mo-narchy-of-democratic-india/<br />
Sonia-LTTE link : by Gurumurthy @ http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems.asp?ID=IEM20080428231348&amp;Title=Main+Article&amp;rLink=0</p>
<p>http://www.desivideonetwork.com/view/x85ak7x4i/rajiv-gandhi-assasination-conspiracy-5-of-7/ ,<br />
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PY-yKwbH0c ,</p>
<p>RAJIV ASSASSINATED</p>
<p>The French Intelligence Agencies as per a regular routine Intelligence Drill, keep under heavily Intelligence Surveillance all the activities of all the Foreigners in all the Five Star Hotels.politicsparty.com has learnt from highly placed sources that, “In the course of the routine surveillance the Intelligence Agencies of France have in their possession On Camera Footage of a now Highly Classified Recording of a Secret Meeting at a Paris Five Star Hotel in 1991.”The L.T.T.E was fighting through the use of Terrorism for the separation of the Tamil portion of the country from Sri Lanka. Rajiv Gandhi as Prime Minister had sent the Indian Army to Sri Lanka to assist the Government forces there to fight and destroy the L.T.T.E. The Indian Army was finally withdrawn from Sri Lanka without achieving success. Rajiv thus became an enemy of the L.T.T.E.Rajiv lost power in 1989 Lok Sabha Elections.In 1991, Rajiv Gandhi was the Congress President, Chandrashekar was the Prime Minister.The Lok Sabha Elections were announced after Rajiv withdrew the Congress support to the Chandrashekar Government.The L.T.T.E. Chief had sent two L.T.T.E delegations to New Delhi in 1991, to meet and discuss with Rajiv Gandhi, to understand his attitude towards the L.T.T.E. After these meetings the L.T.T.E. Chief was not convinced that Rajiv would be soft on the L.T.T.E. In fact Prabhakaran expected Rajiv to be hostile to the L.T.T.E.In the 1991 Elections Rajiv was not expected to come back to power. However the L.T.T.E. did not want the risk of allowing Rajiv to come to power.Rajiv Gandhi and his Congress won a massive victory in 1984 because of the nationwide sympathy generated by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s Assassination by her Sikh Bodyguards. Rajiv’s Congress won 414 Lok Sabha MPs. Rajiv looked like being Prime Minister forever.However, Rajiv got in to a serious Credibility Problem when the HDW Submarine Deal Broke. Rajiv threw out the then Defence Minister V.P.Singh from the Party. Rajiv’s Coterie made a loyal V.P.Singh an enemy of Rajiv.Thereafter the Bofors Gun Deal Scam tumbled out of the Swedish Closet. Rajiv handled the Bofors Scam horribly. Rajiv’s former aides manipulated to destroy Rajiv and Rajiv’s Politics. Rajiv lost complete credibility. Rajiv’s Congress won 195 MPs but lost the Lok Sabha Elections and the Central Government in 1989. The V.P.Singh Government came to power and demonstrated quickness in getting the Bofors Pay Offs in Foreign Bank Accounts Sealed.The Bofors Money Trail led directly to the Italian Wheeler-Dealer Ottavio Quattrocchi.Quattrocchi realized that India’s Opposition Politicians and Anti-Congress Governments in their passion to expose Rajiv would chase the Bofors Scam and all its beneficiaries. However, in that process the involvement of Quattrocchi would be completely exposed. Quatrocchi believed that Rajiv and his Congress were not winning the 1991 Elections. The Third Front Government of V.P.Singh was expected to win. The V.P. Singh Government would accelerate investigation in to the Bofors Scam. Quattrocchi’s role in the Bofors Scam would be completely exposed thus leading to the jailing of Quattrocchi.Quattrocchi panicked. There was only one way for Quattrocchi to survive. The Bofors scam must be buried. The Bofors Enquiry cannot be stopped if Rajiv was Alive. If Rajiv was not there then the Political System would lose interest in the Bofors Scam. So to bury the Bofors Scam Burying Rajiv was a necessity for Quattrocchi. Only then could Quattrocchi happily survive and enjoy the millions looted from India’s Public Exchequer.Anton Balasingham was the Principal Adviser, Most Trusted Lieutenant, Globe Trotting Apex Negotiator, Vital Deal Maker, Super Strategist, Spokesman and Personal Friend of the Chief of the L.T.T.E. Velupillai Prabhakaran.Sources say that, “Quattrocchi got in touch with the L.T.T.E. The meeting with the L.T.T.E. was fixed in a Five Star Hotel in Paris.Ottavio Quattrocchi and Anton Balasingham met. Quattrocchi convinced Balasingham that Rajiv’s death was vital to both. If Rajiv were dead then the Bofors Scam would die. If Rajiv was dead then the L.T.T.E. could be confident that the Indian Army will not go to Sri Lanka to destroy the L.T.T.E. Quattrocchi handed over Bags of Dollars to Balasingham as payment for Rajiv’s Assassination.The entire meeting and conversation between Ottavio Quattrocchi and Anton Balasingham was Recorded by the French Intelligence Agencies.”On the day of his Assassination Rajiv Gandhi was in Vishakapatnam. Rajiv was campaigning for his fond candidate Uma Gajapati Raju. Rajiv was enjoying the campaigning. Rajiv was in no mood to leave Vishakapatnam, on that evening.A Trio of Congress Busybodies including P.V.Narasimha Rao made frantic Phone Calls from New Delhi urging Rajiv to leave Vishakapatnam and fly to Chennai. Rajiv keen on spending the night at Vishakapatnam, tried avoiding to go to Chennai. Rajiv made an excuse that his aircraft was not in perfect order. The Congress Busybodies of Delhi got the Aircraft speedily checked, repaired and told Rajiv that it was ready. The Congress Busybodies forced a reluctant-to-leave-Vishakapatnam Rajiv, to fly from Vishakapatnam to Chennai enroute to Sriperumbudur in Tamilnadu.Rajiv flew to Chennai and went by road to Sriperumbudur. As soon as the cavalcade of cars of Rajiv and the Tamilnadu State leaders accompanying Rajiv reached Sriperumbudur, Rajiv got out of the car and walked through the crowd to the Dias.When any national leader visits any part of the country then the moment the leader gets down from the Aircraft, the entire State Leadership of his Party surrounds him. The State Leaders stick to him through out the Visit until he gets back in to the Airport. If a Photograph is taken at any given minute of the visit, the Photo will contain the National Leader and the Top State Leaders. Whether it is Vajpayee, Advani, Rajnath Singh, Sonia or any national leader the scenario is the same. Every Photo Frame will consist of the National leader being surrounded by State Leaders.When Rajiv alighted at Sriperumbudur all the state Leaders were there. However, each of the Tamilnadu State Leaders suddenly decided to keep away from Rajiv. From the car, Rajiv walked through the crowd unaccompanied by any State Leader.So, when the Human Bomb Exploded, Rajiv was Blown to pieces, but not a single Tamilnadu State Leader Died with him. G.K.Moopanar, P.Chidambaram, Maragatham Chandrashekar and several Other Tamilnadu state Leaders did not walk with Rajiv. Strange and Impossible. But the Tamilnadu State leaders allowed Rajiv to walk the Death-Walk Alone.In the Final Photo Frame of Rajiv Gandhi, no Tamilnadu State leader was present with Rajiv. Were all these State Leaders aware that Rajiv would be killed and hence kept away from Rajiv to save their lives?The Investigation in to the Rajiv Assassination has not interrogated or put on the Lie Detector Test and the Narco-Analysis Test the Congress Bigwigs who insisted that Rajiv must leave Vishakapatnam and go to Tamilnadu, that Assassination night. Why?Similarly the Investgation did not interrogate and subject to a Lie Detector and a Narco Analysis Test the Tamilnadu Congress State Leaders who deserted Rajiv immediately after he got out of the car at Sriperumbudur. Why?Intelligence Agencies Sources say that the International Arms Dealer Adnan Kashogi provided the Bomb Belt worn by the L.T.T.E.’s suicide Human Bomb to assassinate Rajiv Gandhi. India’s Investigation never pursued this lead. Why?Later P.V.Narasimha Rao’s son Prabhakar Rao and Adnan Kashogi’s Son were involved in a UREA SCAM. The Government of India in Dollars issued 125 crores even before the Urea arrived in India. Till today the Urea has not arrived. The 125 Crores has not been recovered from Narasimha Rao’s Son. Now the Manmohan Singh Government has allowed the Crores of Rupees in the Swiss Banks to be defreezed. Narasimha Rao deserved to be in jail for corruption but Manmohan calls him a Saint.India’s Investigation in to the Rajiv Assassination has not investigated P.V.Narasimha Rao and Adnan Kashoggi’s Family to ascertain the facts and complicity, if any, in the Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. Why?Ottavio Quattrocchi was the Mastermind in the Conspiracy to Assassinate Rajiv Gandhi. But Quattrocchi was never investigated. Why?The Intelligence Agencies of France, Israel and the United States of America have Highly Classified Secret Data pertaining to all the details of the Rajiv Gandhi Assassination.Israel, France and US are all Democracies. All three nations are closely involved with India in the International war against terrorism. It is their responsibility to provide India with every bit of evidence and information that they and their Intelligence agencies possess about the Assassination of R ajiv Gandhi.So far these Nations have not given India any information because the government of India has not requested them. The moment India requests these countries then they will give to India, all the information they have.Politicsparty.com Requests the Parliament of India to ensure that the Government of India obtains all the information pertaining to the Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi available with the Intelligence Agencies of France, Israel and the US and discloses all the information to India’s Parliament.politicsparty.com Requests the Parliament of India to ensure that an investigation is ordered in to the Role of Ottavio Quattrocchi in the Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi.Quattrocchi must be arrested, brought to India put on a Lie Detector Test and a Narco-Analysis Test and Questioned about his Role in the Conspiracy to Assassinate Rajiv Gandhi.politicsparty.com expects India’s Parliament to do justice to one of its Assassinated Member of Parliament Rajiv Gandhi.President of India Kalam is now in France. The Government of India must request President Kalam to request the French President to make available to India the Tapes of the Secret Meeting in the Paris Hotel and all other information involving the Assassination of Rajiv Gandhi.The People of India must know the truth about the Assassination of Rajiv and the Conspirators must be arrested, prosecuted and given the Death Sentence.<br />
Sorse of the story hear By :- http://blogs.ibibo.com/ViewComments.aspx?blogid=3c849c43-7793-4455-831c-37f1e8f84ef6&amp;mid=811ff191-26ba-4157-9dea-951460e7e3fc</p>
<p>పూర్తిగా చదవండి</p>
<p>DMK helped LTTE assassinate Rajiv Gandhi. </p>
<p>Munnetra Kazhagam, DMK Leader<br />
India’s Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party (DMK) and its leader Karunanidhi who is the chief minister of Tamil Nadu came in for strong criticism in the interim report of a retired judge who probed the circumstances leading to the killing in 1991 by an LTTE female suicide bomber. Indian officials blamed the killing on Sri Lankan Tamil Tiger terrorists, who the judge said had received support in the past from the DMK.<br />
In 1976, Gandhi&#8217;s federal government dismissed Karunanidhi&#8217;s government, which was accused of corruption. A year later, MGR won local elections and sent Karunanidhi into political wilderness until MGR&#8217;s death in 1987.<br />
After a year of direct rule by the federal government, the DMK party regained power in Tamil Nadu in 1989. Two years later the federal government dismissed Karunanidhi for a second time, accusing him of not doing enough to crack down on the Tamil Tigers in his state.<br />
Further, the Commission said, the LTTE was getting its supplies, including arms, ammunition, explosives, fuel and other essential items from Tamil Nadu to continue its fight against the IPKF that too with the support of the DMK Government, State Administration and connivance of the law enforcement agencies.<br />
The report said that soon after the DMK Government took over the reins of power in Tamil Nadu, &#8220;the LTTE slowly began to consolidate itself in the State and their clandestine activities, heretofore dormant, became more and more pronounced. All the activities of the LTTE at this stage towards resource mobilisation, propaganda and treatment of their wounded cadres, had taken an anti-national dimension.&#8221;<br />
The Commission noted the visit of the then DMK MP, Mr. V. Gopalaswamy, MP (DMK) to Northern Sri Lanka and his reported meeting with Prabhakaran between February 8, 1989, and March 3, 1989.<br />
&#8220;This visit by Mr. V. Gopalaswamy, and the manner in which this entire episode was dealt with by the DMK party sent clear signals to the pro-LTTE anti-IPKF elements in the State as well as LTTE itself that the newly-elected Government would not resort to any drastic action against such elements; on the other hand, the impression that the entire episode created was that pro-LTTE gestures, even if they were illegal, would be tolerated by the Government.&#8221;<br />
The Commission&#8217;s report said the then Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi, was keen that &#8220;some satisfactory solution be arrived at with the LTTE so that the Indo-Sri Lankan Accord could be implemented in letter and spirit. He discussed this concern with Mr. Karunanidhi and sought his assistance.&#8221; After Mr. V. P. Singh became the Prime Minister on December 2, 1989, it was spelt out that if no solution came, India would no longer give any military or monetary help to any of the groups, nor allow its mainland to be used for militant activities. &#8220;The LTTE remained adamant during their parleys with Mr. Karunanidhi, and continued to demand the formation of Eelam,&#8221; the report noted.<br />
The interim report said that credible reports existed of &#8220;active connivance of some DMK leaders with the LTTE. The LTTE was in continuous interaction with Mr. Karunanidhi, primarily to ensure that their activities continue unhindered even after the Padmanabha killing.&#8221; The ATR &#8220;noted&#8221; the observation of the Commission that there was a nexus between the LTTE and the ULFA and their combined endeavours in Tamil Nadu had also been confirmed.<br />
The Commission&#8217;s report ponders over questions of aid to the LTTE in the killing of Rajiv Gandhi. &#8220;Were there other forces behind the LTTE involved in the conspiracy for the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi? These are questions requiring a deep and anxious probe,&#8221; the report said referring to conspiratorial aspects which were yet to be dealt with by the one-man probe panel.<br />
Soon after the DMK Government took over the reins of power in Tamil Nadu, the LTTE slowly began to consolidate itself in the State. During 1990, a growing nexus between the LTTE and DMK and its repercussions on the local law enforcement machinery were discernible. The assassination of EPRLF leader K. Padmanabha and others at Madras on 19th June 1990 was a shocking reminder of the impunity with which the LTTE could operate in India.<br />
The case assumes significance due to the fact that striking similarities were found in the Padmanabha assassination and the case relating to the assassination of Shri Rajiv Gandhi. It can, therefore, be safely concluded that the growing connivance of the DMK Government with the LTTE having been brought to the knowledge of the National Front Government, effective steps were not taken by the Central government to check it, whatever may be the reasons.<br />
From the evaluation of the material, the conclusion is irresistible that there was tacit support to the LTTE by Shri M. Karunanidhi and his Government and law enforcement agencies.<br />
The charges, put together as long quotations from the report, include: that the DMK provided a safe sanctuary for the LTTE cadres and activists, it gave advice, active assistance, finance and security cover to LTTE operations, and that the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi would not have been possible the way it happened without the nexus between the LTTE and the DMK, a nexus which started a chain of events which led to the survival and growth of the LTTE in Tamil Nadu long after the Government of India&#8217;s attitude had changed towards the LTTE and hostilities had broken out between the Indian Peace Keeping Force and the LTTE in Sri Lanka, and finally that the DMK leader and Tamil Nadu Chief Minister, Mr. M. Karunanidhi, had &#8220;himself been instrumental in ensuring that things went smoothly for LTTE&#8221; and that the cadres of the LTTE had little fear of the security agencies in India &#8220;thanks to the patronage of the DMK Government&#8221;.<br />
________________________________________<br />
   Home</p>
<p>Cross  Examination of Chief Justice of India<br />
Hereby ,  we  DEMAND  the Honourable Chief Justice of India to answer the following questions in public interest , for national security , for National unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?</p>
<p>Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ?</p>
<p>Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals &amp; backstabs our motherland , it&#8217;s national security ?</p>
<p>Q4. Don&#8217;t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law &amp; order ?</p>
<p>Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?</p>
<p>Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth &amp; provide timely justice ?<br />
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich &amp; mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?<br />
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don&#8217;t give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts don&#8217;t take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?<br />
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?<br />
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases &amp; by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?<br />
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police &amp; intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?<br />
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?<br />
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses &amp; all parties involved , both during case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q14. How do you monitor &amp; check corrupt police personnel &amp; increase in their family&#8217;s wealth year after year ?<br />
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidate&#8217;s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?<br />
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?<br />
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?<br />
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just &amp; legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?<br />
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded &amp; aided couter terrorist groups , is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained &amp; funded &#8220;salwa judum&#8221; to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements &amp; attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?<br />
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld &amp; fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms &amp; ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty &amp; rich ?<br />
Q23. Law is one &amp; same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich &amp; poor ? why this differentiation ?<br />
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it&#8217;s products come with IMEI number only &amp; stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their&#8217;s as it doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they don&#8217;t have any business relationship with either tata indicom or it&#8217;s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets &amp; cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing<br />
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file &#8220;B&#8221; report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?<br />
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with &#8220;B&#8221; report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?<br />
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?<br />
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?<br />
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ?<br />
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG &amp; IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police &amp; intelligence personnel ?<br />
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?<br />
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases &amp; can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn&#8217;t cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission &amp; home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?<br />
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?<br />
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people&#8217;s representatives are facing criminal charges ?<br />
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?<br />
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?<br />
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people&#8217;s representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?<br />
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?<br />
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?<br />
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?<br />
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?<br />
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin &amp; while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?<br />
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?<br />
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi&#8217;s family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it&#8217;s partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it&#8217;s case &amp; prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks &amp; others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it&#8217;s partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q48.what damages has been done to india&#8217;s national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?<br />
Q49. What action by the government ?<br />
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?<br />
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?<br />
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?<br />
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years &amp; acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?<br />
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters &amp; 3rd degree torture ?<br />
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?<br />
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan&#8217;s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?<br />
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my &#8220;fundamental duty&#8221; hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI &amp; GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?<br />
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more &amp; even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police &amp; their family members on the lines of defense forces ?<br />
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable &amp; his family ?<br />
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?<br />
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?<br />
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?<br />
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?<br />
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?<br />
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?<br />
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?<br />
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?<br />
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings &amp; subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right &amp; legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.<br />
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?<br />
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?<br />
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date<br />
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?<br />
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?<br />
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?<br />
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?<br />
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?<br />
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?<br />
Q78. how ? if not why ?<br />
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judge&#8217;s family members ?<br />
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?<br />
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?<br />
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?<br />
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement &amp; meating out injustice ?<br />
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests like &#8220;poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc&#8221; , in the interest of justice &amp; truth ?<br />
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of &#8220;Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society&#8221;. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society &amp; allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said society&#8217;s – judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ?<br />
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?<br />
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured person&#8217;s case responsible for it ?<br />
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges &amp; the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder &amp; murder ? if not why ?<br />
Q89. registrar , Mysore district &amp; sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.<br />
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.<br />
Q91. when a person doesn&#8217;t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that person&#8217;s case responsible for it ? what action ?<br />
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food &amp; medical care to prisoners ?<br />
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence &amp; gives him 3 months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?<br />
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years &amp; finally the judge finds them as innocents &amp; acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?<br />
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions &amp; the actions arising out of misuse of office ?<br />
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges &amp; their personal actions as individuals ?<br />
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?<br />
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?<br />
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?<br />
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?<br />
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities &amp; women are their in supreme court , state high courts &amp; subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .<br />
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges &amp; to check corruption in judiciary ?<br />
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?<br />
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill &amp; claimed traveling allowance ?<br />
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high court judges &amp; newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?<br />
Q107. when common people / tax payers &amp; even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right &amp; just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties &amp; mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?<br />
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?<br />
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?<br />
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in a case ?<br />
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi&#8217;s assassination case , was not considered by the court ?<br />
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?<br />
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?<br />
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy person&#8217;s rights violation ?<br />
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?<br />
Q118. when the corrupt police officer &amp; government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high &amp; mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?<br />
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper &amp; fair prosecution of cases against rich &amp; mighty ?<br />
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?<br />
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?<br />
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court ready to utilize it ?<br />
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of india&#8217;s on-line grievance system ( DPG &amp; DARPG ) :<br />
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618<br />
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pages<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw</p>
<p>what are the status of those appeals ?<br />
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India ? please answer.<br />
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemen&#8217;s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen &amp; their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?<br />
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.<br />
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?<br />
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?<br />
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel &amp; pay it as compensation to victims of police failures &amp; atrocities ?<br />
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?<br />
Q133. during british rule in india &amp; various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &amp; other british colonies. After india&#8217;s independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ?<br />
Q134. in how many cases GOI &amp; other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?<br />
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?<br />
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it&#8217;s colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?<br />
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?<br />
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?<br />
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND &amp; prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &amp; prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ?<br />
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?<br />
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?<br />
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?</p>
<p>Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators &amp; parliamentarians by the constitution of India?</p>
<p>a) Inside the House b) Outside the House</p>
<p>Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like</p>
<p>a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India</p>
<p>c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC</p>
<p>e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.</p>
<p>Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.</p>
<p>b) Cover both their official &amp; personal actions.</p>
<p>Q146. Are the privileges defined &amp; codified ?</p>
<p>Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?</p>
<p>Q148. Are the liberty &amp; fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?</p>
<p>Q149. Can the Indian legislatures &amp; parliament be equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?</p>
<p>Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?</p>
<p>Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives &amp; executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers &amp; contempt of the court by the House.</p>
<p>Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?</p>
<p>Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of official&#8217;s secret act &amp; go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges</p>
<p>Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court &amp; Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?</p>
<p>Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer&#8217;s money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q157. Judges &amp; Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more<br />
valid) in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?</p>
<p>Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?</p>
<p>Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?</p>
<p>Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?</p>
<p>Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation&#8221; ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.</p>
<p>Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. &amp; giving free legal aid ?</p>
<p>Q164. Communication &#8211; free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?<br />
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just &amp; legal ? give me the names of accused judges &amp; description of charges against them ?<br />
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?<br />
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?<br />
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.<br />
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?<br />
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?<br />
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses &amp; brain. That is why the acts &amp; sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects &amp; produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police &amp; judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them &amp; to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police &amp; judges in drunken state legal ?</p>
<p>Q 172 . What action  has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?</p>
<p>Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state ministers &amp; central ministers who fully aided the criminals – Union Carbide official  Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail  &amp; flee the country without court’s permission ?</p>
<p>Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of court  &amp; for aiding a criminal to escape ?</p>
<p>Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?  what action has been taken against the CJI who  became an official of the  trust belonging to the criminal ?</p>
<p>Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?</p>
<p>Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department &amp; pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?</p>
<p>Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal although they don’t have right to do so ?</p>
<p>Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors &amp; Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didn’t  press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for  producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?</p>
<p>Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials &amp; people’s representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up &amp; aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of  thousands &amp; maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?</p>
<p>Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt  labour / pollution control board officials  HUMAN BEINGS ?<br />
Q  182    Why  police are  not registering my complaint   against  CJI &amp; other VVIPS ,Even after years ?<br />
Q   183   don’t the  police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal  jurisdiction  to register  the case  against these VVIPs ? or  just  because the criminals happens to be VVIPs  ,they  are  not booked  by police? If the  said  police don’t have  legal jurisdiction to book  these VVIPs , they should have  transferred the complaint  to  those authorities who have jurisdiction &amp;   authority to book  &amp; prosecute   these  VVIPs , but not done  so , why ?<br />
Q  184  are not all these actions , of  VVIPs &amp; police amounting to  cover up of crimes &amp; criminals ? are  not  these cover ups itself is a crime ?<br />
Q  185.  Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals  for justice  concerning public welfare , national security  sent  through  post , e-mail  to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ?  does  not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?<br />
Q 186   Are not  the honourable chief justice of india  together  with the jurisdictional police &amp; Revenue district magistrate  responsible  to protect  the  fundamental &amp; human rights  of people ?  why the CJI , Mysore DC &amp; Jurisdictional Police  have failed to protect the fundamental &amp; human rights of  people  including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus  Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate &amp; jurisdictional police  are  together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the trio – Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city &amp; Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station  , mysore  will be responsible . </p>
<p> These corrupt  parasites will feel  , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In  whose  Court of justice  MATCH FIXING is not there &amp; every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.</p>
<p>POLICE  NOT  REGISTERING  COMPLAINT   AGAINST  CHIEF  JUSTICE OF  INDIA  &amp;  OTHERS</p>
<p>From,<br />
NAGARAJ.M.R.<br />
LIG-2 / 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE,<br />
LAXMIKANTANGAR, HEBBAL,<br />
MYSORE &#8211; 570017.</p>
<p>Through,<br />
Honourable DG &amp; IG of Police ,<br />
State Police H.Q ,<br />
Bangalore.</p>
<p>To,</p>
<p>Honourable Circle Inspector of Police,<br />
Vijayanagar Police Station,<br />
Mysore.</p>
<p>Honourable Sir,</p>
<p>   Subject : Violation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; HUMAN RIGHTS by Honourable Chief Jusice of India &amp;  H.E.Honourable President of India &amp; other public servants<br />
                   Karnataka Police are NOT registering &amp; acting on my  complaint  to them dated  04.07.2009<br />
The Vijayanagar police in mysore stated that  they don’t have legal jurisdiction to book the criminals I have mentioned in the complaint &amp; by taking a statement from me to that effect  closed the case temporarily on  11.09.2010  after sitting over the complaint  for years together. Is it not the  duty of  DG&amp;IGP to seek the permission from home ministry to legally prosecute the alleged criminal VVIPs ? Why he was silent ? Ofcourse the lower rung police officers practically don’t have power to prosecute high &amp; mighty ? </p>
<p>Hereby , I do request the  DG &amp; IG OF Police , Government of Karnataka to seek the legal sanction from union home ministry &amp; Karnataka state home ministry , for the prosecution of  below mentioned criminal VVIPs &amp; to reopen my complaint here with. </p>
<p>In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are equal , have right to equal oppurtunity &amp; equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the constitution has guaranteed these to every Indian citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of his / her birth.<br />
However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLIC SERVANTS have forgotten this &amp; are acting as lords , autocrats &#8211; unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public, public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &amp; paymasters of this very same public servants. In India , corruption has spread it&#8217;s tentacles far &amp; wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there corruption has spread.In present day India , if one is rich , he can committ any type of crime &amp; get away clean from courts of law. there are corrupt police officials who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up different line of investigation ,  fix innocents , coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture , file B report closing the case , decides not to appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the list of millionnaire police officials who are caught by karnataka lokayukta.<br />
Next step , the prosecutor &amp; defense advocate strikes a deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way of presentation of case &amp; way of argument favouring the rich crooks for a price , as observed in high profile BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN &amp; defense counsel RK ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police &amp; advocates , together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is left high &amp; dry eventhough the judge is honest, he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is corrupt , people&#8217;s last hope , democracy is dead. Nowadays we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.<br />
our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION before hon&#8217;ble supreme court of India but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ? ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS.<br />
The issues raised by us for sample :<br />
1. sale of fake medicines &amp; adulterated food products , beverages , colas affecting the health of millions of Indians &amp; public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous products from india .<br />
2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits , tribals , backward castes by government authorities whereas regularising  illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings by high &amp; mighty people in total disregard to law. in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying court orders &amp; enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.<br />
3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws , pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.<br />
4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants leaking india&#8217;s defense secrets to foreign countries &amp; some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM &amp; underworld dons in gulf countries &amp; elsewhere. these type of appeals are for public good , national security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of india is not considering<br />
our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good , inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints. over &amp; above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was very low &amp; i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me. Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals  the Honourable chief justice of India &amp; H.E.Honourable President of India are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &amp; PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high &amp; mighty criminals , anti nationals , amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a cognizable offence.<br />
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html</p>
<p>CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA -<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF DG&amp;IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/<br />
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/<br />
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –<br />
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/  , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/<br />
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/  , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED<br />
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218</p>
<p>MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>are you ready to catch tax thieves ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>reliance industry where is accountability ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>crimes at infosys campus<br />
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214</p>
<p>crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>crimes of land mafia in India<br />
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://landscam.wordpress.com/   ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>currency thefts in RBI Press<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80</p>
<p>killer colas &amp; killer medicines of India<br />
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201</p>
<p>We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies , public servants , but it is an appeal to the honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt colleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of India &amp; H.E.Honourable President of India have violated their oaths of office , failed in their constitutional duties , suppressed material truths / informations &amp; thereby repeatedly violated my Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS &amp; Obstructing me from performing constitutionally prescribed FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA.<br />
Hereby , i do request you to legally prosecute the below mentioned public servants viz<br />
1. H.E.Honourable President of India<br />
2. Honourable Chief Justice Of India<br />
3. Union Home Secretary , GOI<br />
4. Governor , Reserve Bank Of India<br />
5. Director-General &amp; Inspector General Of Police , government of karnataka<br />
6. Commissioner , Bangalore Development Authority<br />
7. Commissioner , Mysore Urban Development Authority<br />
8. Commissioner , Mysore City Corporation<br />
9. Labour Commissioner , government of karnataka and<br />
10. all public servants belonging to tax dept , pollution control board , etc mentioned in the above cases with web links.<br />
on the above mentioned charges. the whole issue of this news paper &amp; the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of this complaint. If i am  repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.<br />
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the governmentof india is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking you.<br />
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.</p>
<p>Date :   10.10.2010                             your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Place :  Mysore                                  nagaraj.m.r.</p>
<p>……………………..DECLARATION………………………</p>
<p>Name : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>Address : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP<br />
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE &#8211; 570017 INDIA</p>
<p>Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S &#8211; e – Voice For Justice</p>
<p>Periodicity : WEEKLY</p>
<p>Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB</p>
<p>Donations : NOT ACCEPTED.  Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .</p>
<p>Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.</p>
<p>Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>Nationality : INDIAN</p>
<p>Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated  to JSS Medical College , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be  handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of  medical students.</p>
<p>Eye Donation : Both EYES  of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated  to  Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my  eyes  must be  handed over to  Mysore Eye Bank  , Mysore  WITHIN 6 Hours  for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.</p>
<p>Home page :  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw   ,<br />
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper/    ,<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,<br />
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/     , http://indiapolicelaw.blogspot.com/ ,<br />
,  http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/  ,                     http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,  </p>
<p>Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com  ,</p>
<p>Cell : 0 9341820313</p>
<p>I ,NAGARAJ.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge &amp; belief. If i am  repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.</p>
<p>If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents   or to my family members    &#8211; In such case Chief Justice of  India together with the jurisdictional  revenue &amp; police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india  is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries.  </p>
<p>date :  10/10/2010…………………………..your&#8217;s sincerely,</p>
<p>place : India…………………………………Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>……………………..DECLARATION………………………</p>
<p>Name : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>Address : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP<br />
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE &#8211; 570017 INDIA</p>
<p>Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit</p>
<p>Periodicity : WEEKLY</p>
<p>Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB </p>
<p>Donations : NOT ACCEPTED.  Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .</p>
<p>Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.</p>
<p>Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>Nationality : INDIAN</p>
<p>Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated  to JSS Medical College , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be  handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of  medical students.</p>
<p>Eye Donation : Both EYES  of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated  to  Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my  eyes  must be  handed over to  Mysore Eye Bank  , Mysore  WITHIN 6 Hours  for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.</p>
<p>Home page :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,<br />
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit .<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , </p>
<p>http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/</p>
<p>Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com  ,</p>
<p>Cell : 0 9341820313</p>
<p>I ,NAGARAJ.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge &amp; belief. If i am  repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.</p>
<p>If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents   or to my family members    &#8211; In such case Chief Justice of  India together with the jurisdictional  revenue &amp; police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india  is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries.  </p>
<p>date :  10/10/2010…………………………..your&#8217;s sincerely,</p>
<p>place : India…………………………………Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p> edited , printed , published &amp; owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA  cell :             09341820313<br />
home page:<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,<br />
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,               </p>
<p>http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/</p>
<p> e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com     ,  naghrw@yahoo.com    </p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/129/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=129&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/12/26/rajiv-gandhi-assasination-cover-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crimes of President of USA</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/crimes-of-president-of-usa/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/crimes-of-president-of-usa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crimes of President of USA S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web Working For The Rights &#38; Survival Of The Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 43…… 27/10/2010 home page: http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home , http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit . http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com , naghrw@yahoo.com EDITORIAL : 9/11 , 26/11 &#8211; SIGN TO LEGALLY [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=127&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crimes of President of USA<br />
S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web<br />
Working For The Rights &amp; Survival Of The Oppressed</p>
<p>Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 43…… 27/10/2010</p>
<p>home page:<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home , http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit .</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ </p>
<p> e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com     ,  naghrw@yahoo.com    </p>
<p>EDITORIAL :  9/11 , 26/11 &#8211; SIGN  TO  LEGALLY  PROSECUTE  SPONSORERS OF  TERRORISM  USA , PAKISTAN &amp; INDIA</p>
<p>Visit , read the petition &amp; support by signing the petition demanding<br />
LEGAL PROSECUTION OF SPONSORERS OF TERRORISM</p>
<p>http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/911-2611&#8212;prosecute-the-sponsorers-of-terrorism ,</p>
<p>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/sponsor ,</p>
<p>Visit , read the petition &amp; support by signing the petition demanding<br />
ACCOUNTABILITY OF INDIAN JUDGES &amp; POLICE.</p>
<p>http://www.thepetitionsite.com/4/accountability-of-indian-judges#signatures ,</p>
<p>http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/judge ,</p>
<p>India, U.S.A , U.K , Pakistan and various other countries<br />
have given birth to &amp; supported various terror outfits, all with the<br />
objective of widening their area of influence, to get hold of<br />
governance of other countries, to loot resources of other countries.<br />
At no time they were bothered about the welfare of innocent people<br />
in those victim countries.</p>
<p>Now, when the Frankenstein monster they fathered TERRORISM<br />
is haunting them , came home to roost in their own backyards , all<br />
these countries are crying foul.</p>
<p>Take for instance Pakistan , it has got enough problems on hand , poverty , unemployment , malnutrition , hunger , illiteracy is rampant in Pakistan. Ordinary Pakistanis are suffering, ordinary Pakistanis does not need neither war nor jihad , what they need is food , healthcare , education for their children.</p>
<p>Take for instance india, it has lot of problems on hand<br />
like starvation, lack of education , health care, etc. The GOI says<br />
it doesn&#8217;t have enough funds to solve these problems. These problems<br />
are of pre-independece vintage, increasing multifold after<br />
independence of india. Still the government of india spent crores of<br />
rupees on training , arming of tamil terrorists in srilanka ,<br />
unnecessarily poked it&#8217;s nose in east pakistan creating bangladesh,<br />
created terrorist outfits in punjab &amp; northeast to counter the<br />
influence of other terrorist outfits. ALL THE WHILE PREACHING<br />
PANCHASHEEL PRINCIPLES – peaceful co-existance , respect for<br />
neighbour&#8217;s boundaries, etc, in the same breath. What ordinary Indians , commonfolk need is food , shelter , healthcare &amp; education.</p>
<p>Take the case of USA , from the beginning since decades , it is the habit of US administrators, britishers   to sow the seeds of discontent between two countries , make them to go to war with each other ( simultaneously selling military hardware worth  billions of dollars to those same countries  by the way making profit in billions ) &amp; to finally play the role of a truce maker thereby  getting a foothold in the newly formed government plus getting reconstruction projects worth billions of dollars leading to profit of billions. Just remember the US invasion of iraq , citing presence of WMDs, finally nothing was found. However USA  made billions of profit by business.</p>
<p>The common folk  of whichever country , whichever  religion you take , does not want war , everybody wants peace. The common folk need food , shelter , healthcare &amp; education. It is the scheming politicians who go on the path of violence.  POOJYA BAPUJI&#8217;s  , MAHATMA GANDHIJI&#8217;s  principles of non violence , non interference in the affairs of other individuals / other countries , love / compassion for fellow human beings is much relevant today.</p>
<p>Hereby, e-Voice  urges the international war crimes tribunal , to<br />
order the respective governments who aided terrorism ,to pay damages<br />
to victim countries. Jai hind. Vande mataram</p>
<p>Your&#8217;s sincerely,</p>
<p>Nagaraj.m.r.</p>
<p>                                 CRIMES OF U.S PRESIDENT</p>
<p>From the day one the government of  USA  is selfish &amp; violating the rights of other countrymen. During cold war days , to expand it&#8217;s influence &amp; to give more business for u.s arms manufacturers , the u.s.a sowed the seeds of terrorism in various countries &amp; nurtured them through arms &amp; finance supply , training. The AL-QUEDA &amp; TALIBAN are it&#8217;s own babies.<br />
  The president bush of U.S.A was sufferring from low image ratings , the domestic economy was facing a slump , so to improve his own rating &amp; bring more business to u.s industries , he schemed an inhuman ruthless plan. He wanted to take control of afghanisthan &amp; iraq. He needed a ruse to invade them &amp; concocted one murdering his very own countrymen.</p>
<p>  human rights watch has doubted the authenticity of  9/11 in it&#8217;s articles months ago. it is just a ploy of the bush to  divert attention of public from his dipping ratings , domestic problems  like unemployment , economic lows and more importantly to find rather  fabricate a reason for attacking the arab world , iraq. finally , to  help it&#8217;s MNCs mint millions in reconstuction , oil contracts, etc. it  is a savage act of bush for green bucks.</p>
<p> SEPTEMBER 9/11 WAS PLANNED !!!! VISIT  :  http://www.neiu.edu/~ayjamess/hmmm.htm#Main</p>
<p> The government of U.S.A thrown all international conventions into wind , lied about weapons of destruction in iraq &amp; invaded a sovereign country iraq. Still , it was unabale to find any weapons of mass destruction in iraq. In it&#8217;s greed for power , green bucks , it inhumanly tortured prisoners , took them to 3rd countries for torture , bugged phones of u.s citizens &amp; violated human rights of u.s citizens. In his ego , greed mr.bush has violated all human rights of not only u.s citizens but also human rights of innocent iraqis , afghans , etc &amp; thrown all international laws into winds.<br />
  Now, the president himself has acknowledged the intelligence failure in iraq but defended his iraqi invasion. Mr. Bush will be remebered in the history books as a GREATEST LIAR , INHUMAN SCHEMING  MEGALAMONIAC &amp; GREEDY  OLDMAN.</p>
<p>AN APPEAL TO THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF SUPREME  COURT OF USA  , CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA  &amp;  CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN<br />
- By American Citizens</p>
<p>Our country was known as &#8221; Heaven On Earth&#8221; , &#8220;Land of Equality &amp; Equal Oppurtunity&#8221; &amp; the &#8220;Statue of Liberty&#8221; rightly symbolized the spirit of our country. Now USA is known as a &#8220;Terror State&#8221;.</p>
<p>In the last 3 – 4 decades , the persons who occupied the office of President USA ,in their individual capacity took wrong , inhuman decisions , meddled in the internal affairs of other sovereign nations , spent our resources to create terrorist outfits like al-queda , Taliban in those countries.</p>
<p>In turn these terrorist outfits terrorized , murdered millions of innocents &amp; this Frankenstein monster came home to roost on September 9 / 11 . After September 9 / 11 , each terror suspect is severely tortured in hell like Abu Garibh prison , elsewhere by our authorities. For argument sake let us accept<br />
that these terrorists who murder innocents don&#8217;t deserve kid glove treatment &amp; rightly deserve 3rd degree torture. When a single terrorist deserve such inhuman 3rd degree torture , what quantum of punishment , torture – previous presidents of USA deserve – who created , aided &amp; abetted thousands of such terrorists , terrorist outfits ?</p>
<p>Herby, we appeal to the honourable Supreme Court of USA to order the federal government to to make public :</p>
<p>1. how much US resources were spent from US TREASURY , to finance terrorist outfits , military juntas in other sovereign nations ?</p>
<p>2. is not Al-queda , Taliban creations of USA ?</p>
<p>3. did September 9 / 11 WTC attack truly happened by hijacked airplane or was it planned by US authorities ? see</p>
<p>http://www.neiu.edu/~ayjamess/hmmm.htm#Main</p>
<p>4 . is racial profiling , profiling a particular community &amp; suspecting all the muslims as terror suspects , right?</p>
<p>5. if it is right , the cretors of such terrorist outfits – past presidents of USA – who were Christians makes it logical to assume whole of our Christian community as terror suspect ?</p>
<p>6. is not use of 3rd degree torture on all type of suspects in US prisons &amp; in the prisons of US allied countries at the behest of US authorities , right ? is it not violation of human rights &amp; US laws ?</p>
<p>7. did US find any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq , which was the main reason for US attacking Iraq ?</p>
<p>8. why not US authorities use scientific interrogation techniques like polygraph , lie detector tests instead of inhuman 3rd degree torture on terror suspects &amp; suspects in other criminal cases ?</p>
<p>9 . what legal right our President of USA have , to illegally spend billions of our dollars on inhuman , llegal acts of terrorism , military coup , creation , aiding &amp; abetting of terrorists , etc , in other sovereign nations ? while we are suffering from loss of jobs ,loss of home due to natural calamities , etc ?</p>
<p>Crux , Foundation of all religions is humanity , kindness &amp; universal brotherhood. It is the preachers who misrepresent it. Terrorism created , aided , abetted by anybody is inhuman &amp; wrong . Terrorism is creation of power hungry , selfish people &amp; they must be legally punished .</p>
<p>Hereby , we appeal to the honorable supreme court of USA to legally prosecute Previous PRESIDENTS OF USA in the last 4 decades , for crimes of terror , as per the present US anti-terror laws.</p>
<p>Recently , in the issue of weekly publication  &#8220;The Week&#8221; , cabinet minister of government of srilanka (previously a deadly terrorist &amp; right hand man of LTTE chief Prabhakaran ) Mr. Karuna , Himself has stated in an interview that LTTE received arms training in Tamilnadu State of India , to wage war against Government of Srilanka. The Justice Jain Commission Of Enquiry , which probed late PM Rajiv Gandhi&#8217;s assassination case , also stated that Tamil Terrorist outfits in Srilanka Received monetary , financial , arms training support from government of India. GOI has even setup a radio station for tamil terrorists of srilanka , within Indian territory. GOI spent billions of dollars of Indian taxpayer&#8217;s money for aiding &amp; abetting terrorism , while billions of Indians were half starving &amp; going without a single meal , without proper health care.</p>
<p>Recently  , in a media interview the president of Government of Pakistan Mr. Jardari himself has confessed that in the previous years the government of Pakistan has aided &amp; abetted Terrorism for tactical gains of Pakistan , spending billions of dollars of Pakistani taxpayer&#8217;s money. While ordinary  Pakistanis were suffering from starvation , lack of health care , etc.</p>
<p>All the above proves that Previous Presidents of Government of USA , previous Presidents of Government of Pakistan &amp; Previous Prime Ministers of Government of India were the real master minds of TERRORISM , founded , aided , abetted TERRORISM FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH GAINS. In turn  Murdering  lakhs of innocent human beings. These guilty previous presidents &amp; prime ministers are deadly than OSAMA BIN LADEN.</p>
<p>Hereby , we appeal to the Honorable Chief Justices of supreme courts of USA , INDIA , PAKISTAN  , BANGLADESH , SRILANKA &amp; INTERNATIONAL WAR CRIMES TRIBUNAL , to legally prosecute the previous Prime Ministers of INDIA , the previous presidents of USA &amp; PAKISTAN , on charges of master minding TERRORISM &amp; murdering innocent people in their respective countries .</p>
<p>An appeal to honourable supreme court of USA &amp; HE Honourable president of USA  Mr.Obama</p>
<p>Your government protects all Americans, all American companies both inside America &amp; abroad. If an American tourist is murdered in a third country , American investigators fly over to that country  to conduct investigation in total disregard to local laws. In the same way , if the interests of an American company is threatened in a third country American government goes to it&#8217;s rescue.</p>
<p>However , when an American company butchers , causes mass man slaughter in a third country , as an American company did in Bhopal India , no action by American government. Still the said American company has not removed , cleared the accident site of poisonous debris at Bhopal India since decades and still causing mass man slaughter  , no action by American government  why ?</p>
<p>Some US based companies are selling soft drinks , food products , medicines , drugs in third world countries , which are causing grave health damages to the public. The quality standards of these products are fit cases of rejections by US FDA. Some US companies are selling drugs ( which are banned in the USA ) to third world countries , still us companies are exporting such dangerous medicines , foods to third countries . no action by US government , why ? is it because you think that the lives of  non Americans are cheaper than Americans ?</p>
<p>Hereby, I do request your kindself ,</p>
<p>1 . to initiate criminal prosecution against US based key management personnel responsible for Bhopal gas tragedy .</p>
<p>2 . to make either the respective company management or US government to pay compensation to victims of Bhopal gas tragedy  on par with American lives , as if the same tragedy happened in the USA itself.</p>
<p>3 . to order the management of the said company to clean up Bhopal off poisonous debris , from the accident site at their own expense.</p>
<p>4 . To legally prosecute US exporters &amp;  US based companies selling products  ( which violates US FDA regulations or banned in the USA for domestic consumption ) to third countries.</p>
<p>CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA &amp;  CORRUPT PUBLIC SERVANTS Silencing The Voices Seeking Justice VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHT ACTIVIST</p>
<p>In India, it is nothing new to silence voices seeking justice. Only on paper , in the book called “Constitution of India” , every citizen is treated as equal . In practice , public servants behave as public masters &amp; treat commoners worse . In Their crimes &amp; actions our public servants even outsmart British occupiers. The criminal nexus of politician – police – public servant goes to any length to silence the voices seeking justice  , to threaten them  , to cut-off their sources of livelihood , to falsely implicate them  fix them in criminal cases , to assault them &amp; finally to finish them. Indian judiciary has failed to uphold the “The Constitution of India” in letter &amp; spirit. NOW, ONE MORE VOICE SEEKING JUSTICE IS ON THE FIRING LINES OF CRIMINAL NEXUS  &#8211; the voice of Mr. Nagaraj . M . R . editor , S.O.S-e – Voice For Justice.  Nagaraj will sooner or later will be added along with satyendra dubey &amp; shanmughan Manjunath , by the criminal nexus.</p>
<p>In india , Law is one &amp; same for all , however in it&#8217;s implementation &amp; enforcement  , the public servants are practicing double standards. Poor Innocents are harassed , tortured all in the name of law , rules , technicalities .</p>
<p>Whereas , Rich Criminals are manipulating the evidences , records &amp; are going scot free. The Public Servants treat Rich Criminals Favourably with kid gloves ofcourse for a price.</p>
<p>Now , take for instance , public servants of the rank of supreme court chief justice &amp; President of india are hiding information relating to crime , covering-up crimes , violating commoner&#8217;s human rights , fundamental rights , obstructing citizen from performing their Constitutionally prescribed Fundamental Duties as  Citizens of India , no action by police , they are not even registering the complaint.</p>
<p>Whereas , if a commoner cover-ups a crime or evidence , he also becomes a criminal , if a commoner violates the fundamental / human right of a rich person , if a commoner obstructs a public servant from performing his public duties , all those become crimes &amp; he is legally booked for each counts.</p>
<p>Why not police registering complaint  against the corrupt public servants for their crimes &amp; it’s cover up. IS IT NOT DOUBLE STANDARD.</p>
<p>Will you lend your support for this democratic , non-violent struggle for peace , justice , along with Mr.Nagaraj.M.R. All humane persons are welcome.<br />
 Read</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/cji-others-silencing-a-human-rights-activist</p>
<p>Truth Behind  9 / 11 WTC Attack</p>
<p> SEPTEMBER 9/11 WAS PLANNED !!!! VISIT  :  http://www.neiu.edu/~ayjamess/hmmm.htm#Main</p>
<p>http://countercurrents.org/griffin080710.htm ,</p>
<p>http://www.911truth.org/ ,</p>
<p>Double Standard : BP And Bhopal</p>
<p>By Bill Quigley &amp; Alex Tuscano</p>
<p>When President Barak Obama went after BP and demanded a $20 billion dollar fund be set up for victims of the Gulf oil spill, the people of India were furious. They saw a US double standard. The US demonstrated it values human life within the US more than the lives of the people of India.</p>
<p>BP should pay $20 billion in compensation, probably even more. The people of India agree with that.</p>
<p>But people are angry because the US is treating the oil spill, called the worst environmental disaster in US history, in a radically different way than the US treated the explosion of a US-owned pesticide plant in Bhopal India, which some call the worst industrial disaster in history.</p>
<p>The 1984 Bhopal explosion released tons of toxic chemicals into the air, claimed the lives of between 15,000 and 20,000 people within two weeks, and disabled hundreds of thousands of others – many still suffering from physical damage and genetic defects.</p>
<p>The plant that exploded was operated by Union Carbide India Limited, a corporation owned by Union Carbide of the United States.</p>
<p>The disaster occurred in a thickly populated area close to the central railway station in Bhopal, an urban area of 1.5 million in the heart of India. Most people in the area lived in shanty huts.</p>
<p>Thousands of dead humans and animals filled the streets of Bhopal. Survivors complain of genetic damage which has caused widespread birth defects in children and even grandchildren of those exposed.</p>
<p>The soil and water of Bhopal remain toxic with heavy pesticide residue and toxic metals like lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium and chromium.</p>
<p>While President Obama displayed outrage at BP officials over the 11 deaths from the US oil spill, the US has refused to extradite Warren Anderson, the chair of Union Carbide, to face charges for his role in the Bhopal disaster.</p>
<p>Recall too that Obama advisor Larry Summers, then chief economist at the World Bank, stated in an infamous 1971 memo. “Just between you and me, shouldn’t the world Bank be encouraging MORE migration of the dirty industries to the Less Developed Countries?&#8230; I’ve always thought that under-populated countries in Africa are vastly UNDER-polluted…”</p>
<p>Obsolete and hazardous industries have been systematically transferred to the third world countries to not only exploit the cheap labor but also to avoid disastrous impact of these industries on the advanced countries.</p>
<p>Union Carbide put profit for the corporation above the lives and health of millions of people. Dow Chemical, which took over Union Carbide, is attempting to distance itself from all responsibility.</p>
<p>In India there were two Bhopal developments this month. The Indian government announced a compensation package of $280 million for Bhopal victims, about $22,000 for each of the families of the deceased according to the BBC, and seven former Indian managers of the Bhopal plant were given two year jail sentences for their part in the explosion. These legal developments are a mockery of justice for one of the world’s greatest disasters.</p>
<p>We call on the people of the US and the people of India to join together to demand our governments respect the human rights of all people, no matter where they live.</p>
<p>Together we must bring about change in corporate development. We have to emphasize social production for the needs of people and improved social relations.</p>
<p>If we continue to value some lives more than others, and to allow corporations to spoil some areas with impunity, our world will not last.</p>
<p>Unless we respect the human rights of all people and demand corporations do that as well, we will be damned to live out the Cree Indian prophecy “Only when the last tree from this earth has been cut down, only when the last river has been poisoned, only when the last fish has been caught, only then will humankind learn that money cannot be eaten.”</p>
<p>Saving Democracy From The Corporate Veil</p>
<p>By Gopal Krishna</p>
<p>Five things the US should do to quell the global outrage after the recent verdict in the Bhopal gas leak case and provide some justice to the victims</p>
<p>The labour pains for giving birth to an understanding of a trans-national corporation, the scope of its civil and criminal liability, its corporate veil and the chemical disaster of Bhopal is still far from over. By now it is clear that unless US government decides to act no one else can get to the bottom of the most complex industrial catastrophe known to mankind in the 20th century. Without the helpful intervention by the US President Barack Obama, the litigation process will never be able to provide justice to the victims and penalise the natural and artificial culprits.</p>
<p>As democracies, like Indian government, is it time for US government too to act as parens patriae (guardian) for the past, present and future victims of Bhopal in particular and for justice seeking people of the world. The parens patriae doctrine which was deemed as a pioneering innovation in jurisprudence was invoked for the protection of all victims of disaster but was sabotaged.</p>
<p>While government of India enacted itself as parens patriae, Dow Chemicals Company (after Union Carbide&#8217;s merger in 2001) and its agent in the government have enacted for themselves a similar role for the global community of the trans-national corporations against justice seeking victims.</p>
<p>The global outrage against such sabotage stage-managed under the guidance of US government that has become evident in the aftermath of the June 7 verdict merits President Obama&#8217;s intervention to set matters right. Taking recourse to judicial escapism instead of acting to evolve a jurisprudence of liability for corporations gravely endangers people&#8217;s trust in democracy everywhere.</p>
<p>The deafening silence of the US president and legislature to ensure justice to the victims of corporation engineered mass disaster if not broken would constitute &#8220;yet another instance of American imperialism&#8221; in the words of US Judge Keenan who heard the Bhopal case in New York district court.</p>
<p>Unaccountable and ungovernable corporations are a threat to all the democracies. If democracy in US and India is indeed non-negotiable, it merits global efforts to Dow Chemicals and Warren Anderson accountable. This is required to fix the liability of a trans-national corporation. In a historic and touching &#8220;extraordinary act a foreign sovereign government seeking justice in an American court&#8221;, India had appealed to the democratic judicial system of US for relief in the matter of industrial disaster of Bhopal caused by a US multinational corporation. How democratic governments of US and India respond to provide legal remedy sets a precedent that either legitimises or delegitamises its very existence.</p>
<p>The government of India filed a suit on September 5, 1986 for damages in the court of district judge, Bhopal (Regular Civil Suit N. 113/86) against the US company, Union Carbide Corporation, Connecticut, USA on behalf of all the persons, who have suffered damages due to Bhopal gas leak disaster praying for &#8220;a decree for punitive damages in an amount sufficient to deter the defendant Union Carbide and other multinational corporations involved in similar business activities from willful, malicious and wanton disregard of the rights and safety of citizens of India.&#8221; The Indian government noted in its reply in the court that Union Carbide&#8217;s management policies, states that &#8220;it is the general policy of the corporation to secure and maintain effective management control of an affiliate.&#8221;</p>
<p>If the US is indeed a democratic state, its constitution is still alive then it must make corporations like Dow Chemicals and British Petroleum liable and accountable for their acts of omission and commission. The following steps are required in US towards that end:</p>
<p>1. The US government should accept the above submission of the government of India that &#8220;the corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as a unit, without regard to the location of responsibility within that unit&#8221;. Consequently, an illegal act by it be deemed as the act of the corporation, without consideration to its location of responsibility. The customary alibi of corporations like Dow Chemicals is an act in sophistry designed to conceal fact of crime and criminals of the upper-world. The US government should disclose all the trade secrets of the Union Carbide Corporation and its research and development centre that Union Carbide operated in Bhopal since 1976 that was suspected to be experimenting with wartime use of chemicals. This suspicion regarding the disaster being a consequence of experimenting with war time chemicals is yet to be probed. US government should undertake and facilitate such probe.</p>
<p>2. The US government must take note of the verdict by the chief judicial magistrate, Bhopal, wherein it is stated, &#8220;Warren Anderson, UCC USA and UCC Kowlnn Hong Kong are still absconding and therefore, every part of this case (criminal file) is kept intact along with the exhibited and un-exhibited documents and the property related to this case, in safe custody, till their appearance&#8221;. In the interest of justice for the Bhopal victims, the US government should expedite the process of extraditing Anderson at the earliest.</p>
<p>3. Dow Chemicals Company has set aside $2.2 billion to address future asbestos-related liabilities arising out of the Union Carbide acquisition. How is that Dow Chemicals can take the asbestos liability of Union Carbide and not the liability for the industrial catastrophe in Bhopal? The US government should volunteer its assistance in ascertaining the Bhopal disaster&#8217;s inherited liability of Dow Chemicals Company.</p>
<p>4. The US government should promote acceptance of the resolution of UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights that approved the &#8216;UN norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights&#8217; as a step towards ensuring corporate accountability. Article 18 of the norms called on trans-national corporations and other business enterprises to make reparations for damage done through their failure to meet the standards spelled out: &#8220;Transnational corporations and other business enterprises shall provide prompt, effective and adequate reparation to those persons, entities and communities that have been adversely affected by failures to comply with these norms through, inter alia, reparations, restitution, compensation and rehabilitation for any damage done or property taken. In connection with determining damages, in regard to criminal sanctions, and in all other respects, these norms shall be applied by national courts and/or international tribunals, pursuant to national and international law.&#8221;</p>
<p>5. In memory of victims of Bhopal, the US and Indian governments should call for a mandatory regime for regulating trans-national corporations unlike UN&#8217;s voluntary global compact and reject the report of the United Nations Secretary-General&#8217;s Special Representative for Business and Human Rights wherein it underlined the need for voluntary regulation and self compliance by the companies saying, &#8220;While corporations may be considered organs of society, they are specialised economic organs, not democratic public interest institutions.</p>
<p>If there is one lesson that democracies across the world have clearly not learnt from industrial disasters, it is to ascertain the nature of all the genocidal acts of corporations and the very legal design of the corporation so as to make it genuinely governable by democratic legislatures. A befitting tribute to victims of Bhopal lies in learning this lesson in order to prevent future industrial warfare that irreparably undermines intergenerational equity.</p>
<p>The Cost Of An Indian Life</p>
<p>By Dr. Vispi Jokhi</p>
<p>Twenty-six years ago the people of Bhopal were exposed to a lethal gas in one of the world&#8217;s worst industrial accident. But, was it an accident? The answer is contrary to popular perception a resounding &#8220;No&#8221;. Because we as a nation have rulers who have devalued our lives to such an extent that we have not one but many Bhopals which have occurred in the past, which occur daily and will continue to do so in the future and we will not even notice or see and raise even a whimper of protest any of these events.</p>
<p>To just list a few examples I would like to mention more than a lakh suicides by farmers all over the country, sub-saharan levels of hunger poverty and destitution, high infant and maternal mortality due to lack of sanitation and clean drinking water and primary health care facilities, callous displacement of tribals and the poor in the name of large dams, factories, mines, SEZ&#8217;s, factories, ports. I can go on and on. But is it only the Government who needs to be blamed? Are we all not guilty with our apathy and complicit acceptance of these policies of successive governments? Our obsession with GDP, sensex driven growth has led to wanton destruction of the environment and massive unrest among the poor and dispossessed masses of India. Besides the above issues, India loses so many human lives to natural disasters like floods, earthquakes, drought and such other phenomenon. All this was accepted as our karma when we were ruled by the Englishmen, but in 1947 our rulers gave us a constitution which pronounced that we became a sovereign socialistic secular republic where all citizens are equal before the law.</p>
<p>Our &#8220;chalta hain &#8221; attitude and disregard for rule of law and poor civic sense are responsible for state of our nation today. We need to turn the mirror to our own faces and correct ourselves. Our non-caring so long as the issue is not directly related to us is completely wrong as we must realize that in the welfare of all lies our own welfare. Discipline, civic sense, compassion for our poor unseen brethren, moderation in all aspects of life are the stepping stones to reversing the reasons for the Bhopals. We must put a value to the life of every Indian and not allow people to become mere statistics. Accountability, rule of law and equality before law must be the corner stones of the future path of our nation.</p>
<p>Bhopal is a mere symptom of a deep rooted disease which needs to be tackled by systemic change and course correction in favor of a sustainable economic growth pattern based on human happiness sound ecological principles. I do not see any attempt to do this in all the sound and fury of the outrage which the Bhopal verdict has elicited among the middle class.</p>
<p>http://vhjokhi.blogspot.com</p>
<p>NUCLEAR LIABILITY  IN INDIA </p>
<p>Before  enacting the law on “Nuclear  Accident Liability Bill” , Government of India  should consider the following  issues</p>
<p>1.       The term  Nuclear Accident must include the damages caused due to  radiation leak affecting the employees in the nuclear facility  ,  the people living near the facility  &amp; people affected by the  effluents , scraps  generated by the nuclear facility.</p>
<p>2.       The government of India does not have any right to fix a price tag for the lives of Indians , that too cheaper than US public.</p>
<p>3.       The Nuclear power generating companies must  incorporate safety infrastructure &amp; procedures  as they do in US market , not any obsolete technology.</p>
<p>4.       In  USA &amp; other developing countries , they have very huge , efficient social security network , vast pool of resources  put in by  nuclear power generating companies themselves , to  take care of the affected in case of a nuclear accident . In India we don’t have that type of  social security network nor matching resources , therefore ideally  India must fix a nuclear liability cap much higher than  US market in dollar terms.</p>
<p>5.       Also the company must be made liable  for the complete clean up  of the facility  &amp; surrounding  towns , villages , health care to all the affected victims on par with US market , in case a nuclear accident happens.</p>
<p>6.       The  Nuclear Equipment Suppliers , Nuclear Plant Operators  together  with their  respective governments like USA , UK must  stand  as guarantors .</p>
<p>7.       The  Life Insurance Companies in India Must pay insured amount  to  nominees of insured  in case of nuclear accidents / radiation affects in addition to compensation by the  nuclear power companies . as of now many life insurance companies are not covering nuclear accidents / radiation affects.</p>
<p>Neither our MPs , Cabinet ministers nor  IAS babus  have the right to decide the fate of common people  &amp; fix a rate for lives of Indians. They are not experts in this field ,  they should not  conclude any deals , decisions in  a hush hush manner .  Many  scams have  come out of hush hush deals . Nobody , no MP , no minister , no IAS  officer has paid from his personal  pocket to the victims  of industrial disasters , etc. After all  MPs , Ministers , IAS babus  are  public servants , they must just represent the voices of people , we  people don’t  want  their  personal expertise &amp; opinions. Our Policy makers  must heed to the public advice of senior  scientists , experts in the field of nuclear power generation .</p>
<p>Ofcourse , as a result  unit price of electricity will get front loaded  , we may not get cheap  electricity . but  the lives of Indians are much valuable than Electricty.  The person who benefits from cheap electricity – Industrialists  does not  pay from his pocket  to the victims of disasters . Development  not at the cost of safety &amp; lives. This must dawn on our ill informed  policy makers at the earliest .</p>
<p>What if a nuclear accident happens<br />
- BILL LIMITS LIABILITY OF OPERATOR TO RS 5OO CRORE, ANYTHING ABOVE WILL BE GOVT RESPONSIBILITY</p>
<p>What is the bill’s purpose?</p>
<p>The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill seeks to set down mechanisms and rules for liability claims and payments that might arise because of a nuclear incident and to pave the way for India to join an international liability regime.</p>
<p>What kind of nuclear liability regime does India have at present?</p>
<p>All of India’s nuclear power reactors and nuclear facilities are owned by the central government, or by the Nuclear Power Corporation and Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam (Bhavini) — both public sector enterprises. Any liability issues that emerge from incidents become the responsibility of the central government. The inter-government agreements between India and Russia under which Russia has supplied two nuclear reactors at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu do not clarify liability issues. This has meant uncertainty over trans-boundary liability issues.</p>
<p>Why has the bill become necessary now?</p>
<p>The Indo-US civilian nuclear agreement allows US suppliers to sell nuclear power reactors to India. But the companies have been concerned about the absence of a well-defined nuclear liability regime in India. Environmental groups believe foreign companies will be reluctant to invest without a liability regime in place because they do not want to run the risk of having to compensate without a cap for a nuclear incident. Without the bill, under the existing legal regime, a company may have to encounter absolute, unlimited and non-delegable liability.</p>
<p>What does the bill propose?</p>
<p>A leaked version of the proposed bill circulated by environmental groups indicates that the government plans to cap the maximum liability for each nuclear incident to 300 million Special Drawing Rights ($460 million or Rs 2,100 crore). This is lower than the $470 million settlement in the Bhopal gas disaster.</p>
<p>If the claims for compensation for nuclear damage exceed SDR 300 million, an additional 300 million SDR may be available through an international convention.</p>
<p>The liability of a nuclear power operator (so far only the NPC and Bhavini) for each nuclear incident will be Rs 500 crore. The limit will also apply to private companies if they are allowed entry into the sector.</p>
<p>The central government will be liable for nuclear damage if the liability exceeds the operator’s limit.</p>
<p>Why has this generated controversy?</p>
<p>The bill has generated the widespread perception that it will allow US companies to go scot-free in the event of a nuclear accident and saddle the Indian government with the liability — in other words, Indian taxpayers will have to pay for damages. Some environmental activists are contrasting the proposed Indian cap of $460 million with the much larger $10 billion pool of funds available in the US to cover liability and provide compensation to the public in the event of a nuclear accident. Some legal experts are arguing that there is no place for a cap on liability under Indian law. Any such legislation would be vulnerable and open to challenge and could be easily struck down as a violation of the environmental jurisprudence established by India’s Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Will the bill really allow foreign companies to go scot-free?</p>
<p>A clause in the bill appears to allow the nuclear operator to have “a right to recourse” —which would mean the operator could seek assistance — when the nuclear incident has resulted from negligence on the part of a foreign supplier of a material, equipment or service. However, this would have to be reflected in written contracts between the Indian operator (the NPC, for now) and the foreign suppliers. Environmental groups are sceptical, and fear that this will not emerge in actual contracts.</p>
<p>How is the bill linked to the international nuclear liability regime?</p>
<p>The Convention on Supplementary Compensation under the International Atomic Energy Agency provides for an international fund to compensate for nuclear damage in the event of an accident. The convention envisages a two-tier system — the state will ensure availability of at least 300 million SDR, and an international fund for which all participating nations are obliged to contribute. Any country that plans to join will have to ensure its national legislation is consistent with the convention’s provisions. By enacting domestic legislation, India could join the convention and — should the event arise — also seek money from the much larger international fund, which could help India access an additional 300 million SDR.</p>
<p>How is nuclear liability covered in the US?</p>
<p>The Price-Anderson Act enacted in 1957 ensures the availability of a large pool of funds — about $10 billion — to provide compensation to people who incur damages from a nuclear accident — no matter who is liable.</p>
<p>Have nuclear liability claims been paid in the US?</p>
<p>The American Nuclear Society estimates that the nuclear insurance pools have paid a total of $151 million in the past 43 years. The US energy department has paid $65 million.</p>
<p>What kind of liability regimes do other countries have?</p>
<p>They vary from country to country. Belgium has set a liability amount of 300 million Euros, and the France 91.5 million Euros, and the UK £40 million. Germany has set unlimited liability though a financial security limit is set at about 2,500 million Euros. Japan also has unlimited liability, but a maximum financial security limit of 60 billion yen.</p>
<p>Shame! India sold its dead cheap<br />
Shobhan Saxena, </p>
<p>Around 22,000 dead. More than 1,20,000 injured.  Rs 1 lakh for each<br />
body. Rs 25,000 for every poisoned lung and damaged heart and blinded<br />
eyes. 26 years of long wait. And just 2 years in jail for the men who<br />
committed the worst crime against the people of this country. And this<br />
mockery of justice after such a long wait. Twenty six years after 40<br />
tonnes of lethal gas seeped into the lungs of Bhopal, families of some<br />
17,000 men, women and children are still waiting for the so-called<br />
compensation. Thousands more are still waiting to be accepted as<br />
victims. People of Bhopal are still drinking toxic water poisoned by<br />
Union Carbide in December 1984. And the main culprit is living life<br />
kingsize in a mansion in New York. </p>
<p>No country sells its people so cheap.<br />
No country sells its poor so cheap.<br />
No country sells its dead so cheap. </p>
<p>Today – on the day of Bhopal disaster judgment &#8212; if there is a failed<br />
state in the world, it’s India. It’s not Iraq. It’s not Somalia. It’s<br />
not Sudan. It’s India. </p>
<p>India – its government, judiciary and corporates – accepted the<br />
ridiculous amount of $450 million dollars for the people killed and<br />
maimed by methyl isocyanate leaked from the Union Carbide factory in<br />
the heart of Bhopal three decades ago. In all these years, the poor<br />
victims have done everything they could to get justice and<br />
compensation. They have cried and died on streets, sat hungry and<br />
faced police lathis on roads and filed court cases in the hope that<br />
one day they will get justice. </p>
<p>Today, they were denied justice. Today, they were told that they<br />
should be happy with the peanuts thrown at them by Union Carbide.<br />
Today, India proved once again that it doesn’t care for its poor.<br />
Today, it was proved all over again that those who do politics in the<br />
name of poor in this country, always rule for the rich. </p>
<p>What justification does CBI have for not being able to produce Warren<br />
Anderson in court. The chairman of UC at the time of the gas attack<br />
(it was not an accident, the gas leak was caused because of cost-<br />
cutting steps taken by him) on the people of Bhopal, Anderson was<br />
arrested and later released on bail. He ran off to US in 1986 and we<br />
have not been able to find him or ask the US to extradite Anderson to<br />
India. Why? The government says it doesn’t know where Anderson is.<br />
What a lie. What a shame. </p>
<p>Last year, on a balmy July day, a bunch of victims danced on the<br />
streets after hearing news that the Chief Judicial Magistrate of<br />
Bhopal had ordered the CBI to arrest Anderson and produce him before<br />
the court without delay. The court also asked the CBI to explain what<br />
steps it had taken since 2002 to enforce the warrant and extradition<br />
of Anderson, who was declared an absconder in 1992. Though the CBI and<br />
US government failed to track Anderson, supporters of Bhopal victims<br />
traced him to the elite New York neighbourhood of the Hamptons. In<br />
2003, Greenpeace activists paid Anderson a visit at his home and<br />
handed him an arrest warrant. </p>
<p>Today’s ridiculous judgment in Bhopal didn’t say anything on Anderson<br />
as he is a “proclaimed offender”. This status suits him fine because<br />
he doesn’t have to bother about coming to India and answer some very<br />
crucial questions: </p>
<p> *Why did Union Carbide not apply the same safety standards at its<br />
plant in India as it operated at a sister plant in West Virginia, US? </p>
<p>*On the night of the disaster, why did the six safety measures<br />
designed to prevent a gas leak fail to function? </p>
<p>*Why was the safety siren, intended to alert the people living close<br />
to the factory, turned off? </p>
<p>The victims have always alleged that Bhopal happened because of<br />
negligence by the Union Carbide and that was caused by cost-cutting<br />
measures taken by Anderson. Is it because of this reason that Anderson<br />
has been &#8216;hiding&#8217; in the US? </p>
<p>A criminal has a reason to hide, but what reason does our government<br />
have to let a mass murderer like Anderson go scot-free. Is it because<br />
he is an American? Can an American come to India kill people in this<br />
country and run away with no consequences? That seems to be the case.<br />
We are still struggling to get a chance to question David Headley<br />
Coleman, an American citizen responsible for the worst terror attack<br />
on an Indian city in 2008. Will we succeed in getting Headley<br />
extradited to India? No way. Never. </p>
<p>Today, India proved that it doesn’t really care for its people,<br />
particularly if they have been slaughtered by powerful people from the<br />
most powerful nation in the world. Instead of taking on America and<br />
fighting for justice for its poor, India is more than happy to sell<br />
its dead cheap. </p>
<p>Rs 1 lakh for every body. Rs 25,000 for every blinded eye. This is the<br />
cost of poor life in a failed state. </p>
<p>BHOPAL GAS TRAGEDY 1984 -Bhopal, India</p>
<p>At the first instance the Government of India failed to ensure that Union carbide India Limited (U.C.I.L) has installed proper safety measures and fully implemented it in practice, at it’s plant in Bhopal. The Government of Madhyapradesh through it’s labour<br />
department, factory inspectorate &amp; pollution control board failed to enforce safety practices &amp; environmental protection. In turn, the U.C.I.L didn’t install in full, the safety measures being followed by it’s parent company union carbide corporation (U.C.C) at it’s<br />
Various plants in the U.S.A. The U.C.I.L. didn’t give community training to residents of nearby localities, to cope up with emergencies ie. Industrial accidents. U.C.I.L gave a go – by to safety practices, as it treated Indian lives as cheap. The government of Madhya pradesh instead of shifting slum dwellers around U.C.I.L, to other safe place, gave them legal title deeds just months before the tragedy in 1984.</p>
<p>Now, refer the following:-</p>
<p>1. After the accident at it’s U.C.I.L. plant at Bhopal, India in 1984, when the U.C.C.  Chairman/C.E.O. came over to Bhopal from U.S.A to visit the accident site, local police arrested him on the charges of manslaughter. However, the Government of India got him released.</p>
<p>2. In 1985, Government of India enacted “Bhopal claims Act” took- away the right of appeal of all the Gas tragedy victims &amp; declared itself as the sole representative of all victims. This said act itself is violative of victim’s fundamental &amp; human rights. The<br />
victims didn’t choose Government of India as it’s representative under will, agreement, trust or pleasure.</p>
<p>3. The paradox of this “Bhopal claims Act” is that, Government of India which is also a party to the crime, tragedy, itself is the appellant. The appellant (Petitioner),defendant are Government of India, Prosecution by Government of India &amp; Judged by Government of<br />
India.</p>
<p>4. In 1989, when an appeal about interim compensation to be paid by the U.C.I.L to all the victims was being heard in the apex court, the supreme court of India without giving a chance to the victims to make their point, without consulting them, without making a proper assessment of damages/losses, gave an arbitrary figure as verdict &amp; dropped all civil, criminal proceedings against U.C.C.&amp;U.C.I.L</p>
<p>5. In the same year 1989, the Government of India without consulting the victims of disaster, without making proper assessment of damages/ losses, negotiated a settlement with the U.C.C. and in turn gave full legal immunity to U.C.C.&amp; U.C.I.L from civil &amp;<br />
Criminal proceedings</p>
<p>6. Even the Government of India didn’t present the case of victim’s-gas tragedy victims, properly before the U.S.courts, where the U.C.C is based. All these premeditated acts only benefited the criminals- U.C.C&amp;UCIL. Are not the supreme court of India &amp; Government of India, here to safeguard Indians and to safeguard Justice?</p>
<p>After all these crimes, the Government of India failed to distribute compensation in time to victims. It has failed even to provide safe drinking water to the residents near the accident site, It has failed to provide comprehensive medical care to the victims, till<br />
date . It has even failed to get the accident site cleared off toxic wastes either by the culprit management or by it self, that too after 20 years. The very presence of these toxic wastes since 20 years is further contaminating, polluting the environment and taking toll of more victims.</p>
<p>Particularly in the case of “Bhopal Gas Tragedy” the supreme court of India &amp; Government of India are deadlier criminals than U.C.I.L&amp;U.C.C.</p>
<p>Just consider a case here, Just a few years back an U.S.based M.N.C ENRON set-up a power project in Maharashtra, India through it’s subsidiary. WhenMaharashtra state Electricity Board failed to lift power from Enron&amp; pay them monthly guaranteed revenue, Enron threatened to invoke, open the “Eschrew Clause” with the Government<br />
of India &amp; to approach international arbiter U.K. Government of India has stood as conter-guarantee in this case. Finally the Government paid, of course subsequently the parent ENRON collapsed due to other reasons. If in this case if Government of India failed to pay-up as a counter guarantee &amp; refused to comply with the award of International arbiter, definitely Government of U.S.A. would have stepped into the scene to protect it’s MNC. Hypothetically, In the same vein if Enron has caused damages to Indians either through negligence of safe practices or industrial accidents or bank frauds<br />
amounting over and above it’s Capital base &amp; insurance cover, then it would have been the duty of parent Enron &amp; Government of U.S.A. to step in &amp; pay-up.</p>
<p>In the same way, the U.C.I.L has caused massive damages to Indians &amp; refusing to pay commensurate to damages. Dow chemicals which took- over U.C.C. is also refusing to pay. DOW chemicals which is the new owner of U.C.C. naturally inherits both profits, credits lent &amp; liabilities to pay of U.C.C. Still it is refusing to pay. Now it is the turn of Government of U.S.A. to cough-up the sum.</p>
<p>Nowadays, it has become routine for central &amp; State ministers to go- on foreign jaunts, to globe -trott inviting F.D.I/ M.N.Cs to India. They do sign numerous agreements, only favouring MNC. When tragedies occur or when they cheat Indian banks/ investors, it is Indians who suffer. The ministers &amp; bureaucrats thinks themselves as wizards and enters into agreements with MNCs, industrialists in a hush-hush manner, with vast scope for possible corruption. Is it not the duty of government to be transparent ?</p>
<p>INDIA: Obama administration official supports corporate interests over victims of world&#8217;s worst industrial disaster</p>
<p>Deputy National Security Advisor Froman reveals administration’s double standards on corporate accountability for victims of Bhopal Gas Disaster </p>
<p>At a time when the world is focused on corporate accountability in the wake of the BP&#8217;s Gulf Oil Spill, a leaked email from the Obama administration shows that it values profit over people, when the profit benefits American corporations. The victims of the world’s worst industrial disaster were disappointed to see today that the White House is not pursuing the same levels of accountability from American Dow Chemical as it has from BP. When Dow purchased Union Carbide in 2001, the corporation acquired outstanding liability for the ongoing disaster in Bhopal, which has led to the deaths of an estimated 25,000 people in Bhopal, India following the 1984 Gas Disaster. </p>
<p>Today, Mumbai-based Times Now published an email chain between White House Deputy National Security Advisor Michael Froman, and Indian Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia. In response to an Ahluwalia’s email requesting assistance as India faces a sharp restriction in the World Bank’s lending, Froman replied: </p>
<p>&#8220;We are aware of this issue and we will look into it. We are hearing a lot of noise about the Dow Chemical issue. I trust that you are monitoring it carefully. I am not familiar with all the details, but I think we want to avoid developments which put a chilling effect on our investment relationship.&#8221; </p>
<p>Here Obama’s Deputy NSA apparently tied potential development aid to India with Dow Chemical’s liability in Bhopal. The White House denies any linkage between the IBRD lending and Dow’s ongoing lack of responsibility. Forman’s statement shows callous disregard for ongoing injustice and lack of accountability 26 years after the disaster. The survivor organizations in India, 5 of which have been protesting in Delhi this past month, have faced infringements on their basic rights, especially through discriminatory police abuse. A threatening statement from the Obama office could further repressive action from Indian Central Government of India. </p>
<p>Following months of safety cuts, on Dec 3, 1984 the Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal leaked deadly gas containing Methyl isocyanate (MIC) over the city ofBhopal. In the immediate aftermath 8-12,000 people died. Currently the death toll has risen to approximately 25,000 people. Over 100,000 people are still too sick to work because of long-term health disability. </p>
<p>The Indian Government has been forced to address the Bhopal issue in the recent months following a June 7 verdict convicting the officials of Union Carbide&#8217;s former Indian subsidiary on charges of criminal negligence. The charges and sentence, equivalent to a traffic violation, enraged the Indian public, as did the fact the Union Carbide and its former CEO Warren Anderson have refused to appear in court to face charges of culpable homicide. Bhopal survivors say that Dow Chemical should not be allowed to continue doing business in India until its subsidiary appears in court and cleans up the site of the disaster. </p>
<p>The International Campaign for Justice for Bhopal (ICJB) is a coalition led by four survivor organizations along with environmental, social justice, progressive Indian, and human rights groups around the world. ICJB works to hold the Indian Government and Dow Chemical Corporation (the current owner of Union Carbide) accountable for the ongoing chemical disaster in Bhopal, India. It was set up to address the grave injustices suffered by the half million Bhopal Gas Disaster survivors. </p>
<p>Bhopal and the BP Oil Spill: A Tale of Two Disasters<br />
By Madhur Singh</p>
<p>As BP struggles to contain the damage the Deepwater Horizon oil spill has caused to the Gulf of Mexico and to the people whose livelihoods depend on its waters, a legal judgment in the worst industrial catastrophe in history highlights how wrong the aftermath of such disasters can go — not just in terms of a cleanup but in the matter of justice. It is a terrifying lesson in how a corporation can evade full responsibility for one of the most heinous accidents in human history.</p>
<p>On Monday, more than 25 years after 40 tons of highly toxic methyl isocyanate (MIC) was released from a Union Carbide plant in the central Indian city of Bhopal — killing thousands in a matter of hours and over years, rendering hundreds of thousands seriously ill and causing genetic defects in yet-to-be-born generations — a local court announced its verdict. It held eight former employees of Union Carbide India Ltd guilty of criminal negligence and sentenced seven of them to two years in prison and a fine of $2,100. (The eighth defendant died during the course of the 23-year trial.) The convicted former employees were out on bail — of just $500 each — in less than two hours. Union Carbide India, which no longer exists, was fined less than $11,000. (See the legacy of the Bhopal disaster.)</p>
<p>The judgments are likely to be appealed. Given the speed of the wheels of justice in India, the case is likely to outlast most of the Bhopal survivors and the accused. The most prominent name in the latter category is Warren Anderson, the American CEO of Union Carbide, the U.S. parent company. He is now 89 years old. Arrested by Indian police when he visited the disaster site, he was released on bail and flew out of the country. He continues to be a fugitive from Indian law and hence has not been tried. (He is believed to be living somewhere in New York state.) At the same time, no one has been assigned responsibility for cleaning upBhopal&#8217;s ground zero, which researchers and activists say continues to leach toxic chemicals into the groundwater, used by thousands of families. (See TIME&#8217;s 1984 cover story on the Bhopal disaster.)</p>
<p>The outcome of the case has ignited outrage and disbelief across India. No less than the Law Minister and a former Chief Justice have said justice has been delayed and denied. The Economic Times newspaper led its front page with the headline &#8220;After 25 Years, Another Tragedy Strikes Bhopal.&#8221; &#8220;We are used to being let down,&#8221; says Rachna Dhingra of the Bhopal Group for Information and Action, her voice catching as she spoke to TIME by phone, &#8220;by our government &#8230; now even the judiciary.&#8221;</p>
<p>The letdowns have been serious and repeated — and apparently preordained because of decisions that facilitated the disaster itself. Investigations over the years have shown that the Bhopal plant design was faulty and that there was next to no emergency preparedness — issues that the parent company in the U.S.apparently knew about, according to the groups that conducted the studies. The company was operating in India with standards unacceptable in the U.S. (See pictures of the Gulf oil spill.)</p>
<p>The Indian government seemed to go out of its way to cushion the experience for Union Carbide. After first suing the company for $3.3 billion in 1985, New Delhiannounced an out-of-court settlement of $470 million in February 1989. Then a 1996 ruling by another Supreme Court judge watered down the charges against the accused from culpable homicide (with maximum punishment of 10 years&#8217; jail term) to criminal negligence (maximum sentence two years).</p>
<p>The various governments that have ruled India in the meantime have not taken on Union Carbide, which is now owned by Dow Chemical. Meanwhile, Keshub Mahindra, chairman of Union Carbide India Ltd at the time of the Bhopal disaster and now chairman of India&#8217;s automobile giant Mahindra &amp; Mahindra, was nominated for a civilian honor, the Padma Bhushan, in 2002. He had to decline in the face of widespread protests.</p>
<p>Although environmental legislation was ramped up in the wake of the Bhopal disaster, companies continue to operate in India in ways that severely — if not as dramatically — pollute the environment and impact people&#8217;s health and livelihoods. Britain-based mining major Vedanta, for instance, has faced censure from Amnesty International for violating the human rights of communities in Orissa, where it operates bauxite mines. India continues to be the world&#8217;s e-waste dump. Of late, the government, keen to attract foreign investment to its nascent nuclear energy market, has been pushing a bill to limit the liability of a nuclear-plant operator to $111 million. &#8220;We&#8217;ve learned nothing from Bhopal,&#8221; says Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan. &#8220;There is a drive to attract foreign investment overwhelming all other considerations.&#8221; Opposition parties have already demanded a rethink of the proposed legislation in the face of the Bhopal outcome. (See pictures of people protesting BP.)</p>
<p>There is still outrage that the U.S. refuses to extradite Warren Anderson to face criminal charges in India. New Delhi made the request in 2003, and it was refused the year after. U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Robert Blake, reacting to Monday&#8217;s Bhopal verdict, said, &#8220;I don&#8217;t expect this verdict to reopen any new inquiries or anything like that. On the contrary, we hope that this is going to help to bring closure.&#8221; The Bhopal activists now plan to file a writ petition in the higher court to admit more charges against Union Carbide and Anderson, seeking an as-yet-unspecified figure for personal and property damages, health monitoring and cleanup of the site, which is likely to run into billions of dollars.</p>
<p>Indians point at the way the U.S. government is now confronting BP — holding it squarely responsible for the oil spill and accountable for all cleanup costs — as a stark contrast to the way their own government has dealt with Union Carbide. The hope in India is that U.S. courts will be more amenable to the requests of Bhopal&#8217;s victims now that America has a huge environmental disaster in its own backyard. The Bhopal activists say the Indian government must join the case in the U.S. as a plaintiff (indeed, it owns the land on which the Union Carbide factory was located). &#8220;Prime Minister Manmohan Singh should be inspired by President Obama&#8217;s recent commitment toward making BP pay every cent for its oil spill,&#8221; says Satinath Sarangi of the Bhopal Group for Information and Action. &#8220;And the U.S. government must follow the same standards on corporate liability for U.S. corporations operating in India as it expects for corporations operating in the U.S.&#8221;</p>
<p>See the world&#8217;s top 10 environmental disasters.</p>
<p>See pictures of critters caught in the Gulf oil spill.</p>
<p>BP and Union Carbide:<br />
Corporate Responsibility or Corporate Liability<br />
by Mukesh Williams</p>
<p>Two momentous events separate in time and location have seared our consciousness—the British (Beyond) Petroleum Gulf Coast oil spill on April 20, 2010 and the American Union Carbide Bhopal Gas Tragedy in December 3, 1984. Twenty five years separate these two environmental and human disasters but the greed of big multinational corporations in connivance with state and central agencies still remains insatiable. With a keen eye on profit, big companies compromise safety standards, falsify data, overstate their strength, underestimate their drawbacks, bribe officials, lobby for protection and misinform the public. It is rather difficult to fuse ethical economic standards with ravenous profit-making schemes. Though oil and gas stink most multinational corporations love it.</p>
<p>The neo-classical model of economics has reduced our land and environment to a mere abstraction that can be exploited in terms of supply and demand without compunction. Big companies continue to wreck havoc on our human and natural systems devastating our lives in the name of human progress and development. At such moments we often wonder where is the fashionable concept called social corporate responsibility that is often taught as a philanthropic and ethical tool in business management departments to unsuspecting students. Corporate greed like all other forms of human greed need to be kept under strict check by international pay czars or up-to-date legislation based on global standards with teeth for swift punishment. Also the rhetoric of corporate companies must be separated from what they actually do, how long they do what they do, and what they hide. A constant monitoring system both on the part of governments and private groups must be effectively installed in collaboration with the media to thwart their nefarious activities and ulterior motives. </p>
<p>Union Carbide Bhopal Gas Tragedy 1984</p>
<p>Early this month the Indian Supreme Court passed a verdict indicting the American CEO of Union Carbide Warren Anderson who was allowed to escape to the United States twenty five years ago possibly with the connivance of either the state or central agencies in India. Now both the Congress government and state ministries are trying to escape their involvement in the murky plot. Who wanted the truth then? And who wants the truth now? The declassified CIA report of December 8, 1984 and recent revelations by the principal secretary of Rajiv Gandhi, P. C. Alexander, point to political intrigue involving both state and center in releasing Anderson. Now some leaders claim that the worsening law and order situation in Bhopal in the wake of the accident forced Chief Minister Arjun Singh to provide a safe corridor to Anderson out of the country. Some like Rajinder Puri even see the direct hand of Rajeev Gandhi himself. It seems that US President Ronald Reagan phoned Rajeev Gandhi to release Anderson. The media would like us to believe that even P. Chidambaram and Kamal Nath were campaigning for Dow Chemical to get special concessions so it could invest in India. The chief minister of Gujarat Narendra Modi criticized Sonia Gandhi for the complicity of the Congress Party in the murky affair but it has come to light that he had signed an MOU between state public sector company Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd and Dow Chemicals in April 2008. This is the case of the pot calling the kettle black.</p>
<p>Seemingly neither the American nor the Indian establishments saw the industrial disaster as the responsibility of the MNC Union Carbide. The company was bought by Dow Chemical Company in 1999 further camouflaging accountability. Dow Chemical was the second biggest Texas polluting company in 2009 and paid 1.14 million USD on eight counts of pollution. Now it is investing again in India with the syrupy connivance of people in power.</p>
<p>Even after 25 years the public would like to know if it was Arjun Singh the chief minister of Madhya Pradesh or influential persons in Rajiv Gandhi’s government at the center or the prime minister himself responsible for giving a free passage to Anderson to fly back to the U.S. India has an extradition treaty with the United States and under changed circumstances today when America itself is suffering from another MNC BP, there might be possibility of bringing the fugitive CEO back to justice if India can put together enough evidence. Greenpeace believes that in the 1982 safety audit of the Bhopal factory in the US addressed thirty safety hazards. Anderson knew about them and compromised safety standards causing the death of 20,000 people and affecting 578,000 to date. To make the tragedy reprehensible the out of court settlement made Union Carbide pay a sum of 470 million USD instead of 3.5 billion initially demanded, with each victim getting a measly sum of 550 USD in 1989. In the same year Exxon oil spill in Prince William Sound Alaska forced the company to pay 5 billion USD of which it paid half. Even today there is 425 tons of hazardous waste in Bhopal left by Union Carbide that needs to be cleaned. Who will do it—Dow Chemical or the Indian state government? </p>
<p>Anderson now 90 years lives in a luxury home worth 900,000 USD at 929 Ocean Road, Bridgehampton, Long Island, New York. He is now less of a fugitive and more of a monarch (Sonnenfeld, 1991). It is obvious that in many cases justice delayed is justice denied. Should we stop big companies from doing business? Should we impose heavy penalty on erring foreign companies? Or should we reform the slow and cumbrous judicial system? Jeremy Kahn writing in The Faster Times calls for judicial reform rather than protectionism (Kahn, 2010). The Indian Parliament is debating a law capping liability for foreign nuclear power companies involved in disasters to pay 100 million USD a pittance when compared to the US demand of 100 billion USD from BP. Then Indian law capping liability lacks teeth and may not cover non-nuclear companies. So they can pollute as of before.</p>
<p>British or Beyond Petroleum </p>
<p>The British are desperate to save BP from going down by bringing silly arguments like BP has been a part of America since it merged with American energy Amoco in 1998 and acquired the Gulf of Mexico drilling rights (The Independent, “Cameron Warns Obama over Criticizing BP” 13 June 2010). The new British Prime Minister David Cameron has also chipped in underscoring the sustained “economic importance” of BP to both Britain and America. American President Barrack Obama however is needled by US senators, whose states have been ravaged by oil spills, to push for 100 billion USD compensation, which if realized would force BP to go bankrupt. The British media believes that Obama’s anti-British rhetoric is testing Anglo-American relations. Obama claims that American relation with Britain has not been affected. The environmental disaster caused by a British multinational company should have nothing to do with national identity but corporate liability. Obama has called BP the Swedish Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg, who earns a fat cat salary of 3.8 million USD, to the White House for consultations. </p>
<p>The British are cut up with Obama’s off the cuff remark that he would have fired BP’s chief executive Tony Hayward if the latter had worked for him. With US pressure rising BP may not pay its quarterly dividends which are essential to maintain equilibrium for UK pension funds. The 6.7% shares lunge in the FTSE has adversely affected pension funds in the UK. If the status quo is not altered by American pressure groups BP might only have to pay 20 to 37 billion USD provided it can be proved that BP failed to meet safety regulations in the deep sea oil drilling. </p>
<p>Now BP is using two kinds of dispersants manufactured by Nalco—Corexit 9500 and Corexit EC 9527A. Corexit (deodorized kerosene) is banned in the United Kingdom as even 2.61 ppm can kill 50% of fish in 96 hours. The dispersants turn the oil slick into small particulates which settle on the sea bed and make things look clean on the surface, but they destroy marine life below. Corexit however is on the approved list of dispersants by the US Environmental Protection Agency though the EPA has advised BP to use less toxic dispersants. BP however refused citing lack of availability. The toxicity of the present dispersants increase when they get mixed with oil. BP has links with Nalco. BPs has poured 1,621,000 gallons of dispersants in the Gulf of Mexico to contain the oil spill and has ordered for an additional 805,000 gallons. The ill effects of the dispersant on humans can result in various diseases, reduced growth, kidney failure and death. </p>
<p>The British rely on BP as the national icon and savior of British deficit. Last year BP paid 1.4 billion dollars in taxes on its profits. The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is too far away for the ordinary Britons but the pension funds and BP dividends are closer home.</p>
<p>It stands to logic that a “large, wealthy company” which is eager to pay 1.8 billion quarterly dividends to its shareholders and whose last year’s sales and operating revenues were 239 billion USD, should pay 100 billion USD in damages. Since the oil spill began on April 22, 2010 till June 15, 2010, 55 days have gone by. And if we estimate the oil spill at 50,000 barrels a day it comes to 27500000 gallons. If each gallon spill is fined 4300 USD as the US is suggesting the actual fine would come to 118,250,000,000 that is about 118 billion USD. These figures may not be exact and are vigorously contested by BP which would like to work with half the numbers. However the end is not in sight. According to BP officials it would not be before August that the spill can be contained. If this is true then the figure could be doubled and BP would have to pay damages amounting to all the revenue it earned through sales last year. </p>
<p>Both the American government and public are hopeful that since earlier erring companies like Texaco was forced into bankruptcy in 1987 after paying 10.53 billion USD claim, BP too would have to cough up huge sums. And BP’s reputation does not help a wee bit whatever they claim to the contrary in those daily briefings on the Internet. BP is known as one of the “ten worst corporations” in the world when evaluated on their environmental pollution and infringement of their human rights record. It also has the dubious distinction of being the most polluting company in the United States vis-à-vis EPA toxic release data of 1991. It has been fined 1.7 million USD for burning polluted gases at its Ohio refinery. It also paid 10 million USD fine to the EPA in July 2000 for mismanaging the US oil refineries. The US Public Interest Research Group or PIRG claims that between Jan 1997 and March 1998, BP was involved in 104 oil spills. Obviously a lot of wealthy shareholders, 37% on the British and 31 % on the American side do not want this to happen. </p>
<p>BP’s propaganda regarding its CSR is highly effective as it tries to highlight only the positive aspects of what it has done. In the past BP has invested some money in alternate fuel and green technologies but it has been criticized for proving private funds to public universities of the California Bay Area and closing down its green technology office in London. Its critics call its green technology projects as green washing projects. BP is also a leading producer of solar panels and holds 20% of the global market in this area and it uses this fact to great advantage for image building. It operates the ampm convenience store chain in the US and other countries and is the leading producer of wind power. It is also involved in funding local and international politics. It gave 5 million USD to democrats and republicans in 1990 and spent 16 million USD in lobbing at the US Congress. The moral of the story is that it is not as clean as it claims, nor concerned with the lives of common people unless it serves its purpose or national interest.</p>
<p>BP in its regional spill plan for the Gulf of Mexico and site plan for the Deepwater Horizon rig understated the dangers and overstated its preparedness in the eventuality of a leak. Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal criticized BP for being ‘reactive’ and not ‘proactive’ from the very beginning. Now BP’s report is examined quite critically and it has been discovered that an expert professor listed in its 2009 response plan died in 2005. It lists walruses, sea otters, sea lions and seals as “sensitive biological resources” when none inhabit the Gulf of Mexico. Also names and phone numbers of marine specialists and marine network officers in Louisiana and Florida are not correct. The Justice Department has to find evidence that BP destroyed key documents or lied to the government (The Daily Yomiuri, June 11, 2010).</p>
<p>Corporate Social Responsibility</p>
<p>Corporate social responsibility is one of the modern movements like environmental or tribal movements that have become the buzz word in both business and academic circles. Both businessmen and academics are cashing upon the divine benefits of CSR making more money for their companies and jobs for their departments. Middle level managers and professors have extolled about the virtues of CSR with other buzz words such as people friendly, eco friendly and sustainable. We have come to hear about the unselfishly egalitarian aspects of CSR. It is really a wondrous transformation of the greed-driven capitalist economy of which the corporate system is a byproduct. </p>
<p>Most critics of CSR are not against it per se but against the recent hype associated with it as a panacea of all corporate evils. It is hard to believe that companies are out there not to make profit. We are not talking of basket cases but any company worth its salt aggressively markets itself to make real profit. And what’s wrong in it. Companies are floated for this very purpose both by the shareholders and managers. But in a changed climate of political advocacy of human rights against corporate greed, CSR seems to a new combative tool for companies to be both politically correct and make money as usual. The problem however is that if business corporations give an inch they take a mile.</p>
<p>Definitions and Objections to CSR</p>
<p>In the United States CSR is seen as philanthropy while others see it as improving society, workforce and government. There are arguments in favor of CSR where it is believed that it can support the social fabric of society and promote responsible business practices. But CSR is usually presented as a marketing strategy that articulates business performance rather than encompass social and ethical standards. The recent collapse of American business and manufacturing sectors has revealed the gap between CSR and actual self-regulation. Some CSR models take the company beyond the law into providing public benefits, increase sales, market shares, brand position, retain employees, reduce operating costs and increase investments (Baron, 2001 7-45). There are models of CSR that take into account competitive advantage, positioning, commitment, organizational integration, shareholder’s cooperation and self-correction. CSR helps to create a positive image of a company and brings it rich dividends. Though there are many definitions of CSR we must see CSR as the way business companies conduct their core business not the sops they give to society.</p>
<p>A common objection leveled against CSR comes from the advocates of the laissez faire system who complain that CSR infringes upon the human rights of company shareholders as company managers unilaterally divert company resources to society in the name of better management (Sternberg, 1999). Detractors of CSR complain that there should be a stakeholder claim in CSR as to how it is done. A business corporation should be fair and honest to both the shareholders and customers. CSR therefore depends on the model a company chooses and the reasons for its choice. If a company uses CSR for image building through philanthropy it leads to both ethical and human rights problems. You cannot give away money which ultimately belongs to someone else. On the flipside it also follows that if stakeholders possess sole rights they also should bear full responsibility when there are environmental or social disasters. However if a CSR model seeks a consensus of both stakeholders and company managers then it must become more open to the public. CSR must concentrate upon building customer relationships, attracting talented people, conducting risk management and building the company’s reputation. </p>
<p>Corporate Reputation and CSR</p>
<p>Corporate business companies such as BP or Coca Cola cannot ignore their reputation as about 90 to 95 percent of their assets are intangibles and the remainder immovable property. Big companies such as General Electric, IBM or Motorola use the rhetoric of CSR to show public responsibility and environmental concerns but while conducting hard-nosed bullying business practices are not so transparent in their dealings. A few years ago Sir John Browne of BP was praised for his aggressive promotion of BP while providing environmental leadership but now we come to know that all along BP compromised on safety costs in oil drilling. This is happening in a powerful country like the United States where both politics and laws are strong. Had it happened in a developing or a poor country, things would have been quite different. BP would have gotten away cheaply and Union Carbide once did.</p>
<p>CSR invariably works for companies and countries with resources and political clout. It is not for companies which are small and weak. Small companies fight for survival, cut costs to make ends meet and do not possess precious resources to waste on CSR. Nor can they follow up on legal battles if they come under the scanner. They function in a world of poverty, deprivation and loss. </p>
<p>Conclusion</p>
<p>It is no longer tenable to follow neo-classical economics of Smith, Mill and Bacon that the world is made for us and for us alone. We must eschew the economic theories of Pareto and Hayek as we can no longer treat nature as a mere variable and commodity. Depreciation of ecological assets has taken place at an increasing fast rate. Economics should no longer be about inflation, economic value of goods or maximization of income. It should take into account our natural world as property that belongs to every one of us (McNeill, Padua, Rangarajan, 2010 1-3). We must learn new lessons from ecological economics and environmental history and change the way we do business. We must rein in corporate greed by modifying corporate social responsibility (CSR) to corporate legal liability (CLL) and connect it to governmental deterrence, legal action and international treaties to scare the hell out of the merchants of greed and death who have many supporters in different parts of the world.</p>
<p>edited , printed , published &amp; owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL , MYSORE -570017 INDIA  cell : 09341820313 </p>
<p>home page:    </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home , http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit .</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ </p>
<p> e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com     ,  naghrw@yahoo.com    </p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/127/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=127&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/crimes-of-president-of-usa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CJI &#8211; Answer My Lord</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/cji-answer-my-lord/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/cji-answer-my-lord/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web Working For The Rights &#38; Survival Of The Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 42…… 20/10/2010 Home page http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home , http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit . http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html Editorial : CROSS-EXAMINATION of Chief Justice of India &#8211; Half of [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=125&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web<br />
Working For The Rights &amp; Survival Of The Oppressed</p>
<p>Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 42…… 20/10/2010</p>
<p>Home page<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home , http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit .<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ </p>
<p>SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html</p>
<p>Editorial : CROSS-EXAMINATION   of   Chief Justice of  India  &#8211;  Half of Former Chief Justices of India  are Corrupt </p>
<p> DOUBLE STANDARDS OF  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  &amp;  KARNATAKA POLICE  &#8211; PIL Appeal To Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of Mandamus</p>
<p>Information input  forms part of process of one’s expression. One’s expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information &amp; Expression are inseparable parts &amp; form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person’s  right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also  are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.</p>
<p>In a democracy , people have a right to know  how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding  behind the veil of  Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created  by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption  , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview &amp; bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.</p>
<p>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India  , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to  millions  of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of  Indian judges , police &amp; public servants  .   The  information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals  in public service.  The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the  questions.  JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.</p>
<p>Your’s sincerely ,<br />
Nagaraj.M.R. </p>
<p>SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html</p>
<p>Cross Examination of Chief Justice of India  ,  Chief Justices of state High Courts    ,   DGPs  of all  Indian States / UTs  ,  Loksabha Speaker , Rajyasabha Dy Chairman , Speakers of  all Indian State Legislative Assemblies / Legislative Councils    –     Law Makers  in  witness  box</p>
<p>When everybody else does the mistake , wrong doing  , indulges in corruption , judiciary alone must be pure like  virgin  to punish &amp; guide the wrong doers. Now , the apex court of the land  &amp; the highest judicial officer of the land , the conscience keeper  , protector of rights , Constitutional guardian of  the land – The Honourable Chief Justice of India  himself Has been found guilty .  SHAME SHAME.</p>
<p>Nowadays , we  are seeing criminalization of  politics , judiciary &amp; police. The rowdy elements have become MLAs &amp; MPs &amp; frequestly indulge in fisticuffs , vulgar abuses  in the precincts of the house itself  . These rowdy elements take money for asking questions in the parliament , to vote for bills &amp; for a price pass legislations  favouring lobbies of rich crooks. The police frame , torture  innocents &amp; let out rich crooks for a price . For a price police destroy evidences , records  and create fake records , evidences. Finally there are judges  who issue arrest warrants , give bail , give acquittal  &amp; pass favourable judgements   ALL FOR A PRICE . SHAME SHAME . These corrupt  judges , police , MPs , MLAs  each take  salary &amp; perks far exceeding lakhs per annum , but serve rich crooks instead of   Indian Public. These corrupt are parasites &amp; deadlier , state enemies  than naxalites , terrorists. Democracy in our country , our hard won  national independence is  endangered by these parasites , corrupt judges , police &amp; people’s representatives only. These  parasites  themselves are responsible for origin &amp; growth of  naxalism / terrorism in india .<br />
These corrupt  parasites will feel  , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In  whose  Court of justice  MATCH FIXING is not there &amp; every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.</p>
<p>Read  full case details at following web site </p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html</p>
<p>Hereby ,  we  DEMAND  the Honourable Chief Justice of India to answer the following questions in public interest , for national security , for National unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?</p>
<p>Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ?</p>
<p>Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals &amp; backstabs our motherland , it&#8217;s national security ?</p>
<p>Q4. Don&#8217;t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law &amp; order ?</p>
<p>Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?</p>
<p>Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth &amp; provide timely justice ?<br />
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich &amp; mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?<br />
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don&#8217;t give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts don&#8217;t take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?<br />
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?<br />
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases &amp; by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?<br />
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police &amp; intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?<br />
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?<br />
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses &amp; all parties involved , both during case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q14. How do you monitor &amp; check corrupt police personnel &amp; increase in their family&#8217;s wealth year after year ?<br />
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidate&#8217;s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?<br />
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?<br />
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?<br />
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just &amp; legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?<br />
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded &amp; aided couter terrorist groups , is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained &amp; funded &#8220;salwa judum&#8221; to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements &amp; attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?<br />
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld &amp; fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms &amp; ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty &amp; rich ?<br />
Q23. Law is one &amp; same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich &amp; poor ? why this differentiation ?<br />
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it&#8217;s products come with IMEI number only &amp; stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their&#8217;s as it doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they don&#8217;t have any business relationship with either tata indicom or it&#8217;s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets &amp; cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing<br />
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file &#8220;B&#8221; report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?<br />
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with &#8220;B&#8221; report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?<br />
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?<br />
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?<br />
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ?<br />
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG &amp; IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police &amp; intelligence personnel ?<br />
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?<br />
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases &amp; can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn&#8217;t cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission &amp; home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?<br />
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?<br />
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people&#8217;s representatives are facing criminal charges ?<br />
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?<br />
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?<br />
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people&#8217;s representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?<br />
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?<br />
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?<br />
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?<br />
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?<br />
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin &amp; while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?<br />
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?<br />
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi&#8217;s family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it&#8217;s partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it&#8217;s case &amp; prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks &amp; others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it&#8217;s partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q48.what damages has been done to india&#8217;s national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?<br />
Q49. What action by the government ?<br />
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?<br />
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?<br />
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?<br />
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years &amp; acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?<br />
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters &amp; 3rd degree torture ?<br />
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?<br />
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan&#8217;s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?<br />
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my &#8220;fundamental duty&#8221; hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI &amp; GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?<br />
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more &amp; even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police &amp; their family members on the lines of defense forces ?<br />
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable &amp; his family ?<br />
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?<br />
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?<br />
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?<br />
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?<br />
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?<br />
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?<br />
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?<br />
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?<br />
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings &amp; subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right &amp; legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.<br />
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?<br />
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?<br />
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date<br />
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?<br />
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?<br />
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?<br />
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?<br />
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?<br />
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?<br />
Q78. how ? if not why ?<br />
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judge&#8217;s family members ?<br />
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?<br />
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?<br />
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?<br />
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement &amp; meating out injustice ?<br />
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests like &#8220;poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc&#8221; , in the interest of justice &amp; truth ?<br />
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of &#8220;Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society&#8221;. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society &amp; allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said society&#8217;s – judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ?<br />
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?<br />
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured person&#8217;s case responsible for it ?<br />
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges &amp; the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder &amp; murder ? if not why ?<br />
Q89. registrar , Mysore district &amp; sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.<br />
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.<br />
Q91. when a person doesn&#8217;t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that person&#8217;s case responsible for it ? what action ?<br />
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food &amp; medical care to prisoners ?<br />
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence &amp; gives him 3 months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?<br />
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years &amp; finally the judge finds them as innocents &amp; acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?<br />
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions &amp; the actions arising out of misuse of office ?<br />
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges &amp; their personal actions as individuals ?<br />
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?<br />
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?<br />
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?<br />
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?<br />
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities &amp; women are their in supreme court , state high courts &amp; subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .<br />
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges &amp; to check corruption in judiciary ?<br />
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?<br />
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill &amp; claimed traveling allowance ?<br />
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high court judges &amp; newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?<br />
Q107. when common people / tax payers &amp; even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right &amp; just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties &amp; mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?<br />
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?<br />
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?<br />
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in a case ?<br />
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi&#8217;s assassination case , was not considered by the court ?<br />
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?<br />
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?<br />
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy person&#8217;s rights violation ?<br />
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?<br />
Q118. when the corrupt police officer &amp; government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high &amp; mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?<br />
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper &amp; fair prosecution of cases against rich &amp; mighty ?<br />
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?<br />
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?<br />
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court ready to utilize it ?<br />
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of india&#8217;s on-line grievance system ( DPG &amp; DARPG ) :<br />
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618<br />
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pages<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw</p>
<p>what are the status of those appeals ?<br />
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India ? please answer.<br />
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemen&#8217;s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen &amp; their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?<br />
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.<br />
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?<br />
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?<br />
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel &amp; pay it as compensation to victims of police failures &amp; atrocities ?<br />
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?<br />
Q133. during british rule in india &amp; various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &amp; other british colonies. After india&#8217;s independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ?<br />
Q134. in how many cases GOI &amp; other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?<br />
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?<br />
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it&#8217;s colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?<br />
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?<br />
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?<br />
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND &amp; prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &amp; prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ?<br />
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?<br />
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?<br />
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?</p>
<p>Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators &amp; parliamentarians by the constitution of India?</p>
<p>a) Inside the House b) Outside the House</p>
<p>Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like</p>
<p>a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India</p>
<p>c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC</p>
<p>e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.</p>
<p>Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.</p>
<p>b) Cover both their official &amp; personal actions.</p>
<p>Q146. Are the privileges defined &amp; codified ?</p>
<p>Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?</p>
<p>Q148. Are the liberty &amp; fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?</p>
<p>Q149. Can the Indian legislatures &amp; parliament be equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?</p>
<p>Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?</p>
<p>Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives &amp; executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers &amp; contempt of the court by the House.</p>
<p>Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?</p>
<p>Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of official&#8217;s secret act &amp; go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges</p>
<p>Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court &amp; Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?</p>
<p>Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer&#8217;s money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q157. Judges &amp; Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more<br />
valid) in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?</p>
<p>Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?</p>
<p>Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?</p>
<p>Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?</p>
<p>Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation&#8221; ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.</p>
<p>Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. &amp; giving free legal aid ?</p>
<p>Q164. Communication &#8211; free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?<br />
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just &amp; legal ? give me the names of accused judges &amp; description of charges against them ?<br />
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?<br />
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?<br />
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.<br />
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?<br />
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?<br />
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses &amp; brain. That is why the acts &amp; sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects &amp; produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police &amp; judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them &amp; to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police &amp; judges in drunken state legal ?</p>
<p>Q 172 . What action  has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?</p>
<p>Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state ministers &amp; central ministers who fully aided the criminals – Union Carbide official  Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail  &amp; flee the country without court’s permission ?</p>
<p>Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of court  &amp; for aiding a criminal to escape ?</p>
<p>Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?  what action has been taken against the CJI who  became an official of the  trust belonging to the criminal ?</p>
<p>Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?</p>
<p>Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department &amp; pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?</p>
<p>Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal although they don’t have right to do so ?</p>
<p>Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors &amp; Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didn’t  press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for  producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?</p>
<p>Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials &amp; people’s representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up &amp; aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of  thousands &amp; maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?</p>
<p>Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt  labour / pollution control board officials  HUMAN BEINGS ?<br />
Q  182    Why  police are  not registering my complaint   against  CJI &amp; other VVIPS ,Even after years ?<br />
Q   183   don’t the  police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal  jurisdiction  to register  the case  against these VVIPs ? or  just  because the criminals happens to be VVIPs  ,they  are  not booked  by police? If the  said  police don’t have  legal jurisdiction to book  these VVIPs , they should have  transferred the complaint  to  those authorities who have jurisdiction &amp;   authority to book  &amp; prosecute   these  VVIPs , but not done  so , why ?<br />
Q  184  are not all these actions , of  VVIPs &amp; police amounting to  cover up of crimes &amp; criminals ? are  not  these cover ups itself is a crime ?<br />
Q  185.  Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals  for justice  concerning public welfare , national security  sent  through  post , e-mail  to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ?  does  not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?<br />
Q 186   Are not  the honourable chief justice of india  together  with the jurisdictional police &amp; Revenue district magistrate  responsible  to protect  the  fundamental &amp; human rights  of people ?  why the CJI , Mysore DC &amp; Jurisdictional Police  have failed to protect the fundamental &amp; human rights of  people  including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus  Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate &amp; jurisdictional police  are  together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the trio – Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city &amp; Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station  , mysore  will be responsible . </p>
<p> These corrupt  parasites will feel  , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In  whose  Court of justice  MATCH FIXING is not there &amp; every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.</p>
<p>POLICE  NOT  REGISTERING  COMPLAINT   AGAINST  CHIEF  JUSTICE OF  INDIA  &amp;  OTHERS</p>
<p>From,<br />
NAGARAJ.M.R.<br />
LIG-2 / 761, HUDCO FIRST STAGE,<br />
LAXMIKANTANGAR, HEBBAL,<br />
MYSORE &#8211; 570017.</p>
<p>Through,<br />
Honourable DG &amp; IG of Police ,<br />
State Police H.Q ,<br />
Bangalore.</p>
<p>To,</p>
<p>Honourable Circle Inspector of Police,<br />
Vijayanagar Police Station,<br />
Mysore.</p>
<p>Honourable Sir,</p>
<p>   Subject : Violation of FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; HUMAN RIGHTS by Honourable Chief Jusice of India &amp;  H.E.Honourable President of India &amp; other public servants<br />
                   Karnataka Police are NOT registering &amp; acting on my  complaint  to them dated  04.07.2009</p>
<p>The Vijayanagar police in mysore stated that  they don’t have legal jurisdiction to book the criminals I have mentioned in the complaint &amp; by taking a statement from me to that effect  closed the case temporarily on  11.09.2010  after sitting over the complaint  for years together. Is it not the  duty of  DG&amp;IGP to seek the permission from home ministry to legally prosecute the alleged criminal VVIPs ? Why he was silent ? Ofcourse the lower rung police officers practically don’t have power to prosecute high &amp; mighty ? </p>
<p>Hereby , I do request the  DG &amp; IG OF Police , Government of Karnataka to seek the legal sanction from union home ministry &amp; Karnataka state home ministry , for the prosecution of  below mentioned criminal VVIPs &amp; to reopen my complaint here with. </p>
<p>In India , as per constitution of india all citizens are equal , have right to equal oppurtunity &amp; equitable justice irrespective of caste , creed , religion , etc. the constitution has guaranteed these to every Indian citizen by way of CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. Also , every humanbeing on earth has got HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of his / her birth.<br />
However in india , CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES / PUBLIC SERVANTS have forgotten this &amp; are acting as lords , autocrats &#8211; unquestionable public masters. CONSTITUTIONAL FUNCTIONARIES are PUBLIC SERVANTS appointed to serve the public, public are the kings of democracy , they are the taxpayers &amp; paymasters of this very same public servants. In India , corruption has spread it&#8217;s tentacles far &amp; wide , it has not even spared the judiciary. The last resort of commonman for seeking justice is judiciary , even there corruption has spread.In present day India , if one is rich , he can committ any type of crime &amp; get away clean from courts of law. there are corrupt police officials who modify FIR , suppress evidences ,manipulate evidences , takes up different line of investigation ,  fix innocents , coughs-up false confessions from innocents by 3rd degree torture , file B report closing the case , decides not to appeal in higher court of law , etc , ALL FOR A PRICE. Just see the list of millionnaire police officials who are caught by karnataka lokayukta.<br />
Next step , the prosecutor &amp; defense advocate strikes a deal , manipulates evidences , manipulates way of presentation of case &amp; way of argument favouring the rich crooks for a price , as observed in high profile BMW case involving public prosecutor IU KHAN &amp; defense counsel RK ANAND. In this way , if corrupt police &amp; advocates , together manipulate the due process of law , the presiding judge is left high &amp; dry eventhough the judge is honest, he is left helpless. to add to this , when the judge himself is corrupt , people&#8217;s last hope , democracy is dead. Nowadays we are hearing too many reports of irregularities in judiciary.<br />
our publication has filed many appeals as PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION before hon&#8217;ble supreme court of India but the vested interests there are not accepting it as PILs. WHAT DOES PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION MEANS ? ISSUES WHICH ARE OF PUBLIC CONCERN AFFECTING MANY NUMBER OF PUBLICS.<br />
The issues raised by us for sample :<br />
1. sale of fake medicines &amp; adulterated food products , beverages , colas affecting the health of millions of Indians &amp; public of importing nations who are importing the same dangerous products from india .<br />
2. demolition , eviction of houses , lands belonging to poor dalits , tribals , backward castes by government authorities whereas regularising  illegal land encroachments , illegal buildings by high &amp; mighty people in total disregard to law. in some cases government has even made contempt of court , by defying court orders &amp; enacting special laws all to favour rich land grabbers.<br />
3. take the cases corporate frauds, violation of labour laws , pollution board laws , tax laws , etc by companies.<br />
4. The reports in media about certain highly placed public servants leaking india&#8217;s defense secrets to foreign countries &amp; some politicians , film stars attending parties hosted by anti nationals DAWOOD IBRAHIM &amp; underworld dons in gulf countries &amp; elsewhere. these type of appeals are for public good , national security , as public are affected by them. still supreme court of india is not considering<br />
our repeated PIL Appeals.the courts have the authority to consider even a post card , e-mail as a PIL Appeal , the courts even have the right to initiate suo-motto action for public good , inspite of absence of any appeals / complaints. over &amp; above this at the time of my very first appeal my income was very low &amp; i was a retrenched factory employee who was eligible for free legal aid, even free legal aid was not given to me. Now , even to my repeated RTI Appeals  the Honourable chief justice of India &amp; H.E.Honourable President of India are not giving the requested information . these action of CJI &amp; PRESIDENT OF INDIA is aiding high &amp; mighty criminals , anti nationals , amounts to suppression of information , truth , evidences , which is a cognizable offence.<br />
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html</p>
<p>CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA -<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF DG&amp;IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/<br />
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/<br />
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –<br />
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/  , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/<br />
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/  , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  ,<br />
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED<br />
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218</p>
<p>MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>are you ready to catch tax thieves ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>reliance industry where is accountability ?<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196</p>
<p>crimes at infosys campus<br />
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214</p>
<p>crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman<br />
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>crimes of land mafia in India<br />
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://landscam.wordpress.com/   ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212</p>
<p>currency thefts in RBI Press<br />
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/  ,<br />
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80</p>
<p>killer colas &amp; killer medicines of India<br />
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/  ,<br />
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/  ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201</p>
<p>We do have highest respect for all constitutional bodies , public servants , but it is an appeal to the honest few in public service ,to bring to book their corrupt colleagues.The Honourable Chief Justice of India &amp; H.E.Honourable President of India have violated their oaths of office , failed in their constitutional duties , suppressed material truths / informations &amp; thereby repeatedly violated my Constitutionally guaranteed FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS &amp; BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS &amp; Obstructing me from performing constitutionally prescribed FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES AS A CITIZEN OF INDIA.<br />
Hereby , i do request you to legally prosecute the below mentioned public servants viz<br />
1. H.E.Honourable President of India<br />
2. Honourable Chief Justice Of India<br />
3. Union Home Secretary , GOI<br />
4. Governor , Reserve Bank Of India<br />
5. Director-General &amp; Inspector General Of Police , government of karnataka<br />
6. Commissioner , Bangalore Development Authority<br />
7. Commissioner , Mysore Urban Development Authority<br />
8. Commissioner , Mysore City Corporation<br />
9. Labour Commissioner , government of karnataka and<br />
10. all public servants belonging to tax dept , pollution control board , etc mentioned in the above cases with web links.<br />
on the above mentioned charges. the whole issue of this news paper &amp; the related materials at the weblinks provided, forms part of this complaint. If i am  repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.<br />
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the governmentof india is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking you.<br />
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.</p>
<p>Date :   10.10.2010                             your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Place :  Mysore                                  nagaraj.m.r.</p>
<p>……………………..DECLARATION………………………</p>
<p>Name : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>Address : &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP<br />
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE &#8211; 570017 INDIA</p>
<p>Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit</p>
<p>Periodicity : WEEKLY</p>
<p>Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB </p>
<p>Donations : NOT ACCEPTED.  Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .</p>
<p>Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.</p>
<p>Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJ.M.R.</p>
<p>Nationality : INDIAN</p>
<p>Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated  to JSS Medical College , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my body must be  handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of  medical students.</p>
<p>Eye Donation : Both EYES  of Nagaraj M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit &amp;  S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated  to  Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my  eyes  must be  handed over to  Mysore Eye Bank  , Mysore  WITHIN 6 Hours  for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.</p>
<p>Home page :<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home , http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit .<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ </p>
<p>Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com  ,</p>
<p>Cell : 0 9341820313</p>
<p>I ,NAGARAJ.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge &amp; belief. If i am  repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.</p>
<p>If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents   or to my family members    &#8211; In such case Chief Justice of  India together with the jurisdictional  revenue &amp; police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india  is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries.  </p>
<p>date :  10/10/2010…………………………..your&#8217;s sincerely,</p>
<p>place : India…………………………………Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>An Appeal to Shri.Sunil Thomas , Honourable Registrar (Admn) &amp; RTI Apellate Authority , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi.</p>
<p>From,<br />
Nagaraj .M. R.<br />
Editor , S.O.S e-Clarion of Dalit &amp; S.O.S  e-Voice for Justice,<br />
# LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO First Stage, Laxmikantanagar,<br />
Hebbal  ,  Mysore . PIN-570017   Cell – 09341820313</p>
<p>To ,<br />
Shri. Sunil Thomas ,<br />
Honourable Registrar (Administration) / RTI Appellate Authority ,<br />
Supreme Court of India,<br />
New Delhi.</p>
<p>Honourable Sir / Madam ,<br />
Subject : APPEAL No.300/2010<br />
Reference : Your Letter No.F.1/RTI/A.300/2010 dated  30.07.2010<br />
On-Line Grievance Registration No . DPG/M/2010/80199</p>
<p>At the outset , we express  our whole hearted respects to the honest few  public servants in public service including judiciary. However, the corrupt in public service don’t deserve  respect as individuals – as they are  parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.</p>
<p>All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The term “JUDGE” mentioned throught includes all public servants  discharging  judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial officers to Chief Justice of India.</p>
<p>Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages &amp; is for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise  their voice seeking justice  are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be responsible  for it.</p>
<p>Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court of India &amp; other government authorities, in apprehending criminals including corrupt judges &amp; police. Herewith  , we once  again  appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.</p>
<p>The public servants &amp; the government must be role models in law  abiding acts , for others to emulate &amp; follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable &amp; can be corrected by the teacher. if the  teacher himself makes a mistake , all  his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught  , legally punished &amp; reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his patronage.  even if a police , public  servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted &amp; justice can be sought by the  aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime &#8211; violations of RTI Act , constitutional  rights &amp; human rights of public  and obstructs the public from  performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it  gives a booster dose to the rich &amp; mighty , those in power , criminals  in public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is  happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the occassion &amp;  peacefully , democratically  must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF  MAHATMA GANDHI&#8217;S DREAM.</p>
<p>Kindly go through the following articles &amp; provide justice by giving complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the following questionnaire in an unambiguous  manner.</p>
<p>The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect &amp; uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to<br />
protect our national integrity , to respect &amp; protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has  the right to obstruct the discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal  privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the  FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES OF CITIZEN&#8217;S OF INDIA.<br />
We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India &amp; by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed  back , to ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether  we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information . so ,<br />
basically Right To Information  is an inalienable part of our  fundamental rights &amp; human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time  limit , responsibilities of public servants up to  certain extent. However the citizen&#8217;s fundamental right &amp; human right to seek  information extends far beyond the scope of RTI Act.<br />
Hereby , we seek complete  truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to my RTI application appeal no :  APPEAL NO. 300/2010 .. HEREBY , WE ARE  ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS  IN PUBLIC INTEREST &amp;  JUSTICE. Hereby ,  we request you to register this appeal as a PIL  petition &amp; to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters  raised in my RTI Application , in public interest &amp; equitable justice. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM. </p>
<p>Your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Nagaraj.M.R. </p>
<p>SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA</p>
<p>The public servants &amp; the government must be role models in law  abiding acts , for others to emulate &amp; follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable &amp; can be corrected by the teacher. if the  teacher himself makes a mistake , all  his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught  , legally punished &amp; reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-<br />
free under his patronage.  even if a police , public  servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted &amp; justice can be sought by the  aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime &#8211; violations of RTI Act , constitutional<br />
rights &amp; human rights of public  and obstructs the public from  performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it  gives a booster dose to the rich &amp; mighty , those in power , criminals  in public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is  happenning in india. the educated public must raise to the occassion &amp;<br />
peacefully , democratically  must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF  MAHATMA GANDHI&#8217;S DREAM.</p>
<p>In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic<br />
freedom RIGHT TO INFORMATION &amp; EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the<br />
government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps &amp; leads<br />
to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least bothered<br />
about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats ,<br />
parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these people<br />
want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so<br />
that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes of<br />
V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.<br />
To my numerous appeals , HRW&#8217;s appeals to you ,you have not yet<br />
replied.it clearly shows that you are least bothered about the lives<br />
of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to<br />
protect the criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the<br />
police to enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to<br />
police station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy &#8220;legal<br />
immunity privileges&#8221; ,why don&#8217;t you have given powers to the police /<br />
investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why<br />
don&#8217;t all of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily for<br />
enquiry ?at the least why don&#8217;t all of you are not sending your<br />
statement about the case to the police either through legal counsel or<br />
through post? you are aiding criminals ,by denying me job<br />
oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city civil<br />
court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc &amp; by illegally closing<br />
my newspaper.<br />
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of<br />
office. this amounts to public cheating &amp; moral turpitude on your<br />
part.<br />
1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.<br />
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.<br />
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.<br />
4.you are sponsoring &amp; aiding terorrism &amp; organized crime.<br />
5.you are violating the fundamental &amp; human rights of the citizens of<br />
india and of neighbouring countries.<br />
6.you are violating &amp; making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER<br />
to which india is a signatory.<br />
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a<br />
citizen of india.<br />
you are hereby called upon to SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you<br />
cann&#8217;t be legally prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes .</p>
<p>If i am  repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high &amp; mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit &amp; run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake charges ,  police file fake cases against me or my dependents  to silence me , this complaint is &amp; will be effective.<br />
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india  is liable to pay Rs. one crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants &amp; Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking you.<br />
Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.</p>
<p>Date :  14.05.2010                             your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Place : Mysore                                  nagaraj.m.r.</p>
<p>JUDICIAL CORRUPTION<br />
MY LORDS, THERE’S A CASE AGAINST YOU<br />
Former Union law ministers are spearheading a campaign against sitting judges they accuse of being corrupt. What is the higher judiciary doing to clear itself of these grave charges?<br />
Avinash DuttNew Delhi</p>
<p>Under observation: The Supreme Court of India<br />
Photo by K. Satheesh</p>
<p>Senior lawyers have complained to the CJI and the President that Justice Bhalla illegally amassed properties<br />
The campaign by some senior lawyers and former law ministers who have questioned the integrity of sitting high court judges is set to ratchet up the growing confrontation between the legislative and the judicial arms of the government. Former Union law ministers Shanti Bhushan and Ram Jethmalani are leading the battle against what they claim are corrupt practices in the highest echelons of the judiciary.<br />
Bhushan has categorically condemned the rot he feels has set in the judicial system. “The judiciary of this country is not merely unaccountable, but corrupt and brazenly so,” he wrote in a letter to President APJ Abdul Kalam on December 17. Bhushan has demanded that the President initiate impeachment proceedings against Justice Jagdish Bhalla of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahbad High Court. On December 14, a Supreme Court (SC) collegium recommended that Justice Bhalla be appointed the Chief Justice of the Kerela HC.<br />
Bhushan and Jethmalani, along with noted lawyers and former justices, including Rajendra Sachar, Indira Jaisingh and Hardev Singh, have formed the Committee on Judicial Accountability (COJA) and presented documents to the Chief Justice of India (CJI), YK Sabharwal, to support their complaint against the sitting judges. COJA complained to the CJI on July 11 that Justice Jagdish Bhalla had amassed several illegal properties in the name of his wife and other close relatives. Justice Vijender Jain, the former senior Judge in the Delhi High Court, who was recently appointed the CJ of Punjab and Haryana HC, is also in COJA’s line of fire.<br />
By questioning the integrity of Justices Bhalla and Jain, Bhushan has thrown open the much larger question of judicial accountability. (See interview) “Leave aside taking any action against corrupt judges like Justice Jagdish Bhalla and Justice Vijender Jain, the CJI has been actually avoiding even properly investigating charges against them,” says Bhushan. According to documents produced by COJA on 21 July 2003, Renu Bhalla bought a 7,200 sq. metre plot near the Noida-Greater Noida expressway. On 28 March 2005, Uday Shankar, dsp, Gautam Buddha Nagar (Noida’s official name) submitted a report to the area dm in which he states that the sellers of the plot belong to the “land mafia”. In an enquiry submitted to the dm on 26 June 2005, RK Singh, the area sdm, also described the sellers as belonging to the “land mafia”. According to the two reports, the plots constituted a portion of the gram samaj (joint village property) land, illegally grabbed by the “land mafia”. (All the documents relating to the transaction are in possession of Tehelka)<br />
The SDM’s report says that at the time of the transaction, the plot was worth Rs 7.20 crore in the open market, whereas Renu Bhalla paid Rs 5 lakh for it. The two reports also state that the sellers of the plot have been charged in several criminal cases, and had sold plots to several influential people to curry favour with them. Renu Bhalla is the wife of Justice Jagdish Bhalla.<br />
Bhushan has also drawn attention to the July 2005 draw of lots for allotment of plots in Sector 44 in Greater Noida. When the computerised draw threw up several influential names, a few people approached the Allahabad HC alleging foulplay. In October 2005, the HC decided that the case warranted a fresh draw of lots and ordered a cbi inquiry into the scam. Among those who had been allotted plots in the scrapped list were Aarohi Bhalla and Sheeba Sabharwal. Aarohi Bhalla, who is the son of Justice Bhalla, was allotted plot number f-52, while Sheeba Sabharwal, daughter-in-law of the CJI YK Sabharwal was allotted plot number f-78. In November 2005, the Supreme Court stayed the Allahabad HC judgement, putting the cbi enquiry and the HC’s order to hold a fresh draw of lots on hold.</p>
<p>Admissible in court? Documents furnished by COJA against the justices<br />
Members of COJA have offered to discuss the matter in person with the CJI but they say that they are still waiting to hear from him. Five months after their initial request, they sent another application to the CJI in November. This time they sought his permission to register an FIR against Justice Bhalla, claiming that their initial evidence was enough to register an offence against him under the Prevention of Corruption Act.<br />
“The CJI did not even call us to hear our point,” says Bhushan. “I don’t know why Justice Sabharwal is shielding Justice Bhalla!” Bhushan is equally critical of Justice Vijender Jain.<br />
Justice Jain, who took oath as the new CJ of Punjab and Haryana HC in November, had to endure many delays before he could be appointed to the post. The CJI had to make three efforts to promote Justice Jain. A collegium headed by the Chief Justice of India first recommended Justice Jain’s name for the post in July. However, President APJ Abdul Kalam returned the file, causing a minor embarrassment to the CJI and the Union government. When the collegium reiterated its recommendation through the government in November, the President had to sign the file.</p>
<p>Third time lucky: Chief Justice Vijender Jain</p>
<p>When a collegium headed by the CJI recommended Justice Jain’s name, the President returned the file<br />
Earlier in May, a proposal by the CJI to make Justice Jain CJ of the Maharsahtra HC was stonewalled by a judge in the three-member collegium who questioned Justice Jain’s integrity. The member on the panel cited a complaint made to former CJI RC Lahoti against Justice Jain in January 2005. The CJI revived the proposal a month later, but again a judge on the collegium opposed his appointment. Finally, a fortnight later, in July 2006, the CJI made his third attempt to promote Jain, this time to the Punjab and Haryana HC.<br />
This time around, to address dissenting voices, the CJI also consulted other SC judges who happened to be former chief justices of the Delhi High Court. According to reliable sources, Justice Jain’s former seniors also questioned his integrity. However, on the basis of a majority, the proposal to promote him was forwarded to the Union government for the President’s assent.<br />
A major hurdle in promoting Justice Jain continued on page 8 continued from page 6 was a complaint by one Subhash Agrawal who approached then CJI RC Lahoti in January 2005 with the complaint that Justice Jain had violated the code of conduct for judges. Agrawal claimed that Justice Jain gave a judgement in favour of someone with whom he had “family relations”. He produced a copy of the invitation card of the litigant’s granddaughter’s wedding, held in April 2001. According to the card, the venue of the wedding was the official residence of Justice Jain. (Tehelka has obtained a copy of the wedding card from the Central Information Commission). In November 2004, Justice Jain, hearing an appeal, decided a civil suit in favour of the person who had held his granddaughter’s wedding at his official residence.<br />
When there was no response to his complaint in October 2005, Agrawal approached the SC to find out the status of his complaint under the rti Act. He was told that his complaint was in the relevant HC file. Not satisfied, Agrawal approached the Central Information Commission. On the commission’s insistence, the SC finally told Agrawal that his complaint had not actually been forwarded to the HC, as the SC has “no administrative jurisdiction” over high court judges. Therefore, the complaint was pending before the CJI, YK Sabharwal. The commission asked the CJI to act on the application. The CJI finally settled the complaint, saying he found no merit in it. When Agrawal asked for reasons behind the decision, he drew a blank.<br />
It’s not just Bhushan who feels the need to bring about accountability and transparency in the judiciary. Janata Dal (U) president Sharad Yadav says the issue will be discussed when the Judicial Accountability Bill is tabled in Parliament. “When the government tables the bill, all its aspects will be discussed,” Yadav told Tehelka.<br />
CJI YK Sabharwal could not be reached for his comments. Despite conciliatory notes from him there are all indications that the clamour surrounding judicial misdemeanour and the demand for greater accountability will only increase in the days to come.<br />
Dec 30 , 2006</p>
<p>Related Stories</p>
<p>•	My lords, there’s a case against youFormer Union law ministers are spearheading a campaign against sitting judges they accuse of being corrupt. What is the higher judiciary doing to clear itself of these grave charges? Avinash Dutt reports<br />
•	Serious charges </p>
<p>•	Dubious first</p>
<p>•	‘The Bill for Judicial Accountability is a sham’Former Union Law Minister Shanti Bhushan is angry at the state of the judiciary in India. He talks toAvinash Dutt<br />
•	Delhi HC dilutes the RTI ActThe rules framed by the court deter those who seek information about its workings, reports Avinash Dutt</p>
<p>•	RTI TangleBy Avinash Dutt</p>
<p>‘Half Of The Last 16 Chief Justices Were Corrupt’<br />
The decision to declare assets is a big victory. Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan tells SHOMA CHAUDHURY what else is rotting in our judiciary</p>
<p>In public interest Prashant Bhushan has championed the fight for judicial accountability<br />
Photo: SHAILENDRA PANDEY<br />
It’s great judges have agreed to declare assets. But will it really help? Politicians do it too.<br />
This decision is very welcome, even if it’s only happened under public pressure. It is proof of the power of public opinion. And even though declaring assets is a relatively minor aspect of judicial accountability, it will help. If a judge misdeclares his assets, there’s a chance someone might know he has particular properties he hasn’t declared, and may point it out. One could then examine if these can be explained within their legal income.<br />
The debate around judicial accountability has got really hot. Are there watershed events that triggered this?<br />
Not in my own perception, but I think for the public there were two watershed events – the Chief Justice Sabharwal case (where there was an allegation that Chief Justice YS Sabharwal’s orders to demolish commercial outlets in Delhi directly benefited his sons, who were partners with some mall developers) and the Ghaziabad Provident Fund scam. Both these cases got wide media attention. A 2006 Transparency International report said the judiciary in India is the second most corrupt institution after the police.<br />
You’ve been at the forefront of the judicial accountability campaign. Why?I have been witness to judicial corruption in the courts for a very long time. I know decisions are passed for extraneous considerations, but it’s difficult to get hard evidence of this. There have been highprofile impeachment attempts, for instance, on Justice Ramaswamy, Justice Punchi and Justice Anand. Yet, they all went on to become chief justices. In my view, out of the last 16 to 17 chief justices, half have been corrupt. I can’t prove this, though we had evidence against Punchi, Anand and Sabharwal on the basis of which we sought their impeachment.<br />
What is the root cause of judicial corruption then, and what are your key demands?<br />
Our key demand is an institutional mechanism for entertaining complaints and taking action against the judiciary. Nothing exists today. Everyone realises impeachment is impractical. To move an impeachment motion you need the signatures of 100 MPS, but you can’t get them because many MPs have pending individual or party cases in these judges’ courts. In the impeachment proceeding against Justice Bhalla, the BJP declined to sign because LK Advani had been acquitted by him in the Babri Masjid demolition case. Such political considerations prevail all the time. An in-house procedure was set up in 1999, post a chief justices’ conference in 1997, but that too is activated only selectively. For example, the complaint against Justice Bhalla was that he had purchased land worth Rs 4 crore at Rs 4 lakh — approximately — from land mafia in Noida. This was based on a report from the DM and SSP of Noida. This land mafia had several cases pending in courts subordinate to Justice Bhalla. Another complaint was that in the Reliance Power matter, though his son was the lawyer for Reliance Power, Justice Bhalla constituted a special bench while he was the presiding judge in Lucknow. He sat in the house of one the judges at 11pm at night to hear their case and pass an injunction in their favour. We asked Chief Justice Sabharwal to initiate proceedings against Bhalla, but he refused.<br />
Similarly, Justice Vijender Jain decided the case of a person whose granddaughter had been married out of his own house. He was a close friend but he still heard and decided the case in this person’s favour. The point is, in these cases though very specific complaints were made to the then Chief Justice of India (CJI), he didn’t do anything to activate the in-house procedure. All these judges have gone on to become chief justices. Bhalla is still chief justice of Rajasthan; Virendra Jain became chief justice of Punjab and Haryana.<br />
What’s the answer?The first problem is that there is no independent institution for entertaining complaints and taking action against judges. There has to be a National Judicial Complaints Commission — independent of the government and judiciary. It should have five members and an investigating machinery under them. The second problem lies in the Veeraswamy judgment, which ordered no criminal investigation can be done against a judge without prior written permission of the CJI. That’s what happened in Karnataka. There was a complaint against several judges visiting a motel and misbehaving with women. When the police officer came, the judges threatened him and said no FIR could be filed against them because they were judges. This happened in the Ghaziabad Provident Fund case as well. The investigation is stumped because the CJI hasn’t given permission. We have to get rid of this injunction.<br />
The third problem is the Contempt of Court Act. Today, even if you expose a judge with evidence, you run the risk of contempt. Judges are even seeking to insulate themselves from the RTI. We have to get rid of the Contempt of Court Act – not the whole Act. Disobeying the orders of the court is civil contempt – that should remain. Interfering with the administration of justice is criminal contempt – that too should remain. What needs to be deleted is the clause about scandalising or lowering the dignity of the court, for which Arundhati Roy was sent to jail. Finally, there is the problem of appointments. Earlier, judicial appointments were made by the government, which was bad enough. Now, by a sleight of hand, the Supreme Court has taken the power of appointments to itself. Earlier there were political considerations; now there are nepotistic ones.<br />
Again, what’s the answer to that?<br />
We need an independent Judicial Appointments Commission, which is independent and works full time, and follows some systems and procedures. Eligibility lists should be prepared and comparative merits debated and evaluated. You can’t just pick judges arbitrarily, and let people know about it only after the deed is done.<br />
There is still no independent body to process complaints and action against judges<br />
What are the best practices and conventions elsewhere?<br />
We should at least have Public Confirmation hearings like in the US. In the Senate Judicial Committee, you have hearings where any public citizen can give evidence about the background of a judge that has bearing on their appointment. This is being fiercely resisted here.<br />
Do any counter arguments hold?<br />
None that I can see. The judges say all this will compromise their independence. Unfortunately, they are equating the independence of the judiciary with independence from accountability. Independence of the judiciary was meant to be independence from the political establishment, not from all accountability.<br />
Are there other ways in which judicial corruption manifests itself?There are so many. There is Justice Kapadia who decided on the Niyamgiri mining lease case in Orissa. He said Vedanta can’t be given the lease because it’s been blacklisted by the Norwegian government; but its subsidiary company Sterlite can get the lease because it is a publicly listed company. Justice Kapadia said it’s publicly listed because he had shares in it and yet he passed an order in favour of Sterlite! There is a law against judges hearing cases where there is a conflict of interest, but they just bypass it and you can’t complain because that would be contempt.<br />
WRITER’S EMAIL<br />
shoma@tehelka.com</p>
<p>From Tehelka Magazine, Vol 6, Issue 35, Dated September 05, 2009</p>
<p>Burn After Reading<br />
BRIJESH PANDEY and SANJAY DUBEY track the Supreme Court’s lack of urgency in investigating charges of judicial corruption<br />
THE STORY OF A QUIET BURIAL?<br />
Special CBI judge Rama Jain uncovers Rs 7 crore Provident Fund scam during vigilance inquiry<br />
Accused Ashutosh Asthana revealed that he was paying off 36 judges including a sitting Supreme Court judge and 11 High Court judges<br />
Supreme Court directs CBI to investigate, permits interrogation of all involved judges<br />
Several status reports given by the CBI to the apex court<br />
Reports kept secret. Action taken on basis of reports unknown<br />
WHEN SPECIAL CBI judge Rama Jain received an anonymous letter in January 2008, telling her that the provident funds of Class 3 and Class 4 employees of the Ghaziabad court were being siphoned off, she had no idea that she had stumbled onto the biggest judicial scam in the history of independent India.<br />
As she was the designated vigilance officer at the Ghaziabad court, she first conducted an inquiry on her own, which uncovered the involvement of at least three judges and the Central Nazir in the embezzlement of funds. She reported the matter to the Allahabad High Court, which, in turn, ordered a vigilance inquiry. Holding that the report, prima facie, had merit, the court directed her to file an FIR.<br />
Central Nazir Ashutosh Asthana was arrested on the basis of the FIR on April 10, 2008. His interrogation revealed that Asthana was not a solo player. He claimed that he was first introduced to the scam by a district judge himself. What followed was so shocking that even the Ghaziabad police was on the backfoot. Asthana confessed that from the Rs 7 crore embezzled, he had given cash and gifts such as airconditioners, refrigerators, expensive clothes, jewellery and furniture to as many as 36 judges, including about 10 High Court judges and one Supreme Court judge. In a sworn statement before a magistrate, Asthana revealed that this fraud had run from 2001 to 2007 with the active connivance of district judges. Every month, Asthana even paid bribes to various judges, from Rs 25,000 to a whopping Rs 1.5 lakh.<br />
When these excerpts from Asthana’s confession became public, the public image of the judiciary touched a new low. In perhaps the biggest moment of crisis for the Indian judiciary, Asthana, the main accused, has in turn named judges from the Ghaziabad District Court to the Allahabad High Court, right up to the Supreme Court. This was not all.<br />
These revelations stunned the Ghaziabad police. Clearly out of their depth and (justifiably) wary of taking on the powerful judiciary, they requested the Ghaziabad court to hand over the probe to the CBI. In September 2008, the Supreme Court transferred the case to the CBI, but with a rider: Investigate, but give us a sealed report. The PF scam, as it had come to be known, gave the judiciary a wonderful opportunity to redeem itself in the eyes of the people but the case remained shrouded in secrecy. Cynics then said that the whole matter would be given a quiet burial. Eighteen months after the scam became public and four CBI status reports later, the cynics appear to have had the last laugh.</p>
<p>This delay and secrecy in such a highprofile scam raises various uncomfortable questions for the Indian Judiciary. Legal luminaries believe that this is symptomatic of a larger malaise which ails the judiciary. Says jurist Ram Jethmalani, “The reputation of a judge is more important than the actual fact of his honesty. In fact, if a judge has a bad reputation, even if it is undeserved, he should not be appointed because then nobody will have confidence in his judgements,” adding, “When the judiciary expedites cases concerning the executive branch or even most prominent cases, why is such urgency not displayed here, when the matter is extremely serious. Why this delay?”<br />
For six years, funds worth Rs 7 crore were embezzled and judges were allegedly bribed<br />
A VALID QUESTION. Asthana named 36 judges (a list of which is with TEHELKA). Other than the fact that a few have retired, virtually nothing is known about the fate of the judges of the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court judge. Whether or not the apex court is planning to initiate or has initiated, criminal charges against any of the judges — sitting or retired — are questions that only the Supreme Court can answer.<br />
And the apex court should answer, argues former Union law minister and senior advocate Shanti Bhushan. “I don’t appreciate this sealed-cover business except in very rare cases when making something public might be detrimental to the public interest — mainly if there is an army secret. Whether it is the judiciary or the executive, all officers are appointed on the behalf of the people. It is on the people’s behalf that the judiciary exercises its powers. How can you keep investigations in the PF scam secret? The people have every right to know what is going on.”<br />
VN Khare, former Chief Justice of India, concurs. “These kind of things should not be allowed to linger. This shakes the confidence of the people in the judiciary. If there is an allegation or misconduct, it must be inquired into immediately and strict action should be taken against the erring judges. Why should the reputation of most judges suffer for no fault of theirs?”</p>
<p>When the judiciary expedites cases concerning the executive branch or even most prominent cases, why is such urgency not being displayed in this matter?<br />
RAM JETHMALANI, Jurist<br />
The biggest question which arises from this scam is the lack of will on the part of the judiciary to rein in errant judges. Let alone the judges named by Asthana, what about the fate of the three Ghaziabad District Judges named by vigilance officer of the district court Special CBI Judge Rama Jain herself? Legal luminaries say this hesitancy on the part of judges to act against fellow judges involved in wrongdoing clearly illustrates the prevailing mindset of the judiciary.<br />
“I know of a retired Chief Justice of India who is one of the most honest judges I have ever seen. It’s difficult to imagine a more honest person. However, when a responsible minister made complaints to him against a corrupt High Court Judge, he did not grant permission for an investigation because he felt that as the head of the judicial family, it was his job to protect judges, be they corrupt or not,” says Shanti Bhushan. Ram Jethmalani chips in sarcastically, “This is the reason why judges call each other ‘brother judge.’”<br />
IT IS not only cases like the PF scam which taints the image of the judiciary, but also the extreme reluctance on the part of the judiciary to be open and transparent. Reams and reams of paper have gone towards pious exhortations by the judiciary asking the government to refrain from corruption and work in an efficient manner. But sadly, no judge has held forth at length on the need for the judiciary to refrain from corruption. Even attempts to exercise the Right to Information with respect to the office of the CJI came a cropper as the CJI’s office was always declared out of bounds. It took a historic verdict by the Delhi High Court to declare that the office of the CJI was not immune from accountability and outside the purview of the RTI Act. Senior lawyers and retired chief justices feel that if the judiciary is not transparent or accountable, it only means that they are trying to hide something. Justice Khare feels, “Judges are more accountable than other persons because they hold a very high post. The very existence of the judiciary is based on the faith of the common man in it. If that faith is not there, how can the judiciary function?”<br />
No judge holds forth at length on the need for the judiciary to refrain from corruption<br />
What incenses them is the behaviour of the government with regard to the Judges’ Assets Declaration Bill which the government tried to introduce in 2009. The opposition erupted in protest and forced the government to defer the bill. Jethmalani terms the government’s approach to this bill as a “conspiracy of corruption”. “The government is scared to take on the judiciary. It’s clear that the executive wants to cosy up to the judiciary.” Agrees retired CJI V N Khare, “Why should there be any hesitancy to declare assets at all on the part of judiciary? The whole episode is beyond me.” In a recent development, the Supreme Court has reiterated before the Delhi High Court that the CJI’s office is outside the purview of the RTI Act.</p>
<p>Corruption charges are swept under the carpet by the judiciary. But this has given a shield of total immunity to the judges, who think they can get away with anything<br />
SHANTI BHUSHAN, Former law minister<br />
Another assault on the public image of the judiciary is the Dinakaran episode. Currently, judges are appointed to the Supreme Court by the Supreme Court Collegium, a group of judges chaired by the Chief Justice of India. When Chief Justice Dinakaran of the Karnataka High Court was elevated to the Supreme Court, the state Bar and legal luminaries rose up in protest because the Collegium appeared to have dismissed, or, at least, not have considered the serious allegations of corruption against him. According to Senior Advocate Soli Sorabjee, “The Dinakaran episode shows that the Collegium is not working satisfactorily. You must have a national commission for judges which should be made up of judges, eminent jurists and senior government officials. This council should have the power to get independent information and evaluate it.” Shanti Bhushan feels that as judges are extremely busy with hearing cases, there should be a full-time commission whose sole function is to pick judges for the High Court and the Supreme Court and feels that the commission should also have its own bureau of investigation. They should not be dependent on either the local police, who might be afraid to investigate judges, or on an overburdened CBI.<br />
But all this is very hard to achieve. Jurists feel that the judges of the higher courts have converted themselves into a union of sorts and are trying to protect each other. “Their approach is to sweep every allegation under the carpet. Don’t allow the public to know about it. Let the public believe that our judiciary is very honest. But this has been counterproductive. It has given a shield of total immunity to the judges and they think they can get away with anything. This has led to an increase in corruption in the judiciary,” states Shanti Bhushan. Time and again, opportunities have arisen for the judiciary to reinvent itself in a new avatar. And time after time, it has failed. Caesar’s wife, they say, should be above suspicion. Whatever the cost it might take to ensure it.<br />
WRITERS’ EMAIL<br />
brijesh@tehelka.com<br />
sanjay@tehelka.com</p>
<p>From Tehelka Magazine, Vol 6, Issue 41, Dated October 17, 2009</p>
<p>‘Half of last 16 chief justices have been corrupt’<br />
By churumuri</p>
<p>Judicial corruption is a bull few in India are willing to attach their names to. There are whispers of this or that sitting judge making piles or cash; of sons, daughters and other near and dear ones acting as “brokers” for cases, deals, etc, but none of those allegations see the light of day.<br />
Not because the media is a willing accomplice but because of the sword of “contempt of court” hanging over us.<br />
For long, truth was not, repeat not, a defence in the case of contempt.  Although that is now no longer the case, judicial corruption still isn’t headline news like corruption in other spheres of Indian life. The case of Justice P.D. Dinakaran is one of the rare exceptions and that too only in sections of the media.<br />
In September 2009, the Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan, in an interview to Shoma Chaudhury of Tehelkamagazine, said “half of the last 16 chief justices were corrupt”. The comment invited the apex court’s contempt. Now, Bhushan’s father, the noted jurist Shanti Bhushan has joined issue.<br />
In his application before the Supreme Court praying for his impleadment as respondent No.3 in the case of the Amicus Curiae vs Prashant Bhushan, Bhushan senior repeats his son’s charge that eight out of the last 16 CJs were corrupt, even going so far as to deliver the names of the corrupt in a sealed cover.<br />
“In the applicant’s opinion, eight [of the last 16 chief justices] were definitely corrupt, six were definitely honest and about the remaining two, a definite opinion cannot be expressed whether they were honest or corrupt.”<br />
Below is the full text of Shanti Bhushan’s application, published in the public interest.<br />
***<br />
To<br />
The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India &amp;<br />
His companion justices of the Supreme Court of India<br />
The humble application of the Petitioners above named.<br />
Most respectfully showeth:<br />
1.	That the applicant is filing the present application for his impleadment as Respondent No. 3 in the aforementioned contempt petition as the applicant is making a categorical statement in the present application that eight of the last sixteen Chief Justices of India were definitely corrupt and also providing the names of those eight definitely corrupt Chief Justices in a sealed cover as an annexure along with the present application.<br />
2.	The applicant is a practicing advocate who was enrolled on 8 July 1948. He has appeared in each and every High Court in the country. He is well acquainted with the manner in which the Indian judiciary has been functioning and how its character has been changing over the years.<br />
3.	That the applicant has been a part of the campaign for judicial accountability since its inception in the year 1990.<br />
4.	That there was a time when it was almost impossible even to think that a judge of a High court or the Supreme Court could be corrupt. Things have changed drastically during the last 2 or 3 decades during which corruption has been growing in the Indian judiciary. So much so that even a sitting Chief Justice of India had to openly admit that 20% of the judges could be corrupt. Very recently in March 2010 a sitting Chief Justice of a high court openly made a statement. The statement of the sitting chief justice was published by the Times of India in its issue of 6th march 2010 with the headlines, “In our judiciary, anybody can be bought, says Gujarat chief justice”. A copy of the news paper report is being annexed hereto as Annexure A.<br />
5.	That the applicant believes that the reported statement may not be correctly reflecting the perception of the Gujarat Chief Justice, since he should be knowing as the applicant does that there are and have always been plenty of totally honest judges, but they are also becoming the victim of this public perception since no institution of governance in the country is taking any effective steps about dealing with corruption in the judiciary.<br />
6.	That India became a republic in 1950, when the people became sovereign. They got the right to constitute their institutions, the executive, the legislature and the judiciary, to serve them, who would be accountable to them.<br />
7.	That before 1950, corruption was almost non existent in the High Courts. The federal court had in 1949 got Justice Shiv Prasad Sinha removed from the Allahabad High Court, merely on the finding that he had passed 2 judicial orders on extra judicial considerations.<br />
8.	That it however appears that thereafter the judiciary has adopted the policy of sweeping all allegations of judicial corruption under the carpet in the belief that such allegations might tarnish the image of the judiciary. It does not realize that this policy has played a big role in increasing judicial corruption.<br />
9.	That the Constitution prescribed removal by impeachment as the only way of removing judges who commit misconduct since it was believed at the time of the framing of the Constitution that misconduct by judges of the higher judiciary would be very rare. However those expectations have been belied as is apparent from the surfacing of a series of judicial scandals in the recent past. The case of Justice V. Ramaswami and subsequent attempts to impeach other judges have shown that this is an impractical and difficult process to deal with corrupt judges. The practical effect of this has been to instill a feeling of impunity among judges who feel that they cannot be touched even if they misconduct.<br />
10.	That corruption by judges is a cognizable offence. The Code of Criminal Procedure requires that whenever an FIR is filed with respect to a cognizable offence, it is the statutory duty of the police to investigate the offence. The police has to collect evidence against the accused and charge-sheet him in a competent court. He would then be tried and punished by being sent to jail. The Supreme Court has however by violating this statutory provision in the CrPC given a direction in its Constitution bench judgement in theVeeraswamy case of 1991 that no FIR would be registered against any judge without the permission of the Chief Justice of India. In not a single case has any such permission ever been granted for the registration of an FIR against any judge after that judgement.<br />
11.	That the result of this direction has been that a total immunity has been given to corrupt judges against their prosecution. No wonder that judicial corruption has increased by leaps and bounds.<br />
12.	That an honest judiciary enjoying public confidence is an imperative for the functioning of a democracy, and it is the duty of every right thinking person to strive to achieve this end.<br />
13.	That unless the level of corruption in the judiciary is exposed and brought in the public domain, the institutions of governance cannot be activated to take effective measures to eliminate this evil.<br />
14.	That it is the common perception that whenever such efforts are made by anyone, the judiciary tries to target him by the use of the power of contempt. It is the reputation of the judge which is his shield against any malicious and false allegations against him. He doesn’t need the power of contempt to protect his reputation and credibility.<br />
15.	That the applicant strongly believes that a responsible citizen should be prepared to undergo any amount of suffering in the pursuit of the noble cause of fighting for a clean judiciary.<br />
16.	That there are two statements of Respondent no. 1 (Prashant Bhushan) published in Tehelka by Respondent no. 2 which are alleged to constitute contempt of court. In the 1st statement, Respondent no. 1 has expressed that in his view, out of the last 16 or 17 chief justices of India, half have been corrupt.<br />
17.	The applicant states that in his view too this statement is absolutely correct. At the time of the publication of this report in Tehelka, the last 16 Chief Justices of India were the following:                  1. Justice  Ranganath Mishra,<br />
2. Justice K.N. Singh,<br />
3. Justice M.H. Kania,<br />
4. Justice L.M. Sharma,<br />
5. Justice M.N. Venkatchalliah,<br />
6. Justice A.M. Ahmadi,<br />
7. Justice J.S. Verma,<br />
8. Justice M.M. Punchhi,<br />
9. Justice A.S. Anand,<br />
10. Justice S.P. Bharucha,<br />
11. Justice B.N. Kripal,<br />
12. Justice G.B. Patnaik,<br />
13. Justice Rajendra Babu,<br />
14. Justice R. C. Lahoti,<br />
15. Justice V.N. Khare,<br />
16. Justice Y.K SabharwalOut of these, in the applicant’s opinion, eight were definitely corrupt, six were definitely honest and about the remaining two, a definite opinion cannot be expressed whether they were honest or corrupt. The signed lists identifying these eight, six and two Chief Justices of India are being enclosed in a sealed cover which is being annexed here to as Annexure B.<br />
18.	That in fact two former chief justices of India had personally told the applicant while they were in office that their immediate predecessor and immediate successor were corrupt judges. The names of these four Chief Justices of India are included in the list of the 8 corrupt Chief Justices of India.<br />
19.	That since the applicant is publicly stating that out of the last sixteen Chief Justices of India, eight of them were definitely corrupt, the applicant also needs to be added as a respondent to this contempt petition so that he is also suitably punished for this contempt. The applicant would consider it a great honour to spend time in jail for making an effort to get for the people of India an honest and clean judiciary.<br />
20.	That the applicant also submits that since the questions arising in this case affects the judiciary as a whole, the petition needs to be decided by the entire court and not merely by three judges handpicked by a Chief Justice.<br />
PRAYERS<br />
In view of the above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to:<br />
1.	allow the present application and implead the Applicant as a contemnor in the aforementioned contempt petition as Respondent no. 3; and<br />
2.	pass any other or further order/s as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.<br />
(Shanti Bhushan)<br />
applicant-in-person<br />
New Delhi<br />
***<br />
Photograph: courtesy Shailendra Pandey/ Tehelka<br />
***<br />
Full coverage: The strange case of Justice P.D. Dinakaran<br />
CHURUMURI POLL: Is Dalit Dinakaran above the law?<br />
If he is unfit for Supreme Court, how is he fit for Karnataka HC?<br />
If he is unfit for Supreme Court, how is he fit for Karnataka HC—II?<br />
‘Integrity + competence + judicial temperament’<br />
Yella not OK, but Supreme Court silent yaake?<br />
The brazen conduct of Justice Dinakaran<br />
The strange case of Justice Dinakaran (continued)<br />
Audi alteram partem? Hear the other side out?<br />
CHURUMURI POLL: Will Justice Dinakaran be impeached?<br />
Is CJI K.G. Balakrishnan right about P.D. Dinakaran?<br />
CHURUMURI POLL: Is Dinakaran fit for Sikkim HC?<br />
CHURUMURI POLL: P.D. Dinakaran vs D.V. Shylendra Kumar<br />
Is Sikkim HC’s dignity less than that of Karnataka’s?</p>
<p>edited , printed , published &amp; owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL , MYSORE -570017 INDIA  cell : 09341820313<br />
home page:<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home , http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit .<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ </p>
<p> e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com     ,  naghrw@yahoo.com    </p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/125/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=125&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/cji-answer-my-lord/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>KIADB  BDA SCAMS</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/kiadb-bda-scams/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/kiadb-bda-scams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KIADB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web Working For The Rights &#38; Survival Of The Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 41…… 13/10/2010 home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/ , http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ , http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit , SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html NICE Corridor Questions to Chief Minister of Karnataka http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/nice-corridor-questions-to-chief-minister Editorial [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=123&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web<br />
Working For The Rights &amp; Survival Of The Oppressed</p>
<p>Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 41…… 13/10/2010</p>
<p>home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,<br />
 http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ ,<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit  ,  </p>
<p>SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html</p>
<p>NICE Corridor Questions to Chief Minister of Karnataka</p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/nice-corridor-questions-to-chief-minister</p>
<p>Editorial :  KIADB de-notification scandal , BMIC – NICE SCANDAL  , MINING SCANDALS and Threats to RTI Applicant<br />
-  PIL Appeal To Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of Mandamus</p>
<p> Just months back , we have witnessed the collapse of a multi storied building in bellary ,Karnataka &amp; we have witnessed  a fire tragedy in a  multi-storey building in Bangalore,  months ago there was collapse of a huge building under construction in Bangalore , all resulting in loss of human lives. Recently we have seen de-notification scam involving VVIPs . All these are the result of violations of Urban Town Planning Laws , Building bye-laws which  are observed more in breach by the criminals &amp; conniving public servants .  The authorities are behaving like real estate agents of criminals , by-passing norms , framing laws to the tune of criminals . Authorities are not honoring RTI requests &amp; even high ranking IAS officer  repeatedly threatens a commoner  seeking information under RTI ACT .</p>
<p>Before embarking on land acquisition for any projects government authorities must plan &amp; assess what are the actual requirement of land for that particular project. After finding out the actual requirement of land , they must  assess the loss of forest area , cost of compensation pay-out , cost of rehabilitation of people , environmental damages &amp; resultant health damages to people in surrounding areas ,it’s resultant losses when the project gets running , if at all the benefits , profits from that project far outweighs the losses ,then only project should be put before the public for their consent. Ministers &amp; IAS officers must not take these decisions all by themselves in a hush – hush manner. </p>
<p>Even when a project is downsized , from the previously approved size , the land left over , surplus land must be given back to the original owner on first priority . The project managers must not sell those surplus lands to third parties for a premium .<br />
Even when KIADB ,BDA ,MUDA &amp; other authorities acquire lands from farmers ,for constructing industrial  parks or residential layouts , etc , has framed comprehensive development plans (CDP) for their respective cities , clearly demarcating land usage pattern . However after acquisition of land , the KIADB , BDA , MUDA , etc are selling those very lands to private third parties for different land usage purposes ,completely violating CDP. Are these KIADB , BDA , BBMP , MUDA ,MCC real estate agents of Rich people ? </p>
<p>Now , consider NICE – BMIC SCANDAL or MINING Scandals , public servants in responsible positions are accusing each other , there by proving that almost all of them are criminals. In democracy , ministers &amp; IAS officers are public servants , MLAs , MPs are not leaders just public servants  &#8211; representative of people. They must represent people’s wishes &amp; must order the IAS &amp; other officers to fulfil the wishes of people as per legal provisions.<br />
Information input  forms part of process of one&#8217;s expression. One&#8217;s expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information &amp; Expression are inseparable parts &amp; form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person&#8217;s  right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also  are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.</p>
<p>In a democracy , people have a right to know  how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding  behind the veil of  Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created  by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption  , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview &amp; bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.</p>
<p>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India  , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to  millions  of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of  Indian judges , police &amp; public servants  .   The  information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals  in public service.  The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : &#8220;writ of Mandamus&#8221; and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the  questions.  JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.</p>
<p>Your&#8217;s sincerely ,<br />
Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>RTI – QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY  ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE ( BBMP ) &amp; CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ( KIADB)  ARE  AFRAID TO ANSWER</p>
<p>1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the Bangalore city&#8217;s comprehensive city development plan ?</p>
<p>2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?</p>
<p>4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?</p>
<p>6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &amp; commercial site ? if not why ?</p>
<p>7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings &amp; houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?</p>
<p>10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?</p>
<p>12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?</p>
<p>13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies &amp; real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; how many not ? since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies &amp; illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?</p>
<p>15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &amp; housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?</p>
<p>16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &amp; legalizing those violations. Safety of public &amp; amenities of public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn&#8217;t have a parking space of it&#8217;s own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries &amp; deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries &amp; deaths ?</p>
<p>17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?</p>
<p>18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?</p>
<p>20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts &amp; evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees &amp; build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?</p>
<p>22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?</p>
<p>24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals – tresspassers ? if not why ?</p>
<p>25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &amp; sufficient time to bidders about it&#8217;s auction schedules ?</p>
<p>26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?</p>
<p>27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?</p>
<p>28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &amp; selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?</p>
<p>29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?</p>
<p>30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?</p>
<p>31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?</p>
<p>32. in &amp; around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces &amp; built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer&#8217;s money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under &amp; surrounding HT lines legal ?</p>
<p>33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired &amp; sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?</p>
<p>34. in &amp; around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?</p>
<p>35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; other developers , housing societies ?</p>
<p>36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment &amp; creating public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in &amp; around bangalore city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?</p>
<p>39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB&#8217;s comprehensive industrial area development plan ?</p>
<p>40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?</p>
<p>41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT&#8217;s industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?</p>
<p>42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP &amp; INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &amp; Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?</p>
<p>43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar&#8217;s report on land grabbings in mysore ?</p>
<p>44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal &amp; in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s CDP ? if not why ? what action ?</p>
<p>45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?</p>
<p>46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?</p>
<p>47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it&#8217;s objections , in it&#8217;s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues &amp; the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &amp; alienation legal ?</p>
<p>48.numerous NGO&#8217;s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?</p>
<p>49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections &amp; given media publicity ? if not why ?</p>
<p>52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT officials &amp; their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?</p>
<p>53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?</p>
<p>54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?</p>
<p>55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?<br />
56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.<br />
57. why BDA didn&#8217;t file police complaint to evict encroachers?<br />
58. why BDA didn&#8217;t inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their allotment ?<br />
59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?<br />
60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of BDA committee legal ?<br />
61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufficient time to reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?<br />
62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request &amp; stated that the said file concerning this issue cann&#8217;t be found ie lost . is it legal ?<br />
63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.</p>
<p>RTI QUESTIONS  COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) &amp; COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE  CITY CORPORATION ) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER<br />
 1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the mysore city&#8217;s comprehensive city development plan ?</p>
<p>2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?</p>
<p>4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?</p>
<p>6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &amp; commercial site ? if not why ?</p>
<p>7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>9. how much of MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s / GOVERNMENT&#8217;s lands , sites , buildings &amp; houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?</p>
<p>10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s resolution instead of of reallotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?</p>
<p>12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?</p>
<p>13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies &amp; real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT &amp; how many not ? since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies &amp; illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?</p>
<p>15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &amp; housing societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?</p>
<p>16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &amp; legalizing those<br />
violations. Safety of public &amp; amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn&#8217;t have a parking space of it&#8217;s own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries &amp; deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries &amp; deaths ?</p>
<p>17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?</p>
<p>18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?</p>
<p>20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts &amp; evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees &amp; build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?</p>
<p>22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?</p>
<p>24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals – tresspassers ? if not why ?</p>
<p>25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &amp; sufficient time to bidders about it&#8217;s auction schedules ?</p>
<p>26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?</p>
<p>27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?</p>
<p>28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &amp; selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?</p>
<p>29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /<br />
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?</p>
<p>30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other land developers ?</p>
<p>31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?</p>
<p>32. in &amp; around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out<br />
advertisement spaces &amp; built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer&#8217;s money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under<br />
&amp; surrounding HT lines legal ?</p>
<p>33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired &amp; sold as sites by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?</p>
<p>34. in &amp; around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA &amp; private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?</p>
<p>35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC &amp; other developers , housing societies ?</p>
<p>36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment &amp; creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in &amp; around mysore city ? what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /<br />
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?</p>
<p>39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB&#8217;s<br />
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?</p>
<p>40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?</p>
<p>41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s CDP &amp; KIADB&#8217;s industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?</p>
<p>42. is the MUDA &amp; KIADB revising / modifying CDP &amp; INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &amp; Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?</p>
<p>43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar&#8217;s report on land grabbings in mysore ?</p>
<p>44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal &amp; in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s CDP ? if not why ? what action ?</p>
<p>45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?</p>
<p>46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?</p>
<p>47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it&#8217;s objections , in it&#8217;s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues &amp; the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &amp; alienation legal ?</p>
<p>48.numerous NGO&#8217;s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?</p>
<p>49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC &amp; government action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections &amp; given media publicity ? if not why ?</p>
<p>52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE officials &amp; their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?</p>
<p>53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?</p>
<p>54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?</p>
<p>55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?</p>
<p>NICE Corridor Questions to CHIEF MINISTER .Mr.Yediyurappa<br />
Read full questionnaire </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/nice-corridor-questions-to-chie\</p>
<p>f-minister</p>
<p> BMIC by NICE &amp; land scams  in Karnataka  – an appeal to honourable supreme court of India &amp; H.E.Honourable Governor Of Karnataka</p>
<p>When a crime is noticed , it is the duty of the government to investigate who did it ? and to legally prosecute them in court &amp; provide justice . if  thousands of criminals , lakhs of criminals  got together &amp; did the same type of crimes , all of them must be legally prosecuted. Just  for the overwhelming numbers of criminals law of the land cann&#8217;t be changed. However  in the Karnataka state , many political bigwigs , rich crooks have done the same crime , LAND GRABBING – illegal possession of government land &amp; illegal constructions over it. Important land records of those government lands , lands belonging to poor are lost in record rooms of civic bodies ( cunningly destroyed by corrupt officials ) Now, their political masters are legalizing the crimes . what a shame to the government of Karnataka ?</p>
<p>The  shri.A.T. RAMA SWAMY , (M.L.A) standing committee in the Previous legislative assembly probed  the land grabbings in Karnataka &amp; gave it&#8217;s report to the government . However the government in a hurry , is auctioning – off  those government lands without proper publicity  to the auction process , sufficient time for bidder&#8217;s expression of interest. In some cases , a pittance is levied as penalty for the illegal occupation to get it legalized. The government is not bothered about legally prosecuting the illegal  occupier  of those lands. In many civic bodies , important property documents belonging to the government  &amp; poor are missing from the record rooms. All these point towards the government intention , to legalise the crimes of  illegal land occupiers who are nothing but their own political  cronies.</p>
<p>The recent ordinance by government of Karnataka to regularize land deals is envisaging to legalize the crimes of rich. The illegal land conversions , land encroachments , encroachment of civic amenities made by the rich are being legalized with levying a pittance as penalty in the name of public welfare . Whereas the land worth at today&#8217;s market prices are 10&#8242;s of thousands of crore it is only wefare of the rich &amp; mighty . IT IS GOING TO BE MOTHER OF ALL SCAMS.  The authorities evict poor tribal people from their ancestral forest area in the name of conservation , evict tribal people from villages in the name of development without proper rehabilitation measures. The government is not giving land rights to slum dwellers , poor , dalits over the land they are dwelling , the government is deaf to appeals of dalits for land rights. However the same government is sympathetic to rich who have encroached land &amp; built huge commercial complexes worth crores violating all norms with total disregard to civic amenity or safety.</p>
<p>Questions Bangalore DC , BBMP Commissioner , BDA  Commissioner &amp;  KIADB  Chairman are not answering &amp; HIDING TRUTH , COVERING-UP CRIMES<br />
 http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti&#8212;bda-bbmp-kiadb ,http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,<br />
Questions Mysore  DC , MCC Commissioner &amp;  MUDA  Commissioner  are not answering &amp; HIDING TRUTH , COVERING-UP CRIMES<br />
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti&#8212;muda-mcc ,  http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/</p>
<p>Hereby , e-voice urges the  concerned authorities  , to answer the following questionnaire about BMIC project by NICE </p>
<p>http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20100214a_009101001&#038;ileft=50&#038;itop=56&#038;zoomRatio=130&#038;AN=20100214a_009101001</p>
<p>Hereby ,e-voice  appeals to honourable supreme court of India , to annul the bid process of government of Karnataka with respect to illegally occupied government lands &amp;  to annul this ordinance of government of Karnataka which seeks to legalize land crimes. Jai hind . vande mataram.<br />
Your&#8217;s sincerely,<br />
Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>THE CLOUT OF LAND MAFIA IN INDIA -the governments daring to by-pass judiciary<br />
An appeal ( PIL ) to the honourable supreme court of India </p>
<p>The recent attempts by government of India &amp; other state governments to legalise land grabbings by enacting new land laws in the name of public welfare is farce . while crores of people are without shelter &amp; are living on streets , people in slums , tribal lands are struggling for land rights since decades the governments were mum &amp; deaf. Now , as the rulers themselves &amp; their cronies have built illegal constructions running into crores they are shedding crocodile tears in the name of public welfare. In india, various state governments have enacted &#8221; town municipal / city corporation laws &amp; building laws&#8221; , to ensure orderly growth of cities &amp; towns , to ensure the safety of buildings &amp; it&#8217;s occupants , to ensure the safety of pedestrians &amp; road users.</p>
<p>Numerous educated people , ruling elite – ministers , police , government officials , M.Ps , M.L.As , etc knowing fully well about the laws have illegally built bungalows , commercial complexes , throwing to wind all laws. In their greed they have shown utter contempt towards law. They have encroached dried –up lakes , rivulets , rain flow paths , drainages , foot paths , civic amenity sites. In their building there are violations of- lack of fire safety exits , lack of parking space , encroachment of foot paths , conservancy line , drainages , etc.</p>
<p>There is wide spread corruption in the corporation / municipal authorities. For a price officials have converted  CA sites to commercial purposes , authorised deviations / encroachments of public<br />
lands like foot paths , drainages , parking space , set-off , etc. The corporation officials themselves are violating city master plans. Even before authorising the conversions &amp; encroachments of lands , the<br />
corporation officials are not making alternate arrangements. By all these corrupt deeds many of the corporation officilas have become millionaires . however more &amp; more road accidents are taking place , building collapses &amp; fire tragedies are occurring , during heavy rainfalls water is getting  clogged – ALL THESE RESULTING IN LOSS OF HUMAN LIVE &amp; PROPERTIES. In recent days numerous murders have taken place over the real estate issues . THE CRIMINAL LAND GRABBERS MADE DEATH THREATS &amp; FORCED THE PIL APPLICANT IN THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ABOUT LAND GRABBINGS IN KORAMANGALA LAYOUT BANGALORE. The government of karnataka instead of protecting the PIL applicant &amp; upholding the law has taken sides with the land grabbers.</p>
<p>The state governments of karnataka &amp; delhi has got M.L.As &amp; officials who have themselves violated building laws &amp; grabbed govt lands. Now , the two govts are contemplating to bring in laws regularising these land grabbing crimes for a pittance as penalty. All to by-pass judiciary. The governments are least bothered about the lives of poor &amp; only too caring towards the land grabbing criminals.  The same governments have not yet given land rights to poor slum dwellers / dalits , land rights to tribals living in forest since centuries , land rights to poor agricultural labourers, where as it is full of concern towards rich &amp; mighty land grabbers – criminals.  Bottom line – whatever be the magnitude of crime if you are rich &amp; mighty law will be bended to suit you , by bad luck if you are a poor folk you are bound to suffer being on the right side of law also.  Hereby , e-voice  urges requests the honourable supreme court of india , to register this as a PIL , to provide protection to the PIL applicant in bangalore &amp; to take appropriate actions against the GOK &amp; GOD nipping at bud their illegal motives to regularise land grabbings.</p>
<p>ILLEGALITIES IN AUCTION OF M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD MYSORE</p>
<p>During the auction of above sick industry the land usage was for industrial purpose only. so, people with other commercial objectives were not allowed to participate in the auction. Thereby, the final auctioned amount was very much less than the market value. This has a direct bearing on employees of that industry , lending banks , govt dept , etc who have all put forward their claims for dues from that industry. noW, all of them are getting very much less than what is due from the closed company. A loss of crores of rupees to banks , government , employees has been made by the cunningness of civic bodies.<br />
Now in a backdoor move the M.U.D.A , K.I.A.D.B , M.C.C are moving to give land usage conversion to the new occupier, who is building posh villas &amp; resorts here. Is it right &amp; justified ? should not they conduct auction once again or charge market value to the new owner.</p>
<p>LAND MAFIA IN KARNATAKA</p>
<p>The land mafia which has links with political leadership &amp; top govt servants in the state, is running business widely in &amp; around bangalore,mysore &amp; other major towns. The authorities like city corporation , B.D.A, M.U.D.A , K.I.A.D.B , etc are denotifying the lands meant for public welfare in favour of land mafia. The authorities have earmarked these lands for public welfare ie parks , schools , hospitals at the planning stage itself for current &amp; future needs of the people. In most cases the land mafia has illegally occupied the lands , built commercial complexes &amp; sold it for crores of rupees.</p>
<p>1. the authorities are not demolishing these illegal structures &amp; prosecuting the occupiers.</p>
<p>2. In some cases the authorities are denotifying , regularizing those illegal occupations by levying a pittance as penalty which is very much less than the market value.</p>
<p>3. In some cases for example a notified site for school is alloted to an educational trust. They build 2 rooms in 25% of the site &amp; state that this is free school meant for weaker sections. After a year or two , they state before the authority that to run this school they need funds. So they are planning to build commercial complexes around the school site &amp; by the rent collected from shops they will run the school. In this manner sites meant for schools , hospitals , temples &amp; other social organisations apply for conversion of land usage &amp; use major portion of the land for commercial purposes.</p>
<p>Hereby , e-voice  urges the govt of karnataka &amp; other authorities ,</p>
<p>1. to clearly demarcate the govt lands &amp; announce it boldly to the public.</p>
<p>2. To clearly demarcate lands meant for public amenities both for current &amp; future usage.</p>
<p>3. To clearly demarcate lands required for town planning say 20 years down the line.</p>
<p>4. To clearly mention in such plans the purpose it is reserved for ie parks , hospitals , schools , etc.</p>
<p>5. To impartially act against illegal occupiers – rich or poor.</p>
<p>6. Say while denotifying a land meant for school an alternate land for school must be incorporated in the original plan.</p>
<p>7. Before denotification public objections must be called for &amp; considered responsibly.</p>
<p>8. After denotification the land must be sold at the market rate not the govt rate.</p>
<p>9. In case of land usage conversion also the objections from the public must be called for &amp; considered responsibly.</p>
<p>10. After land usage conversion an alternate land must be incorporated in the plan for the original use.</p>
<p>11. In case of land usage conversion also the occupier must be charged at the market value.</p>
<p>12. To declare annually the property details of all officials with denotifying / land usage conversion authorities together with details of their family member&#8217;s properties with provision for public scrutiny, cross checking.</p>
<p>13. To ruthlessly prosecute the corrupt officials &amp; ministers.</p>
<p>14. To make public the report of past district magistrate mysore mr. T.M. VIJAYA BHASKAR about illegal land dealings in &amp; around mysore. Also the action taken report.</p>
<p>ILLEGALITIES IN BANGALORE-MYSORE EXPRESSWAY PROJECT BMIC by NICE </p>
<p>Different political parties are trading charges against each other about illegalities in the mysore-bangalore expressway project. Grave mistakes have been committed by the previous state governments. The saving grace is judiciary has taken note of it. The fundamental principle behind land acquisitions by the governments is to use that acquired lands for public welfare. As the govt acquires the land with this noble intentions even the land looser contents himself with compensation at govt rate. Always the govt rate is much below market value. If at all the govt wants to give out that acquired land to a private party for private use or for the use of a selected few, the govt must give prevailing market rate to the land looser. In such cases the govt does not have authority to force the land owner to sell his property.</p>
<p>In this mysore-bangalore 4 lane expressway project, following inconsistencies are there,</p>
<p>1.   this road is not for free public use, but only for those who pays the toll fees.</p>
<p>2.   The luxurious resorts , townships , etc which are to be built alongside this road are not open for free public usage but only for the rich who can afford it.</p>
<p>3.   The govt has concluded this deal in a hush-hush manner.</p>
<p>4.   Any disputes raised by this project should be addressed to international arbiter at london which a poor land owner or general public can ill-afford.</p>
<p>5.   The govt has not paid the prevailing market value to the land loosers.</p>
<p>6.   The govt has not given the option to land owners not to sell their property.</p>
<p>7.      This whole project is for rich , built by the rich for the rich &amp; not meant for public welfare.</p>
<p>The govt must give back the lands to the owners who wants it back &amp; must pay the market value to those willing to sell. As this project is built by wealthy people for wealthy people why cann&#8217;t they cough- up market value?</p>
<p>CRIMES BY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( B.D.A)<br />
AGAINST A POOR WOWAN</p>
<p>The B.D.A flouts it&#8217;s own rules &amp; spreads red carpet for big land developers &amp; land grabbers. B.D.A posting is a huge money spinner for corrupt officials. The corrupt B.D.A officials work hand in glove with criminal elements &amp; rowdies. They illegally evict genuine allottees who are poor &amp; without any connections from allotted prime lands &amp; sell-off those prime land to the highest bidder of bribe. The poor fellow is re-alloted lands in backward areas &amp; in some cases left in the lurch.</p>
<p>Now , take the following case. Mr. S.D. chandrashekaraiah a poor old man aged around 80 years was allotted with house no.185, kumaraswamy lay-out, first block, bangalore in 1978 vide letter no.<br />
310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.</p>
<p>The chairman of B.D.A has allotted the built house on lease cum sale basis. The poor old man mr. S.D.chandrashekaraiah complied with all the rules &amp; in accordance with it even deposited 25% of the house cost in B.D.A&#8217;S account. However when he went over to his allotted house for residing in it, he found out some rowdy elements were already residing there. He complained about this matter to the legal owner of the house ie B.D.A . the B.D.A officials didn&#8217;t take steps to evict the illegal encroachers nor did they make any complaint to the police. His appeals to B.D.A, chief minister of karnataka , etc fell on deaf ears. Hurt by this gross injustice &amp; mounting financial burdens the poor old man died.</p>
<p>Subsequently, the poor man&#8217;s daughter smt. Nagalakshmi who was also very poor , appealed to the B.D.A authorities once again , to evict illegal encroachers from her father&#8217;s allotted house. This time the corrupt B.D.A officials played a different game. They showed her a vacant house, gave her oral instructions to live in that vacant house &amp; told her that they will regularise it in due course. The hapless poor woman took huge loans &amp; repaired the house fit for occupation.  Just before she was to occupy that house , corrupt B.D.A officials once again planted rowdy elements in that house. Once again the poor woman was cheated. She lost her house, on top of it her loan burden mounted.</p>
<p>Till date, that poor woman is suffering from these gross injustices of B.D.A . SHAMELESS B.D.A OFFICIALS who take thousands of rupees salary &amp; perks every month, all at the expense of tax-payer has not even cared to rectify the injustice. Thereby, they are violating the poor woman&#8217;s fundamental &amp; human rights.</p>
<p>Hereby,  e-voice urges  the honourable chief minister of karnataka, honourable lokayuktha for karnataka , honourable chairman national human rights commission , honourable chairman national commission for women &amp; honourable chairman state commission for women karnataka, to take the appropriate action &amp; to speedily provide justice to this poor woman.</p>
<p>edited , printed , published &amp; owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL , MYSORE -570017 INDIA  cell : 09341820313<br />
home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/  ,<br />
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,<br />
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ ,     </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit</p>
<p> e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com     ,  naghrw@yahoo.com    </p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/123/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=123&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/08/kiadb-bda-scams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>KIADB , BDA SCANDALS</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/kiadb-bda-scandals/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/kiadb-bda-scandals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KIADB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web Working For The Rights &#38; Survival Of The Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 41……13/10/2010 home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/ , http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ , http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit , Editorial : KIADB de-notification scandal , BMIC – NICE SCANDAL , MINING SCANDALS and Threats to RTI Applicant - [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=121&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web<br />
Working For The Rights &amp; Survival Of The Oppressed</p>
<p>Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 41……13/10/2010</p>
<p>home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/  ,  </p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,</p>
<p> http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ , </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit  ,  </p>
<p>Editorial :  KIADB de-notification scandal , BMIC – NICE SCANDAL  , MINING SCANDALS and Threats to RTI Applicant</p>
<p>-  PIL Appeal To Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of Mandamus</p>
<p> Just months back , we have witnessed the collapse of a multi storied building in bellary ,Karnataka &amp; we have witnessed  a fire tragedy in a  multi-storey building in Bangalore,  months ago there was collapse of a huge building under construction in Bangalore , all resulting in loss of human lives. Recently we have seen de-notification scam involving VVIPs . All these are the result of violations of Urban Town Planning Laws , Building bye-laws which  are observed more in breach by the criminals &amp; conniving public servants .  The authorities are behaving like real estate agents of criminals , by-passing norms , framing laws to the tune of criminals . Authorities are not honoring RTI requests &amp; even high ranking IAS officer  repeatedly threatens a commoner  seeking information under RTI ACT .</p>
<p>Before embarking on land acquisition for any projects government authorities must plan &amp; assess what are the actual requirement of land for that particular project. After finding out the actual requirement of land , they must  assess the loss of forest area , cost of compensation pay-out , cost of rehabilitation of people , environmental damages &amp; resultant health damages to people in surrounding areas ,it’s resultant losses when the project gets running , if at all the benefits , profits from that project far outweighs the losses ,then only project should be put before the public for their consent. Ministers &amp; IAS officers must not take these decisions all by themselves in a hush – hush manner. </p>
<p>Even when a project is downsized , from the previously approved size , the land left over , surplus land must be given back to the original owner on first priority . The project managers must not sell those surplus lands to third parties for a premium .</p>
<p>Even when KIADB ,BDA ,MUDA &amp; other authorities acquire lands from farmers ,for constructing industrial  parks or residential layouts , etc , has framed comprehensive development plans (CDP) for their respective cities , clearly demarcating land usage pattern . However after acquisition of land , the KIADB , BDA , MUDA , etc are selling those very lands to private third parties for different land usage purposes ,completely violating CDP. Are these KIADB , BDA , BBMP , MUDA ,MCC real estate agents of Rich people ? </p>
<p>Now , consider NICE – BMIC SCANDAL or MINING Scandals , public servants in responsible positions are accusing each other , there by proving that almost all of them are criminals. In democracy , ministers &amp; IAS officers are public servants , MLAs , MPs are not leaders just public servants  &#8211; representative of people. They must represent people’s wishes &amp; must order the IAS &amp; other officers to fulfil the wishes of people as per legal provisions.</p>
<p>Information input  forms part of process of one&#8217;s expression. One&#8217;s expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information &amp; Expression are inseparable parts &amp; form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person&#8217;s  right to expression is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also  are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.</p>
<p>In a democracy , people have a right to know  how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding  behind the veil of  Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created  by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption  , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview &amp; bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.</p>
<p>Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India  , DG &amp; IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past , present continuing injustices meted out to  millions  of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of  Indian judges , police &amp; public servants  .   The  information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals  in public service.  The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service &amp; strengthens our national security , national unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : &#8220;writ of Mandamus&#8221; and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties &amp; to answer the  questions.  JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.</p>
<p>Your&#8217;s sincerely ,</p>
<p>Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>RTI – QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY  ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE ( BBMP ) &amp; CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ( KIADB)  ARE  AFRAID TO ANSWER</p>
<p>1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the Bangalore city&#8217;s comprehensive city development plan ?</p>
<p>2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?</p>
<p>4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?</p>
<p>6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &amp; commercial site ? if not why ?</p>
<p>7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings &amp; houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?</p>
<p>10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?</p>
<p>12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?</p>
<p>13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies &amp; real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; how many not ? since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies &amp; illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?</p>
<p>15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &amp; housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?</p>
<p>16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &amp; legalizing those violations. Safety of public &amp; amenities of public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn&#8217;t have a parking space of it&#8217;s own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries &amp; deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries &amp; deaths ?</p>
<p>17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?</p>
<p>18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?</p>
<p>20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts &amp; evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees &amp; build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?</p>
<p>21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?</p>
<p>22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?</p>
<p>24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals – tresspassers ? if not why ?</p>
<p>25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &amp; sufficient time to bidders about it&#8217;s auction schedules ?</p>
<p>26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?</p>
<p>27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?</p>
<p>28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &amp; selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?</p>
<p>29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?</p>
<p>30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?</p>
<p>31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?</p>
<p>32. in &amp; around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces &amp; built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer&#8217;s money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under &amp; surrounding HT lines legal ?</p>
<p>33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired &amp; sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?</p>
<p>34. in &amp; around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?</p>
<p>35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT &amp; other developers , housing societies ?</p>
<p>36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment &amp; creating public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in &amp; around bangalore city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?</p>
<p>39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB&#8217;s comprehensive industrial area development plan ?</p>
<p>40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?</p>
<p>41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT&#8217;s industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?</p>
<p>42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP &amp; INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &amp; Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?</p>
<p>43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar&#8217;s report on land grabbings in mysore ?</p>
<p>44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal &amp; in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s CDP ? if not why ? what action ?</p>
<p>45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?</p>
<p>46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?</p>
<p>47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it&#8217;s objections , in it&#8217;s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues &amp; the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &amp; alienation legal ?</p>
<p>48.numerous NGO&#8217;s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?</p>
<p>49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections &amp; given media publicity ? if not why ?</p>
<p>52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT officials &amp; their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?</p>
<p>53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?</p>
<p>54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?</p>
<p>55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?</p>
<p>56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.</p>
<p>57. why BDA didn&#8217;t file police complaint to evict encroachers?</p>
<p>58. why BDA didn&#8217;t inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their allotment ?</p>
<p>59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?</p>
<p>60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of BDA committee legal ?</p>
<p>61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufficient time to reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior most in the waiting list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?</p>
<p>62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request &amp; stated that the said file concerning this issue cann&#8217;t be found ie lost . is it legal ?</p>
<p>63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.</p>
<p>RTI QUESTIONS  COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) &amp; COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE  CITY CORPORATION ) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER</p>
<p> 1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the mysore city&#8217;s comprehensive city development plan ?</p>
<p>2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?</p>
<p>4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?</p>
<p>6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &amp; commercial site ? if not why ?</p>
<p>7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>9. how much of MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s / GOVERNMENT&#8217;s lands , sites , buildings &amp; houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?</p>
<p>10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?</p>
<p>11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s resolution instead of of reallotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?</p>
<p>12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?</p>
<p>13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies &amp; real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT &amp; how many not ? since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies &amp; illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?</p>
<p>15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &amp; housing societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?</p>
<p>16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators &amp; legalizing those<br />
violations. Safety of public &amp; amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn&#8217;t have a parking space of it&#8217;s own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries &amp; deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries &amp; deaths ?</p>
<p>17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?</p>
<p>18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?</p>
<p>20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts &amp; evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees &amp; build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?</p>
<p>21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?</p>
<p>22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?</p>
<p>23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?</p>
<p>24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals – tresspassers ? if not why ?</p>
<p>25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity &amp; sufficient time to bidders about it&#8217;s auction schedules ?</p>
<p>26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?</p>
<p>27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?</p>
<p>28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &amp; selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?</p>
<p>29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /<br />
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?</p>
<p>30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other land developers ?</p>
<p>31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?</p>
<p>32. in &amp; around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out<br />
advertisement spaces &amp; built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer&#8217;s money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under<br />
&amp; surrounding HT lines legal ?</p>
<p>33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired &amp; sold as sites by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?</p>
<p>34. in &amp; around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA &amp; private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?</p>
<p>35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC &amp; other developers , housing societies ?</p>
<p>36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment &amp; creating public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in &amp; around mysore city ? what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .</p>
<p>38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /<br />
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?</p>
<p>39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB&#8217;s<br />
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?</p>
<p>40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?</p>
<p>41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s / MCC&#8217;s CDP &amp; KIADB&#8217;s industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?</p>
<p>42. is the MUDA &amp; KIADB revising / modifying CDP &amp; INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &amp; Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?</p>
<p>43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar&#8217;s report on land grabbings in mysore ?</p>
<p>44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal &amp; in conformance to MUDA&#8217;s CDP ? if not why ? what action ?</p>
<p>45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?</p>
<p>46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?</p>
<p>47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it&#8217;s objections , in it&#8217;s newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues &amp; the private firm made huge profits. is this auction &amp; alienation legal ?</p>
<p>48.numerous NGO&#8217;s , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?</p>
<p>49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC &amp; government action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?</p>
<p>51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections &amp; given media publicity ? if not why ?</p>
<p>52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE officials &amp; their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?</p>
<p>53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?</p>
<p>54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?</p>
<p>55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?</p>
<p>NICE Corridor Questions to CHIEF MINISTER .Mr.Yediyurappa</p>
<p>Read full questionnaire </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/nice-corridor-questions-to-chie\</p>
<p>f-minister</p>
<p> BMIC by NICE &amp; land scams  in Karnataka  – an appeal to honourable supreme court of India &amp; H.E.Honourable Governor Of Karnataka</p>
<p>When a crime is noticed , it is the duty of the government to investigate who did it ? and to legally prosecute them in court &amp; provide justice . if  thousands of criminals , lakhs of criminals  got together &amp; did the same type of crimes , all of them must be legally prosecuted. Just  for the overwhelming numbers of criminals law of the land cann&#8217;t be changed. However  in the Karnataka state , many political bigwigs , rich crooks have done the same crime , LAND GRABBING – illegal possession of government land &amp; illegal constructions over it. Important land records of those government lands , lands belonging to poor are lost in record rooms of civic bodies ( cunningly destroyed by corrupt officials ) Now, their political masters are legalizing the crimes . what a shame to the government of Karnataka ?</p>
<p>The  shri.A.T. RAMA SWAMY , (M.L.A) standing committee in the Previous legislative assembly probed  the land grabbings in Karnataka &amp; gave it&#8217;s report to the government . However the government in a hurry , is auctioning – off  those government lands without proper publicity  to the auction process , sufficient time for bidder&#8217;s expression of interest. In some cases , a pittance is levied as penalty for the illegal occupation to get it legalized. The government is not bothered about legally prosecuting the illegal  occupier  of those lands. In many civic bodies , important property documents belonging to the government  &amp; poor are missing from the record rooms. All these point towards the government intention , to legalise the crimes of  illegal land occupiers who are nothing but their own political  cronies.</p>
<p>The recent ordinance by government of Karnataka to regularize land deals is envisaging to legalize the crimes of rich. The illegal land conversions , land encroachments , encroachment of civic amenities made by the rich are being legalized with levying a pittance as penalty in the name of public welfare . Whereas the land worth at today&#8217;s market prices are 10&#8242;s of thousands of crore it is only wefare of the rich &amp; mighty . IT IS GOING TO BE MOTHER OF ALL SCAMS.  The authorities evict poor tribal people from their ancestral forest area in the name of conservation , evict tribal people from villages in the name of development without proper rehabilitation measures. The government is not giving land rights to slum dwellers , poor , dalits over the land they are dwelling , the government is deaf to appeals of dalits for land rights. However the same government is sympathetic to rich who have encroached land &amp; built huge commercial complexes worth crores violating all norms with total disregard to civic amenity or safety.</p>
<p>Questions Bangalore DC , BBMP Commissioner , BDA  Commissioner &amp;  KIADB  Chairman are not answering &amp; HIDING TRUTH , COVERING-UP CRIMES </p>
<p> http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti&#8212;bda-bbmp-kiadb ,http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ , </p>
<p>Questions Mysore  DC , MCC Commissioner &amp;  MUDA  Commissioner  are not answering &amp; HIDING TRUTH , COVERING-UP CRIMES </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti&#8212;muda-mcc ,  http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/</p>
<p>Hereby , e-voice urges the  concerned authorities  , to answer the following questionnaire about BMIC project by NICE </p>
<p>http://www.vijaykarnatakaepaper.com/svww_zoomart.php?Artname=20100214a_009101001&#038;ileft=50&#038;itop=56&#038;zoomRatio=130&#038;AN=20100214a_009101001</p>
<p>Hereby ,e-voice  appeals to honourable supreme court of India , to annul the bid process of government of Karnataka with respect to illegally occupied government lands &amp;  to annul this ordinance of government of Karnataka which seeks to legalize land crimes. Jai hind . vande mataram.</p>
<p>Your&#8217;s sincerely,</p>
<p>Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p>THE CLOUT OF LAND MAFIA IN INDIA -the governments daring to by-pass judiciary </p>
<p>An appeal ( PIL ) to the honourable supreme court of India </p>
<p>The recent attempts by government of India &amp; other state governments to legalise land grabbings by enacting new land laws in the name of public welfare is farce . while crores of people are without shelter &amp; are living on streets , people in slums , tribal lands are struggling for land rights since decades the governments were mum &amp; deaf. Now , as the rulers themselves &amp; their cronies have built illegal constructions running into crores they are shedding crocodile tears in the name of public welfare. In india, various state governments have enacted &#8221; town municipal / city corporation laws &amp; building laws&#8221; , to ensure orderly growth of cities &amp; towns , to ensure the safety of buildings &amp; it&#8217;s occupants , to ensure the safety of pedestrians &amp; road users.</p>
<p>Numerous educated people , ruling elite – ministers , police , government officials , M.Ps , M.L.As , etc knowing fully well about the laws have illegally built bungalows , commercial complexes , throwing to wind all laws. In their greed they have shown utter contempt towards law. They have encroached dried –up lakes , rivulets , rain flow paths , drainages , foot paths , civic amenity sites. In their building there are violations of- lack of fire safety exits , lack of parking space , encroachment of foot paths , conservancy line , drainages , etc.</p>
<p>There is wide spread corruption in the corporation / municipal authorities. For a price officials have converted  CA sites to commercial purposes , authorised deviations / encroachments of public</p>
<p>lands like foot paths , drainages , parking space , set-off , etc. The corporation officials themselves are violating city master plans. Even before authorising the conversions &amp; encroachments of lands , the</p>
<p>corporation officials are not making alternate arrangements. By all these corrupt deeds many of the corporation officilas have become millionaires . however more &amp; more road accidents are taking place , building collapses &amp; fire tragedies are occurring , during heavy rainfalls water is getting  clogged – ALL THESE RESULTING IN LOSS OF HUMAN LIVE &amp; PROPERTIES. In recent days numerous murders have taken place over the real estate issues . THE CRIMINAL LAND GRABBERS MADE DEATH THREATS &amp; FORCED THE PIL APPLICANT IN THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ABOUT LAND GRABBINGS IN KORAMANGALA LAYOUT BANGALORE. The government of karnataka instead of protecting the PIL applicant &amp; upholding the law has taken sides with the land grabbers.</p>
<p>The state governments of karnataka &amp; delhi has got M.L.As &amp; officials who have themselves violated building laws &amp; grabbed govt lands. Now , the two govts are contemplating to bring in laws regularising these land grabbing crimes for a pittance as penalty. All to by-pass judiciary. The governments are least bothered about the lives of poor &amp; only too caring towards the land grabbing criminals.  The same governments have not yet given land rights to poor slum dwellers / dalits , land rights to tribals living in forest since centuries , land rights to poor agricultural labourers, where as it is full of concern towards rich &amp; mighty land grabbers – criminals.  Bottom line – whatever be the magnitude of crime if you are rich &amp; mighty law will be bended to suit you , by bad luck if you are a poor folk you are bound to suffer being on the right side of law also.  Hereby , e-voice  urges requests the honourable supreme court of india , to register this as a PIL , to provide protection to the PIL applicant in bangalore &amp; to take appropriate actions against the GOK &amp; GOD nipping at bud their illegal motives to regularise land grabbings.</p>
<p>ILLEGALITIES IN AUCTION OF M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD MYSORE</p>
<p>During the auction of above sick industry the land usage was for industrial purpose only. so, people with other commercial objectives were not allowed to participate in the auction. Thereby, the final auctioned amount was very much less than the market value. This has a direct bearing on employees of that industry , lending banks , govt dept , etc who have all put forward their claims for dues from that industry. noW, all of them are getting very much less than what is due from the closed company. A loss of crores of rupees to banks , government , employees has been made by the cunningness of civic bodies.</p>
<p>Now in a backdoor move the M.U.D.A , K.I.A.D.B , M.C.C are moving to give land usage conversion to the new occupier, who is building posh villas &amp; resorts here. Is it right &amp; justified ? should not they conduct auction once again or charge market value to the new owner.</p>
<p>LAND MAFIA IN KARNATAKA</p>
<p>The land mafia which has links with political leadership &amp; top govt servants in the state, is running business widely in &amp; around bangalore,mysore &amp; other major towns. The authorities like city corporation , B.D.A, M.U.D.A , K.I.A.D.B , etc are denotifying the lands meant for public welfare in favour of land mafia. The authorities have earmarked these lands for public welfare ie parks , schools , hospitals at the planning stage itself for current &amp; future needs of the people. In most cases the land mafia has illegally occupied the lands , built commercial complexes &amp; sold it for crores of rupees.</p>
<p>1. the authorities are not demolishing these illegal structures &amp; prosecuting the occupiers.</p>
<p>2. In some cases the authorities are denotifying , regularizing those illegal occupations by levying a pittance as penalty which is very much less than the market value.</p>
<p>3. In some cases for example a notified site for school is alloted to an educational trust. They build 2 rooms in 25% of the site &amp; state that this is free school meant for weaker sections. After a year or two , they state before the authority that to run this school they need funds. So they are planning to build commercial complexes around the school site &amp; by the rent collected from shops they will run the school. In this manner sites meant for schools , hospitals , temples &amp; other social organisations apply for conversion of land usage &amp; use major portion of the land for commercial purposes.</p>
<p>Hereby , e-voice  urges the govt of karnataka &amp; other authorities ,</p>
<p>1. to clearly demarcate the govt lands &amp; announce it boldly to the public.</p>
<p>2. To clearly demarcate lands meant for public amenities both for current &amp; future usage.</p>
<p>3. To clearly demarcate lands required for town planning say 20 years down the line.</p>
<p>4. To clearly mention in such plans the purpose it is reserved for ie parks , hospitals , schools , etc.</p>
<p>5. To impartially act against illegal occupiers – rich or poor.</p>
<p>6. Say while denotifying a land meant for school an alternate land for school must be incorporated in the original plan.</p>
<p>7. Before denotification public objections must be called for &amp; considered responsibly.</p>
<p>8. After denotification the land must be sold at the market rate not the govt rate.</p>
<p>9. In case of land usage conversion also the objections from the public must be called for &amp; considered responsibly.</p>
<p>10. After land usage conversion an alternate land must be incorporated in the plan for the original use.</p>
<p>11. In case of land usage conversion also the occupier must be charged at the market value.</p>
<p>12. To declare annually the property details of all officials with denotifying / land usage conversion authorities together with details of their family member&#8217;s properties with provision for public scrutiny, cross checking.</p>
<p>13. To ruthlessly prosecute the corrupt officials &amp; ministers.</p>
<p>14. To make public the report of past district magistrate mysore mr. T.M. VIJAYA BHASKAR about illegal land dealings in &amp; around mysore. Also the action taken report.</p>
<p>ILLEGALITIES IN BANGALORE-MYSORE EXPRESSWAY PROJECT BMIC by NICE </p>
<p>Different political parties are trading charges against each other about illegalities in the mysore-bangalore expressway project. Grave mistakes have been committed by the previous state governments. The saving grace is judiciary has taken note of it. The fundamental principle behind land acquisitions by the governments is to use that acquired lands for public welfare. As the govt acquires the land with this noble intentions even the land looser contents himself with compensation at govt rate. Always the govt rate is much below market value. If at all the govt wants to give out that acquired land to a private party for private use or for the use of a selected few, the govt must give prevailing market rate to the land looser. In such cases the govt does not have authority to force the land owner to sell his property.</p>
<p>In this mysore-bangalore 4 lane expressway project, following inconsistencies are there,</p>
<p>1.   this road is not for free public use, but only for those who pays the toll fees.</p>
<p>2.   The luxurious resorts , townships , etc which are to be built alongside this road are not open for free public usage but only for the rich who can afford it.</p>
<p>3.   The govt has concluded this deal in a hush-hush manner.</p>
<p>4.   Any disputes raised by this project should be addressed to international arbiter at london which a poor land owner or general public can ill-afford.</p>
<p>5.   The govt has not paid the prevailing market value to the land loosers.</p>
<p>6.   The govt has not given the option to land owners not to sell their property.</p>
<p>7.      This whole project is for rich , built by the rich for the rich &amp; not meant for public welfare.</p>
<p>The govt must give back the lands to the owners who wants it back &amp; must pay the market value to those willing to sell. As this project is built by wealthy people for wealthy people why cann&#8217;t they cough- up market value?</p>
<p>CRIMES BY BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( B.D.A)</p>
<p>AGAINST A POOR WOWAN</p>
<p>The B.D.A flouts it&#8217;s own rules &amp; spreads red carpet for big land developers &amp; land grabbers. B.D.A posting is a huge money spinner for corrupt officials. The corrupt B.D.A officials work hand in glove with criminal elements &amp; rowdies. They illegally evict genuine allottees who are poor &amp; without any connections from allotted prime lands &amp; sell-off those prime land to the highest bidder of bribe. The poor fellow is re-alloted lands in backward areas &amp; in some cases left in the lurch.</p>
<p>Now , take the following case. Mr. S.D. chandrashekaraiah a poor old man aged around 80 years was allotted with house no.185, kumaraswamy lay-out, first block, bangalore in 1978 vide letter no.</p>
<p>310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.</p>
<p>The chairman of B.D.A has allotted the built house on lease cum sale basis. The poor old man mr. S.D.chandrashekaraiah complied with all the rules &amp; in accordance with it even deposited 25% of the house cost in B.D.A&#8217;S account. However when he went over to his allotted house for residing in it, he found out some rowdy elements were already residing there. He complained about this matter to the legal owner of the house ie B.D.A . the B.D.A officials didn&#8217;t take steps to evict the illegal encroachers nor did they make any complaint to the police. His appeals to B.D.A, chief minister of karnataka , etc fell on deaf ears. Hurt by this gross injustice &amp; mounting financial burdens the poor old man died.</p>
<p>Subsequently, the poor man&#8217;s daughter smt. Nagalakshmi who was also very poor , appealed to the B.D.A authorities once again , to evict illegal encroachers from her father&#8217;s allotted house. This time the corrupt B.D.A officials played a different game. They showed her a vacant house, gave her oral instructions to live in that vacant house &amp; told her that they will regularise it in due course. The hapless poor woman took huge loans &amp; repaired the house fit for occupation.  Just before she was to occupy that house , corrupt B.D.A officials once again planted rowdy elements in that house. Once again the poor woman was cheated. She lost her house, on top of it her loan burden mounted.</p>
<p>Till date, that poor woman is suffering from these gross injustices of B.D.A . SHAMELESS B.D.A OFFICIALS who take thousands of rupees salary &amp; perks every month, all at the expense of tax-payer has not even cared to rectify the injustice. Thereby, they are violating the poor woman&#8217;s fundamental &amp; human rights.</p>
<p>Hereby,  e-voice urges  the honourable chief minister of karnataka, honourable lokayuktha for karnataka , honourable chairman national human rights commission , honourable chairman national commission for women &amp; honourable chairman state commission for women karnataka, to take the appropriate action &amp; to speedily provide justice to this poor woman.</p>
<p>edited , printed , published &amp; owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL , MYSORE -570017 INDIA  cell : 09341820313  </p>
<p>home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/  ,                                                                         </p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , </p>
<p>http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ ,     </p>
<p>http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit</p>
<p> e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com     ,  naghrw@yahoo.com    </p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/121/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=121&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/kiadb-bda-scandals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions to chief justice of india</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/09/19/questions-to-chief-justice-of-india/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/09/19/questions-to-chief-justice-of-india/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 07:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web Working For The Rights &#38; Survival Of The Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… Special Issue …… 19/09/2010 home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit/ , http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ , http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit , Cross Examination of Chief Justice of India , Chief Justices of state High Courts , DGPs of all [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=119&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web<br />
Working For The Rights &amp; Survival Of The Oppressed</p>
<p>Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… Special Issue …… 19/09/2010</p>
<p>home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit/ ,                                                             http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,                                                        http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,                                  http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit  ,  </p>
<p>Cross Examination of Chief Justice of India  ,  Chief Justices of state High Courts    ,   DGPs  of all  Indian States / UTs  ,  Loksabha Speaker , Rajyasabha Dy Chairman , Speakers of  all Indian State Legislative Assemblies / Legislative Councils    –     Law Makers  in  witness  box</p>
<p>When everybody else does the mistake , wrong doing  , indulges in corruption , judiciary alone must be pure like  virgin  to punish &amp; guide the wrong doers. Now , the apex court of the land  &amp; the highest judicial officer of the land , the conscience keeper  , protector of rights , Constitutional guardian of  the land – The Honourable Chief Justice of India  himself Has been found guilty .  SHAME SHAME.</p>
<p>Nowadays , we  are seeing criminalization of  politics , judiciary &amp; police. The rowdy elements have become MLAs &amp; MPs &amp; frequestly indulge in fisticuffs , vulgar abuses  in the precincts of the house itself  . These rowdy elements take money for asking questions in the parliament , to vote for bills &amp; for a price pass legislations  favouring lobbies of rich crooks. The police frame , torture  innocents &amp; let out rich crooks for a price . For a price police destroy evidences , records  and create fake records , evidences. Finally there are judges  who issue arrest warrants , give bail , give acquittal  &amp; pass favourable judgements   ALL FOR A PRICE . SHAME SHAME . These corrupt  judges , police , MPs , MLAs  each take  salary &amp; perks far exceeding lakhs per annum , but serve rich crooks instead of   Indian Public. These corrupt are parasites &amp; deadlier , state enemies  than naxalites , terrorists. Democracy in our country , our hard won  national independence is  endangered by these parasites , corrupt judges , police &amp; people’s representatives only. These  parasites  themselves are responsible for origin &amp; growth of  naxalism / terrorism in india .</p>
<p>These corrupt  parasites will feel  , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In  whose  Court of justice  MATCH FIXING is not there &amp; every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.</p>
<p>Read  full case details at following web site </p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html</p>
<p>Hereby ,  we  DEMAND  the Honourable Chief Justice of India to answer the following questions in public interest , for national security , for National unity &amp; integrity.</p>
<p>Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?</p>
<p>Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ?</p>
<p>Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals &amp; backstabs our motherland , it&#8217;s national security ?</p>
<p>Q4. Don&#8217;t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law &amp; order ?</p>
<p>Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?</p>
<p>Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth &amp; provide timely justice ?<br />
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich &amp; mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double standard ?<br />
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don&#8217;t give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts don&#8217;t take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?<br />
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?<br />
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases &amp; by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?<br />
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police &amp; intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?<br />
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?<br />
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses &amp; all parties involved , both during case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q14. How do you monitor &amp; check corrupt police personnel &amp; increase in their family&#8217;s wealth year after year ?<br />
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidate&#8217;s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?<br />
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?<br />
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?<br />
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has funded &amp; aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just &amp; legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?<br />
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded &amp; aided couter terrorist groups , is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained &amp; funded &#8220;salwa judum&#8221; to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements &amp; attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?<br />
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld &amp; fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms &amp; ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty &amp; rich ?<br />
Q23. Law is one &amp; same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich &amp; poor ? why this differentiation ?<br />
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it&#8217;s products come with IMEI number only &amp; stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their&#8217;s as it doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they don&#8217;t have any business relationship with either tata indicom or it&#8217;s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesn&#8217;t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile hand sets &amp; cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing<br />
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file &#8220;B&#8221; report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?<br />
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed with &#8220;B&#8221; report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?<br />
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?<br />
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?<br />
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any basic requirements ?<br />
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG &amp; IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police &amp; intelligence personnel ?<br />
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?<br />
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases &amp; can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn&#8217;t cover the individual actions of those public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission &amp; home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy evidences. Is it right &amp; legal ?<br />
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?<br />
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?<br />
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people&#8217;s representatives are facing criminal charges ?<br />
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?<br />
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?<br />
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people&#8217;s representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?<br />
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?<br />
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?<br />
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?<br />
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?<br />
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin &amp; while they are on foreign tour , from national security perspective ?<br />
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?<br />
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi&#8217;s family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?<br />
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it&#8217;s partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it&#8217;s case &amp; prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case involving shiv sainiks &amp; others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it&#8217;s partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just &amp; legal ?<br />
Q48.what damages has been done to india&#8217;s national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?<br />
Q49. What action by the government ?<br />
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?<br />
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?<br />
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?<br />
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years &amp; acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?<br />
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters &amp; 3rd degree torture ?<br />
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?<br />
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan&#8217;s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not why ?<br />
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my &#8220;fundamental duty&#8221; hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI &amp; GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?<br />
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more &amp; even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police &amp; their family members on the lines of defense forces ?<br />
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable &amp; his family ?<br />
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?<br />
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?<br />
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?<br />
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?<br />
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?<br />
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?<br />
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?<br />
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?<br />
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings &amp; subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right &amp; legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.<br />
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?<br />
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?<br />
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date<br />
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?<br />
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?<br />
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?<br />
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?<br />
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?<br />
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?<br />
Q78. how ? if not why ?<br />
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judge&#8217;s family members ?<br />
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?<br />
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?<br />
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?<br />
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement &amp; meating out injustice ?<br />
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests like &#8220;poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc&#8221; , in the interest of justice &amp; truth ?<br />
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of &#8220;Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society&#8221;. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society &amp; allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said society&#8217;s – judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly illegal ?<br />
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?<br />
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured person&#8217;s case responsible for it ?<br />
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges &amp; the police officers for committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder &amp; murder ? if not why ?<br />
Q89. registrar , Mysore district &amp; sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the post of peon.<br />
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.<br />
Q91. when a person doesn&#8217;t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that person&#8217;s case responsible for it ? what action ?<br />
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food &amp; medical care to prisoners ?<br />
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence &amp; gives him 3 months sentence. What about the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?<br />
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years &amp; finally the judge finds them as innocents &amp; acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what action against the judge ?<br />
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions &amp; the actions arising out of misuse of office ?<br />
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges &amp; their personal actions as individuals ?<br />
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?<br />
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?<br />
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?<br />
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?<br />
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities &amp; women are their in supreme court , state high courts &amp; subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .<br />
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges &amp; to check corruption in judiciary ?<br />
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?<br />
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill &amp; claimed traveling allowance ?<br />
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high court judges &amp; newly selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?<br />
Q107. when common people / tax payers &amp; even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right &amp; just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax payer&#8217;s expense ?<br />
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties &amp; mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?<br />
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?<br />
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?<br />
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in a case ?<br />
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an &#8220;amicus curie&#8221; in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi&#8217;s assassination case , was not considered by the court ?<br />
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?<br />
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?<br />
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy person&#8217;s rights violation ?<br />
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case &amp; afterwards ?<br />
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?<br />
Q118. when the corrupt police officer &amp; government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high &amp; mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?<br />
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper &amp; fair prosecution of cases against rich &amp; mighty ?<br />
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?<br />
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?<br />
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court ready to utilize it ?<br />
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of india&#8217;s on-line grievance system ( DPG &amp; DARPG ) :<br />
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 , DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618<br />
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pages<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,<br />
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,</p>
<p>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw</p>
<p>what are the status of those appeals ?<br />
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary , constitution of India &amp; citizens of India ? please answer.<br />
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemen&#8217;s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen &amp; their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?<br />
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.<br />
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?<br />
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?<br />
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?<br />
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel &amp; pay it as compensation to victims of police failures &amp; atrocities ?<br />
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?<br />
Q133. during british rule in india &amp; various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India &amp; other british colonies. After india&#8217;s independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with the prosecution ?<br />
Q134. in how many cases GOI &amp; other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?<br />
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?<br />
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it&#8217;s colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?<br />
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?<br />
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?<br />
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND &amp; prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &amp; prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such advocates in practice ?<br />
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet meeting of union ministers ?<br />
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?<br />
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?</p>
<p>Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators &amp; parliamentarians by the constitution of India?</p>
<p>a) Inside the House b) Outside the House</p>
<p>Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like</p>
<p>a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India</p>
<p>c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC</p>
<p>e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.</p>
<p>Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.</p>
<p>b) Cover both their official &amp; personal actions.</p>
<p>Q146. Are the privileges defined &amp; codified ?</p>
<p>Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?</p>
<p>Q148. Are the liberty &amp; fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?</p>
<p>Q149. Can the Indian legislatures &amp; parliament be equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?</p>
<p>Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?</p>
<p>Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?</p>
<p>Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives &amp; executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers &amp; contempt of the court by the House.</p>
<p>Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?</p>
<p>Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of official&#8217;s secret act &amp; go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges</p>
<p>Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court &amp; Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?</p>
<p>Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer&#8217;s money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is above or more valid in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q157. Judges &amp; Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks &amp; lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge / constitutional functionary is above (more<br />
valid) in a democracy ?</p>
<p>Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?</p>
<p>Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?</p>
<p>Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?</p>
<p>Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?</p>
<p>Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation&#8221; ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.</p>
<p>Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. &amp; giving free legal aid ?</p>
<p>Q164. Communication &#8211; free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?<br />
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just &amp; legal ? give me the names of accused judges &amp; description of charges against them ?<br />
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?<br />
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?<br />
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.<br />
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?<br />
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?<br />
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses &amp; brain. That is why the acts &amp; sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects &amp; produce those suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police &amp; judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them &amp; to issue judicial orders. Are these actions of police &amp; judges in drunken state legal ?</p>
<p>Q 172 . What action  has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?</p>
<p>Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state ministers &amp; central ministers who fully aided the criminals – Union Carbide official  Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail  &amp; flee the country without court’s permission ?</p>
<p>Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of court  &amp; for aiding a criminal to escape ?</p>
<p>Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?  what action has been taken against the CJI who  became an official of the  trust belonging to the criminal ?</p>
<p>Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?</p>
<p>Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department &amp; pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?</p>
<p>Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal although they don’t have right to do so ?</p>
<p>Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors &amp; Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didn’t  press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for  producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?</p>
<p>Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials &amp; people’s representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up &amp; aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of  thousands &amp; maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?</p>
<p>Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt  labour / pollution control board officials  HUMAN BEINGS ?<br />
Q  182    Why  police are  not registering my complaint   against  CJI &amp; other VVIPS ,Even after years ?<br />
Q   183   don’t the  police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal  jurisdiction  to register  the case  against these VVIPs ? or  just  because the criminals happens to be VVIPs  ,they  are  not booked  by police? If the  said  police don’t have  legal jurisdiction to book  these VVIPs , they should have  transferred the complaint  to  those authorities who have jurisdiction &amp;   authority to book  &amp; prosecute   these  VVIPs , but not done  so , why ?<br />
Q  184  are not all these actions , of  VVIPs &amp; police amounting to  cover up of crimes &amp; criminals ? are  not  these cover ups itself is a crime ?<br />
Q  185.  Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals  for justice  concerning public welfare , national security  sent  through  post , e-mail  to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ?  does  not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?<br />
Q 186   Are not  the honourable chief justice of india  together  with the jurisdictional police &amp; Revenue district magistrate  responsible  to protect  the  fundamental &amp; human rights  of people ?  why the CJI , Mysore DC &amp; Jurisdictional Police  have failed to protect the fundamental &amp; human rights of  people  including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus  Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate &amp; jurisdictional police  are  together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my dependents the trio – Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city &amp; Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station  , mysore  will be responsible . </p>
<p> These corrupt  parasites will feel  , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In  whose  Court of justice  MATCH FIXING is not there &amp; every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less nothing more.</p>
<p>edited , printed , published &amp; owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL , MYSORE -570017 INDIA  cell : 09341820313<br />
home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit/  ,  http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/  ,                     http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,   http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit   ,<br />
 e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com     ,  naghrw@yahoo.com    </p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/119/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=119&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/09/19/questions-to-chief-justice-of-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>India  Sold Out Dirt Cheap</title>
		<link>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/india-sold-out-dirt-cheap-2/</link>
		<comments>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/india-sold-out-dirt-cheap-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nagaraj M R</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear cap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/?p=117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web Working For The Rights &#38; Survival Of The Oppressed Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 36…… 08/09/2010 home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/ , http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ , http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit , SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html Editorial : INDIA SOLD OUT TO MNCs DIRT CHEAP Are [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=117&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>S.O.S &#8211; e &#8211; Clarion Of Dalit &#8211; Weekly Newspaper On Web<br />
Working For The Rights &amp; Survival Of The Oppressed</p>
<p>Editor: NAGARAJ.M.R… VOL.4 issue. 36…… 08/09/2010</p>
<p>home page: http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarionofdalit/  ,                                                       http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ , http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/eclarionofdalit/ ,                                  http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit  ,  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.amnesty.org"><img border="0" alt="Support Amnesty International" title="Support Amnesty International" src="http://www.amnesty.org/images/banners/banner2-red/banner2-88x31-eng.jpg" /></a> </p>
<p>SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA</p>
<p>http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-court-of-india.html</p>
<p>Editorial :  INDIA SOLD  OUT TO MNCs  DIRT CHEAP                                                                      Are the  lives of Indians Cheaper than  Electricity produced by nuclear power &#8212;   Government Backing for Criminal Corporations</p>
<p>http://irrepressible.info/static/images/en/logo.gif</p>
<p>Before  enacting the law on “Nuclear  Accident Liability Bill” , Government of India  should consider the following  issues<br />
1.       The term  Nuclear Accident must include the damages caused due to  radiation leak affecting the employees in the nuclear facility  ,  the people living  near the facility  &amp; people affected by the  effluents , scraps  generated by the nuclear facility.<br />
2.       The government of India does not have any right to fix a price tag for the lives of Indians , that too cheaper than US public.<br />
3.       The Nuclear power generating companies must  incorporate safety infrastructure &amp; procedures  as they do in US market , not any obsolete technology.<br />
4.       In  USA &amp; other developing countries , they have very huge , efficient social security network , vast pool of resources  put in by  nuclear power generating companies themselves , to  take care of the affected in case of a nuclear accident . In India we don’t have that type of  social security network nor matching resources , therefore ideally  India must fix a nuclear liability cap much higher than  US market in dollar terms.<br />
5.       Also the company must be made liable  for the complete clean up  of the facility  &amp; surrounding  towns , villages , health care to all the affected victims  on par with US market , in case a nuclear accident happens.<br />
6.       The  Nuclear Equipment Suppliers , Nuclear Plant Operators  together  with their  respective governments like USA , UK must  stand  as guarantors .<br />
7.       The  Life Insurance Companies in India Must pay insured amount  to  nominees of insured  in case of nuclear accidents / radiation affects in addition to compensation by the  nuclear power companies . as of now many life insurance companies are not covering nuclear accidents / radiation affects. </p>
<p>Neither our MPs , Cabinet ministers nor  IAS babus  have the right to decide the fate of common people  &amp; fix a rate for lives of Indians. They are not experts in this field ,  they should not  conclude any deals , decisions in  a hush hush manner .  Many  scams have  come out of hush hush deals . Nobody , no MP , no minister , no IAS  officer has paid from his personal  pocket to the victims  of industrial disasters , etc. After all  MPs , Ministers , IAS babus  are  public servants , they must just represent the voices of people , we  people don’t  want  their  personal expertise &amp; opinions. Our Policy makers  must heed to the public advice of senior  scientists , experts in the field of nuclear power generation .</p>
<p>Ofcourse , as a result  unit price of electricity will get front loaded  , we may not get cheap  electricity . but  the lives of Indians are much valuable than Electricty.  The person who benefits from cheap electricity – Industrialists  does not  pay from his pocket  to the victims of disasters . Development  not at the cost of safety &amp; lives. This must dawn on our ill informed  policy makers at the earliest . Jai  Hind. Vande Matarm.</p>
<p>Your’s sincerely,<br />
Nagaraj.M.R.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amnesty.org"><img border="0" alt="Support Amnesty International" title="Support Amnesty International" src="http://www.amnesty.org/images/banners/banner2-red/banner2-88x31-eng.jpg" /></a> </p>
<p>Letter To NHRC On Nuclear Liability For IAEA&#8217;s Treaty<br />
By Gopal Krishna</p>
<p>To,<br />
Justice Shri K.G. Balakrishnan<br />
The Chairperson<br />
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)<br />
Faridkot House, Copernicus Marg, New Delhi<br />
Sub: Human rights violations from nuclear damage &#8211; its impact on human life and enviro-occupational health<br />
Sir,<br />
This Hon’ble Commission has been seriously pursuing the problem of “enviro-occupational health”, and has been taking “preventive” as well as “remedial” measures. It is humbly brought to your notice that there is another equally serious enviro-occupational hazard which is exposure from radioactive radiations and wastes. The issue of liability for nuclear damage is directly linked to it. The grave problem of diseases caused to present and future generations by radiation exposures is required to be addressed as it affects environment and human health and violates Article 21 of the Constitution, Directive Principles as well as “human rights” as defined under the UDHR, ICCPR and ICESCR.<br />
2. That at the outset, the Applicant wishes to refer to the problem of exposure from radioactive radiations. The Supreme Court has looked at the entire issue, keeping in view the Directive Principles as well as Article 21 of the Constitution, and held that “life” includes right to health and medical care etc. There is no database on the records of the Government to show, to the best of Applicant’s knowledge, as to what actions the Government has taken, namely, how many persons have been reported to be suffering from exposure to radioactive radiation? How many have died? Did they receive any compensation? How many persons suffering from it are receiving treatment?<br />
3. That the Applicant is an environmental health researcher who was invited to make submissions before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science &amp; Technology, Environment &amp; Forests following a written submission on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill, 2010 which is meant to pave the way for India to sign International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)’s Convention on Supplementary Compensation (CSC) for Nuclear Damage, 1997.<br />
4. That in its 25 page report on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill, 2010, Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science &amp; Technology, Environment &amp; Forests which was tabled in the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha on 18th August, 2010.observes, “When the Committee inquired from the Secretaries of Ministries/Departments of Government of India who appeared before the Committee as to whether the draft nuclear liability Bill was referred to them for their views/comments, some of them viz. Ministries of Health &amp; Family Welfare, Agriculture, Labour &amp; Employment, Food &amp; Public Distribution, etc. replied in the negative. The Committee is of the opinion that Government must have sought the opinion of Ministries which are even distantly related to any provision of the legislation. The Committee, therefore, recommends that in future Government should consult all such Ministries/ Departments which are even remotely concerned with the provisions of a proposed legislation.” This Hon’ble Commission may take cognizance of the submissions of these Secretaries and direct the concerned authorities to internalize their suggestions in the text of the Bill to protect the human rights of Indian citizens and safeguard intergenerational equity.<br />
5. That, in view of the facts mentioned above, the applicant humbly submits that the Hon’ble Commission may kindly initiate appropriate proceedings and issue directions to all the concerned Secretaries of the Central Government and relevant States/UTs with regard to the following :<br />
How would they respond in the event of a nuclear disaster?<br />
Do they know as to how many industries/factories exist in the States/UTs where radioactive material is used? Is there an inventory of products wherein the said material is used?<br />
What is the total number of workers employed in the nuclear power industries and other nuclear installations?<br />
Whether there is regular medical check-up and whether medical facilities exist for workers and communities in the vicinity of nuclear installations?<br />
Whether there is any record of persons who died because of radioactive radiation?<br />
How many persons suffer from radioactive radiation and whether they are receiving regular treatment for the said disease?<br />
What steps States/UTs have taken to check/prevent occurrence of radioactive radiations and how many hospitals dealing with the enviro-occupational diseases exist in the States/UTs.<br />
How many institutions in the country have the competence to decontaminate and how many medical, occupational health and scientific institutions can diagnose radiation exposure?<br />
What action has been taken by the central government and the State Governments/UTs have taken to protect exposure from radiation in the future?<br />
6. That it is submitted that this Hon’ble Commission for the purpose of collecting the above information, may also take the benefit of its experience in the case of enviro- occupational diseases which are preventable but incurable. By giving medicines, impact of radioactive radiation can be reduced and life span can be prolonged but ultimately fate of the affected person is painful death. A brief note on the issue of liability from nuclear damage and the submissions of the concerned Secretaries of the central government is enclosed as Annexure A<br />
7. That the applicant wishes to bring to this Hon’ble Commission’s notice that India has ratified Radiation Protection Convention, 1960 of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) but its provisions have not been complied with. India is yet to ratify ILO’s Occupational Cancer Convention, 1974 which is concerning Prevention and Control of Occupational Hazards caused by Carcinogenic Substances and Agents took cognizance of the Radiation Protection Convention and Radiation Protection Recommendation. It refers to the work done by International Agency for Research on Cancer and The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) that provides guidance on all aspects of protection against ionising radiation. Article 6 of the ILO&#8217;s Radiation Protection Convention with regard to “Maximum permissible doses of ionising radiations which may be received from sources external to or internal to the body and maximum permissible amounts of radioactive substances which can be taken into the body” has been ignored. Article 7 of the Convention calls for “Appropriate levels” be fixed in accordance with Article 6 for workers who are directly engaged in radiation work and are (a) aged 18 and over; (b) under the age of 18, No worker under the age of 16 to be engaged in work involving ionising radiations and Article 8 that seeks “Appropriate levels (to be) fixed in accordance with Article 6 for workers who are not directly engaged in radiation work, but who remain or pass where they may be exposed to ionising radiations or radioactive substances.” Drafters of the Nuclear Liability Bill appear to have ignored their recommendations.<br />
8. It is humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Commission may enquire /investigate into the problem of radioactive radiation and issue necessary directions/recommendation for its prevention and appropriate remedial steps to the Central Government/State Governments and UTs.<br />
Yours Faithfully<br />
Gopal Krishna</p>
<p>What if a nuclear accident happens<br />
- BILL LIMITS LIABILITY OF OPERATOR TO RS 5OO CRORE, ANYTHING ABOVE WILL BE GOVT RESPONSIBILITY</p>
<p>Answers to questions on the nuclear damage bill the Centre withdrew from the Lok Sabha on Monday<br />
What is the bill’s purpose?<br />
The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill seeks to set down mechanisms and rules for liability claims and payments that might arise because of a nuclear incident and to pave the way for India to join an international liability regime.<br />
What kind of nuclear liability regime does India have at present?<br />
All of India’s nuclear power reactors and nuclear facilities are owned by the central government, or by the Nuclear Power Corporation and Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam (Bhavini) — both public sector enterprises. Any liability issues that emerge from incidents become the responsibility of the central government. The inter-government agreements between India and Russia under which Russia has supplied two nuclear reactors at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu do not clarify liability issues. This has meant uncertainty over trans-boundary liability issues.<br />
Why has the bill become necessary now?<br />
The Indo-US civilian nuclear agreement allows US suppliers to sell nuclear power reactors to India. But the companies have been concerned about the absence of a well-defined nuclear liability regime in India. Environmental groups believe foreign companies will be reluctant to invest without a liability regime in place because they do not want to run the risk of having to compensate without a cap for a nuclear incident. Without the bill, under the existing legal regime, a company may have to encounter absolute, unlimited and non-delegable liability.<br />
What does the bill propose?<br />
A leaked version of the proposed bill circulated by environmental groups indicates that the government plans to cap the maximum liability for each nuclear incident to 300 million Special Drawing Rights ($460 million or Rs 2,100 crore). This is lower than the $470 million settlement in the Bhopal gas disaster.<br />
If the claims for compensation for nuclear damage exceed SDR 300 million, an additional 300 million SDR may be available through an international convention.<br />
The liability of a nuclear power operator (so far only the NPC and Bhavini) for each nuclear incident will be Rs 500 crore. The limit will also apply to private companies if they are allowed entry into the sector.<br />
The central government will be liable for nuclear damage if the liability exceeds the operator’s limit.<br />
Why has this generated controversy?<br />
The bill has generated the widespread perception that it will allow US companies to go scot-free in the event of a nuclear accident and saddle the Indian government with the liability — in other words, Indian taxpayers will have to pay for damages. Some environmental activists are contrasting the proposed Indian cap of $460 million with the much larger $10 billion pool of funds available in the US to cover liability and provide compensation to the public in the event of a nuclear accident. Some legal experts are arguing that there is no place for a cap on liability under Indian law. Any such legislation would be vulnerable and open to challenge and could be easily struck down as a violation of the environmental jurisprudence established by India’s Supreme Court.<br />
Will the bill really allow foreign companies to go scot-free?<br />
A clause in the bill appears to allow the nuclear operator to have “a right to recourse” —which would mean the operator could seek assistance — when the nuclear incident has resulted from negligence on the part of a foreign supplier of a material, equipment or service. However, this would have to be reflected in written contracts between the Indian operator (the NPC, for now) and the foreign suppliers. Environmental groups are sceptical, and fear that this will not emerge in actual contracts.<br />
How is the bill linked to the international nuclear liability regime?<br />
The Convention on Supplementary Compensation under the International Atomic Energy Agency provides for an international fund to compensate for nuclear damage in the event of an accident. The convention envisages a two-tier system — the state will ensure availability of at least 300 million SDR, and an international fund for which all participating nations are obliged to contribute. Any country that plans to join will have to ensure its national legislation is consistent with the convention’s provisions. By enacting domestic legislation, India could join the convention and — should the event arise — also seek money from the much larger international fund, which could help India access an additional 300 million SDR.<br />
How is nuclear liability covered in the US?<br />
The Price-Anderson Act enacted in 1957 ensures the availability of a large pool of funds — about $10 billion — to provide compensation to people who incur damages from a nuclear accident — no matter who is liable.<br />
Have nuclear liability claims been paid in the US?<br />
The American Nuclear Society estimates that the nuclear insurance pools have paid a total of $151 million in the past 43 years. The US energy department has paid $65 million.<br />
What kind of liability regimes do other countries have?<br />
They vary from country to country. Belgium has set a liability amount of 300 million Euros, and the France 91.5 million Euros, and the UK £40 million. Germany has set unlimited liability though a financial security limit is set at about 2,500 million Euros. Japan also has unlimited liability, but a maximum financial security limit of 60 billion yen.</p>
<p>http://irrepressible.info/static/images/en/logo.gif</p>
<p>India&#8217;s Sham Nuclear Liability Bill<br />
By Toxic Watch</p>
<p>New Delhi: British Petroleum (BP) is facing a bill of up to $34 billion from the Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster. After US senators demanded, the oil company deposited $20 billion (about Rs 92000 crores) into a ring-fenced account to meet escalating compensation costs but the way Indian legislators are agreeing to a Rs 1500 crore cap on nuclear disaster from large nuclear power plants, Rs 300 crore cap for institutions involved in reprocessing fuel and Rs 100 crore cap for small research reactors is unacceptable and condemnable.<br />
Srikumar Banerjee, Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission and ex-officio Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy, one of the drafters of the Bill is guilty of ignoring the consequences of possible nuclear disaster because his text has privatized profits and made liabilities public. Mamohan Singh who is in-charge of Department of Atomic Energy appears to be guilty of dereliction of duty as well. The Report of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science &amp; Technology, Environment &amp; Forests chaired by T Subbirami Reddy reveals their culpability quite categorically. This report was tabled in the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha on 18th August, 2010. Report attached What else can explain their indifference towards other concerned ministries like health, agriculture, labour, water resources etc. Aren’t they relevant? What can explain the lack of consensus among the committee members even in matters of national interest?<br />
India’s Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill, 2010 is meant to pave the way for India to sign International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)’s Convention on Supplementary Compensation (CSC) for Nuclear Damage, 1997. The question that stares citizens in the face is: whether or not the proposed liability Bill and the pre-existing IAEA’s compensation treaty in the supreme interest of present and future generation of Indians? If India decides to join the CSC, it will be an exercise in surrendering its sovereignty to a conflict of interest ridden regime like IAEA which is both the promoter and regulator of nuclear commerce. Like IAEA, Indian the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) is dependent on the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) whose mandate is charged with promoting nuclear power in India.<br />
The Parliamentary Committee enquired from Nirupama Rao , the Foreign Secretary that “whether there are other considerations apart from the legal requirements that necessitated the Bill.” She informed that “since the Government is operating within the ambit of international agreements and on the basis of certain principles the nation should have provisions of the nuclear liability Bill.”<br />
This is further corroborated by two members of the Parliamentary Standing Committee namely, Saman Pathak and Barun Mukherji. Both have observed categorically that the provisions of the Bill will unduly favour the foreign suppliers of nuclear equipment and it is being done to make the provisions compatible with the Convention on Supplementary Compensation (CSC). Like all Indians both these members are not convinced with the rationale of India joining the CSC because this legislation on civil nuclear liability does not “keep the interests of the Indian people, who may be affected in a nuclear accident, as its core concern&#8217;.<br />
In its 25 page report on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill, 2010, Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science &amp; Technology, Environment &amp; Forests observes, “When the Committee inquired from the Secretaries of Ministries/Departments of Government of India who appeared before the Committee as to whether the draft nuclear liability Bill was referred to them for their views/comments, some of them viz. Ministries of Health &amp; Family Welfare, Agriculture, Labour &amp; Employment, Food &amp; Public Distribution, etc. replied in the negative. The Committee is of the opinion that Government must have sought the opinion of Ministries which are even distantly related to any provision of the legislation. The Committee, therefore, recommends that in future Government should consult all such Ministries/ Departments which are even remotely concerned with the provisions of a proposed legislation.”<br />
It is noteworthy that the 25-member working group on civil nuclear energy-2009 constituted by the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) under the chairmanship of Dr S K Jain, chairman and managing director, Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited came out with a 57-page report with the format of the proposed Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill. Dr Jain was present during the testimony of the experts and citizens to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science &amp; Technology, Environment &amp; Forests. The government of India has an ambitious target &#8220;to increase our installed capacity more than seven fold to 35,000 MWe by the year 2022, and to 60,000 MWe by 2032.&#8221; Established in pre-independent India in 1927, FICCI is the largest and oldest apex business organization of the country. It claims to be a “non-government, not-for-profit organisation”. FICCI has direct membership from the private as well as public sectors, including SMEs and MNCs, and an indirect membership of over 83,000 companies from regional chambers of commerce. As part of its corporate lobbying, “FICCI works closely with the government on policy issues, enhancing efficiency, competitiveness and expanding business opportunities for industry through a range of specialised services and global linkages. It also provides a platform for sector specific consensus building and networking.” In such conflict of interest ridden circumstances, Dr Jain claimed that the health hazards from Chernobyl nuclear disaster is no more visible. Therefore, he implied that the questions of intergenerational adverse effects do not arise. Are his claims factual and trustworthy?<br />
Under the influence of FICCI and US nuclear industry, Dr.T. Subbarami Reddy, Dr Mammohan Singh and Dr Srikumar Banerjee have chosen not learn from the mistakes of US firms who embarked on a nuclear power strategy under the assumption that the radioactive waste management problem was not difficult and would be solved relatively quickly. Subsequent events have proved otherwise because radioactive waste management efforts are quite different from industrial and municipal waste management.<br />
Observations of G K Pillai, Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs illustrate how Banerjee has not been rigorous in the drafting of the Bill. While commenting on the conditions in which the operator of a nuclear power plant, who could be made liable for nuclear damage, Pillai stated that the Bill contains such terms as armed conflict, hostilities, civil war, insurrection or an act of terrorism that have wide meanings but have not been defined in the present Bill. Therefore there is a need for inserting meanings of these terms from other laws, in Section 2 of this Bill. Such vagueness in connotations can make the operators negligent in observing security procedures and can create situations of disputes between the operator and the central government.<br />
It is frightening to know that any nuclear incident may induce radioactive contaminations in surface, ground water bodies, and other water resources. U N Panjiar, the Secretary, Water resources was of the opinion that the Ministry does not have any facility for testing water quality, from point of view of nuclear contamination because this work has been done by the Department of Atomic Energy. The efficiency of Department of Atomic Energy gets routinely revealed in issues ranging from radioactive steel, ship breaking industry, Mayapuri scrap market, Kaiga incident etc. Didn’t AERB reveal its incompetence when it declared Mayapuri scrap market radiation free when it was proven later that the radiation still existed in the area? Didn’t it do the same after inspecting the obsolete ship Blue Lady?<br />
While Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy responded by saying that Ministry of Water Resources has not been involved in checking and monitoring the quality of water because this job is done by the Environmental Survey Laboratories of the Department of Atomic Energy, the fact remains the Bill should have been sent to the Water Resources Ministry as well because Department of Atomic Energy deals with point source of radioactive pollution and not with non-point source of pollution. It is saddening that Ministry of Water Resources conceded that since expertise is available in DAE alone, the Ministry need not be consulted. Panjiar rightly stressed upon the need to study the impact of nuclear contaminated water on human beings, animals, plants and crops. The Bill does not make any provision for such efforts. In such a context it is germane to recollect that more than 51 years ago, on 28 May 1959, the World Health Organisation (WHO)&#8217;s assembly voted into force an agreement with the IAEA, a UN agency that prevented the WHO from investigating, warning and revealing the dangers of nuclear radiation on health. The agreement is attached.<br />
Coincidentally, K Sujata Rao, Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare while deposing before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science &amp; Technology, Environment &amp; Forests mentioned that “while drafting the Bill the Dept. of Atomic Energy did not consult them. Since the response system to deal with any kind of emergency of such type, the hospitals are not well-equipped, it is natural that mortality and morbidity due to multiple burn, blasts, radiation injuries and psycho-social impact could be on very high scale and medical tackling of such a large emergency could have enough repercussions in the nearby areas of radioactive fallout. She also mentioned that in the entire Bill, there is not a single clause which speaks about taking health care during radiological emergencies. It reflects only about payment of compensation due to health impacts of such radiation. She suggested while setting up nuclear plants consideration may also be given to the fact that there should be hospital having trained doctors near such establishments and arrangements should also be made for free treatment of people who are affected by serious nuclear fallout.” She confessed that her Ministry is nowhere to meet an eventuality that may arise out of nuclear and radiological emergencies. Present and future generation of India would slaute Sujatha Rao for her exemplary conduct to safeguard her compatriots.<br />
Clearly, objectives of Health Ministry and Department of Atomic Energy are at loggerheads in the same way as objectives of WHO and IAEA are. The former is dedicated to promoting health and the latter exists to promote nuclear commerce. Under the agreement between WHO and IAEA, the two agencies must &#8220;keep each other fully informed concerning all projected activities and all programs of work which may be of interest to both parties&#8221;. Notably, probe into the health impacts of the Chernobyl nuclear accident in Ukraine on 26 April 1986 was taken over by IAEA and dissenting voices were suppressed. The health effects of the nuclear accident were the subject of two major conferences, in Geneva in 1995, and in Kiev, Ukrain in 2001. The full proceedings of those conferences remain unpublished. The programme and conclusions of the Kiev Conference is attached. The Kiev conference was organised by WHO Association of &#8220;Physicians of Chernobyl&#8221; in co-operation with UN agencies. There is no evidence to suggest that our Department of Atomic Energy or the Parliamentary Standing Committee had accessed the documents of these conferences and drew lessons from it.<br />
IAEA’s International Conference on Chernobyl &#8211; Looking Back to Go Forwards Towards a United Nations Consensus on the Effects of the Accident and the Future, Vienna, September, 2005 was a public relations exercise by the nuclear industry that promoted such risk models for nuclear radiation that understated the true hazards. Chris Busby, the scientific secretary of European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR) and visiting professor at the University of Ulster&#8217;s school of biomedical sciences observes, &#8220;The subordination of the WHO to IAEA is a key part of the systematic falsification of nuclear risk which has been under way ever since Hiroshima, the agreement creates an unacceptable conflict of interest in which the UN organisation concerned with promoting our health has been made subservient to those whose main interest is the expansion of nuclear power. Dissolving the WHO-IAEA agreement is a necessary first step to restoring the WHO&#8217;s independence to research the true health impacts of ionising radiation and publish its findings.&#8221;<br />
Disregarding lessons from 26 years of Bhopal disaster, even in the 24th anniversary year of the Chernobyl disaster the WHO-IAEA Agreement is yet to be abandoned. ECRR has called for its abandonment. India too should call for freeing WHO from hiding facts about health effect from nuclear hazards due to the agreement.<br />
Amidst public relations blitzkrieg of nuclear companies, it is not surprising that Banerjee, Secretary, Department of Atomic Energy expressed his touching faith in the nuclear power companies of all ilk and informed the Parliamentary Committee that the “Reactor at Chernobyl did not have a containment, while old reactors in India have containments and, therefore, Chernobyl type incident can never take place in India.” Is it because of such divine belief in the nuclear technology that he was starkly negligent in choosing not to consult revenant ministries while drafting the Bill? Is it for this very reason that doctrine of “absolute liability” for the operator, supplier, builder and owner has been subverted? Business enterprises are “strictly and absolutely liable to compensate all those who are affected by the accident and such liability is not subject to any of the exceptions which operate vis-à-vis the tortuous principle of strict liability,” as per Supreme Court’s order. The liability of the operator should be made “absolute” to ensure that there are no exceptions.<br />
The Bill ignores the fact that Union Carbide Corporation was also in the business of nuclear power and its current owner The Dow Chemicals Company (since February 6, 2001) too offers a range of nuclear grade resins that are designed and manufactured to meet the requirements of the nuclear power industry. As part of its ‘policy perspectives’ for ‘Accelerate Development of Alternatives and Renewable Energy’, Dow calls for “An increased reliance on safe nuclear power and technologies for effectively managing nuclear waste”. Radioactive waste is not a single &#8220;thing&#8221; that can be isolated and dealt with.<br />
Reddy, Singh and Banerjee should have recommended more openness, increased public access to information so that no agency hides problems to be solved by the future generations. Current draft of the Bill is leaving the nuclear waste problems for future generations.<br />
This is illustrated by what Alka Sirohi, Secretary, Department of Food &amp; Public Distribution informed the Parliamentary Standing Committee , while explaining the functioning of her Ministry, she emphasized the ill-effects of nuclear radiation on food items and its subsequent repercussions on human health and safeguards to be taken to prevent nuclear contamination of food during radiological accidents. She further mentioned although radiological damage to food items may fall within the generic definition of the property as mentioned in Clause 2f (ii) of the Bill, it would be better if the said Clause could provide a separate definition food grains along with of storage of foodgrains. Additionally she also mentioned that safety norms, distance, location and operating procedure, which should be defined in the Bill during the construction of the warehouses for foodgrains storage to be followed, near a nuclear facility. She also mentioned about the establishment of laboratories for the standard testing of food articles to ascertain radiation levels. Sirohi merits appreciation for her considered submission before the Parliamentary Standing Committee.<br />
The Bill remains silent on the grave issues raised by Prabeer Kumar Basu, Secretary, Agriculture who mentioned before the Committee that the disaster management structure in the country is oriented in such a manner that emergencies arising out of floods, earthquakes and droughts could be managed in an efficient manner. However, on the other hand, unfortunately the disaster management structure in the country, as per his opinion, is not well tailored in meeting radiological fall out and more unfortunate to mention that even educated section of the people is not well aware about the implications of a serious nuclear disaster. He therefore, felt that more public awareness needs to be built in respect of nuclear disaster and its hair-raising impact on biological population. He further pointed out that as a consequence of a nuclear disaster of the Chernobyl type, it is quite possible that agricultural crops around 30 to 100 kms. from the site of the incident could be wiped out total. This may affect seriously the biodiversity of the crops in the radiation area and the farmer may loose their traditional variety of crops. In this connection he mentioned that the National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources and Gene Bank in the country who are keeping a sample of each variety of crops can preserve these varieties which could be planted for further production if a variety of crops is entirely lost due to radiological emergency. He however, mentioned that there should be suitable rules, regulations and guidelines and compensation model for agricultural damage that could be inserted at an appropriate place in the legislation which may work after a radiological eventuality takes place.<br />
Further revealing the criminal negligence of the drafters of the Bill, Prabhat C Chatirvedi, Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment while referring to Clause 5 (1)(i) which provides for non-liability of operator for any nuclear damage arising out of a grave natural disaster of an exceptional character pointed out that grave natural disaster should not include earthquakes or floods. He advised the Committee that if nuclear plant is placed in a seismic zone, it should be properly designed to withstand earthquake of severe character. The word natural disaster is too general. He further mentioned that concept of absolute liability of the operator in case of a nuclear damage whether it is on worker or someone else should be invoked in the Bill. The Secretary, while referring to Clause 39 (1) of the Bill, drew the attention of the Committee that no specific monetary quantum has been mentioned in regard to the fine to be imposed under the chapter on offenses and penalties. He therefore, suggested that specific quantum of fine in monetary terms should be defined in the Bill. Chaturvedi merits plaudits for his considered submission before the committee.<br />
In compliance of the suggestion of Chairperson, Parliamentary Standing Committee Science &amp; Technology, Environment &amp; Forests during my testimony on 3rd August, 2010 and pursuant to my written submission dated 7th July, 2010, Toxicswatch Alliance (TWA) had specifically drawn the attention of the Parliamentary Standing Committee with regard to the narrow definition of the word “installation” and conflict of interest ridden existence of Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB). In a letter to the Parliamentary Standing Committee dated August 12, 2010, TWA has highlighted the backdrop of the deliberations on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill. Meera Shankar, Indian Ambassador to the US, and William Burns , the Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs of the United States signed the Agreement on Arrangements and Procedures for Reprocessing on July 30, 2010 in pursuance to Article 6(iii) of the Agreement for Cooperation concerning Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between India and the US. TWA has questioned the merit of centralised power stations like nuclear given 35-40 percent transmission and distribution loss from power grids.<br />
R.Gopalan, Secretary, Financial Services submitted before the Parliamentary Committee that “any increase in premium of insurance will lead to increase in the cost of production of electricity for nuclear power. It is argued that higher the liability limit higher will be the insurance premium and subsequently higher will be the cost of electricity production.” Unmindful of such concerns its business as usual for the US nuclear companies and FICCI. A press release from the Indian Embassy in Washington, DC noted, &#8220;The historic bilateral cooperation agreement for peaceful uses of nuclear energy, the 123 Agreement that we signed two years back provided for reprocessing of US obligated nuclear material in an Indian national facility under IAEA safeguards.&#8221;<br />
It observes, &#8220;The government of India has already designated two sites for nuclear power plants to be established in cooperation with the US and the companies of the two countries are now engaged in discussions&#8221; as a follow up of the last month&#8217;s Strategic Dialogue and the meeting of the CEO&#8217;s Forum prior to the visit of President Barack Obama to India in November 2010.<br />
Reddy, Dr Singh and Banerjee have failed to discourage nuclear power companies to locate &#8220;sinks&#8221; like deep waters of ocean, sea, rivers, air and landfills etc in which it could dump, flush, or vent radioactive waste products. They have skirted the issue of India’s radioactive waste management and it should desist from NIMBY-ism. NIMBY stands for &#8220;Not In My Back Yard&#8221;. The US state of Nevada is fighting a classic NIMBY battle against the Yucca Mountain facility. In India too communities should be empowered and not harassed for asserting their right to safe environment and the rights of future generations. It was once argued that reprocessing spent nuclear fuel was another important waste management strategy although the act of reprocessing still generated volatile waste products which exacerbated the waste management problem even as it reduced the overall volume of radioactive waste material but it only made radioactive waste problem a long-term disposal option. Notably, US itself has stopped reprocessing nuclear fuel during the late 1970s by order of President Jimmy Carter.<br />
Reddy, Singh and Banerjee do not realize that the difficulties with radioactive waste cannot be dealt with by imposing a legislative fix on a problem that has not been clearly defined or fully understood. Such legislative fixes are hardly a solution as became evident from US Nuclear Waste Repository Act of 1982 and a 1987 Congressional amendment to the Act which mandated consideration of only one location, Nevada&#8217;s Yucca Mountain as a permanent repository leading to major litigation as well as significant opposition from people in the US state of Nevada. Nuclear power cannot and should not expand in India as is the case with the US until the problem of where to dispose of radioactive waste is solved.<br />
P Umashankar, Secretary, Ministry of Power apprised the Committee about the Clause 3 of the Bill, wherein the notification regarding the occurrence of a nuclear incident is to be issued within 15 days by the AERB. According to him, “the nuclear power station incharge/ director will immediately declare nuclear emergency, and forthwith the disaster management plan will start, without waiting for the publication of the notification and the 15 days time-period also needs to be reduced. “ This is quite sensible but it appears that Department of Atomic Energy did not consult even the Power Ministry.<br />
Testimony after testimony before the Committee had asked for deletion of the word terrorism from the Bill but the same is not reflected in the Committee’ s report despite the fact that Pradeep Kumar, the Defence Secretary, who also appeared before the Committee categorically stated, “under different layers of protection, nuclear assets including nuclear installations are being protected through Defence. However he admitted that absolute and fool proof protection cannot be guaranteed for any nuclear or other assets in the country during peace or war.” Exceptions for acts of terrorism can easily be used by the supplier and the operator to wash their hands off any nuclear disaster.<br />
In view of the above observations, there is a very urgent need for a Joint Parliamentary Committee (sans conflict of interest) to probe and examine the current liability regime in general and nuclear liability regime in particular in the developed countries besides a High Powered Trans-disciplinary Independent Experts Committee to study the status of adverse enviro-occupational hazards world over. Human cost of industrial disasters have created a compelling logic to do away with the idea of limited liability to companies, the proposed Companies Bill should make a beginning in order to make these legal-artificial persons accountable to our legislature. </p>
<p>Shame! India sold its dead cheap<br />
Shobhan Saxena,<br />
Around 22,000 dead. More than 1,20,000 injured.  Rs 1 lakh for each<br />
body. Rs 25,000 for every poisoned lung and damaged heart and blinded<br />
eyes. 26 years of long wait. And just 2 years in jail for the men who<br />
committed the worst crime against the people of this country. And this<br />
mockery of justice after such a long wait. Twenty six years after 40<br />
tonnes of lethal gas seeped into the lungs of Bhopal, families of some<br />
17,000 men, women and children are still waiting for the so-called<br />
compensation. Thousands more are still waiting to be accepted as<br />
victims. People of Bhopal are still drinking toxic water poisoned by<br />
Union Carbide in December 1984. And the main culprit is living life<br />
kingsize in a mansion in New York.<br />
No country sells its people so cheap.<br />
No country sells its poor so cheap.<br />
No country sells its dead so cheap.<br />
Today – on the day of Bhopal disaster judgment &#8212; if there is a failed<br />
state in the world, it’s India. It’s not Iraq. It’s not Somalia. It’s<br />
not Sudan. It’s India.<br />
India – its government, judiciary and corporates – accepted the<br />
ridiculous amount of $450 million dollars for the people killed and<br />
maimed by methyl isocyanate leaked from the Union Carbide factory in<br />
the heart of Bhopal three decades ago. In all these years, the poor<br />
victims have done everything they could to get justice and<br />
compensation. They have cried and died on streets, sat hungry and<br />
faced police lathis on roads and filed court cases in the hope that<br />
one day they will get justice.<br />
Today, they were denied justice. Today, they were told that they<br />
should be happy with the peanuts thrown at them by Union Carbide.<br />
Today, India proved once again that it doesn’t care for its poor.<br />
Today, it was proved all over again that those who do politics in the<br />
name of poor in this country, always rule for the rich.<br />
What justification does CBI have for not being able to produce Warren<br />
Anderson in court. The chairman of UC at the time of the gas attack<br />
(it was not an accident, the gas leak was caused because of cost-<br />
cutting steps taken by him) on the people of Bhopal, Anderson was<br />
arrested and later released on bail. He ran off to US in 1986 and we<br />
have not been able to find him or ask the US to extradite Anderson to<br />
India. Why? The government says it doesn’t know where Anderson is.<br />
What a lie. What a shame.<br />
Last year, on a balmy July day, a bunch of victims danced on the<br />
streets after hearing news that the Chief Judicial Magistrate of<br />
Bhopal had ordered the CBI to arrest Anderson and produce him before<br />
the court without delay. The court also asked the CBI to explain what<br />
steps it had taken since 2002 to enforce the warrant and extradition<br />
of Anderson, who was declared an absconder in 1992. Though the CBI and<br />
US government failed to track Anderson, supporters of Bhopal victims<br />
traced him to the elite New York neighbourhood of the Hamptons. In<br />
2003, Greenpeace activists paid Anderson a visit at his home and<br />
handed him an arrest warrant.<br />
Today’s ridiculous judgment in Bhopal didn’t say anything on Anderson<br />
as he is a “proclaimed offender”. This status suits him fine because<br />
he doesn’t have to bother about coming to India and answer some very<br />
crucial questions:<br />
 *Why did Union Carbide not apply the same safety standards at its<br />
plant in India as it operated at a sister plant in West Virginia, US?<br />
*On the night of the disaster, why did the six safety measures<br />
designed to prevent a gas leak fail to function?<br />
*Why was the safety siren, intended to alert the people living close<br />
to the factory, turned off?<br />
The victims have always alleged that Bhopal happened because of<br />
negligence by the Union Carbide and that was caused by cost-cutting<br />
measures taken by Anderson. Is it because of this reason that Anderson<br />
has been &#8216;hiding&#8217; in the US?<br />
A criminal has a reason to hide, but what reason does our government<br />
have to let a mass murderer like Anderson go scot-free. Is it because<br />
he is an American? Can an American come to India kill people in this<br />
country and run away with no consequences? That seems to be the case.<br />
We are still struggling to get a chance to question David Headley<br />
Coleman, an American citizen responsible for the worst terror attack<br />
on an Indian city in 2008. Will we succeed in getting Headley<br />
extradited to India? No way. Never.<br />
Today, India proved that it doesn’t really care for its people,<br />
particularly if they have been slaughtered by powerful people from the<br />
most powerful nation in the world. Instead of taking on America and<br />
fighting for justice for its poor, India is more than happy to sell<br />
its dead cheap.<br />
Rs 1 lakh for every body. Rs 25,000 for every blinded eye. This is the<br />
cost of poor life in a failed state. </p>
<p>http://irrepressible.info/static/images/en/logo.gif</p>
<p> WHY MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES ARE INVESTING IN INDIA?</p>
<p>We condemn the brutal massacre by police on farmers – who are going to loss all their lands , sources.of livelihood for the sake of special economic zones , industrial parks , etc in various states of India.<br />
In every mega projects undertaken by government , both the state government &amp; central government have functioned  like  REAL ESTATE / COMMISSION  AGENTS for the rich &amp; mighty . the government says it is acquiring lands for development of industries , for public good. In reality there is only good of rich &amp; mighty.<br />
For forming S.E.Zs , corporates gets speedy single window approvals from government , lands at concessional rates – lower than market value  , soft loans from Indian banks , tax exemptions for years from the government , dedicated power supply , etc , from the government . these corporates are even given free hand to raise share capital in the Indian market. the government has enacted flexible labour laws specifically for S.E.Zs , they can hire &amp; fire without bothering to pay gratuity , etc and they are exempted from providing P.F / E.S.I  coverage to their employees ie they need not worry about the occupational health hazards of their employees , they can employ them till they are fit &amp; throw them on streets afterwards. These corporates take our own money,  employ our own people , use our own natural resources &amp; finally  take away the net profits to their home countries  – what they give back ? – environmental pollution , tax evasions , low paid occupational hazardous jobs to locals , stock market scams .</p>
<p>During Previous License Regime foreign, investment was not directly welcome in India. As people at that time perceived it as “Neo colonisation” &amp; detested it. There were various restrictions on foreign investments. The local industrialists under monopolistic<br />
environment thrived, who were no way better than day light robberers, of course with a few exception. Under the political patronage, the cunning industrialists looted public money, cheated the government of tax, cheated lending banks &amp; cheated the investors<br />
too. They easily flouted labour laws &amp; made labourers to work in inhuman conditions.<br />
During 1990′s under the international pressure India signed GATT &amp; slowly started opening it’s economy. Now, from 01/01/05 even product patent has come into force in India. Are MNCs bringing high technology intensive industries to India? No, not at all. They are actually denying sophisticated technologies to India. They are only<br />
bringing the FMCG industries – salt, chips, ketch-up, colas, for which India is a huge home market. They are into services like Hotels, medical care, marketing. In other cases, they are just marketing the products manufactured at their bases in U.S.A. or Europe.<br />
They are not bringing in new production technologies in the areas like space research, nuclear energy, bio-technology, pharmaceuticals or pollution control, to India. Also, some MNCs are relocating their highly polluting industries to India, as they are subjected to stringent environmental protection standards in their own home countries. Whereas, In India the Government is highly corrupt &amp; can be bought for a price. The attractive points for foreign direct investment (FDI) in India are,</p>
<p>1. There is lack of comprehensive environmental norms.</p>
<p>2. The enforcement of environmental norms is lax.</p>
<p>3. The cost of health coverage, social security net to be provided to the workers exposed to the occupational hazards is less.</p>
<p>4. The cost of compensation to be paid to the persons-who died or suffered damages due to occupational hazards/environmental pollution is meager.</p>
<p>5. The enforcement of labour laws are lax.</p>
<p>6. Public money can be easily raised through lending Banks, primary market within India &amp; the public can be easily cheated.</p>
<p>7. The tax can be evaded through various loopholes like transferring money to holding companies situated at Mauritius or countries which have double taxation avoidance agreement with India.</p>
<p>8. The tax can be evaded, company money can be cheated by lending money to sister / holding concerns at low interest rates or by selling shares, materials to their private companies at low rates or by buying shares, materials from their holding/sister concerns at exhorbitant rates, etc.</p>
<p>9. The corporate governance laws are almost absent in India &amp; it’s enforcement nil.</p>
<p>10. Above all, the time can be bought by very slow Indian legal system, if any dispute arise.</p>
<p>11. On top of it, well trained, technically qualified people are available at low rates through contractors.<br />
Just consider the following cases which highlight the apathy, irresponsibility of  government of India and emboldened the cunning, MNCs:-<br />
1. The India which boasts of so much scientific/technological advancements, is till date has been unable to provide potable water to it’s people. People of west Bengal , Karnataka , Andrapradesh states are forced to drink Arsenic, Fluoride poisoned water.</p>
<p>2. The people living near the mines of R.E.M.P. in Kerala are suffering due to exposure to the radio active materials, Same is the case with the people of Jadaguda, Jharkhand, living near the U.C.I.L. plant. Both M/S R.E.M.P &amp; M/s U.C.I.L are department of atomic energy enterprises.</p>
<p>3. Most recently  Radio active materials were found  in second hand shop of delhi market , causing  death &amp; grievous injuries to public. Few years back, In Mysore railway station containers of radio- active materials were left unattended. The dome of reactor building at construction stage collapsed in nuclear power plant at Kaiga. A fire tragedy occurred in Kakrapar nuclear power plant. In the recent Tsunami waves onslaught, certain important facilities of Koodakulam atomic plant were damaged near Chennai.</p>
<p>4. In 1984, U.S. based MNC union carbide mass murdered nearly 20,000 people, injured lakhs who are still suffering health problems. The polluted poisonous accident site i.e. Union carbide plant in Bhopal is not yet cleared off toxic materials even after 20 years.<br />
This is still further damaging the residents of Bhopal.</p>
<p>5. In the above union carbide disaster, the Government of India didn’t present the case properly before supreme courts of India &amp; U.S.A.. As a result the MNC just paid a pittance as compensation. As per that the cost of Indian lives are just a fraction of cost of<br />
American lives. Just imagine if a same disaster occurred in U.S.A. at the plant of a MNC headquartered in India, what would have been the consequence?</p>
<p>6. In India, hazardous chemicals laced with food additives are passed through the drinks, beverages like pepsi, cola, coco cola very easily.</p>
<p>7. The medicines like nimesulide, paracetamol, etc. with hazardous side effects which are banned in U.S.A.&amp; Europe, are easily marketed by the same U.S.&amp; Europe based MNCs in India.</p>
<p>8. In India spurious drugs, medicines, food stuffs are easily marketed.</p>
<p>9. In India, the clinical trials of new medicines under research are done without proper compensation structure to those being tried upon ie. Virtual guinea pigs.</p>
<p>10. In India, the genetically engineered BT crops are being introduced without paying attention to formers, ecology or eco-system.</p>
<p>11. In India, during setting up of large projects, scant attention is paid to environment, eco-system &amp; the displaced persons.</p>
<p>Most of the times, in government projects itself the displaced persons are cheated by the government in numerous ways.</p>
<p>12. In India, various Government as well as private hospitals dumps hospital wastes with deadly viruses in the open, with scant regard to public health.</p>
<p>13. In India, aged ships belonging to foreign countries are breaked down to scrap in ship breaking yards of Gujarath , Maharashtra &amp; AP. Various toxins like the Asbestos, lead, etc &amp; the hazardous, dirty water, Oil inside the ship are drained into Indian seashore. The labourers here are forced to work without any safety gears.</p>
<p>14. When specific cases of human rights violations were brought before the government &amp; Judiciary by us , both of them didn’t respond at all.<br />
All the above cases highlight the fact that, government of India &amp; Indian judiciary treats it’s citizens lives as cheap, dispensable at will. This is the major attracting force for MNCs to India. </p>
<p>NUCLEAR DISASTER IN MYSORE ? </p>
<p>Even in developed countries like USA &amp; UK mal &#8211; handling of radio<br />
active<br />
materials takes place now &amp; then, which in itself constitute nuclear<br />
disasters<br />
on small scale. Refer the Deccan Herald ( 12/10/03 to 18/10/03) for<br />
details. few<br />
years back, there were media reports about certain containers with<br />
radio active<br />
materials dumped in the open in Mysore city Railway Station. In Kaiga<br />
nuclear<br />
power project a doom collapsed. In India how many cases of<br />
mal-handling of radio<br />
active materials have taken place ? No public knowledge . In the back<br />
drop of<br />
corrupt ,negligent hush-hush, buck passing work culture in most of the<br />
government service, I do want to know from the union Health Minister &amp;<br />
the<br />
Karnataka State Health Minister, how safe are we from the processing &amp;<br />
storage<br />
of radio active materials at M/s REMP, Mysore M/s REMP Kerala, &amp; M/s<br />
UCIL<br />
Jadaguda Jharkhand ? How the spent fuel is disposed off in nuclear<br />
power plants<br />
in India ? few months back there were media reports about ill effects<br />
of<br />
radiation on the employees &amp; peoples of adjacent villages near the<br />
operations<br />
site of M/s Uranium Corporation of India Ltd. Jadaguda Jharkhand &amp;<br />
Near the<br />
Operations site of M/s REMP in Kerala.<br />
In tsunami waves onslaught of december 2004 , the vital facilities of<br />
kundakulam<br />
nuclear reserch station in tamilnadu were damaged . just last week<br />
tremors of<br />
earth quake were felt in kaiga nuclear power plant in kaiga ,<br />
karnataka . if<br />
anything untoward happens as a result of natural calamities or human<br />
failure ,<br />
etc , what sort of contigency plans the government has got ready for<br />
the safety<br />
of public ?<br />
Even some of the insurance companies like M/s Met Life India Insurance<br />
Co. don&#8217;t<br />
cover the risk of physical / mental disabilities or death caused due<br />
to nuclear<br />
hazards . In such an event who will bear the cost of compensation ?<br />
How the<br />
quantum of compensation is calculated ? will you take into<br />
consideration the<br />
insurance policies brought by individuals ? Give me information about<br />
the safety<br />
measures taken by M/s REMP, M/s UCIL &amp; other related agencies at all<br />
it&#8217;s<br />
operation sites / nuclear sites.</p>
<p>Severe accident risk at India’s fast breeder nuclear reactor<br />
The safety inadequacies of India’s fast breeder reactor<br />
Article Highlights<br />
•	India’s Department of Atomic Energy plans to build a large fleet of fast breeder nuclear reactors in the coming years.<br />
•	However, many other countries that have experimented with fast reactors have shut down their programs due to technical and safety difficulties.<br />
•	The Indian prototype is similarly flawed, inadequately protected against the possibility of a severe accident.<br />
India’s Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) is planning a large expansion of nuclear power, in which fast breeder reactors play an important role. Fast breeder reactors are attractive to the DAE because they produce (or &#8220;breed&#8221;) more fissile material than they use. The breeder reactor is especially attractive in India, which hopes to develop a large domestic nuclear energy program even though it has primarily poor quality uranium ore that is expensive to mine.<br />
Currently, only one fast reactor operates in the country—a small test reactor in Kalpakkam, a small township about 80 kilometers (almost 50 miles) south of Chennai. The construction of a larger prototype fast breeder reactor (PFBR) is underway at the same location. This reactor is expected to be completed in 2010 and will use mixed plutonium-uranium oxide as fuel in its core, with a blanket of depleted uranium oxide that will absorb neutrons and transmute into plutonium 239. Liquid sodium will be used to cool the core, which will produce 1,200 megawatts of thermal power and 500 megawatts of electricity. The reactor is to be the first of hundreds that the DAE envisions constructing throughout India by mid-century.<br />
However, such an expansion of fast reactors, even if more modest than DAE projections, could adversely affect public health and safety. While all nuclear reactors are susceptible to catastrophic accidents, fast reactors pose a unique risk. In fast reactors, the core isn’t in its most reactive—or energy producing— configuration when operating normally. Therefore, an accident that rearranges the fuel in the core could lead to an increase in reaction rate and an increase in energy production. If this were to occur quickly, it could lead to a large, explosive energy release that might rupture the reactor vessel and disperse radioactive material into the environment.<br />
Many of these reactors also have what is called a &#8220;positive coolant void coefficient,&#8221; which means that if the coolant in the central part of the core were to heat up and form bubbles of sodium vapor, the reactivity—a measure of the neutron balance within the core, which determines the reactor’s tendency to change its power level (if it is positive, the power level rises)—would increase; therefore core melting could accelerate during an accident. (A positive coolant void coefficient, though not involving sodium, contributed to the runaway reaction increase during the April 1986 Chernobyl reactor accident.) In contrast, conventional light water reactors typically have a &#8220;negative coolant void coefficient&#8221; so that a loss of coolant reduces the core’s reactivity. The existing Indian fast breeder test reactor, with its much smaller core, doesn’t have a positive coolant void coefficient. Thus, the DAE doesn’t have real-world experience in handling the safety challenges that a large prototype reactor will pose.<br />
More largely, international experience shows that fast breeder reactors aren’t ready for commercial use. Superphénix, the flagship of the French breeder program, remained inoperative for the majority of its 11-year lifetime until it was finally shuttered in 1996. Concerns about the adequacy of the design of the German fast breeder reactor led to it being contested by environmental groups and the local state government in the 1980s and ultimately to its cancellation in 1991. And the Japanese fast reactor Monju shut down in 1995 after a sodium coolant leak caused a fire and has yet to restart. Only China and Russia are still developing fast breeders. China, however, has yet to operate one, and the Russian BN-600 fast reactor has suffered repeated sodium leaks and fires.<br />
When it comes to India’s prototype fast breeder reactor, two distinct questions must be asked: (1) Is there confidence about how an accident would propagate inside the core and how much energy it might release?; and (2) have PFBR design efforts been as strict as necessary, given the possibility that an accident would be difficult to contain and potentially harmful to the surrounding population?<br />
The simple answer to both is no.<br />
The DAE, like other fast-reactor developers, has tried to study how severe a core-disruptive accident would be and how much energy it would release. In the case of the PFBR, the DAE has argued that the worst-case core disruptive accident would release an explosive energy of 100 megajoules. This is questionable.<br />
The DAE’s estimate is much smaller when compared with other fast reactors, especially when the much larger power capacity of the PFBR—and thus, the larger amount of fissile material used in the reactor—is taken into account. For example, it was estimated that the smaller German reactor (designed to produce 760 megawatts of thermal energy) would produce 370 megajoules in the event of a core-disruptive accident—much higher than the PFBR estimate. Other fast reactors around the world have similarly higher estimates for how much energy would be produced in such accidents.<br />
The DAE’s estimate is based on two main assumptions: (1) that only part of the core will melt down and contribute to the accident; and (2) that only about 1 percent of the thermal energy released during the accident would be converted into mechanical energy that can damage the containment building and cause ejection of radioactive materials into the atmosphere.<br />
Neither of these assumptions is justifiable. Britain’s Atomic Energy Authority has done experiments that suggest up to 4 percent of the thermal energy could be converted into mechanical energy. And the phenomena that might occur inside the reactor core during a severe accident are very complex, so there’s no way to stage a full-scale experiment to compare with the theoretical accident models that the reactor’s designers used in their estimates. In addition, important omissions in the DAE’s own safety studies make their analysis inadequately conservative. (Our independent estimates of the energy produced in a hypothetical PFBR core disruptive accident are presented in the Science and Global Security article, &#8220;Compromising Safety: Design Choices and Severe Accident Possibilities in India’s Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor&#8221; and these are much higher than the DAE’s estimates.)<br />
Turning to the second question: In terms of the stringency of the DAE’s design effort, the record reveals inadequate safety precautions. One goal of any &#8220;defense-in-depth&#8221; design is to engineer barriers to withstand the most severe accident that’s considered plausible. Important among these barriers is the reactor’s containment building, the most visible structure from the outside of any nuclear plant. Compared to most other breeder reactors, and light water reactors for that matter, the design of the PFBR’s containment is relatively weak and won’t be able to contain an accident that releases a large amount of energy. The DAE knows how to build stronger containments—its newest heavy water reactor design has a containment building that is meant to withstand six times more pressure than the PFBR’s containment—but has chosen not to do so for the PFBR.<br />
The other unsafe design choice is that of the reactor core. As mentioned earlier, the destabilizing positive coolant void coefficient in fast reactors is a problem because it increases the possibility that reactivity will escalate inside the core during an accident. It’s possible to decrease this effect by designing the reactor core so that fuel subassemblies are interspersed within the depleted uranium blanket, in what is termed a heterogeneous core. The U.S. Clinch River Breeder Reactor, which was eventually cancelled, was designed with a heterogeneous core, and Russia has considered a heterogeneous core for its planned BN-1600 reactor. The DAE hasn’t made such an effort, and the person who directed India’s fast breeder program during part of the design phase once argued that the emphasis on the coolant void coefficient was mistaken because a negative void coefficient could lead to dangerous situations in an accident as well. That might be true, but it misses the obvious point that the same potentially dangerous situations would be even more dangerous if the void coefficient within the core is positive.<br />
Both of these design choices—a weak containment building and a reactor core with a large and positive void coefficient—are readily explainable: They lowered costs. Reducing the sodium coolant void coefficient would have increased the fissile material requirement of the reactor by 30-50 percent—an expensive component of the initial costs. Likewise, a stronger containment building would have cost more. All of this is motivated by the DAE’s assessment that &#8220;the capital cost of [fast breeder reactors] will remain the most important hurdle&#8221; to their rapid deployment.<br />
Lowered electricity costs would normally be most welcome, but not with the increased risk of catastrophic accidents caused by poorly designed fast breeder reactors.</p>
<p>BHOPAL GAS TRAGEDY 1984 -Bhopal, India</p>
<p>At the first instance the Government of India failed to ensure that Union carbide India Limited (U.C.I.L) has installed proper safety measures and fully implemented it in practice, at it’s plant in Bhopal. The Government of Madhyapradesh through it’s labour<br />
department, factory inspectorate &amp; pollution control board failed to enforce safety practices &amp; environmental protection. In turn, the U.C.I.L didn’t install in full, the safety measures being followed by it’s parent company union carbide corporation (U.C.C) at it’s<br />
Various plants in the U.S.A. The U.C.I.L. didn’t give community training to residents of nearby localities, to cope up with emergencies ie. Industrial accidents. U.C.I.L gave a go – by to safety practices, as it treated Indian lives as cheap. The government of Madhya pradesh instead of shifting slum dwellers around U.C.I.L, to other safe place, gave them legal title deeds just months before the tragedy in 1984.<br />
Now, refer the following:-<br />
1. After the accident at it’s U.C.I.L. plant at Bhopal, India in 1984, when the U.C.C.  Chairman/C.E.O. came over to Bhopal from U.S.A to visit the accident site, local police arrested him on the charges of manslaughter. However, the Government of India got him released.</p>
<p>2. In 1985, Government of India enacted “Bhopal claims Act” took- away the right of appeal of all the Gas tragedy victims &amp; declared itself as the sole representative of all victims. This said act itself is violative of victim’s fundamental &amp; human rights. The<br />
victims didn’t choose Government of India as it’s representative under will, agreement, trust or pleasure.</p>
<p>3. The paradox of this “Bhopal claims Act” is that, Government of India which is also a party to the crime, tragedy, itself is the appellant. The appellant (Petitioner),defendant are Government of India, Prosecution by Government of India &amp; Judged by Government of<br />
India.</p>
<p>4. In 1989, when an appeal about interim compensation to be paid by the U.C.I.L to all the victims was being heard in the apex court, the supreme court of India without giving a chance to the victims to make their point, without consulting them, without making a proper assessment of damages/losses, gave an arbitrary figure as verdict &amp; dropped all civil, criminal proceedings against U.C.C.&amp;U.C.I.L</p>
<p>5. In the same year 1989, the Government of India without consulting the victims of disaster, without making proper assessment of damages/ losses, negotiated a settlement with the U.C.C. and in turn gave full legal immunity to U.C.C.&amp; U.C.I.L from civil &amp;<br />
Criminal proceedings</p>
<p>6. Even the Government of India didn’t present the case of victim’s-gas tragedy victims, properly before the U.S.courts, where the U.C.C is based. All these premeditated acts only benefited the criminals- U.C.C&amp;UCIL. Are not the supreme court of India &amp; Government of India, here to safeguard Indians and to safeguard Justice?<br />
After all these crimes, the Government of India failed to distribute compensation in time to victims. It has failed even to provide safe drinking water to the residents near the accident site, It has failed to provide comprehensive medical care to the victims, till<br />
date . It has even failed to get the accident site cleared off toxic wastes either by the culprit management or by it self, that too after 20 years. The very presence of these toxic wastes since 20 years is further contaminating, polluting the environment and taking toll of more victims.<br />
Particularly in the case of “Bhopal Gas Tragedy” the supreme court of India &amp; Government of India are deadlier criminals than U.C.I.L&amp;U.C.C.<br />
Just consider a case here, Just a few years back an U.S.based M.N.C ENRON set-up a power project in Maharashtra, India through it’s subsidiary. When Maharashtra state Electricity Board failed to lift power from Enron&amp; pay them monthly guaranteed revenue, Enron threatened to invoke, open the “Eschrew Clause” with the Government<br />
of India &amp; to approach international arbiter U.K. Government of India has stood as conter-guarantee in this case. Finally the Government paid, of course subsequently the parent ENRON collapsed due to other reasons. If in this case if Government of India failed to pay-up as a counter guarantee &amp; refused to comply with the award of International arbiter, definitely Government of U.S.A. would have stepped into the scene to protect it’s MNC. Hypothetically, In the same vein if Enron has caused damages to Indians either through negligence of safe practices or industrial accidents or bank frauds<br />
amounting over and above it’s Capital base &amp; insurance cover, then it would have been the duty of parent Enron &amp; Government of U.S.A. to step in &amp; pay-up.<br />
In the same way, the U.C.I.L has caused massive damages to Indians &amp; refusing to pay commensurate to damages. Dow chemicals which took- over U.C.C. is also refusing to pay. DOW chemicals which is the new owner of U.C.C. naturally inherits both profits, credits lent &amp; liabilities to pay of U.C.C. Still it is refusing to pay. Now it is the turn of Government of U.S.A. to cough-up the sum.<br />
Nowadays, it has become routine for central &amp; State ministers to go- on foreign jaunts, to globe -trott inviting F.D.I/ M.N.Cs to India. They do sign numerous agreements, only favouring MNC. When tragedies occur or when they cheat Indian banks/ investors, it is Indians who suffer. The ministers &amp; bureaucrats thinks themselves as wizards and enters into agreements with MNCs, industrialists in a hush-hush manner, with vast scope for possible corruption. Is it not the duty of government to be transparent ?</p>
<p>INDIA: Obama administration official supports corporate interests over victims of world&#8217;s worst industrial disaster</p>
<p>Deputy National Security Advisor Froman reveals administration’s double standards on corporate accountability for victims of Bhopal Gas Disaster </p>
<p>At a time when the world is focused on corporate accountability in the wake of the BP&#8217;s Gulf Oil Spill, a leaked email from the Obama administration shows that it values profit over people, when the profit benefits American corporations. The victims of the world’s worst industrial disaster were disappointed to see today that the White House is not pursuing the same levels of accountability from American Dow Chemical as it has from BP. When Dow purchased Union Carbide in 2001, the corporation acquired outstanding liability for the ongoing disaster in Bhopal, which has led to the deaths of an estimated 25,000 people in Bhopal, India following the 1984 Gas Disaster. </p>
<p>Today, Mumbai-based Times Now published an email chain between White House Deputy National Security Advisor Michael Froman, and Indian Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission, Montek Singh Ahluwalia. In response to an Ahluwalia’s email requesting assistance as India faces a sharp restriction in the World Bank’s lending, Froman replied: </p>
<p>&#8220;We are aware of this issue and we will look into it. We are hearing a lot of noise about the Dow Chemical issue. I trust that you are monitoring it carefully. I am not familiar with all the details, but I think we want to avoid developments which put a chilling effect on our investment relationship.&#8221; </p>
<p>Here Obama’s Deputy NSA apparently tied potential development aid to India with Dow Chemical’s liability in Bhopal. The White House denies any linkage between the IBRD lending and Dow’s ongoing lack of responsibility. Forman’s statement shows callous disregard for ongoing injustice and lack of accountability 26 years after the disaster. The survivor organizations in India, 5 of which have been protesting in Delhi this past month, have faced infringements on their basic rights, especially through discriminatory police abuse. A threatening statement from the Obama office could further repressive action from Indian Central Government of India. </p>
<p>Following months of safety cuts, on Dec 3, 1984 the Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal leaked deadly gas containing Methyl isocyanate (MIC) over the city of Bhopal. In the immediate aftermath 8-12,000 people died. Currently the death toll has risen to approximately 25,000 people. Over 100,000 people are still too sick to work because of long-term health disability. </p>
<p>The Indian Government has been forced to address the Bhopal issue in the recent months following a June 7 verdict convicting the officials of Union Carbide&#8217;s former Indian subsidiary on charges of criminal negligence. The charges and sentence, equivalent to a traffic violation, enraged the Indian public, as did the fact the Union Carbide and its former CEO Warren Anderson have refused to appear in court to face charges of culpable homicide. Bhopal survivors say that Dow Chemical should not be allowed to continue doing business in India until its subsidiary appears in court and cleans up the site of the disaster. </p>
<p>The International Campaign for Justice for Bhopal (ICJB) is a coalition led by four survivor organizations along with environmental, social justice, progressive Indian, and human rights groups around the world. ICJB works to hold the Indian Government and Dow Chemical Corporation (the current owner of Union Carbide) accountable for the ongoing chemical disaster in Bhopal, India. It was set up to address the grave injustices suffered by the half million Bhopal Gas Disaster survivors. </p>
<p>Nuclear Liability Bill in India</p>
<p>NEW DELHI: Government has brought some fresh amendments to the Nuclear Liability Bill that are likely to trigger a fresh controversy as these could be seen as diluting the right of recourse of operator to seek damages from supplier in the event of an accident. </p>
<p>One of the 18 amendments cleared by the Union Cabinet yesterday suggests that an accident in a nuclear plant should have occurred as a consequence of an act done with an &#8220;intent&#8221; if an operator has to claim damages from supplier. </p>
<p>The amended Clause 17 says &#8220;the operator of a nuclear installation, after paying the compensation for nuclear damage in accordance with Section 6, shall have a right of recourse where &#8212; </p>
<p>(a) such right is expressly provided for in a contract in writing; </p>
<p>(b) the nuclear incident has resulted as a consequence of an act of supplier or his employees, done with the intent to cause nuclear damage, and such act includes supply of equipment or material with patent or latent defects or sub-standard services; </p>
<p>(c) the nuclear incident has resulted from the act of commission or ommission of an individual done with intent to cause nuclear damage.&#8221; </p>
<p>Experts feel that the mention of &#8220;intent&#8221; in the sub-clauses (b) and (c) regarding an accident may give a route to suppliers to escape responsibility because it would be difficult to prove intent in any such mishap. </p>
<p>This amendment in the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill, 2010 will be moved along with 17 other amendments in the Lok Sabha on August 25. </p>
<p>Significantly, neither the original bill nor the recommendations of Parliamentary Standing Committee which examined it had contained such a proposal. </p>
<p>Only earlier this week, the government had to beat a hasty retreat when a controversy arose over inclusion of a word &#8220;And&#8221; between sub-clauses (a) and (b) in Clause 17 which the BJP and Left parties feared diluted the supplier&#8217;s liability in case of an accident. </p>
<p>The government then dropped the controversial word but reworked the language of the Clause 17 in which the word &#8220;intent&#8221; has been included. </p>
<p>CPI leader D Raja reacted strongly to the fresh changes made by the government, saying these would dilute the supplier&#8217;s liability drastically. </p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t understand what they say. Disaster is a disaster. Who will agree that this was done willfully or deliberately. It is irrational and ridiculous,&#8221; he said. </p>
<p>The Left parties would look at the amendments carefully when these are brought to Parliament and decide their strategy.</p>
<p>Read more: Fresh changes in N-bill may trigger a new row &#8211; India &#8211; The Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Fresh-changes-in-N-bill-may-trigger-a-new-row/articleshow/6388939.cms#ixzz0xJX0utbm</p>
<p>Capping nuclear liability is a non-starter<br />
Soli J. Sorabjee</p>
<p>The government proposes to introduce a Civil Nuclear Liability Bill to appease foreign investors. Any legislation that attempts to dilute the Polluter Pays and Precautionary Principle and imposes a cap on liability will be in blatant defiance of Supreme Court judgments and is likely to be struck down.<br />
One of the vital guarantees in our Constitution is the protection of the Right to Life enshrined in Article 21. Our Supreme Court by creative interpretation ruled that the expression ‘life’ does not connote merely physical existence but embraces the right to live with “human dignity and all that goes along with it, namely, the bare necessaries of life such as adequate nutrition, clothing and shelter over the head.” Thereafter it further expanded the concept of the right to live with human dignity to encompass within its ambit, the protection and preservation of environment, ecological balance free from pollution of air and water.<br />
Our Constitution evinces great concern for environment. Article 48-A of the Directive Principle mandates that the state shall endeavour to protect and improve the environment. One of the fundamental duties prescribed in Article 51-A is, inter alia, to protect and improve the natural environment.<br />
Despite these constitutional provisions, pollution continues unabated. The river Ganges was brazenly polluted by the discharge of effluents by some tanneries in Kanpur who, despite notices issued by the Supreme Court to take steps for the primary treatment of industrial effluent, had utterly failed to do so. Hence the court was constrained to issue directions for the closure of the tanneries. The court was conscious that closure of tanneries may bring unemployment and loss of revenue, but it significantly ruled that “life, health and ecology have greater importance to the people.”<br />
In its landmark judgment in the Oleum Gas Leak case, the Supreme Court laid down certain important principles. A five-judge bench unanimously ruled that “an enterprise which is engaged in a hazardous or inherently dangerous industry which poses a potential threat to the health and safety of the persons working in the factory and residing in the surrounding areas owes an absolute and non-delegable duty to the community to ensure that no harm results to anyone on account of hazardous or inherently dangerous nature of the activity which it has undertaken.” The court further held that “it should be no answer to the enterprise to say that it had taken all reasonable care and that the harm occurred without any negligence on its part.”<br />
At first blush, this may appear unduly harsh. However the rationale for this rule as explained by the court is that “such hazardous or inherently dangerous activity for private profit can be tolerated only on condition that the enterprise engaged in such activity indemnifies all those who suffer on account of the carrying on of such activity regardless of whether it is carried on carefully or not.” Therefore in a case of escape of toxic gas, “the enterprise is strictly and absolutely liable to compensate all those who are affected by the accident and such liability is not subject to any of the exceptions.”<br />
In 1996 in the case of Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action Justice Jeevan Reddy speaking for the court pointed out that the rule of absolute liability is premised on the very nature of the activity carried on and “it is the enterprise carrying on the hazardous or inherently dangerous activity alone has the resource to discover and guard against hazards or dangers.” The court further introduced the Polluter Pays Principle, which according to it requires that the financial costs of preventing or remedying damage caused by pollution should lie with the undertakings that cause the pollution. Under this principle, it is not the role of government to meet the costs involved in either prevention of such damage, or in carrying out remedial action, because the effect of this would be to shift the financial burden of the pollution incident to the taxpayer. The responsibility for repairing the damage is that of the offending industry. It is noteworthy that the Polluter Pays Principle has been incorporated into the European Community Treaty as part of the new articles on environment that were introduced by the Single European Act of 1986.<br />
In its subsequent judgment in Vellore Citizens Forum, Justice Kuldip Singh speaking for the court held that “the Precautionary Principle and the Polluter Pays Principle are essential features of Sustainable Development.” This is a milestone judgment in our environmental jurisprudence. The court reaffirmed the Polluter Pays Principle laid down in its previous judgments to mean that “the absolute liability for harm to the environment extends not only to compensate the victims of pollution but also the cost of restoring the environmental degradation. Remediation of the damaged environment is part of the process of Sustainable Development and as such the polluter is liable to pay the cost to the individual sufferers as well as the cost of reversing the damaged ecology.” The seminal significance of this judgment lies in the court’s holding that the Precautionary Principle and the Polluter Pays Principle are part of the environmental law of the country and the court’s pointed reference to Articles 21, 47, 48-A, and 51-A (g) of the Constitution in this connection.<br />
The thrust of these Supreme Court judgments is for compensating and protecting the victims of accidents as part of their fundamental right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution. Under our Constitution, Supreme Court judgments constitute the law of the land and are binding on all courts, authorities and persons.<br />
It is claimed that foreign companies are reluctant to invest in India as they do not want to run the risk of having to compensate without a cap for a nuclear accident on account of imposition of absolute liability. It is understood that the government to appease the foreign investors proposes to introduce a Civil Nuclear Liability Bill whereby inter alia the compensation payable in case of a nuclear accident is capped at $450 million.<br />
In effect, this means that in case the actual damage and the cost of remedying environmental degradation exceeds the proposed ridiculously low cap of $450 million or any other sum, the government would have to bear the remaining burden. This would be directly contrary to the Supreme Court’s ruling that it is not the role of the government to meet the costs involved. The effect of a cap in reality would be to shift the financial burden of the consequences of the accident to the taxpayer. According to the Polluter Pays Principle that has been embedded in our jurisprudence, the liability and responsibility for compensating the victims of accident and remedying the environmental damage caused is that of the offending industry alone. No part of the liability can be limited nor passed on to the government.<br />
There can be two views about the advantages or disadvantages of foreign investment in India in the nuclear energy sector. But there can be only one view: health well-being and protection of our people are paramount and must override dollar considerations. Foreign multinationals are not solicitors of the fundamental rights of our people. The Bhopal Gas case is a burning reminder.<br />
Any legislation that attempts to dilute the Polluter Pays and Precautionary Principle and imposes a cap on liability is likely to be struck down as it would be in blatant defiance of the Supreme Court judgments. Moreover, it would be against the interests and the cherished fundamental right to life of the people of India whose protection should be the primary concern of any civilised democratic government.</p>
<p>if (WIDGETBOX) WIDGETBOX.renderWidget(&#8217;021c3fef-5bbe-4dc1-9ee9-abde54da3e12&#8242;);Get the <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com/widget/human-rights-watch-banner-small">Human Rights Watch banner (small)</a> widget and many other <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com/">great free widgets</a> at <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com">Widgetbox</a>! Not seeing a widget? (<a href="http://docs.widgetbox.com/using-widgets/installing-widgets/why-cant-i-see-my-widget/">More info</a>)</p>
<p>India’s Nuclear Liability Bill<br />
Chaitanya Ravi<br />
A Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill that is essential for American commercial nuclear firms to enter the US$150 billion Indian civil nuclear energy market has sharply polarized India’s political, legal and strategic communities. The government deferred the introduction of the bill in Parliament after strong opposition from India’s major opposition parties in March 2010. </p>
<p>Passage of the bill is considered important for the full implementation of the landmark Indo-US nuclear deal that was signed in December 2008. It may also result in contracts worth US$10 billion for the moribund American nuclear industry from the two reactor sites allotted to Westinghouse Electric (a unit of Toshiba) and GE Hitachi by the Indian government. Indian planners consider nuclear power to be an important part of the energy mix and aim to increase nuclear capacity from the current 4560MW (3% of total capacity) to 20,000MW by 2020 and 63,000MW by 2032.  </p>
<p>Bitter memories of past industrial accidents and pricing controversies over major power projects among India’s political and intellectual class has cast a shadow over the nuclear liability debate. India lost 3,800 people in a gas leak at the Union Carbide factory in Bhopal in 1984 and was polarized over pricing issues concerning the US$2.9 billion Enron power project. </p>
<p>At present, India is not a party to any of the four international nuclear liability conventions (the 1960 Paris Convention, the 1963 Vienna Convention, the 1997 protocol to Amend Vienna Convention and the 1997 Convention on Supplementary Liability for Nuclear Damage). Its domestic nuclear law (Atomic Energy Act of 1962) says nothing about nuclear liability or compensation for nuclear damage resulting from a nuclear accident.</p>
<p>Since all civil nuclear facilities are owned by the Central Government (Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited and the Bharat Navbhikiya Vidyut Nigam, both public sector enterprises), the liability issues arising from these installations are its responsibility. Under existing Indian legislation, foreign suppliers may face absolute, unlimited and non-delegable liability, something that prevents them from taking insurance cover. Private American firms are more affected than their government backed French and Russian counterparts. There is no clarity over trans-boundary liability issues and liability during transport of nuclear material.</p>
<p>The provisions in the bill that deal with total compensation in case of a nuclear accident and limits on the liability of the nuclear operator are the most controversial. Clause 6 caps the maximum amount of liability in case of a nuclear accident at 300 million Special Drawing Rights (SDR’s- around US$460 million or Rs2100 crore) while the liability of the operator for each nuclear incident has been capped at Rs500 crore. The government will be responsible for liability over Rs500 crore.</p>
<p>In a move that is likely to strengthen the government’s case, the country’s atomic energy establishment including Srikumar Banerjee, Chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, Anil Kakodkar and MR Srinivasan- both former Chairmen of the Atomic Energy Commission have come out in support of the deal. They have pointed out that India needs a well defined liability framework and claim that the liability bill will pave the way for India to join an international liability regime and access additional funds (if compensation claims exceed the overall cap specified in the liability bill, an additional 300 million SDR can be made available through the Convention on Supplementary Compensation). </p>
<p>Clause 3 of the bill requires the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board to notify the nuclear incident within fifteen days. Clause 9 empowers the Central Government to appoint a Claims Commissioner (or a Nuclear Damages Claims Commission if the liability exceeds Rs500 crore) for adjudicating claims for compensation and deciding awards.<br />
Opponents like anti-nuclear activist Praful Bidwai and leading strategic expert Brahma Chellaney argue that the government, by channeling the legal and financial liability to the operator is exempting foreign suppliers from the legal and financial fallout of negligence at the cost of the Indian taxpayer. </p>
<p>Former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee has termed the US$460 million cap as ‘ridiculously low’ and has argued that the legislation “attempts to dilute the Polluter Pays and the Precautionary Principle,” in “blatant defiance of Supreme Court judgments.” He reckons that the legislation “would be against the interests and the cherished fundamental right to life of the people of India whose protection should be the primary concern of any civilized government.” </p>
<p>Critics have also questioned the ten year time limit to claim compensation for any nuclear damage (Clause 18) and argue that the effects of radiation extend across generations.  They are strongly opposed to Clause 35 of the bill that prevents Civil Courts from exercising any jurisdiction over the proceedings of the Nuclear Damages Claims Commission and its final award; which according to them, is tantamount to preventing victims from suing foreign suppliers in Indian courts.</p>
<p>Bhopal and the BP Oil Spill: A Tale of Two Disasters<br />
By Madhur Singh</p>
<p>As BP struggles to contain the damage the Deepwater Horizon oil spill has caused to the Gulf of Mexico and to the people whose livelihoods depend on its waters, a legal judgment in the worst industrial catastrophe in history highlights how wrong the aftermath of such disasters can go — not just in terms of a cleanup but in the matter of justice. It is a terrifying lesson in how a corporation can evade full responsibility for one of the most heinous accidents in human history.<br />
On Monday, more than 25 years after 40 tons of highly toxic methyl isocyanate (MIC) was released from a Union Carbide plant in the central Indian city of Bhopal — killing thousands in a matter of hours and over years, rendering hundreds of thousands seriously ill and causing genetic defects in yet-to-be-born generations — a local court announced its verdict. It held eight former employees of Union Carbide India Ltd guilty of criminal negligence and sentenced seven of them to two years in prison and a fine of $2,100. (The eighth defendant died during the course of the 23-year trial.) The convicted former employees were out on bail — of just $500 each — in less than two hours. Union Carbide India, which no longer exists, was fined less than $11,000. (See the legacy of the Bhopal disaster.)<br />
The judgments are likely to be appealed. Given the speed of the wheels of justice in India, the case is likely to outlast most of the Bhopal survivors and the accused. The most prominent name in the latter category is Warren Anderson, the American CEO of Union Carbide, the U.S. parent company. He is now 89 years old. Arrested by Indian police when he visited the disaster site, he was released on bail and flew out of the country. He continues to be a fugitive from Indian law and hence has not been tried. (He is believed to be living somewhere in New York state.) At the same time, no one has been assigned responsibility for cleaning up Bhopal&#8217;s ground zero, which researchers and activists say continues to leach toxic chemicals into the groundwater, used by thousands of families. (See TIME&#8217;s 1984 cover story on the Bhopal disaster.)<br />
The outcome of the case has ignited outrage and disbelief across India. No less than the Law Minister and a former Chief Justice have said justice has been delayed and denied. The Economic Times newspaper led its front page with the headline &#8220;After 25 Years, Another Tragedy Strikes Bhopal.&#8221; &#8220;We are used to being let down,&#8221; says Rachna Dhingra of the Bhopal Group for Information and Action, her voice catching as she spoke to TIME by phone, &#8220;by our government &#8230; now even the judiciary.&#8221;<br />
The letdowns have been serious and repeated — and apparently preordained because of decisions that facilitated the disaster itself. Investigations over the years have shown that the Bhopal plant design was faulty and that there was next to no emergency preparedness — issues that the parent company in the U.S. apparently knew about, according to the groups that conducted the studies. The company was operating in India with standards unacceptable in the U.S. (See pictures of the Gulf oil spill.)<br />
The Indian government seemed to go out of its way to cushion the experience for Union Carbide. After first suing the company for $3.3 billion in 1985, New Delhi announced an out-of-court settlement of $470 million in February 1989. Then a 1996 ruling by another Supreme Court judge watered down the charges against the accused from culpable homicide (with maximum punishment of 10 years&#8217; jail term) to criminal negligence (maximum sentence two years).<br />
The various governments that have ruled India in the meantime have not taken on Union Carbide, which is now owned by Dow Chemical. Meanwhile, Keshub Mahindra, chairman of Union Carbide India Ltd at the time of the Bhopal disaster and now chairman of India&#8217;s automobile giant Mahindra &amp; Mahindra, was nominated for a civilian honor, the Padma Bhushan, in 2002. He had to decline in the face of widespread protests.<br />
Although environmental legislation was ramped up in the wake of the Bhopal disaster, companies continue to operate in India in ways that severely — if not as dramatically — pollute the environment and impact people&#8217;s health and livelihoods. Britain-based mining major Vedanta, for instance, has faced censure from Amnesty International for violating the human rights of communities in Orissa, where it operates bauxite mines. India continues to be the world&#8217;s e-waste dump. Of late, the government, keen to attract foreign investment to its nascent nuclear energy market, has been pushing a bill to limit the liability of a nuclear-plant operator to $111 million. &#8220;We&#8217;ve learned nothing from Bhopal,&#8221; says Supreme Court lawyer Prashant Bhushan. &#8220;There is a drive to attract foreign investment overwhelming all other considerations.&#8221; Opposition parties have already demanded a rethink of the proposed legislation in the face of the Bhopal outcome. (See pictures of people protesting BP.)<br />
There is still outrage that the U.S. refuses to extradite Warren Anderson to face criminal charges in India. New Delhi made the request in 2003, and it was refused the year after. U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for South Asia Robert Blake, reacting to Monday&#8217;s Bhopal verdict, said, &#8220;I don&#8217;t expect this verdict to reopen any new inquiries or anything like that. On the contrary, we hope that this is going to help to bring closure.&#8221; The Bhopal activists now plan to file a writ petition in the higher court to admit more charges against Union Carbide and Anderson, seeking an as-yet-unspecified figure for personal and property damages, health monitoring and cleanup of the site, which is likely to run into billions of dollars.<br />
Indians point at the way the U.S. government is now confronting BP — holding it squarely responsible for the oil spill and accountable for all cleanup costs — as a stark contrast to the way their own government has dealt with Union Carbide. The hope in India is that U.S. courts will be more amenable to the requests of Bhopal&#8217;s victims now that America has a huge environmental disaster in its own backyard. The Bhopal activists say the Indian government must join the case in the U.S. as a plaintiff (indeed, it owns the land on which the Union Carbide factory was located). &#8220;Prime Minister Manmohan Singh should be inspired by President Obama&#8217;s recent commitment toward making BP pay every cent for its oil spill,&#8221; says Satinath Sarangi of the Bhopal Group for Information and Action. &#8220;And the U.S. government must follow the same standards on corporate liability for U.S. corporations operating in India as it expects for corporations operating in the U.S.&#8221;<br />
See the world&#8217;s top 10 environmental disasters.<br />
See pictures of critters caught in the Gulf oil spill.</p>
<p>BP and Union Carbide:<br />
Corporate Responsibility or Corporate Liability<br />
by Mukesh Williams</p>
<p>Two momentous events separate in time and location have seared our consciousness—the British (Beyond) Petroleum Gulf Coast oil spill on April 20, 2010 and the American Union Carbide Bhopal Gas Tragedy in December 3, 1984. Twenty five years separate these two environmental and human disasters but the greed of big multinational corporations in connivance with state and central agencies still remains insatiable. With a keen eye on profit, big companies compromise safety standards, falsify data, overstate their strength, underestimate their drawbacks, bribe officials, lobby for protection and misinform the public. It is rather difficult to fuse ethical economic standards with ravenous profit-making schemes. Though oil and gas stink most multinational corporations love it.</p>
<p>The neo-classical model of economics has reduced our land and environment to a mere abstraction that can be exploited in terms of supply and demand without compunction. Big companies continue to wreck havoc on our human and natural systems devastating our lives in the name of human progress and development. At such moments we often wonder where is the fashionable concept called social corporate responsibility that is often taught as a philanthropic and ethical tool in business management departments to unsuspecting students. Corporate greed like all other forms of human greed need to be kept under strict check by international pay czars or up-to-date legislation based on global standards with teeth for swift punishment. Also the rhetoric of corporate companies must be separated from what they actually do, how long they do what they do, and what they hide. A constant monitoring system both on the part of governments and private groups must be effectively installed in collaboration with the media to thwart their nefarious activities and ulterior motives. </p>
<p>Union Carbide Bhopal Gas Tragedy 1984</p>
<p>Early this month the Indian Supreme Court passed a verdict indicting the American CEO of Union Carbide Warren Anderson who was allowed to escape to the United States twenty five years ago possibly with the connivance of either the state or central agencies in India. Now both the Congress government and state ministries are trying to escape their involvement in the murky plot. Who wanted the truth then? And who wants the truth now? The declassified CIA report of December 8, 1984 and recent revelations by the principal secretary of Rajiv Gandhi, P. C. Alexander, point to political intrigue involving both state and center in releasing Anderson. Now some leaders claim that the worsening law and order situation in Bhopal in the wake of the accident forced Chief Minister Arjun Singh to provide a safe corridor to Anderson out of the country. Some like Rajinder Puri even see the direct hand of Rajeev Gandhi himself. It seems that US President Ronald Reagan phoned Rajeev Gandhi to release Anderson. The media would like us to believe that even P. Chidambaram and Kamal Nath were campaigning for Dow Chemical to get special concessions so it could invest in India. The chief minister of Gujarat Narendra Modi criticized Sonia Gandhi for the complicity of the Congress Party in the murky affair but it has come to light that he had signed an MOU between state public sector company Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd and Dow Chemicals in April 2008. This is the case of the pot calling the kettle black.</p>
<p>Seemingly neither the American nor the Indian establishments saw the industrial disaster as the responsibility of the MNC Union Carbide. The company was bought by Dow Chemical Company in 1999 further camouflaging accountability. Dow Chemical was the second biggest Texas polluting company in 2009 and paid 1.14 million USD on eight counts of pollution. Now it is investing again in India with the syrupy connivance of people in power.</p>
<p>Even after 25 years the public would like to know if it was Arjun Singh the chief minister of Madhya Pradesh or influential persons in Rajiv Gandhi’s government at the center or the prime minister himself responsible for giving a free passage to Anderson to fly back to the U.S. India has an extradition treaty with the United States and under changed circumstances today when America itself is suffering from another MNC BP, there might be possibility of bringing the fugitive CEO back to justice if India can put together enough evidence. Greenpeace believes that in the 1982 safety audit of the Bhopal factory in the US addressed thirty safety hazards. Anderson knew about them and compromised safety standards causing the death of 20,000 people and affecting 578,000 to date. To make the tragedy reprehensible the out of court settlement made Union Carbide pay a sum of 470 million USD instead of 3.5 billion initially demanded, with each victim getting a measly sum of 550 USD in 1989. In the same year Exxon oil spill in Prince William Sound Alaska forced the company to pay 5 billion USD of which it paid half. Even today there is 425 tons of hazardous waste in Bhopal left by Union Carbide that needs to be cleaned. Who will do it—Dow Chemical or the Indian state government? </p>
<p>Anderson now 90 years lives in a luxury home worth 900,000 USD at 929 Ocean Road, Bridgehampton, Long Island, New York. He is now less of a fugitive and more of a monarch (Sonnenfeld, 1991). It is obvious that in many cases justice delayed is justice denied. Should we stop big companies from doing business? Should we impose heavy penalty on erring foreign companies? Or should we reform the slow and cumbrous judicial system? Jeremy Kahn writing in The Faster Times calls for judicial reform rather than protectionism (Kahn, 2010). The Indian Parliament is debating a law capping liability for foreign nuclear power companies involved in disasters to pay 100 million USD a pittance when compared to the US demand of 100 billion USD from BP. Then Indian law capping liability lacks teeth and may not cover non-nuclear companies. So they can pollute as of before.</p>
<p>British or Beyond Petroleum </p>
<p>The British are desperate to save BP from going down by bringing silly arguments like BP has been a part of America since it merged with American energy Amoco in 1998 and acquired the Gulf of Mexico drilling rights (The Independent, “Cameron Warns Obama over Criticizing BP” 13 June 2010). The new British Prime Minister David Cameron has also chipped in underscoring the sustained “economic importance” of BP to both Britain and America. American President Barrack Obama however is needled by US senators, whose states have been ravaged by oil spills, to push for 100 billion USD compensation, which if realized would force BP to go bankrupt. The British media believes that Obama’s anti-British rhetoric is testing Anglo-American relations. Obama claims that American relation with Britain has not been affected. The environmental disaster caused by a British multinational company should have nothing to do with national identity but corporate liability. Obama has called BP the Swedish Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg, who earns a fat cat salary of 3.8 million USD, to the White House for consultations. </p>
<p>The British are cut up with Obama’s off the cuff remark that he would have fired BP’s chief executive Tony Hayward if the latter had worked for him. With US pressure rising BP may not pay its quarterly dividends which are essential to maintain equilibrium for UK pension funds. The 6.7% shares lunge in the FTSE has adversely affected pension funds in the UK. If the status quo is not altered by American pressure groups BP might only have to pay 20 to 37 billion USD provided it can be proved that BP failed to meet safety regulations in the deep sea oil drilling. </p>
<p>Now BP is using two kinds of dispersants manufactured by Nalco—Corexit 9500 and Corexit EC 9527A. Corexit (deodorized kerosene) is banned in the United Kingdom as even 2.61 ppm can kill 50% of fish in 96 hours. The dispersants turn the oil slick into small particulates which settle on the sea bed and make things look clean on the surface, but they destroy marine life below. Corexit however is on the approved list of dispersants by the US Environmental Protection Agency though the EPA has advised BP to use less toxic dispersants. BP however refused citing lack of availability. The toxicity of the present dispersants increase when they get mixed with oil. BP has links with Nalco. BPs has poured 1,621,000 gallons of dispersants in the Gulf of Mexico to contain the oil spill and has ordered for an additional 805,000 gallons. The ill effects of the dispersant on humans can result in various diseases, reduced growth, kidney failure and death. </p>
<p>The British rely on BP as the national icon and savior of British deficit. Last year BP paid 1.4 billion dollars in taxes on its profits. The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is too far away for the ordinary Britons but the pension funds and BP dividends are closer home.</p>
<p>It stands to logic that a “large, wealthy company” which is eager to pay 1.8 billion quarterly dividends to its shareholders and whose last year’s sales and operating revenues were 239 billion USD, should pay 100 billion USD in damages. Since the oil spill began on April 22, 2010 till June 15, 2010, 55 days have gone by. And if we estimate the oil spill at 50,000 barrels a day it comes to 27500000 gallons. If each gallon spill is fined 4300 USD as the US is suggesting the actual fine would come to 118,250,000,000 that is about 118 billion USD. These figures may not be exact and are vigorously contested by BP which would like to work with half the numbers. However the end is not in sight. According to BP officials it would not be before August that the spill can be contained. If this is true then the figure could be doubled and BP would have to pay damages amounting to all the revenue it earned through sales last year. </p>
<p>Both the American government and public are hopeful that since earlier erring companies like Texaco was forced into bankruptcy in 1987 after paying 10.53 billion USD claim, BP too would have to cough up huge sums. And BP’s reputation does not help a wee bit whatever they claim to the contrary in those daily briefings on the Internet. BP is known as one of the “ten worst corporations” in the world when evaluated on their environmental pollution and infringement of their human rights record. It also has the dubious distinction of being the most polluting company in the United States vis-à-vis EPA toxic release data of 1991. It has been fined 1.7 million USD for burning polluted gases at its Ohio refinery. It also paid 10 million USD fine to the EPA in July 2000 for mismanaging the US oil refineries. The US Public Interest Research Group or PIRG claims that between Jan 1997 and March 1998, BP was involved in 104 oil spills. Obviously a lot of wealthy shareholders, 37% on the British and 31 % on the American side do not want this to happen. </p>
<p>BP’s propaganda regarding its CSR is highly effective as it tries to highlight only the positive aspects of what it has done. In the past BP has invested some money in alternate fuel and green technologies but it has been criticized for proving private funds to public universities of the California Bay Area and closing down its green technology office in London. Its critics call its green technology projects as green washing projects. BP is also a leading producer of solar panels and holds 20% of the global market in this area and it uses this fact to great advantage for image building. It operates the ampm convenience store chain in the US and other countries and is the leading producer of wind power. It is also involved in funding local and international politics. It gave 5 million USD to democrats and republicans in 1990 and spent 16 million USD in lobbing at the US Congress. The moral of the story is that it is not as clean as it claims, nor concerned with the lives of common people unless it serves its purpose or national interest.</p>
<p>BP in its regional spill plan for the Gulf of Mexico and site plan for the Deepwater Horizon rig understated the dangers and overstated its preparedness in the eventuality of a leak. Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal criticized BP for being ‘reactive’ and not ‘proactive’ from the very beginning. Now BP’s report is examined quite critically and it has been discovered that an expert professor listed in its 2009 response plan died in 2005. It lists walruses, sea otters, sea lions and seals as “sensitive biological resources” when none inhabit the Gulf of Mexico. Also names and phone numbers of marine specialists and marine network officers in Louisiana and Florida are not correct. The Justice Department has to find evidence that BP destroyed key documents or lied to the government (The Daily Yomiuri, June 11, 2010).</p>
<p>Corporate Social Responsibility</p>
<p>Corporate social responsibility is one of the modern movements like environmental or tribal movements that have become the buzz word in both business and academic circles. Both businessmen and academics are cashing upon the divine benefits of CSR making more money for their companies and jobs for their departments. Middle level managers and professors have extolled about the virtues of CSR with other buzz words such as people friendly, eco friendly and sustainable. We have come to hear about the unselfishly egalitarian aspects of CSR. It is really a wondrous transformation of the greed-driven capitalist economy of which the corporate system is a byproduct. </p>
<p>Most critics of CSR are not against it per se but against the recent hype associated with it as a panacea of all corporate evils. It is hard to believe that companies are out there not to make profit. We are not talking of basket cases but any company worth its salt aggressively markets itself to make real profit. And what’s wrong in it. Companies are floated for this very purpose both by the shareholders and managers. But in a changed climate of political advocacy of human rights against corporate greed, CSR seems to a new combative tool for companies to be both politically correct and make money as usual. The problem however is that if business corporations give an inch they take a mile.</p>
<p>Definitions and Objections to CSR</p>
<p>In the United States CSR is seen as philanthropy while others see it as improving society, workforce and government. There are arguments in favor of CSR where it is believed that it can support the social fabric of society and promote responsible business practices. But CSR is usually presented as a marketing strategy that articulates business performance rather than encompass social and ethical standards. The recent collapse of American business and manufacturing sectors has revealed the gap between CSR and actual self-regulation. Some CSR models take the company beyond the law into providing public benefits, increase sales, market shares, brand position, retain employees, reduce operating costs and increase investments (Baron, 2001 7-45). There are models of CSR that take into account competitive advantage, positioning, commitment, organizational integration, shareholder’s cooperation and self-correction. CSR helps to create a positive image of a company and brings it rich dividends. Though there are many definitions of CSR we must see CSR as the way business companies conduct their core business not the sops they give to society.</p>
<p>A common objection leveled against CSR comes from the advocates of the laissez faire system who complain that CSR infringes upon the human rights of company shareholders as company managers unilaterally divert company resources to society in the name of better management (Sternberg, 1999). Detractors of CSR complain that there should be a stakeholder claim in CSR as to how it is done. A business corporation should be fair and honest to both the shareholders and customers. CSR therefore depends on the model a company chooses and the reasons for its choice. If a company uses CSR for image building through philanthropy it leads to both ethical and human rights problems. You cannot give away money which ultimately belongs to someone else. On the flipside it also follows that if stakeholders possess sole rights they also should bear full responsibility when there are environmental or social disasters. However if a CSR model seeks a consensus of both stakeholders and company managers then it must become more open to the public. CSR must concentrate upon building customer relationships, attracting talented people, conducting risk management and building the company’s reputation. </p>
<p>Corporate Reputation and CSR</p>
<p>Corporate business companies such as BP or Coca Cola cannot ignore their reputation as about 90 to 95 percent of their assets are intangibles and the remainder immovable property. Big companies such as General Electric, IBM or Motorola use the rhetoric of CSR to show public responsibility and environmental concerns but while conducting hard-nosed bullying business practices are not so transparent in their dealings. A few years ago Sir John Browne of BP was praised for his aggressive promotion of BP while providing environmental leadership but now we come to know that all along BP compromised on safety costs in oil drilling. This is happening in a powerful country like the United States where both politics and laws are strong. Had it happened in a developing or a poor country, things would have been quite different. BP would have gotten away cheaply and Union Carbide once did.</p>
<p>CSR invariably works for companies and countries with resources and political clout. It is not for companies which are small and weak. Small companies fight for survival, cut costs to make ends meet and do not possess precious resources to waste on CSR. Nor can they follow up on legal battles if they come under the scanner. They function in a world of poverty, deprivation and loss. </p>
<p>Conclusion</p>
<p>It is no longer tenable to follow neo-classical economics of Smith, Mill and Bacon that the world is made for us and for us alone. We must eschew the economic theories of Pareto and Hayek as we can no longer treat nature as a mere variable and commodity. Depreciation of ecological assets has taken place at an increasing fast rate. Economics should no longer be about inflation, economic value of goods or maximization of income. It should take into account our natural world as property that belongs to every one of us (McNeill, Padua, Rangarajan, 2010 1-3). We must learn new lessons from ecological economics and environmental history and change the way we do business. We must rein in corporate greed by modifying corporate social responsibility (CSR) to corporate legal liability (CLL) and connect it to governmental deterrence, legal action and international treaties to scare the hell out of the merchants of greed and death who have many supporters in different parts of the world.</p>
<p>An Analysis of Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill 2010<br />
- Professor Madabhushi Sridhar</p>
<p>In recent times, no draft law has generated such a commotion among various sections of people as the Civil Liability of Nuclear Damage Bill 2010 has. This article is an attempt to explain and analyze the Bill with the background of law of liability that evolved over a period of time.<br />
I. Background<br />
Because developing India needs more power to meet increasing demands and it is not self-sufficient in nuclear fuel; India is importing it. Following the successful clinching of the Indo-US Nuclear deal, on October 10, 2008, India contemplated an ambitious goal to increase 5-fold the amount of electricity produced from nuclear power plants to 20,000 MWe by 2020 to be further increased to 63,000 MWe by 2032. Then India will be producing 25 percent of its electricity from nuclear power plants by 2050. India’s present production of electricity through nuclear power is 3981 MWe. Thus it offers very lucrative field for nuclear reactor manufacturing MNCs of US and other countries.<br />
Nuclear Power or Nuclear Market? Whether India’s claim that it is a nuclear power is true or not, it is now being considered as a big nuclear market. The US was in forefront in imposing isolating sanctions over India after it declared itself as ‘nuclear weapon power’ with five explosion tests on May 11 and 13, 1998. Thereafter, the US changed its policy and offering unprecedented cooperation in the field of nuclear power in India, radically reversed the situation in 2005. The US lobby has even coerced international community to accept India as legitimate partner in civilian nuclear trade.  The 45-member Nuclear Supplier Group (NSG) on September 6, 2008 granted a unique waiver to India also.  The Indo-US nuclear deal initially appeared to be bilateral, later it gradually opened up doors to the global nuclear market. This market remained out of bounds for India since first its nuclear test conducted by India on May 18, 1974 with the plutonium obtained from the spent fuel rods of the nuclear reactor CIRUS supplied by Canada to India onto the path of developing capabilities to generate nuclear power (only) for “peaceful” purposes. But west did not believe this ‘peaceful’ adjective of India, which perhaps now believes. Thus the Indo-U.S. nuclear deal has cleared many international obstacles to the import of enriched uranium, nuclear fuel, and related technologies, and opened the door for subsequent similar deals with countries such as France and Russia. It is in the interest of global market need to deal with India which has a potential scope as purchaser of reactors, which the American and other industry is looking at.<br />
While US desires to grab this market through its own MNCs and prevent nuclear industrial giants from other western countries from taking it over, India too was anxious to fall in line to attract the US companies involved in nuclear commerce such as General Electric and Westinghouse. But only major hindrance the global market considered is the baffling liability for nuclear accidents. As the population is dense, damage could be severe in case of nuclear tragedy their profit range would drastically fall. They are prevailing over the law makers in India to introduce this kind of law limiting their liability or providing a kind of certainty as to the quantum of possible liability. Even the insurance lobby is bringing pressure to limit its ‘risk’. The main aim of this bill appears to fulfill the desire of MNCs by which they could secure insurance cover for a fixed amount in their home state. The aims and objectives of the bill are written in very attractive way saying – it is to legally and financially bind the operator and the government to provide relief to the affected population in the case of a nuclear accident. The developments in international nuclear community in recent years circling around India suggest that the US might have linked the completion of the Indo-US nuclear agreement to India’s capping of nuclear liability.<br />
In his analytical article, Mr. Sukla Sen[1] says that India is paying back for the generosity of US and explained US pressure behind the bill:<br />
This Bill is generally being looked upon as a continuum of that process, allegedly, in order to ensure a “level playing field” for the American enterprises – to let them have a significant share of the cake[2] – the Indian nuclear market – a part payback for the American generosity bestowed upon India, for its very own reasons though. The move had, however, been first conceived by the then NDA government way back in 1999[3].  When the US Secretary Of State, Hillary Clinton, visited India in July 2009[4], there were talks of the Bill getting passed by the Indian Parliament. But nothing of that sort happened. Again in late November 2009, when Singh was to meet Obama in Washington DC[5], there was talk of getting the Bill enacted. Even then, it did not happen. The Union Cabinet had dutifully approved the Bill just on the eve of the visit though. With Manmohan Singh to visit the US to attend the Nuclear Security Summit, called by President Barack Obama, slated to be held on April 12-13[6] the government was again trying to push it through. Never mind the considerable cooling off of Indo-US relations in the meanwhile as compared to the George Bush days[7].<br />
Another famous critique, Praful Bidwai[8] wrote about US interest in maximizing its business and hurry preventing the competition from other western countries:<br />
The US evidently wants a share of India’s nuclear power pie for American corporations and is loath to see the French and the Russians cornering the bulk of the new atomic power projects that have been made possible by the US-India nuclear deal and its endorsement by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group—secured by Washington. But so crude is the application of the US pressure, as usual, that it is somewhat counterproductive…. Besides being messy, such a compromise would still leave the bill’s basic flaws unaddressed.<br />
The discreet demand to limit the liability itself reflects lack of concern for human lives, exposing them to nuclear accidents and also represents disinterest in shouldering responsibility for damaging consequences. If ‘absolute liability’ law remains in force the western MNC considers it as a big financial burden. It is evident that they do not worry about the fatal consequences of lethal nuclear accidents. Without the fear of huge damages and criminal liability how any MNC will realize responsibility to improve safety? It might be in their business interest the MNCs are pressurizing the third world to make a law for limiting their liability, with a veiled threat that otherwise none would provide fuel and technology to any Indian nuclear power plant. But why the states under rule of law with welfare objective which are expected to secure the lives of the people, offering these exemptions and immunities? Is it not inhuman that no nuclear exporting country or company is willing to undertake the responsibility of safety in operations and maintenance of the plant in a country to which it has sold nuclear fuel, generator and technology? Their liability to the human lives and environment depend upon their fault and not on their undertaking. It is unreasonable to desire to share only benefit and relinquish responsibility.<br />
II. Emerging Liability Jurisprudence<br />
As per the international and domestic Environmental law principles, polluter has to pay. If there is a nuclear accident caused by the MNC, it will be that polluter, which has to bear the burden. The expression payment means compensating the loss totally. There are various principles of liability that evolved over a period of time in UK, US and India.<br />
1.       Fault based liability, where the victim has to prove the fault of the wrong doer, while the defendant will get a chance to plead absence of negligence or fault etc.<br />
2.       Strict liability or no fault liability, where the wrong doer will be liable with or without proof of fault by the claimant.<br />
3.       Absolute Liability:  stricter than the strict liability, where person engaged in hazardous and dangerous activity would be liable to pay for every loss. Principle of absolute liability is laid down by Supreme Court in Shriram Gas Leak case: Where an enterprise is engaged in a hazardous or inherently dangerous activity and harm results to any one on account of an accident or in the operation of such hazardous or inherently dangerous activity resulting for example, escape of toxic gas, the enterprise is strictly and absolutely liable to compensate all those who are affected by the accident and such liability is not subject to any of the exceptions which operate vis-à-vis the tortuous principle of strict liability under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher.[9].<br />
4.       Product Liability: Whatever may be the consequence of the use of the product, if that resulted in any loss or harm, it is the bounden duty of the producer of the product to compensate the loss. It is a kind of product related strict liability, which exempts non-interfering middle agencies such as links between maker and seller. (Donogue v Stevenson[10]). If nuclear reactor is defective, and that caused an accident, more than an operator it is the maker or supplier to take up the responsibility of defective product i.e. the reactor and be liable.<br />
On February 14, 1989 the Supreme Court[11], based on earlier settlement, directed the Union Carbide to pay up US $ 470 million in “full and final settlement” of all claims, rights, and liabilities arising out of the disaster in 1984. The entire suit was ordered to be settled with a view to provide ‘immediate and substantial relief to the victims, essentially on the following conditions:<br />
(1)     The Union Carbide Corporation shall pay a sum of US $ 470 million (approximately 750 Crores) to the Union of India in full settlement of all claims, rights and liabilities related to and arising out of the Bhopal Gas disaster;<br />
(2)     All Civil proceedings arising out of the Bhopal Gas disaster shall stand concluded in terms of the settlement and all criminal proceedings related to and arising out of the disaster shall stand quashed wherever these may be pending..<br />
In response to criticism from several quarters, and review petitions were filed by several action groups, the Supreme Court decided in 1991[12] upholding the settlement except the condition of quashing criminal charges. The Supreme Court has set aside the quashing of the Criminal proceedings being not justified and said that those proceedings would continue[13]. The UPA Government’s bill with liability limitations had several clauses against these norms debated during Bhopal litigation.<br />
Unlimited liability: Common law and law of Torts impose liability in tune with the loss as part of civil rights of the people, besides inevitable criminal liability. Over a period of time the tort law gave rise to ‘strict liability’ (Rylands v Fletcher[14]) without expecting victim to prove the fault of wrong doer, and at a later stage, developed a stricter law of liability called ‘absolute liability’ (Sri Ram Gas leak case[15]) where the wrong doers will be asked to pay compensation to all those who suffered because of their dangerous activity irrespective of their diligence, absence of negligence or lack of proof of fault. The legal regime has traveled so long that to go back from these well established norms will be a retrograde step without justification.<br />
Primarily the liability is fault based. But most of the systems under rule of law have already working with ‘strict liability’ or no-fault liability principle to ensure quick realization of compensation from the industries causing disasters. The Supreme Court of India in Sriram gas leak case and other cases has rightly come out with new principle of ‘absolute liability’ where defences are reduced to a bare minimum and proof of negligence is totally done away with.<br />
Supreme Court said in Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum vs Union of India[16]..“once the activity carried on is hazardous or potentially hazardous, the person carrying on such activity is liable to make good the loss caused to any other person by his activity irrespective … whether he took reasonable care….” This absolute liability “extends not only to compensate the victims of pollution but also the cost of restoring the environmental degradation…”<br />
The provisions of liability and limitation on the controversial bill 2010 are in contradiction with the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principles, which are internationally accepted norms. These norms were also upheld and made law by the Supreme Court in relation to fundamental constitutional rights. It is not proper for any body to involve in potentially harmful activities.  Those who indulge in inherently dangerous activity should bear cost of all consequences of accidents, without availing any defences recognized for ‘strict liability’ in Rylands v Fletcher[17] principle. Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 has codified this absolute liability principle as explained by the apex court, which amounts to legislative validation.<br />
Even in Motor Vehicle Accidents, the liability towards third party is unlimited, which means whatever is the loss caused to third party by the involvement of automobile, the owner will be liable to compensate which of course is done by insurance company through compulsory insurance. After Motor Vehicle legislation, the Public Liability Insurance Act introduced another involuntary insurance for industrial disasters. Thus the law of unlimited liability for inherently dangerous operations is already in operation wherever the Motor Vehicle laws are enforced, it was extended to industry by legislation, and it was effectively evolved and approved by the apex court in India with greater emphasis. The idea of limiting the liability is not in tune with any norms and thus not acceptable. Any industry-specific law imposing liability must provide compensation for every loss covering the maximum possible damage. No such law can limit it to an average or minimum or probable damage for the victims of an accident. An Automobile can spell disaster to the family of victim, who has every right to seek restitution of loss. Motor Vehicle Act provided for it, and also evolved insurance mechanism to realize it. The premium paid to insurance company is no way proportionate to the size of the risk it is going to cover in a year. In spite of increase in number of accidents, the insurance companies are not going bankrupt because the losses and payments are still less in number because of various factors. When it was asked to compensate a particular victim of a particular motor vehicle, insurance company cannot say no. Restitution of the parties to the position prior to accident is the aim of ‘compensation’.  If this norm is fine for motor vehicle accident, why not extend it to cover victims of nuclear accident also?<br />
Limitation on Liability is Unconstitutional: The eminent jurist, and former Attorney General, Soli Sorabjee has explained the legal position and viability of this proposed legislation[18]: Any legislation that attempts to dilute the norms of ‘Polluter Pays’[19] and ‘Precautionary Principle’ and imposes a cap on liability is likely to be struck down as it would be in blatant defiance of the law laid down by the Supreme Court judgments. In Indian Council of Enviro-Legal case[20], the Court ruled that according to this principle;<br />
…once the activity carried on is hazardous or inherently dangerous, the person carrying on such activity is liable to make good the loss caused to any other person by his activity irrespective of the fact whether he took reasonable care while carrying on his activity. The rule is premised upon the very nature of the activity carried on. … It is that the enterprise (carrying on the hazardous or inherently dangerous activity) alone has the resource to discover and guard against hazards or dangers – and not the person affected and the practical difficulty (on the part of the affected person) in establishing the absence of reasonable care or that the damage to him was foreseeable by the enterprise[21].<br />
The apex court also ruled in the above judgment that the responsibility for repairing the damage is that of the offending industry[22] and imposed on the offending industry the obligation for carrying out necessary remedial measures to repair the environmental damage caused[23].<br />
A three judge bench of the Supreme Court in Vellore Citizens’[24] case reaffirmed this point in these terms:<br />
“The Polluter Pays Principle as interpreted by this Court means that the absolute liability for harm to the environment extends not only to compensate the victims of pollution but also the cost of restoring the environmental degradation. Remediation of the damaged environment is part of the process of “Sustainable Development” and as such the polluter is liable to pay the cost to the individual sufferers as well as the cost of reversing the damaged ecology”[25].<br />
Apart from these profound judicial pronouncements, the constitutionally guaranteed rights of people in general also need to be secured. It would be against the interests and the cherished fundamental right to life of the people whose protection should be the primary concern of any civilized democratic government. The Supreme Court reiterated that “the Precautionary Principle and the Polluter Pays Principle have been accepted as part of the law of the land” and referred to Articles 21, 47, 48-A and 51-A(g) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court further held that “the onus of proof” is on the actor or the developer/industrialist to show that his action is environmentally benign”[26].<br />
With regard to measure of compensation also the Supreme Court was very specific: In Shriram gas leak case it said:<br />
We would also like to point out that the measure of compensation in the kind of cases referred to in the preceding paragraph must be correlated to the magnitude and capacity of the enterprise because such compensation must have a deterrent effect. The larger and more prosperous the entire, greater must be the amount of compensation payable by it for the harm caused on account of an accident in the carrying on of the hazardous or inherently dangerous activity by the enterprise.<br />
III. Problematic Provisions of Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill<br />
There are four major problems with the Bill:<br />
1.       It caps the total liability for a nuclear mishap, however serious, at as little as 300 million SDR (Special Drawing Rights), and the liability for the operators of nuclear facilities to Rs.500 crore.<br />
2.       It imposes liability only on the operator, which means statutory exemption to plant designers, manufacturers and suppliers.<br />
3.       It leaves the determination of the occurrence and gravity of a nuclear accident exclusively to the four claims commissions at four zones under Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB), which means a non-judicial executive body, would determine the losses in contradiction to existing law.<br />
4.       It bars the post-mishap period for which the operator is liable to only 10 years. If compared with Bhopal tragedy, as per this Bill, the plant owners (now Dow Chemicals) will not be responsible for continuous damage being caused.<br />
The crucial clause that limits liability is 6 (2) which says: The liability of an operator for each nuclear incident shall be rupees five hundred crores. The Clause 7 (1) provides: The Central Government shall be liable for nuclear damage in respect of a nuclear incident. (a) Where liability exceeds the amount of liability of an operator specified under sub-section of section 6; (b) occurring in a nuclear installation owned by it. Furthermore, the Clause 6 (1) provides: The maximum amount of liability in respect of each nuclear incident shall be the rupee equivalent of three hundred million Special Drawing Rights. It means that in case of the power plants the quantum of “liability” is “three hundred million US $ Special Drawing Rights” or equal to the “maximum” (i.e. total) “liability” of 450 million US $.  The lower quantum of “rupees five hundred crores” will apply only in case of nuclear power plants operated by private companies. As of now, there is no such private plant. Because there are specific provisions referring to operator, it is inferred that there would be private operators in future. Some are apprehensive of the possibility that public sector undertakings alone would be operators and thus the bill imposes liability on operator only. In case the operators are public sector bodies alone, limiting their liability is considered as an appropriate provision.<br />
If the operators are private parties, there are apprehensions about their safety adherence. There is higher number of safety hazards unique to nuclear industry and the nuclear power plants are suspected to be potentially catastrophic, as proved in the Chernobyl Disaster. Will it be proper to hand over such a vulnerable industry with dangerous tendencies of killing people and destroying environment, to private hands with reduced liability law?<br />
There are immunity clauses where the operator is exempted. Clause 5 (1) says operator will not be liable for damage as a consequence of (i) a grave natural disaster of exceptional character and (ii) an act of armed conflict, civil war, hostility, civil war, insurrection or terrorism. Clause 5(ii) offers six excuses for an operator to escape liability. Clause 5(2) says the operator shall not be liable for damage caused to nuclear installation or to any property connected to installation or damage caused to the means of transport upon which nuclear material involved was carried at the time of nuclear incident. The bill also says the operator of a nuclear power plant will be liable for all accidents, including those that occur during the transport of the material. Of course, force majeure occurrences such as armed conflicts, natural calamities, terrorist attacks, etc., are excluded.<br />
The maximum financial liability in case of an accident in nuclear reactors which has been set at the rupee equivalent of 300 million or Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) as per clause 6 is considered meager in comparison to the destruction caused by a nuclear accident. Especially when a similar law in US has set the financial liability for such accident at $10.5 billion, why there should be such a low limit in India? Clause 2(p) of Bill says Special Drawing Rights are as determined by International Monitory Fund. It is very clear as to who will decide the quantum of damages to compensate the damage.<br />
There is further sharing of liability among liable groups as defined by clause 7,  which states that the operator will have to pay Rs. 500 crore and the remaining amount will be paid by the Indian government. By this law the Central Government also undertook to bear the damage from nuclear incident caused by grave natural disaster, or terrorism, or damage caused to nuclear installation owned by it. Because these are defences which immune the operator totally. Does it mean that private operators are free to operate reactors in existing nuclear installations, and cause any damage to those government installations without any fear of liability?<br />
The limits spelt in the Bill would mean immunity to certain sections which are otherwise liable. The clause 17 deals with the liability in case of a nuclear accident. It allows only the operator to sue the manufacturers and suppliers, i.e., victims will not be able to sue them. Combined reading these clauses will lead to an understanding that no one will, in fact, be legally liable because the recourse taken by the operator will yield only Rs. 500 crore at maximum. If written into the contract, the operator can claim the liabilities from the manufacturer and supplier as per that contract. This is purely between the product maker and supplier and operator. But the maximum amount payable by the foreign companies, as per this bill will be limited to a meager sum of Rs. 500 crore.<br />
In sum and substance, this bill envisages to<br />
a)      prohibit the victims to sue operator for beyond Rs. 500 crore,<br />
b)     prohibit operator from getting more than Rs 500 crore from supplier or manufacturer,<br />
c)      prohibit victims from suing suppliers or manufacturers directly,<br />
d)      prohibit the courts of law from hearing the claims, and prohibit the claims beyond ten years from date of nuclear accident.<br />
Mr. Sukla Sen[27] analysed and compared the liability amounts with the Bhopal tragedy saying:<br />
In case of Bhopal Gas Disaster, the Supreme Court had approved a deal between UCC and Union of India providing compensation to the victims amounting to US$ 470 million. That was way back in 1989, more than two decades ago. Even at that time this was considered grossly inadequate. So, while whatever cap on “liability” is unacceptable; this cap on total “liability” or the “maximum amount of liability”, as the draft Bill has put it, is woefully paltry. More so, given the fact that a catastrophic nuclear accident may very well dwarf the Bhopal Gas Disaster in terms of devastations. In case of Chernobyl Disaster, while no precise estimate of total economic impact is available, as per one report, the total “spending [only] by [neighboring] Belarus on Chernobyl between 1991 and 2003 was more than US $ 13 billion.  That’s incomparably larger as compared to the “maximum liability” pegged in the Bill – 450 million US $! The second tier of compensation amounting to Rs. 2,100 crore is to be met by the government.<br />
If we take inflation since 1984 into account, even the Bhopal settlement would be $1.5 billion today – about three times higher than the Bill’s ceiling. Though the Bill allows for the raising or lowering of liability up to Rs. 100 crore, it offers no remedy. Besides, this is an arbitrary power given in the state’s hands. Thus limiting the liability in terms of rupees also does not help the victims and largely benefits an MNC involved in irresponsible operation of the nuclear industry. It makes no sense to let manufacturers and suppliers of nuclear plant and equipment off the liability hook. If defective designs are the root causes of a mishap (as in Bhopal), the designer must be made liable for the consequences of that mishap. Or else, we will end up punishing a subordinate agency, like the Indian subsidiary of Union Carbide, while exonerating the culpable parent[28].<br />
Another point of view is that this legislation is necessary because the Indian Atomic Energy Act of 1962 has no provision for liability or compensation in the event of a nuclear accident even though India operates 18 nuclear power plants.<br />
The Bill provides for increase and decrease also. The Central Government may, having regard to the extent of risk involved in a nuclear installation by notification, either increase or decrease the amount of liability of the operator. Assessing the loss and imposing liability is supposed to be done by an independent adjudicator like court of law or special tribunal in each individual case separately. Giving power to the Government to increase or decrease the amount liability by issuing notification, which again amounts to ‘executive limitation’ on overall size of the liability, which is against principles of justice and cannot work out in actually providing relief and compensation to the victims.<br />
One interesting feature of the Bill is that it recognizes that the consequences of a nuclear accident may not be limited to national borders and provides for liability outside India’s territory too. But it makes no provision for enforcing that liability. It is practically almost impossible to enforce such liability beyond territory. It appears we traveling from progressive statutory absolute liability rule to statutory corporate immunity regime.<br />
Right of Recourse: Although the bill channels all liability for a nuclear accident to the operator of the facility, Clause 17 of the draft allows the operator a ‘right of recourse’ which means the right to recover any compensation it is forced to pay. The Clause 17, inter alia, provides as under: The operator of a nuclear installation shall have a right of resource where – (a) such right is expressly provided for in a contract in writing; (b) the nuclear incident has resulted from the willful act or gross negligence on the part of the supplier of the material, equipment or services, or of his employee; and (c) the nuclear incident has resulted from the act of commission or omission of a person done with intent to cause nuclear damage. The clauses (a) and (c) are mentioned in the model law developed by the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage (CSC). However the CSC does not prohibit the inclusion of additional provisions. Indeed, some countries have already included gross negligence by suppliers as grounds for invoking the right of recourse in their liability laws. Article 4 of the South Korean Act on Compensation for Nuclear Damage, for example, includes language similar to 17(b) of the Indian draft. Clause 17(b) is needed to deter suppliers from being negligent. Clause 17(a) alone is inadequate since no supplier will agree to accept liability for negligence in a contract. But, surprisingly, the Union government has agreed to delete this key provision.  The Hindu newspaper reported[29] how the U.S. nuclear industry was upset with 17(b) and wanted it deleted for fear it would “open the door to more lawsuits.” The government has obliged the American side by getting rid of this sub-clause entirely[30]. After the uproar against the June 7 judgment of Bhopal trial court in a criminal proceeding leading to paltry punishment to the accused other than UCC and its chief Anderson, the Government of India decided not to delete 17 (b).<br />
Another ridiculous ‘immunity’ provided by the bill to the nuclear radioactive polluters is that victims cannot question them ten years after the accident. The objections raised as regards the 10-year limit to “liability”, as provided in Clause 18 (Chapter IV), are very reasonable and quite valid[31]. In case of exposure to low dose radiations, the injuries caused thereby – mostly in various forms of cancer, may take much longer time to manifest. However, it is very difficult to establish the causal link.<br />
Exclusion of Courts jurisdiction: Clause 35 extends the legal binding that the responsible groups may have to face. The operator or the responsible persons in case of a nuclear accident will undergo the trial under Nuclear Damage Claims Commissions and no civil court is given the authority. The country will be divided into zones with each zone having a Claims Commissioner. This is in contrast to the US counterpart – the Price Anderson Act, in which lawsuits and criminal proceedings are taken up under the US courts.<br />
Disadvantage to US companies?: One general and strong argument that is put forward by the supporters of the bill is that without this kind of law the US companies would be at a disadvantage, and that will affect our nuclear industrial progress. Their disadvantage is correct. The American vendors will be at no disadvantage as compared to their competitors as the vendors are routinely “indemnified for consequential damages”. Even otherwise, the Bill does not prohibit the operator from making the equipment vendor liable on account of an accident. That is between the operator and the vendor. Liability depending upon the operation is something to do with the rights of the people at large that cannot be considered a disadvantage. No nation can allow any operator including Government operator to exempt from liability after causing a disaster through its dangerous operations.<br />
Criminal Liability: Another basic omission in this Bill is mention of criminal liability. As we have seen from Bhopal incident leading to serious public anger at the way criminal prosecution was handled resulting in meager punishment and leaving out the real culprits, it is necessary to specify the criminal liability for causing death with negligence in such hazardous and inherently dangerous activities considering it as culpable homicide not amounting to murder.<br />
Vicarious liability: The Bill should specify absolute liability principle and also impose vicarious liability with specific provisions on the persons including corporations who involved in selecting, designing and sending the technology or product which might have given rise to the dangers of disasters to pay the damages and fix up criminal liability on the overall in-charge of principal MNC. The problem of escaping from liability and imposing liability only on subsidiary or operator must be thoroughly dealt with and the Bill should send across a message to the whole world that third world will not tolerate any more the accidents or disasters and excuses from liability.<br />
India should lead the third world in agitating for vicarious liability of principal companies like UCC headquartered elsewhere over and above liability of the supplier. It should work for a convention and international agreement on vicarious liability of MNCs for the disasters of their subsidiaries in third world. There should be a time limit also within which they have to settle all claims and damage payments to the victims.<br />
Political Opposition: As the essential aspects of the Bill became controversial the United Progressive Alliance could not table the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill, 2010, on March 15, 2010 with the strong opposition from the Left parties, sections of the Bharatiya Janata Party, other centrist parties and some of the Congress’ own allies. It was referred to a Parliamentary Standing Committee, to analyze it thoroughly and critique the rationale for limiting the liability for accidents in civilian nuclear installations. Earlier, the Union Cabinet has openly ruled out the objections raised by the Finance and Environment ministries indicating that it succumbed to the pressure of the US officials[32]. After the approval a significant change is made in clause 6 (2), where the quantum of “liability of an operator for each nuclear incident” has been revised upwards from “rupees three hundred crores” to “rupees five hundred crores”. A new “Chapter”, ‘Offences and Penalties’ with 4 clauses, has been added. Besides, the Chapter IV, ‘Claims and Awards’, has been somewhat restructured and expanded[33]. The Bill has 7 Chapters with 49 clauses along with ‘Statement of Objects and Reasons’ and ‘Notes on clauses’. The objective of the Bill is explained as: To provide for civil liability for nuclear damage, appointment of claims Commissioner, establishment of Nuclear Damage Claims Commission and for matters connected therewith or incidental there of. Para 7 of the ‘Statement of Objects and Reasons’ further lays down that the purpose of the Bill is: to enact a legislation which provides for nuclear liability that might arise due to a nuclear incident and also the necessity of joining an appropriate international liability regime.<br />
The Bill in the Clause 9 (Chapter III) provides: The Central Government shall, by notification, appoint one or more Claims Commissioners for such area, as may be specified in that notification, for the purpose of adjudicating upon claims for compensation in respect of nuclear damage.<br />
The Chapter IV deals with ‘Claims and Awards’, which is the main part of the law. The clause 6 prescribes the limits of “liabilities”, clause 7 spells out the “liability” of the Central Government and the clause 5 lists out the circumstances under which the “operator” shall not be “liable”. The liability of supplier or producer is totally removed, which amounts to granting immunity to producers apparently a major departure from principle of product liability in strict terms.<br />
Openings to Private Operators: After reading the serious apprehensions as introduction and brief outline of the killer bill let us study the impact of this defective law on this nation.  Today we have a law called Environment Protection Act, 1985 which makes the polluter to pay and imposes on polluter a legal obligation to take precaution. This was strengthened by the most imaginative judicial legislation principle of Absolute Liability laid down by Supreme Court in 1986. These two legal instruments were not available to tackle the Bhopal gas leak tragedy in 1984. Now the situation is different, liabilities are fixed. The Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 made it mandatory to the hazardous industry to insure the possible damage to people and environment.  For people of India, there is no need for any law to make the hazardous nuclear industrialists liable today. But big energy corporate sector in United States of America and Union of India Government needs to limit the liability or exempt totally wherever possible.<br />
Apparently serving the US and other western corporate interest, the Bill is an open invitation to corporate catastrophes as it envisages and permits the entry of private players as “operators” nuclear power industry. Because of unique nature of nuclear power industry and its catastrophic potentials, as chillingly illustrated by the Chernobyl Disaster on April 26, 1986, provisions of this bill are very dangerous. The fact is that profit-maximization is the very raison d’etre of a private enterprise giving rise to the consequent innate tendency to cut corners in terms of safety measures.<br />
Enforcing liability strictly is what is needed than mere regulation, because regulatory mechanisms can at best only “regulate”. Hence, the envisaged ushering in of private players as “operators” of nuclear power plants has become an open invitation to disaster. Thus validating the private participation as “operator” of nuclear power plants in India is emerging as a big legal controversy. This draft legislation aims at defining the ‘liability’, arising out of any nuclear accident, of an individual “operator” independent of (and unaffiliated with) the Government of India.  At present all nuclear establishments &amp; ventures, power plants are run by the state through affiliated bodies the Uranium Corporation of India Limited (UCIL) for uranium mines and the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) for the power plants. Without specifically laying red carpet for private ‘operators’, the Bill provided for ‘operators’ and their ‘liability’ and at times ‘immunity’ specifically. This indicates possible private operators to come up with state support.<br />
Limiting the total “liability” of the (private) “operator” plus the “state” regardless of the scale of the disaster is the most unreasonable part of the draft law. Generally an enactment aims at imposing liability in the interest of the people who are innocent victims. Strangely this law proposes just unacceptable propositions of reducing the liability and offering immunity, besides legally burdening the state to pay for by foreign nuclear corporate caused disasters.<br />
Defending the Bill: The provisions regarding liabilities are very crucial in this Bill of 2010. The defence of the bill rests on this aspect and on the need for nuclear power to end the scarcity of power. The scientific studies and advances in nuclear technology have significantly reduced the probability of a nuclear catastrophe and thus nuclear power is considered an environment friendly and sustainable source of energy, though environmentalists oppose to agree that it is clean or green energy. The supporters of bill say, however, it is still necessary to keep in mind the possibility of nuclear accidents and other negative aspects of the nuclear energy and measures must be taken for its peaceful use. Substantial part of the controversy is about providing sufficient financial assistance under such circumstances.<br />
Having brought it, naturally the government has defended this civil nuclear liability legislation. Pointing to the fact that only the government or NPCIL runs nuclear power plants in India, said liability of a foreign supplier could be defined by an agreement with the operator. Fixing responsibility in terms of faulty equipment would always be time-consuming and this was why the operator had been made directly responsible for compensation. For liability beyond Rs 500 crore and up to Rs 2,300 crore, a tribunal would assess the compensation to be paid. The Government and other supporters of this Bill as it is, refer to the legislations in other countries offering even lower amounts (the Rs 205 crore prevalent in China and Rs 335 crore in Canada), and $350-600 million in some other countries. As pointed out by Praful Bidwai and many opponents argued, the US had a pooled fund of about $11 billion under the Price-Anderson Act. The United States has displayed its concern for the safety of the US plays a safe game when it comes to its own people and tries to save coffers of its MNCs in relation to disasters in third world. What is that Indian statesman are interested in?<br />
There are certain contentions in favour of the statutory limit on liability.  Prakash Nanda[34], a journalist and editorial consultant for Indian Defense Review says comparing with Bhopal is irrelevant, he wrote:<br />
As regards the limit, the government has said that the amount could be raised. The point to note here is that in India all nuclear power plants are owned by the government, so there is no private motive in limiting the liability in cases of a nuclear accident, which, in any case, is a rarest of rare possibilities. Therefore, comparing the situation with the Bhopal-gas tragedy in 1985 is irrelevant since Union Carbide, owner of the Bhopal plant, was a foreign body (U.S. organization), whereas here the government of India owns the nuclear power plant. And the government can always go beyond the written liability amount by either meeting the excess from its own exchequer or from international sources such as the CSC. It does not make sense to have a high liability amount on paper, since doing so would result in high insurance coverage of the concerned power plant, which would ultimately be reflected in the rate of the nuclear energy it provided to consumers. As regards the second criticism, itis wrong to say that only the Americans are demanding a liability law of this sort. France and Russia, or for that matter any other potential supplier, also want such a law, something Energy Minister has revealed.<br />
Comparison with Bhopal is just to explain the problem of enforcing liability in case of major disasters. A nuclear accident could be very high in its proportion compared to Bhopal tragedy. Without considering these major aspects, the state limits the liability simply to reduce the burden of insurance premium sacrificing the interests and even lives of Indians.  Liability for Bhopal tragedy is not established and not imposed on Union Carbide, which supplied machinery, technology and offered training besides guiding the Union Carbide India Limited totally. Legally the UCIL is shown as separate concern in which the Union of India and Madhya Pradesh state have owned shares along with UCC. The Union of India accepted its share of liability either by offering damages beyond what is given by UC or suffering the losses of the disaster. If the state becomes responsible for the disaster caused by the foreign nuclear firm, it amounts to victims paying for the victims. Whether the nuclear firm belongs to India or a foreign country, responsibility should fall on those who caused it.<br />
Official sources say still there is no problem, as general remedies are not closed by this law. Scope for legal action against a supplier of faulty or unsafe equipment is possible as per clause 46 of the nuclear bill, which says that the Act’s provisions “shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, any other law for the time being in force.” This will allow the filing of tort claims and even criminal charges in case a nuclear accident is caused by negligence on the part of the nuclear operator or its equipment suppliers. Most of the Torts claims are not pursued here in this country which presents very less possibility of enforcing general remedies.  It is proved that general remedies could not be pressed in Bhopal case. The question is: If the liability is already there in general principles of tortuous liability, why this law is being made? When a special law is passed specifically for nuclear damage, how can a general law apply to nuclear accident?<br />
IV. Liability norms in other countries<br />
Other countries, while implementing the broad principles laid down under international conventions, have framed their own legislative regimes for nuclear liability. They also impose financial security requirements on the operator, which vary from nation to nation.<br />
The Situation in the US: For instance, in the US, the 1957 version of the Price-Anderson Act — the world’s first comprehensive nuclear liability law — prescribed the operator’s liability at $60 million and the government’s share of liability at $500 million. After a series of amendments, the Act currently absolves the State from any liability below $10.761 billion in cover and places the onus entirely on the operator, without any cost to public or government and without fault needing to be proven. Over $200 million has been paid by US insurance pools in claims and costs of litigation since the Price-Anderson Act came into effect, all of it through the insurance pools. Of this amount, around $71 million was related to litigation following the 1979 accident at the Three Mile Island. According to World Nuclear Association data, in mainland Europe, individual countries have their own cap levels.<br />
In US, in the event of an accident, the first $375 million is paid by the insurer(s) of the plant. It is mandatory to insure the plant. Beyond that, up to US$ 10 billion is paid out of a fund jointly contributed by the “operators” as mandated by the Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act. Beyond that, the Federal Government pays[35]. For US victims of nuclear accidents, they guarantee 10 billion US dollars from a fund of operators, and for the victims in India, US wants reduced, limited and truncated liability for a paltry amount. Does value of life differ from US to India?<br />
In Germany: Germany has unlimited operator liability and requires € 2.5 billion security, which must be provided by the operator for each plant. This security is partly covered by insurance. France requires financial security of € 91 million per plant. Switzerland requires operators to get insurance cover of up to € 600 million. It is proposed to increase this to € 1.1 billion and ratify the Paris and Brussels conventions. In Finland, a 2005 Act requires operators to take at least € 700 million insurance cover, and operator liability is unlimited beyond the € 1.5 billion provided under the Brussels Convention. Sweden has ratified the Joint Protocol relating to Paris and Vienna conventions. The country’s Nuclear Liability Act requires operators to be insured for at least Swedish Kroner (SEK) 3300 million (€ 302 million), beyond which the State will cover to SEK 6 billion per incident.<br />
In Canada, the Nuclear Liability and Compensation Act is also in line with the international conventions and establishes the licensee’s absolute and exclusive liability for third party damage. The limit of Canadian<br />
$75 million per power plant set in 1976 as the insurance cover required for individual licensees was increased to $650 million in the Act’s 2008 revision.<br />
In Japan, China etc: Japan is not party to any international liability convention but its laws generally conform to them. The two laws governing them are revised about every 10 years. Russia is party to the Vienna Convention since 2005 and has a domestic nuclear insurance pool comprising 23 insurance companies covering a liability of some $350 million. It has a reinsurance arrangement with Ukraine and is setting one up with China. China is not party to any international liability convention and has only a 1986 interim domestic law on nuclear liability, which corresponds with international conventions, except that the liability limit is only about $36 million[36].<br />
V. Nuclear Accidents<br />
It is necessary to study technicalities and the possible quantum of damage in nuclear accidents. In any nuclear industry, the maximum accident is a core meltdown: the overheating of the core of a nuclear reactor, the site of fission, due to a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) or some other malfunction. It is the meltdown that caused disaster in Chernobyl (1986) Even the Three-Mile Island (1979) tragedy was a LOCA. But that was not led to meltdown. But meltdown cannot be ruled out altogether, until 2007, it was pointed out by newspapers and journals that the global nuclear power industry recorded more than 60 serious accidents and many of them were LOCAs. A LOCA can within seconds produce an uncontrollable chain of events. The danger is especially high in certain reactor types that have a positive void coefficient of reactivity. Simply put, this describes the reactor’s tendency to get progressively hotter when bubbles form in the coolant. This can have grave consequences. The natural uranium-heavy water-based CANDU design, the mainstay of India’s nuclear programme, has such a positive coefficient, according to Praful Bidwai[37].<br />
What happens when there is a nuclear accident? Even if one of 430 operating commercial nuclear reactors can undergo a core meltdown, it would release vast amounts of radioactivity. The radioactivity, carried in dust clouds, can spread over hundreds of kilometres depending on the wind direction and speed. Such a spread of radioactivity to distant places will have a far reaching effect. It is inevitable to refer again to the worst example in Chernobyl accident, wherein leaked radioactivity made thousands of sheep in faraway Scotland and reindeer in northern Sweden, non consumable as they had fed on radioactively contaminated grass, and thus they had to be slaughtered.  Explaining the disaster that can spell serious damage to India, Praful Bidwai wrote:<br />
A Chernobyl-like accident (1986) will wreak damage upon human and animal life, the environment and the infrastructure running into hundreds of billions to several trillions of dollars, and make huge swathes of land uninhabitable for centuries. The initial damage from the reactor-core meltdown in Chernobyl was estimated by the Ukrainian government at $250 billion. It may turn out even higher as more cases of cancer and genetic damage come to light, necessitating expensive treatment. German researchers estimate that a Chernobyl-type accident in Germany will cause damage in the range of 2 trillion to 5 trillion euros, which equals the entire annual gross domestic product of the world’s third biggest economy, and until recently, its topmost exporter. ….An estimated 65,000 people perished in the Chernobyl accident. And the death toll mounts every month. This is more than three times the number killed in Bhopal. An Indian Chernobyl could conceivably kill even more given our cities’ high population density. Such estimates are in line with forecasts made in the mid-1970s by United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission-sponsored studies with 3,300 early deaths plus 45,000 early radiation-related illnesses. More recent estimates are higher and run into scores of billions of dollars. It makes no ethical, technological or practical sense to subsidize nuclear power by extinguishing the liability burden or transferring it to the public[38].<br />
It is impossible to imagine that the damage from an Indian reactor-core meltdown will be less severe. Even lesser accidents such as spills and leaks of nuclear material during transportation and handling, loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs), other radioactivity releases, and overexposure of the public to emissions and effluents containing dangerous material can cause grave damage. With our industrially safety norms, mostly violated and the history of industrial disasters, the nuclear radioactivity leak or meltdown would have a very serious impact on human life, animals and environment.  Referring to Charles Perrow’s classic Normal Accidents; Basic Books, 1984, Praful Bidwai explained: Nuclear technology is extremely hazardous, indeed uniquely so: it is the only mode of energy generation capable of catastrophic accidents. Nuclear reactors concentrate within a small volume large quantities of fissile material, equivalent to several hundred multiples of the critical mass needed to make a nuclear bomb – and hence a high energy density. Their core must be cooled effectively and without interruption so that it does not overheat, potentially leading to a runaway reaction. That apart, all nuclear power generation based on existing reactor designs is inherently hazardous because, as organization theory puts it, it involves large, complex systems within which various subsystems are tightly coupled, leading to a rapid transmission of a problem event to the entire system and hence to catastrophic accidents. The probability of catastrophic nuclear accidents is admittedly low. But their consequences are extremely large, indeed unacceptably so. Praful Bidwai[39] wrote further:<br />
According to a post-Chernobyl study by an independent expert body, Gruppe Ökologie (Germany), all existing reactor types have safety problems, many have had LOCAs, and are vulnerable to all kinds of mishaps that can produce a catastrophic accident. Very few new reactors have been built in the developed countries since Chernobyl. No nuclear reactor has been ordered in the U.S. since 1973, even before Three Mile Island (1979). This has severely limited safety innovation.<br />
Two new designs – Westinghouse’s AP-1000 and Areva’s European (since pompously renamed Evolved) Power Reactor – have just emerged. These are claimed to be “Generation III-plus” and safer than the designs of the 1970s. But they have run into problems with regulatory authorities in the U.S., France, the United Kingdom and Finland, where the first fully market-driven nuclear project in Europe is now in progress – three-and-a-half years behind schedule and with 60 per cent over budget. Scrapping the Olkiluto project will produce a potentially fatal setback to the global nuclear industry.<br />
At any rate, the none-too-happy story of nuclear safety warrants a liability compensation regime which is strict and based on the polluter pays principle and the precautionary principle. That alone can provide the nuclear industry the incentive to redesign reactors for greater safety and operate them with abundant caution. The Bill does the opposite by lightening the nuclear industry’s responsibility by Rs.1,800 crore to compensate the victims of a nuclear accident.<br />
Another critical analyst Shobhana Saxena[40] wrote in Pak Observer: The Gulf of Mexico slick threatens the fishing industry, thousands of jobs, tourism and marine life in the coastal American states. The tragedy is that President Obama’s effort to raise the liability cap to $1.5 billion failed as the Republicans in the Senate didn’t allow the bill to be tabled. The Obama administration wanted to increase from $1 billion to $1.5 billion the amount that could be spent from an emergency cleanup fund paid with industry fees, and raise a $75 million liability limit BP would bear for costs not directly connected to cleaning up the spill, such as lost wages and tourism. Even as Obama licks his wounds, the real tragedy is unfolding in India where the government is again trying to push through the controversial nuclear liability bill. It’s a cruel truth that when an industrial disaster happens in the US, the government of that country doesn’t allow the MNC involved go scot-free. In the Gulf of Mexico accident just 11 people died, but the US government it trying to force BP to pay for everything – deaths, damages and lost wages.<br />
Did we learn any thing from Bhopal? Though in principle, there is criminal liability for killing the people with gross negligence, it is almost impossible to procure presence of the head of MNC who caused the disaster. Best example cited could be Bhopal tragedy and failure of Indian system to bring in Warren Anderson, Chief of Union Carbide Corporation. The verdict of a Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhopal on 7th June 2010, holding eight officers of UCIL guilty after 26 years of tragedy speaks volumes of the tragic consequences of tragedy. In the whole episode, it is not properly examined as to what crime the offenders would be charged with? Is it murder, culpable homicide not amounting murder or merely causing death by rash and negligent act?<br />
The second question is about civil liability, which is equally complex and totally depends upon the international cooperation. In Bhopal the achievement in this front is neither ideal nor acceptable. But that remains a reality. It is once again manifested that our governments do not learn from experience. Bhopal should have strengthened our commitment, law and enforcement mechanism. No doubt that Bhopal experience gave us a comprehensive environmental policy, but it failed to help developing a legal regime of imposing liability on MNCs.  It is beyond any sane understanding capacity that with a tragic experience of Bhopal genocide caused through pesticide factory by Union Carbide, how India is signing this suicidal pact and what for. All the law of Globalization is a major disaster as that could not secure the lives in Bhopal and could not make the Union Carbide of US liable for its wrongs. The strange technical argument that Union Carbide has nothing to do with Bhopal Disaster is still a problem India faces in its efforts to nail this MNC. It has thrown total responsibility on the Indian special purpose vehicle ‘Union Carbide India Limited’ in which Government of India and Government of Madhya Pradesh were also share holders. More than the profit or benefit, these two governments shared the tragic load more than any body that caused it. The Government of India with its bankrupt mindset argued before US District Court that India had not developed a mature administration of justice system and judiciary here was not mature enough to deal with such massive liability litigation. It is a shame. Marc Galanter, an author and advocate represented India and filed the affidavit signed by Government of India, claiming immaturity of system to provide answer to Bhopal claim. It is ultimately Indian system that came to rescue of Indian victims and not any other law. Now the government is destroying efficiency of legal system by bringing in such a ‘legal disaster’ wherein the nation surrenders its right to claim for future disasters by multinational companies to give them ‘free hand’ to establish nuclear power houses and sell that power to a big market called ‘India”.<br />
Disaster and Compensation: An estimated 8,000 people died immediately and another 12000 thereafter, when Union Carbide’s pesticide plant in Bhopal spewed deadly cyanide gas on the night of Dec. 24, 1984. Tens of thousands of others who were maimed were largely left to fend for themselves or paid inadequate compensation. Around 5 lakh affected and remain victims for ever, two generations scarred, and the air, soil and water of the city poisoned forever. How much they got in compensation: $470 million, a ridiculous amount. In 1999, Bhopal survivors filed a class action suit in U.S. courts against Union Carbide, asking that the company be held responsible for violations of international human rights aw and for the cleanup of environmental contamination in Bhopal. Nothing tangible could happen in US and the litigation came back to India and it was ultimately a settlement but not adjudication. The counsel of Union of India and Union Carbide heeded the advise of the Supreme Court to end the possibly a prolonged legal war, which might not help a suffering victim.<br />
After purchasing Bhopal industry the Dow Chemicals has refused to accept responsibility for the tragedy or pay proper financial compensation. Strangely, Dow spent $10 million on an advertising campaign to fix their image but offered less than a million to help the people of Bhopal. On the 20th anniversary of the disaster, Bichlbaum went on British TV to claim that Dow chemicals was belatedly accepting all the blame for the incident and would reimburse the people of Bhopal by selling off shares of the company and donating $12 million to the people affected.<br />
Although the stunt was quickly revealed as a hoax, the result was that Dow Chemicals lost $3 billion dollars in less than a half hour during a frantic stock sell-off that followed the faux announcement.<br />
The Union Carbide could get away lightly after causing the world’s worst industrial tragedy at Bhopal. The government is aware of all that difficult and protracted process to get 470 million dollars as compensation from Union Carbide, which is one-fifth of the amount required to look after the health of those affected by the Bhopal gas leak and take care of the environmental damage it left behind. Compare this with fraudulent nuclear liability Bill the government is trying to impose on this country. The Bill, in its present form, seeks to limit all liability arising out of a nuclear accident to about $450 million and the liability of the operator only to Rs 300 crore. The difference between $450 million and Rs 300 crore (about $67 million) is the government’s liability.<br />
Considering India’s population density (even stampedes at temples leave hundreds dead every year) and poor industrial safety record (radioactive material can be found in scrap markets), a nuclear accident can cause immense damage both in terms of loss of human life as well as environmental destruction.<br />
The Bhopal case is regarded as a proof of international corporate ‘immunity’, instead of liability, where corporations use the laws of one nation to evade responsibility in another. With all this experience, the leaders of this country proposed under this nuclear liability bill to immune a nuclear equipment supplier from any victim-initiated civil suit or criminal proceedings in an Indian court or in the home country.<br />
When the civil liability is truncated by Government itself, it is almost impossible to visualize making guilty criminal liable and sent to jail. The successive governments have not shown any desire to get Warren Anderson, the criminal-in-chief of Bhopal tragedy, extradited from New Jersey, where he has been living in a mansion. When he visited Bhopal after the tragedy he was given a red carpet welcome and farewell too at airport after getting a few papers signed, might be warrant of arrest and release on bail. The criminal case first conceded to be withdrawn as a term of settlement, but after admonition from Supreme Court the trial went on till recently and judgment was reserved by the trial court in Bhopal without personally hearing Warren Anderson. There is no surprise if the trial ends in finding local managers guilty of the ghastly crime with one or two comments on the masters of disaster.<br />
VI. International Law of Nuclear Liability<br />
Liability for Nuclear disasters is explained in four conventions. They are: 1. The International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) Vienna Convention of 1963 (since 1977); 2. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Paris Convention on third party liability in the field of nuclear energy of 1960 (since 1968); 3. Brussel’s Supplementary Convention of 1963; 4. Convention on Supplementary Convention (CSC) 1997. The very low liability levels which were started with the Paris Convention of SDR 5 million, or €6 million, to SDR 175 million (about €210 million) were adopted by the Brussels Convention. However, by the 1982 Protocol, those levels were raised to SDR 300 million. In 1997, the Vienna Protocol and the Convention on Supplementary Convention (CSC) marked increased limits and set up a somewhat extensive, but still limited, definition of nuclear damage altered to include preventive steps and environmental reinstatement, and changes such as allowing compensation to residents of non-Contracting Parties and making 300 million DRs (about €360 million) the minimum amount that State Parties must make available under national laws, and the CSC would provide for a supplementary fund.53 On the basis of installed nuclear capacity, the CSC provides for additional funds to be made available through contributions by State Parties collectively and a UN rate of assessment. Although the CSC is not functional yet and is not going to come into force anywhere in the near future, whether or not a State is party to any existing nuclear liability convention or has nuclear installations on its’ territory, it may adopt to the CSC[41].<br />
The expression “appropriate international liability regime” in objective statement of the Bill clearly refers to ‘Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage’ (CSC) 1997, which is based on the earlier Paris and Vienna Conventions. India is not a signatory to these Conventions, and the CSC has not come into force. Before India is considered for membership of this convention, it has to bring a national law in compliance with it. While the CSC provided for absolute liability of the operator, that is the operator would be held liable irrespective of its fault, the Bill provided for contrary to it. The concerned Clause lists out the circumstances under which the “operator” will not be “liable” in case of an accident. This is also in contradiction to the accepted norms of jurisprudence in democratic countries. International Environmental law also did not provide any such exemption to operators whose industry caused a disaster. It is highly unjustifiable to include such a clause in clear departure from CSC and other basic law. Even if India becomes a signatory of CSC it would not harm the interests of the people as that provided for absolute liability. The Bill has stipulated immunity to industries in certain cases, besides limiting their liability. The range of implications of joining this Convention, the main purpose of which appears to make  Supplementary Compensation available jointly by the member countries in case of a (catastrophic) accident over and above the “liability” limit of the “operator” and the concerned state also need be thoroughly examined.<br />
Sukla Sen[42] pointed out: The mainstream, and also radical, critics, known to be otherwise knowledgeable, have rather pitiably missed the central point that the essential thrust of the Bill is to enact a law defining “civil liability” in case of “nuclear damage”, in compliance of the CSC, and usher in private players as “operators” and peg their “liability” at ridiculously low levels, going much beyond the framework of the CSC.  The CSC does not obligate a member state to open up its womb to private players nor does it compel the “liability” to be pegged at a level below SDR 300 million.<br />
Of the 30 countries that operate 436 nuclear power plants, 28 countries, with 416 such plants, have some sort of nuclear liability act in force in their territories. Only India, which operates 18 nuclear power plants, and Pakistan, which has two, are neither members of any international convention nor have any national legislation. But then, India, unlike Pakistan, has a big plan for augmenting nuclear energy.<br />
There must be a national law or bilateral arrangement or international liability regime such as the Vienna-based Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage[43] or the Paris Convention on Third Party Nuclear Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy – for the exporter and importer to manage the liability in case any nuclear accident takes place. India is not a signatory to the Convention on Supplementary Compensation (CSC) for Nuclear Damage, which was adopted in 1997, seeks to provide complete protection for nuclear equipment suppliers. But the CSC has so far been ratified by just four countries – the United States, Argentina, Morocco and Romania. Devised by the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency, the CSC comes into force after at least five countries with a minimum installed nuclear capacity of 400,000 megawatts ratify it.<br />
This Bill is claimed to have been made as per on two nuclear liability conventions of the early 1960s, the “Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy”, or the Paris Convention of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and the Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage of 1963 under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) auspices.<br />
These conventions limited nuclear liability because nuclear power was believed to have unlimited potential for public welfare. Sixty years on, nuclear power has comprehensively belied its early promise. It is far more expensive (about twice as costly as) than electricity from fossil fuels or even renewables like wind. It is inappropriate for developing-country grids that have large peaking-power requirements. And it bristles with safety problems – from radiation exposure of occupational workers, routine radioactivity releases, LOCAs, and problems posed by high-level wastes, which remain hazardous for thousands of years. Besides, many renewable energy sources have since evolved impressively, demolishing the no-alternative-to-nuclear-power claim. The global nuclear industry, working through the IAEA, recently sponsored the Convention on Supplementary Compensation (CSC) for Nuclear Damage which works within the Paris-Vienna framework but doubles the maximum compensation, to $986 million. The global nuclear industry, working through the IAEA, recently sponsored the Convention on Supplementary Compensation (CSC) for Nuclear Damage which works within the Paris-Vienna framework but doubles the maximum compensation, to $986 million[44].<br />
Science and Technology Minister of Government of India claimed that the CSC was tried and tested, widely respected international treaty “the international regime for compensation payment in case of nuclear accidents”. But the reality is otherwise. Since it was opened for signature in 1977, the CSC has only been signed by 13 states and ratified by only four countries (Argentina, Morocco, Romania and the U.S.) – in place of the minimum of five countries needed for its entry-into-force. Most of the developed countries have passed their own domestic laws on nuclear liability. Their compensation levels are not as sordid as the CSC’s. States like Germany, Austria and Sweden laws did not place any cap on liability. Even the U.S. has a corpus fund of $10.7 billion for compensation. This CSC exists only on paper.<br />
In his analysis Sukla Sen further pointed out the difference between the CSC and our Bill, saying: However, once India joins the CSC, and it comes into force, the cap on total “liability” would undergo significant change as additional compensation over and above 300 million SDR would become available. In fact the CSC also permits the concerned states to provide for further compensation, without any “cap”. There must not be any overall “cap” on the quantum of compensation to potential victims. That is too unjust and inhumane. The CSC, as explained above, does not impose any such obligation to limit or cap the liability. It also does not obligate entry of private “operators”. Natural justice demands that it has to relate to the actual damages caused. The overall “cap” of 300 million SDR, which works out to about 460 million US$, is even lower than the compensation amount of US$ 470 million ratified by the Indian Supreme Court to the victims of Bhopal Gas Disaster way back in 1989[45].<br />
VII. Conclusion: Draft Law in Breach of Law<br />
The Sovereign Republic of India in its 60th year of Constitutional Rule of Law is reinventing the liability jurisprudence to detriment of people and for the benefit of MNCs. It can also be condemned because it promotes all terms of MNCs at the cost of people and future generation. The bill is virtually the Corporate Immunity for National Damage Bill 2010. It appears that Indian political rulers are apprehending post-nuclear-accident-trauma of foreign corporate bodies and scripting a legal remedy as a sequel to nuclear disaster if happens at all. ‘King can do no wrong’ was an old British maxim about sovereign immunity in tort (civil wrongs) law. But for modern India, the new maxim is ‘MNC can do no wrong’.  The jurists and activists are questioning why the state should take responsibility for the damage which might be caused in nuclear accidents resulting from nuclear reactors by enacting self-imposing liability legislation? Whether India is trying to curry favour of US companies by this law, just to secure foreign direct investment or foreign technology and the nuclear reactors to India to increase the generation of nuclear power in future?<br />
In 1999, soon after the second Pokhran tests, the Vajpayee government initiated the process of India joining the CSC for Nuclear Damage, which is the international regime for compensation payment in case of nuclear accidents. Simultaneously, the Vajpayee government set up a committee to study the nuclear liability regime. This committee produced a report in November 2001, which said that the Atomic Energy Act was silent about liability and compensation in case of nuclear accidents and that it was time to have a legal mechanism to clarify liability in case of nuclear accidents and join the international treaty regime for nuclear liability.<br />
It is claimed that the IAEA is an impartial body as regards nuclear safety or regulation, its very charter commits it to promote nuclear power on the presumption that it is safe and economical. This agency has refused to involve another United Nations agency, in particular the World Health Organisation with its strong health mandate, in assessing the damage from Chernobyl. For years, it blatantly claimed that less than 30 people died in the accident – primarily firemen[46].<br />
Here it is pertinent to keep in mind that the CSC does not establish either a floor or a ceiling on the liability of the operator or require the concerned state to limit the liability of the “operator”. It in no way makes it incumbent upon any member country to either bring in private “operator” or limit/cap its “liability” at a level lower than the “total liability” (of minimum 300 million SDR)[47]<br />
Sidhartha Varadarajan, wrote in The Hindu[48] quoting the responses of American nuclear industry representatives. Speaking on background because of the sensitivities involved, an American nuclear industry source told The Hindu, “CSC Annex Article 3.3 says, ‘The liability of the operator for nuclear damage shall be absolute’… [But] the draft India bill has no provision making the operator absolutely liable, as required by the CSC.” This objection assumes significance in the light of claims made by senior Indian officials in briefings to the media and political parties that the Rs. 500-crore cap applies only to “no-fault liability.” Nuclear operators and their suppliers would continue to be exposed to claims of tortious liability — liability for damages caused through some fault of theirs — by Indian victims in the event of an accident. Indian officials cited Article 46 of the bill — which says the liability law will not take away from the provisions of the existing laws allowing action in the event of a nuclear accident — and reiterated the government’s willingness to make the bill’s provisions more explicit. They said the Article 35 exclusion of civil courts jurisdiction applied only to claims arising out of a ‘no-fault liability’. Civil courts would remain fully empowered to hear tort claims. On his part, the American nuclear industry source also identified the ‘right of recourse’ granted to nuclear operators by the Indian bill against suppliers as a major problem area. Article 17(b) of the bill — first highlighted in The Hindu— allows the operator to sue his supplier for recovery of any damages he is forced to pay if a nuclear accident results from “the willful act or gross negligence on the part of the supplier of the material, equipment or services, or of his employee.”<br />
“Like the lack of absolute or strict liability, 17(b) is inconsistent with the CSC, as well as the Paris and Vienna Conventions and the nuclear liability laws of every other country with a nuclear power programme,” the U.S. nuclear industry source said.<br />
The American source also found fault with Article 46. “If this article means the operator would not be exempt from any other proceedings [other than criminal liability], that too would be inconsistent with the CSC requirement for exclusive operator liability. CSC Annex Article 3.9 provides, “he right to compensation for nuclear damage may be exercised only against the operator liable … The draft bill has no such provision channelling liability exclusively to the operator.”<br />
While the Obama administration has not said anything to India about these “problem” clauses, Indian officials say they are aware that the nuclear industry association in the U.S. is beginning its lobbying drive. “They have held a meeting and it is only a matter of time before Washington raises this with us,” an official said. “But they are also in a bind. After all, the Indian law is consistent with the CSC. But that doesn’t mean we have to give up our rights under tort law and common law.”<br />
When basic principles such as liability to the extent of damage caused which is conveniently transferred to insurer under a risk management mechanism, polluter shall pay and no harm rule reflected in International Environmental Law, how can some conventions force the states to agree to cap the liabilities which stand to no reason or logic?. While the philosophy of sustainable development is universally agreed, how can any convention or law give primacy to development to the global environment and lives of people?<br />
If the above referred conventions contradict other conventions of environment and sustainable development, the law proposed by India is further dilution of both international and municipal law of liability. The Bill virtually says ‘you do what ever you want and just do not pay more than 500 crores of rupees’. We are making a solemn promise that we do not make any body other than local company liable for any disaster caused by any reactor sold by any country.  In one word the civil nuclear liability bill is a suicide pact with a promise of no liability. It is against all basic norms of international or national liability for wrongs perpetrated against human beings and humanity at large. Why should people of India guarantee benefit, profit and cover all the losses in favour of wrong doing nuclear power MNCs?<br />
Is it a draft law aiming at limiting liability only to operator and awarding immunity to producer or any other player? How far it is proper to offer legal immunity or reduce the liability to those who install nuclear reactors which can cause nuclear dangers in its general operations? It is pathetic that we offer in golden plate the lives and golden environment of this great country to international corporate thugs in the name of ‘energy development’.  This bill is in the form of a pledge that we do not make any claim against suppliers and producers of defective nuclear reactors, and not claim beyond Rs.500 crore from operators even if thousands of us are killed and valuable environs are destroyed. The liability jurisprudence evolved from fault-based liability to no-fault liability emerging into absolute liability. This bill proposes retrograde law limiting liability in general and granting absolute immunity to some, imposing liability on the state itself in brazen violation of international liability norms, Constitutional principles, profound judicial pronouncements and environmental enactments.<br />
What cannot be included in agreement, in the interest of people and the environment, is being made into a law. A government elected for five years, is attempting to inflict a permanent damage on coming generations depriving their right to remedy and to full compensation to the damage suffered.<br />
For these reasons, this Civil Nuclear Liability Bill should not become law in present form. Better we do not have any law in its place because this bill is a manifestation of unreasonable bias towards the global nuclear industry and commerce with scant regard for human life in India. The purpose of making law is to provide for enforceable remedies but not to deny the remedies which were developed over a period of time. This Bill is denial by ‘law’ of decent compensation to the suffering public. Even if there is strong law, there is no possibility of enforcement bending Indian big industry to abide by it. But our existing law is not that strong and leaves so many problems and thus it does not work against a strong MNC which is beyond the jurisdiction of India. Instead of making a strong law making the makers, suppliers and operators liable jointly and severally for the cumulative loss of life, property and environment, by defining vicarious liability of principal companies for the damages caused by their subsidiaries and imposing criminal liability with specific legislative frame, state chose to deny what is already available to people under un-codified principles of liability developed by Supreme Court of India. When the law itself allows openly an unreasonable limit on ‘operator’ and absolute immunity on ‘supplier’ or ‘Parent Corporation headquartered elsewhere, what kind of justice it can render to the future victims of possible nuclear accidents?  If tested on what our Constitution and judiciary laid down over a period of time, the Act of this nature cannot stand scrutiny of the constitutional court.<br />
Finally, this bill is totally unwarranted and good if withdrawn. If the Government has a strong will to provide perfect systems of liability and remedies, there should be a comprehensive law to impose civil liability on principal companies, manufacturers along with operators. Absolute liability norms which are scattered in judgments and various laws or rules should be codified into law. Following is the table of demerits of the Bill and suggestions to remove the damage going to be caused by the Bill.<br />
The Damage Bill 2010	To remove the Damage by the Bill<br />
S 1(3) Bill extends to Territorial Waters, Continental shelf, Maritime Zones, on board Ships and Aircrafts and artificial islands.	With various limitations on liability provided in other sections, this extension becomes meaningless.<br />
s 2(f) defines nuclear damage in extensive terms. Covers human, property, economic, environmental losses and costs of preventive measures too.<br />
2 (f) “nuclear damage” means—<br />
(i) loss of life or personal injury to a person; or<br />
(ii) loss of, or damage to, property, caused by or arising out of a nuclear incident, and includes each of the following to the extent notified by the Central Government;<br />
(iii) any economic loss, arising from the loss or damage referred to in clauses (i) or (ii) and not included in the claims made under those clauses, if incurred by a person entitled to claim such loss or damage;<br />
(iv) costs of measures of reinstatement of impaired environment caused by a nuclear incident, unless such impairment is insignificant, if such measures are actually taken or to be taken and not included in the claims made under clause (ii);<br />
(v) loss of income deriving from an economic interest in any use or enjoyment of the environment, incurred as a result of a significant impairment of that environment caused by a nuclear incident, and not included in the claims under clause (ii);<br />
(vi) the costs of preventive measures, and further loss or damage caused by such measures;<br />
(vii) any other economic loss, other than the one caused by impairment of the environment referred to in clauses (iv) and<br />
(v), in so far as it is permitted by the general law on civil liability in force in India and not claimed under any such law, in the case of sub-clauses (i) to (v) and (vii) above, to the extent the loss or damage arises out of, or results from, ionizing radiation emitted by any source of radiation inside a nuclear installation, or emitted from nuclear fuel or radioactive products or waste in, or of, nuclear material coming from, originating in, or sent to, a nuclear installation, whether so arising from the radioactive properties of such matter, or from a combination of radioactive properties with toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of such matter;	Because this definition covers almost all imaginable losses, it leaves no scope for any body to claim a relief or compensation. Good definition, but because of limitations and exemptions provided in other sections does not serve purpose.<br />
Limitations should be removed and every element of nuclear damage has to be compensated.<br />
Definition of “nuclear damage” covers “impaired environment”.<br />
There is no provision as to who can lodge claims for “costs of measures of reinstatement” as mentioned therein.<br />
Any public spirited group or citizen, apart from public bodies like Gram Sabha, panchayat, municipality etc. and affected persons, must be entitled to raise such claims.<br />
S 3: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board shall notify nuclear incident.<br />
3. (1) The Atomic Energy Regulatory Board constituted under the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 shall, within a period of fifteen days from the date of occurrence of a nuclear incident, notify such nuclear incident:<br />
Provided that where the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board is satisfied that the gravity of threat and risk involved in a nuclear incident is insignificant, it shall not be required to notify such nuclear incident.	It shall notify every incident causing damage and accident causing serious damage. Whether damage is substantial or not, there is a duty to compensate every loss. Word ‘Accident’ be added and Proviso be removed. Non-notification shall be considered as dereliction of duty and penal consequence should be prescribed<br />
Any private citizen, or group, should have the right to draw the attention of the AERB to an alleged “incident’ in case it is not notified by the AERB suo moto. The AERB shall duly examine and respond to such request.<br />
S 4. Liability of operator.<br />
4. (1) The operator of the nuclear installation shall be liable for nuclear damage caused by a nuclear incident —<br />
(a) in that nuclear installation; or<br />
(b) involving nuclear material coming from, or originating in, that nuclear installation and occurring before —<br />
(i) the liability for nuclear incident involving such nuclear material has been assumed, pursuant to a written agreement, by another operator; or<br />
(ii) another operator has taken charge of such nuclear material; or<br />
(iii) the person duly authorized to operate a nuclear reactor has taken charge of the nuclear material intended to be used in that reactor with which means of transport is equipped for use as a source of power, whether for propulsion thereof or for any other purpose; or<br />
(iv) such nuclear material has been unloaded from the means of transport by which it was sent to a person within the territory of a foreign State; or<br />
(c) involving nuclear material sent to that nuclear installation and occurring after—<br />
(i) the liability for nuclear incident involving such nuclear material has been transferred to that operator, pursuant to a written agreement, by the operator of another nuclear installation; or<br />
(ii) that operator has taken charge of such nuclear material; or<br />
(iii) that operator has taken charge of such nuclear material from a person operating a nuclear reactor with which a means of transport is equipped for use as a source of power, whether for propulsion thereof or for any other purpose; or<br />
(iv) such nuclear material has been loaded, with the written consent of that operator, on the means of transport by which it is to be carried from the territory of a foreign State.	This section explains various kinds of situations wherein liability arises but proviso states that liability is limited as prescribed by section 6.<br />
Liability of operator should be joint and several along with makers and suppliers including principal companies.<br />
To be further added:<br />
The operator shall deposit a sum of 300 million SDR in an escrow account for each nuclear reactor to be operated before start of operation.<br />
S 4(2) Joint liability of all operators.<br />
Section 4 (2) Where more than one operator is liable for nuclear damage, the liability of the operators so involved shall, in so far as the damage attributable to each operator is not separable, be joint and several: Provided that the total liability of such operators shall not exceed the extent of liability specified under sub-section (2) of section 6.<br />
(3) Where several nuclear installations of one and the same operator are involved in a nuclear incident, such operator shall, in respect of each such nuclear installation, be liable to the extent of liability specified under sub-section (2) of section 6.<br />
Explanation.— For the purposes of this section,—<br />
(a) where nuclear damage is caused by a nuclear incident occurring in a nuclear installation on account of temporary storage of material-in-transit in such installation, the person responsible for transit of such material shall be deemed to be the operator;<br />
(b) where a nuclear damage is caused as a result of nuclear incident during the transportation of nuclear material, the consignor shall be deemed to be the operator;<br />
(c) where any written agreement has been entered into between the consignor and the consignee or, as the case may be, the consignor and the carrier of nuclear material, the person liable for any nuclear damage under such agreement shall be deemed to be the operator;<br />
(d) where both nuclear damage and damage other than nuclear damage have been caused by a nuclear incident or, jointly by a nuclear incident and one or more other occurrences, such other damage shall, to the extent it is not separable from the nuclear damage, be deemed to be a nuclear damage caused by such nuclear incident.	It explains in detail the liability of the operator and discusses in minute aspects the liability of separate operators, and says where separation is not possible the liability is joint and several. Again it is limited by a cap in section 6.<br />
Makers and suppliers should be added for imposing liability.<br />
S 5.  Liability and immunity of operators.<br />
5. (1) An operator shall not be liable for any nuclear damage where such damage is caused by a nuclear incident directly due to—<br />
(i) a grave natural disaster of an exceptional character; or<br />
(ii) an act of armed conflict, hostility, civil war, insurrection or terrorism.<br />
(2) An operator shall not be liable for any nuclear damage caused to—<br />
(i) the nuclear installation itself and any other nuclear installation including a nuclear installation under construction, on the site where such installation is located; and<br />
(ii) to any property on the same site which is used or to be used in connection with any such installation; or<br />
(iii) to the means of transport upon which the nuclear material involved was carried at the time of nuclear incident:	5 (1)(ii) should be removed. This should be absolute liability. Only possible exception is grave natural disaster.<br />
Immunity under 5(2) is meaningless, why should installation suffer from the acts of operator, without any remedy of compensation?<br />
This immunity should be removed.<br />
The corresponding CSC clause – Annex, Article 3, 5. b. – provides that national law may have provision to drop such circumstances from the list of exceptions. Cl 591)(ii) does not figure in the corresponding CSC clause: Annex, Article 3, 5. a.<br />
The concept of “strict liability” being the foundational concept, such exceptions, and consequent transfer of liability for damage under such circumstances to the “Central Government”, and thereby to the Indian taxpayers, in case of a private operator, is wholly undesirable and unjustified.<br />
Proviso to Section 5 Liability<br />
Provided that any compensation liable to be paid by an operator for a nuclear damage shall not have the effect of reducing the amount of his liability in respect of any other claim for damage under any other law for the time being in force.	Securing liability under other law is good. But how many proceedings that law will allow for claiming damages. Because of rule that one cause of action arises out of one wrong,, this provision may not help the victims. This law prohibited other actions for claiming damages other than under this law.<br />
Section 5 (3) Where any nuclear damage is suffered by a person on account of his own negligence or from his own acts of commission or omission, the operator shall not be liable to such person.	This is against the norms and principles of compensation as prescribed under Workmen’’ Compensation Act, 1923.<br />
This has to be removed.<br />
S 6. Capping liability<br />
6. (1) The maximum amount of liability in respect of each nuclear incident shall be the rupee equivalent of three hundred million Special Drawing Rights.<br />
(2) The liability of an operator for each nuclear incident shall be rupees five hundred crores:<br />
Provided that the Central Government may, having regard to the extent of risk involved in a nuclear installation, by notification, either increase or decrease the amount of liability of the operator:<br />
Provided further that where the amount of liability is decreased, it shall not be less than rupees one hundred crore:<br />
Provided also that the amount of liability shall not include any interest or cost of proceedings.	Most unlawful and unreasonable provision of this Bill, and should be deleted outright.Liability should commensurate the damage and compensate every loss. Penalty in proportion to guilt and compensation to wipe out the loss are basic and universal norms. A government elected for five years has no authority to sacrifice this right of future generations for benefit of a business company. Remove all limits on liability. Do not deny the rights of people by passing a new law. It is unconstitutional, against the norms of Environmental law, International Law, etc.<br />
How can the Government deny the interest and cost of proceedings if the victim is otherwise entitled to?<br />
The Convention for Supplementary Compensation (CSC) does not obligate the GoI to go in for such differentiated liabilities, one for private operator and another for the state affiliated operator.<br />
This provision has to go.<br />
In case of Bhopal gas disaster, the compensation amount settled (to be paid by the UCC) back in 1989 was 470 million US $. That was pretty much inadequate.<br />
In case, of oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the BP has committed an initial amount of US $ 20 billion. And there will be no cap. In the US, in case of a nuclear accident, the first 300 million US $ to come from the respective insurance cover, then up to US $ 10 billion from a common pool of funds maintained by the nuclear industry. Beyond that, the Federal Government, without any cap. (Ref.: P. 2/4 of ‘The Price-Anderson Act: Background Information: November 2005’ at .)</p>
<p>S 7. Liability of Central Government<br />
7. The Central Government shall be liable for nuclear damage in respect of a nuclear<br />
incident, —<br />
(a) where the liability exceeds the amount of liability of an operator specified under sub-section (2) of section 6, to the extent such liability exceeds such liability of the operator;<br />
(b) occurring in a nuclear installation owned by it; and (c) occurring on account of causes specified in clauses (i) and (ii) of subsection (1) of section 5.	If a government, who is not supplier, operator, or investor can be made liable for the damage caused by accident, it can be called absolute liability which stricter than absolute liability recognized, where even Act of God or Civil war is no defence. Then why not this liability be extended to maker/supplier and operator? Why should Government spend people’s money to pay people’s loss caused by MNC?<br />
S 8 Insurance cover to limited liability<br />
8. (1) The operator shall, before he begins operation of his nuclear installation, take out insurance policy or such other financial security, covering his liability under sub-section<br />
(2) of section 6, in such manner as may be prescribed.<br />
(2) The operator shall from time to time renew the insurance policy or other financial security referred to in sub-section (1), before the expiry of the period of validity thereof.<br />
(3) The provisions of sub-sections (1) and (2) shall not apply to a nuclear installation owned by the Central Government.	When even Motor Vehicle Act imposes a statutory obligation on owners of vehicles to insure their ‘unlimited’ liability towards third parties, how can insurance of nuclear operator be limited?<br />
“Under Sub-section (2) of S 6” should be removed.<br />
S 9: Claim Commissioners<br />
9. (1) Whoever suffers nuclear damage shall be entitled to claim compensation in accordance with the provisions of this Act.<br />
(2) For the purposes of adjudicating upon claims for compensation in respect of nuclear damage, the Central Government shall, by notification, appoint one or more Claims Commissioners for such area, as may be specified in that  notification.	It should be called special nuclear claims courts and be made independent in function so that they decide liability and do justice. But the hands of these commissioners are tightened with limitations. Remove these limitations.<br />
The Claims Commission must include member(s) of the medical profession with an established track record of engaging with people’s health issues to ensure the proper assessment of the health impact of an “incident”.<br />
S 15 Procedure for claims<br />
15. (1) Every application for compensation before the Claims Commissioner for nuclear damage shall be made in such form, containing such particulars and accompanied by such documents, as may be prescribed.<br />
(2) Subject to the provisions of section 18, every application under sub-section (1) shall be made within a period of three years from the date of knowledge of nuclear damage by the person suffering such damage.	Prescribing such forms as mandatory will limit the rights of the victims.<br />
These forms should not be made compulsory though advised to be used.<br />
S 16(3) Order to restrain the operator who is likely to remove the property.<br />
(3) Where an operator is likely to remove or dispose of his property with the object of evading payment by him of the amount of the award, the Claims Commissioner may, in accordance with the provisions of rules 1 to 4 of Order XXXIX of the First Schedule to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, grant a temporary injunction to restrain such act.	It is good but not enough; it should be empowered to attach the property also.<br />
S 17 Right to recourse when contract is there.<br />
17. The operator of a nuclear installation shall have a right of recourse where —<br />
(a) such right is expressly provided for in a contract in writing;<br />
(b) the nuclear incident has resulted from the willful act or gross negligence on the part of the supplier of the material, equipment or services, or of his employee;<br />
(c) the nuclear incident has resulted from the act of commission or omission of a person done with the intent to cause nuclear damage.	Right to recourse is available whether there is contract or not. This provision limits the right unreasonably.<br />
The right under (b) should extend against manufacturer also.<br />
The contract between any and every operator and its supplier(s) (of equipment, material or services, as the case may be) must include in writing a provision to the effect that the operator shall have the right of recourse in case of an “incident” without any exception, including as regards the damage to the equipment/plant/ site.<br />
S 18: Right to claim extinguishes in 10 years.<br />
18. The right to claim compensation for any nuclear damage caused by a nuclear incident shall extinguish if such claim is not made within a period of ten years from the date of incident notified under sub-section (1) of section 3:<br />
Provided that where a nuclear damage is caused by a nuclear incident involving nuclear material which, prior to such nuclear incident, had been stolen, lost, jettisoned or abandoned, the said period of ten years shall be computed from the date of such nuclear incident, but, in no case, it shall exceed a period of twenty years from the date of such theft, loss, jettison or abandonment.	There should not be such limit at all.<br />
S 20 Nuclear Damage Claims Commission<br />
19. Where the Central Government, having regard to the injury or damage caused by a nuclear incident, is of the opinion that—<br />
(a) the amount of compensation may exceed the limit specified under sub-section (2) of section 6; or<br />
(b) it is expedient and necessary that claims for such damage be adjudicated by the Commission instead of Claims Commissioner; or<br />
(c) it is necessary in the public interest to provide special measures for speedy adjudication of claims for compensation, the Central Government may, by notification, establish a Nuclear Damage Claims Commission, for the purposes of this Act.	It totally depends on Govt. opinion.<br />
If Govt. thinks compensation is sufficient there will be no commission.<br />
Only bureaucrats cannot decide independently. It should consist of independent members from judiciary and people’s agencies without bureaucrats because they are not trained to assess the claims.<br />
S 35 no injunction can be given by courts.<br />
35. No civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceedings in respect of any matter which the Claims Commissioner or the Commission, as the case may be, is empowered to adjudicate under this Act and no injunction shall be granted by any court or other authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this Act.	Section 5 Proviso says the choice of claiming damages under other laws is available. That is denied here in s 35.<br />
S 39 Offences and Penalties, 5 yrs imprisonment<br />
39. (1) Whoever—<br />
(a) contravenes any rule made or any direction issued under this Act; or<br />
(b) fails to comply with the provisions of section 8; or<br />
(c) fails to deposit the amount under section 36, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years or with fine or with both.	These offences are breach of order by Commission, not taking insurance cover for limited liability and not depositing amount in advance.<br />
Here criminal liability provision should be made: If the act leads to death of human being, operator shall be prosecuted for murder.<br />
S 40 Offences by Companies	Principal company should be made liable jointly along with subsidiary company.<br />
It is against the principle of command responsibility and thereby would ensure that minions are punished in case of violations and senior officers go scot free.<br />
This has to be amended as:Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any punishment under this Act, if he proves he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.  “that offence was committed without his knowledge or”: to be deleted.<br />
S 47 Protection for action taken in good faith	No such immunity in operating a nuclear plant/installation is called for. Such immunity will only engender criminal negligence and worse.<br />
Instead of this or along with this there should be a provision to impose liability for action taken not in good faith, or done without due care or caution, or negligently done.<br />
________________________________________<br />
[1] See: Sukla Sen’s article:  http://environmentpress.in/2010/04/02/the-civil-liability-for-nuclear-damage-bill-2010-some-tentative-observations/<br />
[2] See http://indiacurrentaffairs.org/civil-nuclear-liability-bill-prefering-interests-of-us-companies-over-indian-people/<br />
[3] See: &lt;http://www.business-standard.com/india/news//govt-open-to-raising-nuclear-liability-cap//388512<br />
[4] See &lt;http://www.america.gov/st/texttrans-english/2009/July/20090720161943xjsnommis0.2136499.html<br />
[5] See: &lt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8374050.stm<br />
[6] See: &lt;http://www.deccanchronicle.com/national/pm-may-visit-us-april-n-summit-158<br />
[7] See the Abstract at &lt;http://acdis.illinois.edu/newsarchive/newsitem-indiausrelationsfrombushtoobamanewchallenges.html<br />
[8] Don’t Amend, Just Scrap the Bill, Praful Bidwai Opinion, Financial Chronicle, mydigitalfc.com, March 24, 2010<br />
[9] Decision in M.C. Mehta v Union of India (Sriram gas leak case) (1987) 1 SCC 395, AIR 1987 SC 965<br />
[10] Donoghue v Stevenson, 1932 AC 562<br />
[11] Union Carbide Corporation v Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 273<br />
[12] Union Carbide Corporation v Union of India, AIR 1992 SC 248<br />
[13] The Accused has been charged under Section 304A Indian Penal Code, Keshub Mahindra v State of Madhya Pradesh, 1996 (2) Scale 522)<br />
[14] Rylands v. Fletcher [1868] (19) LT<br />
[15] AIR 1987 SC 965<br />
[16] [1996 (5) SCC 647]<br />
[17] Rylands v. Fletcher [1868] (19) LT<br />
[18] http://beta.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/ article64688.ece?homepage=true,<br />
[19] Indian Council of Enviro-Legal Action vs. Union of India [1996 (3) SCC 212] which was reaffirmed in Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum vs. Union of India [1996 (5) SCC 647]<br />
[20] [1996 (3) SCC 212]<br />
[21] [ibid, see page 246 para 65]<br />
[22] [ibid, see page 248]<br />
[23] [ibid, see page 247 para 67]<br />
[24] [1996 (5) SCC 647]<br />
[25] [ibid, see page 659]<br />
[26] [ibid, see page 658 para 11]<br />
[27] Sukla Sen’s article:  http://environmentpress.in/2010/04/02/the-civil-liability-for-nuclear-damage-bill-2010-some-tentative-observations/<br />
[28] Bhopal CJM court punished officials of Indian company UCIL, leaving out chief of UCC, on June 7, 2010.<br />
[29] See the Hindu news papers dated March 8 and April 1, 2010<br />
[30] Sidhartha Varadarajan, Government dilute nuclear Bill under US pressure, The Hindu, 10th June 2010.<br />
[31] The bill lets nuclear equipment suppliers and designers off the hook, from The great nuclear folly by Praful Bidwai at &lt;http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=130882<br />
[32] The bill was approved by Union Cabinet on November 20, 2009<br />
 or ,<br />
[33] See revised bill at http://www.cndpindia.org/download.php?view.36&gt; and earlier version given in Nuclear Liability Law in Developing Countries – Indian Case by B. B. Singh at &lt;http://www.cndpindia.org/e107_plugins/content/content.php?content.65<br />
[34] Prakash Nanda is a journalist and editorial consultant for Indian Defense Review, Right Angle column, published on March 30, 2010<br />
[35] See: &lt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price%E2%80%93Anderson_Nuclear_Industries_Indemnity_Act<br />
[36] News Report by Anil Sasi, Businessline, April 5, 2010<br />
[37]Praful Bidwai, A Flawed Bill, Frontline,  March 27, April 9, 2010, http://www.flonnet.com/stories/20100409270709500.htm<br />
[38] Ibid<br />
[39] Ibid<br />
[40] Views From Abroad, http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=32103, by Shobhan Saxena<br />
[41] Report on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill by Ajay Goyal, Anand Misra, Bikas Mohanty, Shaunak Kashyap, for Greenpeace, 2010, at page 37<br />
[42] Sukla Sen’s article:  http://environmentpress.in/2010/04/02/the-civil-liability-for-nuclear-damage-bill-2010-some-tentative-observations/<br />
[43] See: &lt;http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Conventions/supcomp.htmll<br />
[44] Praful Bidwai, A Flawed Bill, Frontline, March 27, April 9, 2010, http://www.flonnet.com/stories/20100409270709500.htm<br />
[45] Sukla Sen’s article:  http://environmentpress.in/2010/04/02/the-civil-liability-for-nuclear-damage-bill-2010-some-tentative-observations/<br />
[46] Praful Bidwai, A Flawed Bill, Frontline, March 27, April 9, 2010<br />
[47] The Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage: Catalyst for a Global Nuclear Liability Regime by Ben McRae at<br />
[48] Sidhartha Varadarajan, The Hindu, 1 April 2010</p>
<p>Vedanta mines illegal, must be shut down: Green panel</p>
<p>NEW DELHI: Mining giant Vedanta consistently violated several laws in bauxite mining at Niyamgiri, encroached upon government land, got clearances on the basis of false information and illegally built its aluminium refinery at Lanjigarh, Orissa. As the company engaged in these violations, the Orissa government colluded with it and the Centre turned a blind eye. </p>
<p>These are some of the findings of the four-member N C Saxena committee, which on Monday recommended that the company not be allowed to mine in the hills that are the abode of the Dongaria Kondh and Kutia Kondh tribes in Orissa. </p>
<p>The no-holds-barred indictment of the state and private sector in the $1.7billion project brings out the short shrift given to concerns about tribal rights and environmental protection. It is significant also because it underlines the changed sensibilities of the government towards the issues against the backdrop of Left-wing extremism and why Naxalites are finding it easy to influence alienated tribal belts. </p>
<p>The stern report of the environment and forests ministry panel signalled that tribal rights and environmental isssues have finally muscled their way onto the governance agenda, forcing the authorities to take action against corporates who may have shown disregard for rules. The Saxena committee report, which could lead to shutting down of the Vedanta smelters in Orissa, comes after the MoEF moved to stop or stall several high-profile, heavy-investment projects, including the Posco Integrated Steel project in Orissa, which, at Rs 56,000 crore is the single-largest foreign direct investment in India, the Jindal thermal power plant in Chhattisgarh (Rs 10,000 crore), hydroelectric projects on Bhagirathi in Uttarakhand and the Navi Mumbai airport in Maharashtra (Rs 7,972 crore). </p>
<p>The panel was set up by the ministry of environment and forests to investigate if the state government and the aluminium giant had complied with the Forest Rights Act and Forest Conservation Act while mining for bauxite. </p>
<p>The report reveals exhaustive evidence to nail the complicity of the state government in permitting Vedanta to flagrantly violate the laws. </p>
<p>But the committee, even as it recommended that the mining project be disallowed, stopped short of asking for prosecution of the officials involved in what seems to be a blatant fraud that went unchecked for years. </p>
<p>&#8220;The question of whom to prosecute is secondary. First, we have to consider the clearance,&#8221; said Union minister for enviroment and forests Jairam Ramesh. Asked if the violations could be set right now, the minister said, &#8220;Without prejudice to the existing case, it would be a tragedy that one violates laws and still has a window of opportunity to just pay a penalty and get away with it later.&#8221; </p>
<p>The report will now be reviewed by the statutory Forest Advisory Committee, which will then give its recommendations to the ministry to take a final call on the forest clearance. </p>
<p>The report says, &#8220;This committee is of the firm view that allowing mining in the proposed mining lease area by depriving two primitive tribal groups of their rights over the proposed mining area in order to benefit a private company would shake the faith of tribal people in the laws of the land which may have serious consequences for the security and well-being of the entire country.&#8221; </p>
<p>The report records how the state government falsified documents and concealed information from the central government to facilitate the aluminium refinery in mining bauxite while the company encroached upon government and tribal lands with impunity. </p>
<p>The aluminium czar Anil Aggarwal&#8217;s company has illegally &#8212; despite legal notices from the Orissa State Pollution Control Board &#8212; begun building a refinery to produce 6 million tonnes of aluminium per annum instead of the 1 million tonnes per annum plant that it had got the green clearance for. </p>
<p>The committee &#8212; that included S Parasuraman, director of Tata Institute of Social Sciences; Promode Kant, retired forest official; and Amita Baviskar, professor at the Institute of Economic Growth &#8212; pointed out how right from the beginning, the firm had furnished falsified reports to the Centre to seek clearance, and how the state officials ranging from the highest bureaucrats to the collectors of two districts either refused to enforce existing laws or simply colluded with the company to deny the tribals right over their lands.</p>
<p>Read more: Vedanta mines illegal, must be shut down: Green panel &#8211; India Business &#8211; Business &#8211; The Times of India http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Vedanta-mines-illegal-must-be-shut-down-Green-panel/articleshow/6321872.cms#ixzz0xJfQXrtF</p>
<p> Uranium Corporation of India Limited: Wasting Away Tribal Lands<br />
by Moushumi Basu, Special to CorpWatch<br />
October 7th, 2009<br />
“I have had three miscarriages and lost five children within a week of<br />
their births,” says Hira Hansda, a miner’s wife. “Even after 20 years<br />
of marriage we have no children today.” Now in her late forties, she<br />
sits outside her mud hut in Jadugoda Township, site of one of the<br />
oldest uranium mines in India.<br />
The Uranium Corporation of India Limited (UCIL) operates that mine,<br />
part of a cluster of four underground and one open cast mines and two<br />
processing plants, in East Singbhum district in the Eastern Indian<br />
state of Jharkhand. The deepest plunges almost one kilometer into the<br />
earth.<br />
Incorporated as a public sector enterprise under the Department of<br />
Atomic Energy (DAE) in 1967, UCIL has sole responsibility for mining<br />
and processing all of India&#8217;s uranium. And since the strength of the<br />
Jadugoda region&#8217;s uraninite ore is extremely low, it takes many tons<br />
of earth as well as complex metallurgical processes to yield even a<br />
small amount of useable uranium ore—along with tons of radioactive<br />
waste, disposed of in unlined tailing dams.<br />
UCIL processes the ore into yellowcake and sends it to the Nuclear<br />
Fuel Complex in Hyderabad, where it is officially designated for use<br />
in nuclear reactors. But it is an open secret that some of the nuclear<br />
material becomes the key ingredient in India&#8217;s nuclear arsenal. (India<br />
is one of only three states—along with Israel and Pakistan—that are<br />
not signatories to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear<br />
Weapons. North Korea withdrew from the Treaty in 2003.)<br />
Unhealthy Villages<br />
Radiation and health experts across the world charge that toxic<br />
materials and radioactivity released by the mining and processing<br />
operations are causing widespread infertility, birth defects and<br />
cancers. A 2008 health survey by the Indian chapter of International<br />
Physicians for Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW), found that “primary<br />
sterility was found to be more common in the people residing near<br />
uranium mining operations area.”<br />
Jadugoda residents Kaderam Tudu and his wife, Munia, considered<br />
themselves fortunate when their infant was born alive, until, “I found<br />
that my baby son did not have his right ear and instead in its place<br />
was a blob of flesh,” says Tudu, a day worker in his late thirties.<br />
Their son, Shyam Tudu, now eight, has a severe hearing impairment.<br />
Even children who appear healthy are impacted. &#8220;The youths from our<br />
villages have become victims of social ostracism,&#8221; says Parvati<br />
Manjhi, and cannot find spouses. &#8220;And a number of our girls have been<br />
abandoned by their husbands, when they failed to give birth,” Now<br />
middle-aged, Parvati and her husband, Dhuwa Manjhi, who used to work<br />
for UCIL, are childless.<br />
Harrowing tales fill the region around the mines, and add irony to the<br />
area&#8217;s name, Jharkhand, which in the local tribal language means<br />
“forest endowed with nature’s bounties.” If the lush land was the<br />
indigenous population&#8217;s boon for centuries, its rich mineral reserves<br />
have become their bane. Six decades of industrialization has depleted<br />
the forest cover, degraded the environment, displaced tribal peoples—<br />
who along with Dalit (&#8220;untouchables&#8221;) form an oppressed underclass—and<br />
devastated a way of life deeply interwoven with nature.<br />
Despite India&#8217;s economic boom and proximity to one of the country&#8217;s<br />
richest mineral reserves, the villages in Jharkhand are now among the<br />
poorest in the country, according to the Center For Science &amp;<br />
Environment’s (New Delhi) 2008 report “Rich Lands Poor People.”<br />
Uranium Corporation of India Limited in Jharkhand<br />
UCIL’s underground mines in Jadugoda, Bhatin, Turamdhih, Narwapahar,<br />
and its open cast mine at Banduhurang extract 1,000 tons per day (TPD)<br />
of uranium ore. Two underground mines in the pipeline at Baghjata and<br />
Mahuldih will boost that amount. The ore is processed at the Jadugoda<br />
and Turamdih mills with a combined capacity of 5,000 TDP.  The company<br />
earned $64 million in 2007-08, and made a $3 million profit.<br />
The 20-year lease for UCIL&#8217;s mines was up in 2007, and a new<br />
application is being processed. Under it, the company wants to add<br />
6.37 hectares to tailing dam capacity and expand production, according<br />
to UCIL Chairman and Managing Director Ramendra Gupta. This move<br />
requires an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental<br />
Management Plan (EMP) drawn up by the Central Institute of Mining &amp;<br />
Fuel Research (CIMFR), along with a public hearing.<br />
Addressing the affected community at the May public hearing in<br />
Jadugoda, the company represented the local plans as “a marginal<br />
expansion.” But the UCIL website promises “a quantum leap in UCIL’s<br />
activities” that includes plans to &#8220;deepen the existing mines, expand<br />
its processing facilities,” and “not only opening new mines, but also<br />
the development of the community around its operations.”<br />
While the company has created local schools and provides jobs and<br />
social services, villagers who attended the hearing argued that these<br />
provisions do not compensate for the health effects and destruction of<br />
their way of life.<br />
“Why are we being made to pay such a heavy price, for so many<br />
decades”? Asks Hira Hansda, speaking of her three miscarriages and<br />
birth to five infants that quickly died. Her husband Sonaram worked at<br />
the tailing dam as a casual employee between 1984-87, and like many<br />
villagers, he links the deterioration in local health conditions to<br />
the arrival of the uranium mines. The last three surveys conducted in<br />
the area found increased radiation levels.<br />
Heavy Security at UCIL’s Public Hearing Keeps Villagers Out<br />
The public hearing on UCIL&#8217;s new application took place at the heavily<br />
fortified camp of the Central India Security Force (CISF) within the<br />
UCIL colony at Jadugoda. Conducted by the Jharkhand State Pollution<br />
Control Board, the proceedings were marked by restrictions on personal<br />
liberties under sections of a law applying to situations with the<br />
potential to cause civil unrest.<br />
Leaving little room for the public or protesters, the hall was packed<br />
with hundreds of UCIL workers and other company beneficiaries who held<br />
placards reading: “When compared to hunger, pollution is a small<br />
issue,&#8221; and &#8220;Save UCIL.”<br />
Those who had lost their lands and health to the mines were physically<br />
barred from the tent. Outside the proceedings, protesters shouted: “Do<br />
not destroy our land,&#8221; “No uranium, no uranium waste, no weapons, care<br />
for the future.&#8221; Many indigenous villagers waved the banner of the<br />
Jharkhandi Organization Against Radiation (JOAR), winner of the<br />
Germany-based Nuclear Free Future Award for its long crusade against<br />
the hazards of uranium mining in Jadugoda. The protesters denounced<br />
the hearing as &#8220;a farce&#8221; and demanded that it be immediately stopped.<br />
Villager and JOAR president, Ghanashyam Biruli, issued the demands:<br />
no new uranium mines, bring the existing mine under international<br />
safety guidelines, return unused tribal land, provide livelihood and<br />
rehabilitation to displaced people, clean up the contamination,<br />
commission an independent study of environmental contamination and<br />
health effects, and monitor water bodies to ensure that the<br />
radionuclides do not seep into the aquifer that is the lifeline of<br />
more than 100,000 people. The activists also argued that since the<br />
country can buy uranium on the international market, there is no<br />
compelling need to expand UCIL&#8217;s capacity.<br />
The real compelling need, they asserted, was protecting health and the<br />
environment. The 2008 health survey by the Indian chapter of<br />
International Physicians for Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW)<br />
provided clear evidence, finding that:<br />
* Couples living near the mines were &#8220;1.58 times more vulnerable to<br />
primary sterility&#8221; with 9.6 percent of couples in study villages<br />
unable to conceive after three years of marriage, compared with 6.27<br />
percent in a reference (control) group.<br />
* Birth defects followed a similar pattern with 1.84 times higher<br />
incidence: “[B]abies from mothers, who lived near uranium mining<br />
operation area, suffered a significant increase in congenital<br />
deformities,” according to the report. While 4.49 percent of mothers<br />
living in the study villages reported bearing children with congenital<br />
deformities, only 2.49 percent of mothers in reference villages fell<br />
under this category.&#8221; The national rate for people with disabilities<br />
(including congenital deformities) is 3 percent, according to official<br />
government statistics.<br />
* Deformed babies near the mining operations are almost 6 times more<br />
likely to die, with 9.25 percent mothers in the study villages<br />
reporting congenital deformities as the cause of death of their<br />
children. In the reference village, mothers reported 1.70 percent of<br />
babies died of deformities.<br />
* Cancer deaths were also higher: 2.87 percent of households in study<br />
villages attributed the cause of death to be cancer, compared to 1.89<br />
percent in the reference village.<br />
These factors contributed to a lowered life expectancy. In the study<br />
villages 68.33 percent of the population died before reaching the<br />
state&#8217;s average life expectancy: 62 years old.<br />
UCIL Denies Contamination<br />
Despite such alarming reports, radiation data are not made public<br />
because they fall under the purview of the Atomic Energy Act of 1962.<br />
UCIL / DAE (Department of Atomic Energy) also cites security concerns<br />
for refusing to release data on health of the workers. But Buddha<br />
Weeps in Jadugoda, a 1999 award-winning film by Shri Prakash<br />
documented that, despite a law mandating regular monitoring, in the<br />
last five- to ten-year period few workers underwent blood and urine<br />
tests to assess the impact of radiation.<br />
Independent scientists have confirmed the danger. Professor Hiroaki<br />
Koide, from the Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, Japan,<br />
sampled soil and air in the surrounding villages and documented that<br />
“The circumference of tailing ponds is impacted with uranium<br />
radiation. The strength of the radiation is of 10 to 100 times high in<br />
comparison to places without contamination. &#8230;There are places where<br />
uranium concentration is high in the road or the riverside, and it is<br />
thought that tailings are used for construction material,” including<br />
on villagers&#8217; houses.&#8221; Tailings are production waste material that,<br />
according to critics are unsafely stored, dumped, and used for<br />
landfills, roads and construction.<br />
UCIL Technical Director D Acharya denied that the company was<br />
responsible for radiological contamination. “UCIL’s safety and<br />
pollution control measures are at par with the international<br />
standards, comparable at any point of time,” he said. The company is<br />
dealing with naturally occurring materials, he noted, the very low<br />
grade ore extracted is a minimal environmental hazard, and the company<br />
is not enriching the ore in Jadugoda.<br />
But tacitly acknowledging the risks, UCIL head, Gupta, noted in the<br />
2008 Annual Report that &#8220;External gamma radiation, Radon<br />
concentration, suspended particulate matters, airborne long lived<br />
Alpha activity and concentration of radio nuclides- uranium and Radium<br />
in surface and ground water, in soil and food items etc are monitored<br />
regularly.&#8221;<br />
Although he presented no evidence, UCIL Technical Director Acharya<br />
said that allegations of health problems are canards spread by anti-<br />
uranium lobbies, and that the physical fitness of the employees can be<br />
gauged the UCIL football team&#8217;s success in winning the DAE tournaments<br />
for the past five years.<br />
“From time to time we have also conducted structured health surveys<br />
and examinations, by independent sources,&#8221; said Acharya. &#8220;One was done<br />
by the erstwhile Bihar Assembly, about ten years ago, but the findings<br />
are absolutely normal.” (The area was part of Bihar at the time.) &#8220;The<br />
effects of radiation are being constantly monitored by independent<br />
watchdogs, and there are health physics experts who are always with<br />
us, for round-the clock-vigil of the situation. Hence, there is really<br />
no cause of concern,” he added.<br />
That is not the experience of many villagers, who link serious health<br />
problems to the mines. Like many of the women in the surrounding<br />
areas, Hansda&#8217;s pregnancies were a time of terror. “It fills within us<br />
fear and apprehensions of the possible ordeal that may be in store.<br />
Who knows what would be the fate of the baby,” she said. </p>
<p>Police verification of judges is mandatory: SC</p>
<p>Taking a serious view of the fact that a person in the &#8220;rowdy list&#8221; was appointed as a district judge, the Supreme Court has directed all High Courts to henceforth ensure that police verification was carried out before making appointments to the judiciary.<br />
A bench of Justices B S Chauhan and Swatanter Kumar also ruled that it would be mandatory for the High Courts to maintain the annual confidential reports (ACRs) of the judges to ensure transparency and also provide fair treatment to the incumbents.<br />
&#8220;It is a matter of concern, as we are of the considered view, that timely action on behalf of the High Court would have avoided this uncalled for litigation as it would have been a matter of great doubt whether the appellant could at all be inducted into the service in face of the admitted position that the name of the appellant was stated to be on rowdy list at the relevant time,&#8221; the bench observed. </p>
<p>Judges writing LLM examination caught copying</p>
<p> The Andhra Pradesh High Court has suspended five district judges of the state subordinate judiciary services after they were allegedly caught copying while writing their LLM first-year examination at Kakatiya University in Warangal on Wednesday.<br />
Chief Justice Nisar Mohammad Kakru took serious note of their conduct and ordered an inquiry while placing them under suspension.<br />
The judges allegedly took books and other material to copy from into the exam room and were caught by the University’s Controller of Examinations and K Dayakar Rao, principal of arts college during a surprise check. The judges placed under suspension are Senior Civil Judge of Ranga Reddy district, Ajitsimha Rao, Principal Senior Civil Judge, Anantapur M Krishnappa, Second Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy P Vijendra Reddy, Senior Civil Judge, Bapatla, M Srinivas Chary, and additional Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, Hanumanta Rao. </p>
<p> edited , printed , published &amp; owned by NAGARAJ.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL , MYSORE -570017 INDIA  cell : 09341820313  home page:<br />
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit/  ,                                                                                                    http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/  ,                                                                               http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,                                                             http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit   ,<br />
 e-mail : nagarajhrw@hotmail.com     ,  naghrw@yahoo.com    </p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/117/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com&amp;blog=2130203&amp;post=117&amp;subd=eclarionofdalit&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://eclarionofdalit.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/india-sold-out-dirt-cheap-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/6561e94a96ecfcb3423157d12abb783b?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">nagmysr</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.amnesty.org/images/banners/banner2-red/banner2-88x31-eng.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Support Amnesty International</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://www.amnesty.org/images/banners/banner2-red/banner2-88x31-eng.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Support Amnesty International</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
